Chapter 15 Foundations of Organization Structure

Chapter 15
Foundations of
Organization Structure
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. WWW.PRENHALL.COM/ROBBINS PowerPoint Presentation
All rights reserved. by Charlie Cook
What Is Organizational Structure?
Organizational Structure
Defines how job tasks are
formally divided, grouped, Key Elements:
and coordinated. 1. Work specialization
There are six key elements 2. Departmentalization
that managers need to 3. Chain of command
address when they design
4. Span of control
their org.s structure.
5. Centralization and
decentralization
6. Formalization
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 152

1-Work Specialization..1
The degree to which tasks in the organization are

subdivided into separate jobs.
Division of labor:
Makes efficient use of employee skills
Increases employee skills through repetition
Less between-job downtime increases productivity
Specialized training is more efficient.
Allows use of specialized equipment.

Division of Labor
Benefits include:
Increasing levels of skill
Less time is wasted moving from job to job
Training is less costly
Increased focus
Adam Smiths pin factory
Men are much more likely to discover easier and readier methods of
attaining any object, when the whole attention of their minds is
directed towards that single object, than when it is dissipated among
a great variety of things. WON p. 14

1-Work Specialization..2
Work Specialization
The degree to which tasks in the organization are divided
into separate jobs with each step completed by a different
person. (Adam Smiths-Division of Labor)
During the 1st half of the 20th century, managers viewed
work specialization as an unending source of increased
productivity, and , for a time, it was.
However, by 1960, it became evident that a good thing
could be carried too far.
The point reached in some jobs where human
diseconomies from work overspecialization resulted -
boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality, increased
absenteeism, and higher turnover more than offset the
economic advantages.

Economies and Diseconomies of
Work Specialization
High
Impact from
Productivity
human
Impact from diseconomies
economies
of specialization
Low
Low High
Work Specialization
1-Work SpecializationTodays View3
Most managers today see work specialization as
an important org. mechanism but not as a source
of ever-increasing productivity.
They recognize the efficiencies it creates in
certain types of jobs, but they also recognize the
problems it creates when its carried to extremes.
McDonald uses high work specialization to
efficiently make & sell its products.
However, American Express & Ford Australia
have broadened the scope of employees jobs &
reduced work specialization.

2- Departmentalization
The basis by which jobs are grouped together.
Grouping Activities By:

Function
Product
Geography
Process
Customer

2- Departmentalization by Type
The basis by which jobs are Process
grouped together is called. Grouping jobs on the
Functional basis of product or
Grouping jobs by customer flow
functions performed Customer
Product Grouping jobs by type
Grouping jobs by of customer and
product line needs
Geographical
Grouping jobs on the
basis of territory or
geography

Departmentalization
Functional
Product
Major
Types
of Customer
Department
Organization
Geographic
Process
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
2 -Departmentalization..continued
Large orgs. Often combine most or all of these
forms of departmentalization.
For example a major Japanese electronic firm
organizes each of its divisions along functional
lines, its manufacturing units around processes,
its sales units around seven geographic regions,
and its sales regions into four customer
groupings.

Departmentalization ..todays view
Two popular trends today in departmentalization are the
increasing use of customer departmentalization & the use
of cross-functional teams.
customer departmentalization helps managers better
monitor customers needs & respond to changes in those
needs.
Managers are using cross-functional teams, which are work
teams composed of individuals from various functional
specialties. For example at Fords material planning &
logistics division, a cross-functional team with employees
from finance, purchasing, engineering, and quality control
areas and with representatives from outside logistics
suppliers has made several work improvements.

Functional Departmentalization
Advantages
Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and
people with common skills, knowledge, and orientations
Coordination within functional area
In-depth specialization
Disadvantages
Poor communication across functional areas
Limited view of organizational goals

Geographical Departmentalization
Advantages
More effective and efficient handling of specific
regional issues that arise
Serve needs of unique geographic markets better
Disadvantages
Duplication of functions
Can feel isolated from other organizational areas

Product Departmentalization
+ Allows specialization in particular products and services

+ Managers can become experts in their industry
+ Closer to customers
Duplication of functions
Limited view of organizational goals

Process Departmentalization
+ More efficient flow of work activities

Can only be used with certain types of products

Customer Departmentalization
+ Customers needs and problems can be met by specialists

