TITLE ONE: 3.
That the offender either (modes of committing):
CRIMES AGAINST NATIONAL
SECURITY AND LAW OF NATIONS
SECTION ONE: TREASON AND ESPIONAGE
ARTICLE 114
TREASON
Treason
It is a breach of allegiance to a government, committed by a
person who owes allegiance to it.
Allegiance
It is the obligation of fidelity and obedience which the
individual owes to the government under which he lives or to
his sovereign, in return for the protection he receives.
Hence, an alien residing in the Philippines may be
prosecuted for acts of treason due to the temporary
allegiance he owes to the Philippine government.
Elements of treason:
1. That the offender owes allegiance to the Government of
the Philippines; (a Filipino citizen or an alien residing in
the Philippines).
Place of commission:
Filipino Citizen: Anywhere (Art.2, RPC) since he owes
permanent allegiance which consists in the obligation of
fidelity and obedience which a citizen or subjects owes to
his government or sovereign.
Alien: Only in the Philippines (EO No. 44) except in case
of conspiracy.
An alien owes permanent allegiance to his own country,
at the same time, a temporary allegiance to the country
where he resides. Temporary allegiance is the obligation
of fidelity & obedience which an alien owes to the
government of the country where he resides.
2. That there is a war in which the Philippines is involved;
Treason is a war crime. It remains dormant until the
emergency arises.
But as soon as war starts, it is put into effect (Laurel vs.
Misa, G.R. No. L-200 March 28, 1946).
a. Levies war against the government; or
b. Adheres to the enemies, giving them aid or comfort.
Ways of being committed:
1. Levying war
Requisites:
a. That there is an actual assembling of men; and
b. For the purpose of executing a treasonable design by
force.
It is not necessary that there be a formal declaration of
the existence of a state of war. Actual hostilities
may determine the date of the commencement of war
(U.S. vs Lagnason, G.R. No. 1582. March 28,
1904).
The levying of war must be with intent to overthrow the
government not merely to resist a particular statute or
to repel a particular officer. It is not necessary that
those attempting to overthrow the government by force
of arms should have the apparent power to succeed in
their design, in whole or in part.
2. Adherence to the enemies, giving them aid and
comfort
Requisites:
a. Adherence to the enemies, AND
b. Giving of aid or comfort to them.
Note: Mere adherence without its physical
manifestation through the giving of aid or comfort is not
sufficient to constitute treason. Both adherence and the
giving of aid or comfort to the enemy must concur.
The term enemy applies only to the subjects of a foreign
power in a state of hostility with the traitors country. It
does not embrace rebels in insurrection against their own
country, for in that case the crime would be rebellion.
The act committed need not actually strengthen the
enemy or be successful. However, the act must be such
that it directly and materially tends to improve the conduct
of war of the enemy.
 Ways of proving Treason (overt act):
Treason Sedition 1. Testimony of two witnesses, at least, to the same overt
act (two-witness rule); or
Philippines must be at
The testimonies must refer to the same act, place and
war with another Internal conflict
moment of time.
country.
If the overt act is separable, two witnesses must also
Violation of oath of Causing disturbances in testify to each part of the overt act.
allegiance. ones country. It is sufficient that the witnesses are uniform in their
testimony on the overt act. It is not necessary that there
The purpose of levying Such purpose is not
be corroboration between them.
war is to help the necessary. (e.g. civil
enemy. uprising)
2. Confession of guilt by the accused in open court.
Adherence to enemy
It means that there is intent to betray. The accused Treason absorbs crimes committed in furtherance thereof.
intellectually or emotionally favors the enemy and harbors Treason cannot be complexed with other crimes.
sympathies or convictions disloyal to his countrys policy or
interest.
Treason is a CONTINUOUS OFFENSE. Treason is of
Rendering aid or comfort such nature that it may be committed by one single act,
It means an act which strengthens or tends to by series of acts, or by several series thereof, not only in
strengthen the enemy in the conduct of war against the a single time, but in different times, it being a continuous
traitors country or any act which weakens or tends to crime (People vs. Victoria, G.R. No. L-369, March 13,
weaken the power of the traitors country to resist or to 1947).
attack the enemy.
Defenses:
Extent of aid or comfort it must be a deed or physical a. Allowed:
activity and not merely a mental operation such as acts i. Duress and fear of immediate death.
furnishing the enemy with arms, troops, supplies, ii. Obedience to a de facto government (Mere
information, or means of transportation. acceptance of public office and discharge of official
duties under the enemy do not constitute per se the
The extent of aid and comfort given to the enemies must felony of treason. BUT when the position is policy-
be to render assistance to them as enemies and not determining, the acceptance of public office and the
merely as individuals and, in addition, be directly in discharge of official duties constitute treason).
furtherance of the enemies hostile designs.

