0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
31 просмотров25 страниц
The document presents the results of a trial of a power booster cell. It finds that while the power booster improved coverage and throughput, it also led to a huge increase in traffic that degraded most key performance indicators (KPIs). It recommends using such equipment only in areas where enhanced coverage would not result in additional traffic loads to avoid degrading network performance.
The document presents the results of a trial of a power booster cell. It finds that while the power booster improved coverage and throughput, it also led to a huge increase in traffic that degraded most key performance indicators (KPIs). It recommends using such equipment only in areas where enhanced coverage would not result in additional traffic loads to avoid degrading network performance.
The document presents the results of a trial of a power booster cell. It finds that while the power booster improved coverage and throughput, it also led to a huge increase in traffic that degraded most key performance indicators (KPIs). It recommends using such equipment only in areas where enhanced coverage would not result in additional traffic loads to avoid degrading network performance.
8/15/2017 23 Highly Confidential Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions
Huge increment in CS and PS traffic is detected
SDCCH traffic increment is detected as well All KPIs suffered of huge degradation except for HO KPIs which were slightly degraded UL/DL Edge throughput KPIs are increased consequently this is due to the increment in C/I resulted after adding the power booster to the cell
Recommendation
For such kind of equipment its recommended to be used in places where
Reference No. (9 pt Arial)
coverage enhancement will not lead to extra traffic absorption So I advise to have the same trial in Sharora desert highway and have the trial results there otherwise we will face a huge degradation in performance.