- Duplication of functions
- Limited view of organizational goals

3 - Chain of Command
The continuous line of authority that extends from

upper levels of an organization to the lowest levels of
the organization and clarifies who reports to whom.
Chain of Command involves three

other concepts:
Authority
Responsibility
Unity of Command

3 - Chain of Commandcontinued
Authority
Refers to the rights inherent in a managerial position to tell
people what to do and to expect them to do it.
An org.s managers, who are in the chain of command, are
granted a certain degree of authority to do their job of
coordinating & overseeing the work of others.
Responsibility
The obligation or expectation to perform any assigned
duties.
As managers assign work to employees, those employees
assume an obligation to perform any assigned duty.
Unity of Command
The concept that a person should have one boss and should
report only to that person.( Fayols 14 Principles of
Management)
Without unity of command, conflicting demands & priorities
from multiple bosses can create problems.
3- Chain of Command.todays view
Early management theorists ( Fayol, Weber, Taylor, &

others ) were enamored with the concepts of chain of
command, authority, responsibility, & unity of command.
However, the above mentioned concepts are considered

less relevant today because of things like IT.
With computers, employees communicate with anyone with

else anywhere in the org. without going through formal
channels- i.e., chain of command. Moreover, as more orgs.
use self-managed & cross-functional teams as new org.
designs with multiple bosses are implemented, these
traditional concepts are less relevant.

4 - Span of Control
The number of subordinates a manager can efficiently

and effectively direct.
Concept:
Wider spans of management increase organizational
efficiency.
Narrow Span Drawbacks:

Expense of additional layers of management.
Increased complexity of vertical communication.
Encouragement of overly tight supervision and
discouragement of employee autonomy.

4 - Span of Control.contd
The number of employees who can be effectively and
efficiently supervised by a manager.
Width of span is affected by:

Skills and abilities of the manager
Employee characteristics
Characteristics of the work being done
Similarity of tasks
Complexity of tasks
Physical proximity of subordinates
Standardization of tasks
Sophistication of org.s information system
Strength of the org. culture & preferred style of the manager

Contrasting Spans of Control

4 - Span of Control ..todays view
The trend in recent years has been toward larger
spans of control, which are consistent with
managers efforts to reduce costs, speed up
decision making, increase flexibility, get closer to
customers, and empower employees.
However, to ensure that performance doesnt
suffer because of these wider spans, orgs. are
investing heavily in employee training.
Managers recognize that they can handle a wider
span when employees know their jobs well or can
turn to co-workers if they have Qs.

5 - Centralization & Decentralization
Centralization
The degree to which decision-making is concentrated
at a single point in the organizations.
Organizations in which top managers make all the
decisions and lower-level employees simply carry out
those orders.
Decentralization
Organizations in which decision-making is pushed
down to the managers who are closest to the action.
Employee Empowerment
Increasing the decision-making authority (power) of
employees.

Factors that Influence the Amount of Centralization
More Centralization
Environment is stable.
Lower-level managers are not as capable or experienced at
making decisions as upper-level managers.
Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in decisions.
Decisions are relatively minor.
Organization is facing a crisis or the risk of company failure.
Company is large.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on
managers retaining say over what happens.

Factors that Influence the Amount of Centralization
More Decentralization
Environment is complex, uncertain.
Lower-level managers are capable and experienced at making
decisions.
Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions.
Decisions are significant.
Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to have a say in
what happens.
Company is geographically dispersed.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on
managers having involvement and flexibility to make decisions.

Centralization & Decentralization. Todays view
An org. have had to become more flexible & responsive,

theres been a distinct trend toward decentralizing decision
making.
In large companies, especially, lower-level managers are
closer to the action & typically have more detailed
knowledge about problems & how best to solve them than
do top managers.
Honeywell Pacific, which moved from a hierarchical
management structure to one that is much flatter & team-
based.
Result- increased revenues & more intimate knowledge of
the companys major customers.

6 - Formalization
The degree to which jobs within the organization are

standardized and the extent to which employee
behavior is guided by rules and procedures.
Highly formalized jobs offer little discretion over what is

to be done.
Low formalization means fewer constraints on how
employees do their work.

Common Organizational Designs
Three of the more common org. designs in use: the simple

structure, the bureaucracy, and the matrix
Simple Structure
A structure characterized by a low degree of departmentalization, wide
spans of control, authority centralized in a single person, and little
formalization.
This structure is most widely practiced in small businesses in which the
manager & the owner are one & the same.
The strength of this structure lies in its simplicity. It is fast, flexible, &
inexpensive to maintain, and accountability is clear.
One major weakness is that its difficult to maintain in any other than small
orgs. As org. grows due to its low formalization & high centralization creates
information overload at the top.

