INTERRELATION BETWEEN QUALITY OF

WORK LIFE AND JOB SATISFACTION

AMONG FACULTY AT TOP THREE BUSINESS
SCHOOL IN KARACHI

MBA THESIS DEFENSE

BY
1
HAMDIYA KHAN
MBA FALL 2016
2 CONTENT OF PRESENTATION

INTRODUCTION

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

DATA INTEGRATION AND ANALYSIS

CONCLUSION

RECOMMENDATIONS
3 INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM BACKGROUND:
 METHODOLOGY
4 Research Design Descriptive
Research Type Interrelation (Exploratory Research)
Nature of Research Qualitative and Quantitative
Methodology Survey Research & Review of Literature
Research Instrument Questionnaire
Population Assistant, Professors and Lecturers
Sample Size 100 respondents
Sample Area Top three Business Schools in Karachi:
1. IBA

2. SZABIST

3. CBM
Sampling Method Convenience Sampling
Statistical Tool SPSS version 23
Statistical Technique Correlation and Regression
5
VARIABLES:
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE:
Quality of Work Life
Work environment

Management support

Compensation

DEPENDENT VARIABLE:
Job Satisfaction
6
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

WORK
ENVOIRNMENT

QUALITY OF WORK
MANAGEMENT
LIFE JOB SATISFACTION
SUPPORT

COMPENSATION
7 HYPOTHESIS:
Hypothesis 1
Ha : There is a positive relationship between work environment and job
satisfaction.

Hypothesis 2

Ha : There is a positive relationship between management support and

job satisfaction.

Hypothesis 3

Ha : There is a positive relationship between compensation and job

satisfaction.
 Ha : There is a positive relationship between work environment and job
8 satisfaction.

INTERPRETATION: Correlations

r = .572 satisfaction workenv

satisfaction Pearson Correlation
p = .000 1 .572**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100
workenv Pearson Correlation
.572** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
 Ha : There is a positive relationship between management support and
9 job satisfaction.

INTERPRETATION: Correlations

r = .647 satisfaction mangsup

satisfaction Pearson
p = .000 Correlation
1 .647**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100
mangsup Pearson
.647** 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
 Ha : There is a positive relationship between compensation and job
10 satisfaction.

INTERPRETATION: Correlations

r = .602 satisfaction compe

Satisfaction Pearson
p = .000 Correlation
1 .602**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100
Compe Pearson
.602** 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 100 100
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).