TIMBUNAN

ENERGY

Field Development
Plan
Presentation
Company Profile
TIMBUNAN Shazreena
ENERGY General Manager

Shazreena Nur Syuhada Khairul Haziq Faisal

Geology & Geophysics
Petrophysic Department Reservoir Department Drilling Department
Department

Shazreena Muhsin Faisal Nur Syuhada

Production Department Production Department Economic Department HS&E Department

MISSION
To deliver the safest, most economical and reliable engineering solutions in developing Gelama Merah field to its maximum extent.
To provide the team members a steady platform for a knowledgeable, creative and competitive working environment.

VISION
Delivering Solutions
Reservoir Engineering
 Reservoir & Hydrocarbon Classification
Reservoir Fluid Study Report: Compositional Analysis:
Reported Reservoir Conditions Component Mole %
N2 2.43
Reservoir Pressure ................................... 2116 psia
CO2 0.94
Reservoir Temperature 115 F
C1 26.50
Constant Composition Expansion
C2 2.63
Bubble Point Pressure ............................. 2014 psig C3 0.45
i-C4 0.15
Differential Vaporization Test
(at 2014 psig and 115 F) n-C4 0.22
i-C5 0.13
Oil Formation Volume Factor ................... 1.169 bbl/stb
Solution Gas Oil Ratio 336 scf/stb n-C5 0.13
Oil Density . 0.828 g/cc C6 0.43
C7 2.95

Pi > Pb
C8 4.18
C9 2.90
C10 4.48
C11+ 51.49
Total 100.00 Gas Condensate
Undersaturated Oil
Reservoir
Fluid contact & Datum depth
MDT Pressure Plot

Depth ft

Datum: GOC = 4904.86 ft @ 1495 m

4971 ft @
1515.3 m WOC = 5037.07 ft @ 1535.3 m

Pressure psia
 Reservoir Fluid & Rock Study
Oil Gas Water

Density 0.829 g/cc Density 6.82 lb/ft3 Water formation volume 1.0138
Specific gravity 0.83 Specific gravity 0.65 factor
oAPI 39.71 Viscosity 0.18 cp Gas solubility in water 20.2327
Viscosity 1.35 cp Compressibility 6.58E-4 psi-1 Water compressibility 2.99556E-06
Compressibility 7.225E-06 psi-1 Formation volume factor 7.438E-3 Water viscosity 0.4434
Formation volume factor 1.1678 bbl/stb Solution Gas/Oil Ratio 336 scf/stb
Solution Gas/Oil Ratio 336 scf/stb

Porosity 0.351585

Permeability md 140

Rock Compressibility Factor psi-1 3.36E-6

Skin factor -2.1

 Well Development Planning
Drainage planning
Creaming curve
Plan A B C
Cumulative Production of each well number Drainage area 1000 1500 2000
Production well 8 8 8
40000000 FOPT (STB) 3.03E+07 3.01E+07 3.00E+07
35000000 FGPR (Mscf) 2.04E+08 2.04E+08 2.04E+08
Cumulative Production (STB)

30000000
Sensitivity Analysis
25000000

20000000 Plan A B C
15000000
No of production well 8 8 8
10000000
No of injection well 2 3 3
5000000

0
Drainage area 1000ft 1000ft 1000ft
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Type of Injection water water gas
Number of well
FOPT (STB) 5.16E+07 5.29E+07 5.22E+07
FOPR Not good Good Not Good
Optimum production well: 8 FGPT (Mscf) 2.43E+08 2.83E+08 2.85E+08
FGPR Not good Not good Not Good
Over 20 years production
Recovery factor % 22 25 23
 Well Development Planning
Well location planning
Bubble Map
3 plan different location

I1

I2

I3
Drive Mechanism
Rock & Liquid Expansion

Water Drive Water Solution Gas Drive

Drive

Gravity
Drainage
Reservoir Simulation

Static Model Dynamic Model Simulator: Eclipse 100

Conclusion

Optimum well: 8 production well, 3 injection well

Recovery factor: 25%

Oil estimated recoverable: 5.29E+07 STB

Water injection at 3rd year of production life

EOR/artificial lift may needed to enhance production