Populism has dominated Philippine politics for the long decade since Joseph Erap E. Estrada became Philippine president in 1998, but in a broader since his poll victory as vice in 1992 and even his election as senator in 1987. But by 2009, the political agenda had changed. The candidacy of Benigno Noynoy Aquino III on the coat tails of the outpouring of grief that followed his mother, Corazon C. Aquinos death in August of that year, has been called a political game changer. The decline of populist appeals to the poor and the return of bourgeois-led reformism in the Philippines may not seem surprising, given the forces marshaled against populism. Estrada was deposed and jailed on corruption while his friend Fernando Poe Jr. was cheated in the 2004 election, dying shortly thereafter, probably literally of a broken heart. But structural conditions for populism-both economic and political remain ripe in the bourgeois Philippine Polity. Income Inequality is still high and non class cleavages are weak, making class based, populist appeals potentially power Yet former president, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has done the dirty work of the bourgeoisie in defeating populism. Through a strategy of neo-traditionalism, she has tethered populism through patronage and militarization (guns, goons and gold) . she has, however reaped no upper class praise for this success. On the contrary, the widespread corruption that inevitably results from such a strategy unintendedly set the stage for the revival of reformism. It is speculated that there are cycles in Filipino politics based on three forms of elite politics- populism, clientelism and reformism, renewed populism may be consequence of the probable failure of reform Glossary of Terms Populism is a political style of action that mobilizes a large alienated element of a population against a government which is seen as controlled by an out-of-touch closed elite that acts on behalf of its own interests. Other definition is a member of a political party claiming to represent the common people. Bourgeoisie in Marxist contexts the capitalist class who own most of societys wealth and means of production Clientilism a political or social system based on the relation of client to patron with the client giving political or financial support to a patron in exchange for some special privilege or benefit Reformism is the belief that gradual changes through and within existing institution can ultimately change a societys fundamental economic and political structures Neo-traditionalism, in politics the deliberate revival and revamping of old cultures, practices and institutions for use in politics Conclusion The political and economic system of our country is controlled by the elites. During the election it was a battle between elites. Popularity to the voters are of great advantage to the celebrities, actors-politician because they could easily recall their names. In 2004 Presidential Election it paved way to the return of the elites in the centerfold; GMA grabbed the political power by means of using money politics whereby she used the resources of the government to attain her ultimate goal to get another term of office as president. During her 9 years stay in power there was no changed in our country, hence the wide gap between the rich and the poor is still rampant, graft and corruption, lack of political will and unsatisfied Filipinos are demanding for a changed. When Noynoy filed his candidacy for president they look at him as the reformer and supported his candidacy and later became the next president of the Republic. The trends in politics is often times changing from clientelism to populism to elitists democracy to reformists in short there is political cycle that exist base on the choice or preference of the voters.