Common Organization Designs (contd)
Bureaucracy
Standardization! thats the key concept that underlies all
bureaucracies.
A structure of highly operating routine tasks achieved through
specialization, very formalized rules and regulations, tasks that are
grouped into functional departments, centralized authority, narrow
spans of control, and decision making that follows the chain of
command.
The primary strength of the bureaucracy lies in its ability to perform
standardized activities in a highly efficient manner.
Putting like specialties together in functional depts. results in
economies of scale, minimum duplication of personnel & equipment,
and employees who have the opportunity to talk the same language
among their peers.
The Bureaucracy
Strengths Weaknesses
Functional Subunit conflicts with
economies of scale organizational goals
Minimum duplication Obsessive concern
of personnel and with rules and
equipment regulations
Enhanced Lack of employee
communication discretion to deal
Centralized decision with problems
making

Common Organization Designs (contd)
Matrix Structure
Matrix management is a technique of managing an org.( or, more
commonly, part of an org.) through a series of dual-reporting
relationships instead of a more traditional linear management structure.
In its simplest form, a matrix configuration may be known as a cross-
functional work team, which brings together individuals who report to
different parts of the company in order to complete a particular project or
task.
A structure that creates dual lines of authority and combines functional
and product departmentalization.

Matrix Structure

Matrix Structurecontinued
Matrix structure is used in aerospace firms, R&D
laboratories, construction companies, hospitals,
management consulting firms etc.
Essentially, the matrix combines two forms of
departmentalization: functional & product.
The strength of functional departmentalization
lies in putting like specialists together, which
minimizes the number necessary while allowing
the pooling & sharing of specialized resources
across products.
Its major disadvantage is the difficulty of
coordinating the tasks of diverse functional
specialists so that their activities are completed
on time & within budget.
Matrix Structurecontinued
Product departmentalization, on the other hand, has exactly

the opposite benefits & disadvantages.
It facilitates coordination among specialties to achieve on-
time completion & meet budget targets.
It provides clear responsibility for all activities related to a
product, but with duplication of activities & costs.
The matrix attempts to gain the strengths of each, while
avoiding their weaknesses.
The most obvious structural characteristic of the matrix is
that it breaks the unity-of-command concept.
Employees in the matrix have two bosses their functional
dept. managers & their product managers. Therefore, the
matrix has a dual chain of command.

Matrix Structurecontinuedadvantages
The strength of the matrix lies in its ability to facilitate
coordination when the org. has a multiplicity of complex &
interdependent activities.
As an org. gets larger, its information-processing capacity
can become over-loaded.
In a bureaucracy, complexity results in increased
formalization.
The direct & frequent contact b/w different specialties in the
matrix can make for better communication & more
flexibility.
Information permeates the org. & more quickly reaches the
people who need to take account of it.
Matrix reduces bureau-pathologies - the dual lines of
authority reduce the tendencies of dept. members to
become so busy protecting their little worlds that the orgs
overall goals become secondary.

Matrix Structurecontinuedadvantages
Matrix also facilitates the efficient allocation of
specialists.
When individuals with highly specialized skills
are stuck in one functional dept. or product
group, their talents are monopolized &
underused.
The matrix achieves the advantages of
economies of scale by providing the org. with
both the best resources & an effective way of
ensuring their efficient deployment.

Matrix Structurecontidisadvantages
The major disadvantages of the matrix lie in the confusion it
creates, its propensity to foster power struggles, & the
stress it places on individuals.
When unity-of-command concept is ignored, ambiguity
increases & ambiguity often leads to conflict.
Confusion & ambiguity also create the seeds of power
struggles.
Bureaucracy reduces the potential for power grabs by
defining the rules of the game. When those rules do not
exist, power struggles b/w functional & product managers
result.
For individuals who desire security & absence from
ambiguity, this work climate can produce stress.
Reporting to more than one boss introduces role conflict &
unclear expectations introduce role ambiguity.

New Design Options
Team Structure
The use of teams as the central device to coordinate
work activities.
Characteristics:
Breaks down departmental barriers.
Decentralizes decision making to the team level.
Requires employees to be generalists as well as
specialists.
Creates a flexible bureaucracy.

New Design Options (contd)
Virtual Organization
A small, core organization that outsources its major
business functions.
Highly centralized with little or no departmentalization.
Concepts:
Advantage: Provides maximum flexibility while
concentrating on what the organization does best.
Disadvantage: Reduced control over key parts of
the business.

New Design Options (contd)
Boundaryless Organization
General Electrics former chairman, Jack Welch, wanted to
eliminate vertical & horizontal boundaries within GE & break
down external barriers b/w the company & its customers &
suppliers.
The boundary-less organization seeks to eliminate the chain of
command, have limitless spans of control, and replace
departments with empowered teams.
And because such org. rely so heavily on IT, it is also
sometimes called the T-form ( or technology based) org.

Boundary-less Organization.continued

T-form Concepts:
Eliminate vertical (hierarchical) and horizontal
(departmental) internal boundaries.
Breakdown external barriers to customers and
suppliers.

Why Do Structures Differ?
Mechanistic Model
A structure characterized by extensive
departmentalization, high formalization, a limited
information network, and centralization.
Rigid, narrow span of control, rules n reg r given
Organic Model
A structure that is flat, uses cross-hierarchical and
cross-functional teams, has low formalization,
possesses a comprehensive information network, and
relies on participative decision making.
Not rigid

Mechanistic versus Organic Organization
High specialization Cross-functional teams

Rigid departmentalization Cross-hierarchical teams
Clear chain of command Free flow of information
Narrow spans of control Wide spans of control
Centralization Decentralization
High formalization Low formalization

Organizational Design Decisions
Mechanistic Organization Organic Organization
A rigid and tightly Highly flexible and
controlled structure adaptable structure
High specialization Non-standardized jobs
Rigid Fluid team-based
departmentalization structure
Narrow spans of control Little direct supervision
High formalization Minimal formal rules
Limited information Open communication
network (downward) network
Low decision Empowered employees
participation

Why Do Structures Differ? Strategy
Innovation Strategy
A strategy that emphasizes the introduction of major
new products and services.
Cost-minimization Strategy
A strategy that emphasizes tight cost controls,
avoidance of unnecessary innovation or marketing
expenses, and price cutting.
Imitation Strategy
A strategy that seeks to move into new products or
new markets only after their viability has already
been proven.
Using products which r already acceptedby customers
Why Do Structures Differ? Size
Size
How the size of an organization affects its structure.
As an organization grows larger, it becomes more
mechanistic.
Characteristics of large organizations:

More specialization
More vertical levels
More rules and regulations

Why Do Structures Differ? Technology
Technology
How an organization transfers its inputs into outputs.
Characteristics of routineness (standardized or

customized) in activities:
Routine technologies are associated with tall,
departmentalized structures and formalization in
organizations.
Routine technologies lead to centralization when
formalization is low.
Nonroutine technologies are associated with delegated
decision authority.

Why Do Structures Differ? Environment
Environment
Institutions or forces outside the organization that
potentially affect the organizations performance.
Key Dimensions-
Capacity: the degree to which an environment can
support growth.
Volatility: the degree of instability in the environment.
Complexity: the degree of heterogeneity and
concentration among environmental elements.

Bureaucracy Is Dead
Characteristics of Why Bureaucracy
Bureaucracies Survives
Specialization Large size prevails.
Formalization Environmental
turbulence can be
Departmentalization
largely managed.
Centralization
Standardization
Narrow spans of control achieved through hiring
people who have
Adherence to a chain of
undergone extensive
command.
educational training.
Technology maintains
control.

Organizational Designs and Employee
Behavior
Research Findings:
Work specialization contributes to higher employee
productivity, but it reduces job satisfaction.
The benefits of specialization have decreased rapidly as
employees seek more intrinsically rewarding jobs.
The effect of span of control on employee performance is
contingent upon individual differences and abilities, task
structures, and other organizational factors.
Participative decision making in decentralized
organizations is positively related to job satisfaction.

Common Organizational Designs
Traditional Designs
Simple structure
Low departmentalization, wide spans of control,
centralized authority, little formalization
Functional structure
Departmentalization by function
Operations, finance, human resources, and product
research and development
Divisional structure
Composed of separate business units or divisions with
limited autonomy under the coordination and control the
parent corporation.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Traditional Organizational Designs

Key Elements:
Gains the advantages of functional and
product departmentalization while
avoiding their weaknesses.
Facilitates coordination of complex and
interdependent activities.
Breaks down unity-of-command
concept.

Chapter 15 Foundations of Organization Structure

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Chapter 15 Foundations of Organization Structure

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Chapter 15

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 152

The degree to which tasks in the organization are

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 153

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 154

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 155

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 157

The basis by which jobs are grouped together.

Grouping Activities By:

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 158

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 159

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1511

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1512

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1513

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1514

+ Allows specialization in particular products and services

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1515

+ More efficient flow of work activities

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1516

+ Customers needs and problems can be met by specialists

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1517

The continuous line of authority that extends from

Chain of Command involves three

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1518

Early management theorists ( Fayol, Weber, Taylor, &

However, the above mentioned concepts are considered

With computers, employees communicate with anyone with

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1520

The number of subordinates a manager can efficiently

Narrow Span Drawbacks:

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1521

Width of span is affected by:

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1522

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1523

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1524

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1525

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1526

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1527

An org. have had to become more flexible & responsive,

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1528

The degree to which jobs within the organization are

Highly formalized jobs offer little discretion over what is

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1529

Three of the more common org. designs in use: the simple

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1530

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1532

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1533

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1534

Product departmentalization, on the other hand, has exactly

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1536

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1537

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1538

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1539

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1540

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1541

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1542

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1543

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1544

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1545

High specialization Cross-functional teams

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1546

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1547

Characteristics of large organizations:

2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1549