Giving information to (People vs. Paar, G.R. No. L- 2318,
March 31, 1950), or commandeering foodstuffs (People
vs. Mangahas, 93 Phil 113) for the enemy is evidence of
both adherence and aid or comfort.
It is not essential that the effort to aid be successful,
provided overt acts are done which if successful would
advance the interest of the enemy (People vs. Alarcon,
G.R. No. L-407, July 28, 1947)
Commandeering of women to satisfy the lust of the
enemy is not treason.
Adherence may be proved:
1. By one witness;
2. From the nature of the act itself; or
3. From the circumstances surrounding the act.
b. NOT allowed:
i. Suspended allegiance (since sovereignty is not
suspended in times of war, only the exercise thereof
is suspended).
ii. Change in sovereignty
iii. Loss of citizenship by joining the army of the
enemy.
There is no treason thru negligence. The overt act of giving
aid or comfort to the enemy must be intentional.
Circumstances inherent in treason: treachery, abuse of
superior strength and evident premeditation.
Circumstances aggravating in treason: ignominy, cruelty,
amount or degree of aid, gravity of separate distinct acts of
treason.

83
 ARTICLE 115
CONSPIRACY & PROPOSAL
TO COMMIT TREASON
Conspiracy to commit treason
Committed when in time of war, two or more persons
come to an agreement to levy war against the Government
or to adhere to the enemies and to give them aid or comfort,
and decide to commit it (Arts. 8 and 114).
Proposal to commit treason
Committed when in time of war a person who has decided
to levy war against the Government or to adhere to the
enemies and to give them aid or comfort, proposes its
execution to some other person or persons (Arts. 8 and
114).
As a general rule, conspiracy and proposal to commit a
felony are not punishable (Article 8). Art 115 is an exception
as it specifically penalizes conspiracy and proposal to
commit treason.
The reason for the provision is that in treason, the very
existence of the state is endangered.
The two-witness rule does NOT apply because this is a
separate and distinct offense from that of treason.
These felonies are absorbed if treason is actually
committed.
ARTICLE 116
MISPRISION OF TREASON
Elements:
1. That the offender is a citizen of the Philippines, and
not a foreigner;
2. That he has knowledge of any conspiracy against the
Government;
3. That the conspiracy is one to commit treason; and
4. That he conceals or does not disclose and make known
the same as soon as possible to the proper authority.
Art. 116 does NOT apply when treason is already
committed and the accused does not report its commission.
Art 116 is an EXCEPTION to the rule that mere silence
does not make a person criminally liable.
The phrase shall be punished as an accessory to the crime
of treason, mentioned in the provision, does not mean that
the offender is, legally speaking, an accessory to the crime
of treason because he is already a principal in
the crime of misprision of treason. It simply means that the
penalty imposed is that of an accessory to the crime of
treason.
But the offender in Article 116 is a principal in the crime of
misprision of treason. Misprision of treason is a separate
and distinct offense from the crime of treason.
ARTICLE 117
ESPIONAGE
Espionage
The offense of gathering, transmitting, or losing information
respecting the national defense with intent or reason to
believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the
Republic of the Philippines or to the advantage of a foreign
nation.
Two ways of committing:
1. By entering, without authority, a warship, fort, or military
or naval establishment or reservation to obtain any
information, plans, photographs, or other data of
confidential nature relative to the defense of the
Philippines.
Elements:
a. That the offender enters any of the places mentioned
therein;
b. That he has no authority therefor; and
c. That his purpose is to obtain information, plans,
photographs or other data of a confidential nature
relative to the defense of the Philippines.
Offender must have the intention to obtain information
relative to the defense of the Philippines.
However, it is not necessary that the information is
actually obtained.
Person liable is any person (citizen or foreigner; private
individual or public officer).
2. By disclosing to the representative of a foreign nation the
contents of the articles, data or information referred to in
the preceding paragraph, which he had in his possession
by reason of the public office he holds.
Elements:
a. That the offender is a public officer;
b. That he has in his possession the articles, data or
information referred to in par. 1 of Art. 117, by reason
of the public office he holds; and
c. That he discloses their contents to a representative
of a foreign nation.

COMMONWEALTH ACT NO. 616
An Act to Punish Espionage and
Other Offenses Against
National Security
Acts Punished:
1. Unlawfully obtaining or permitting to be obtained
information affecting national defense.
Ways of Violating Sec. 1:
a. By going upon, entering, flying over or otherwise
obtaining information concerning any vessel, aircraft,
work of defense or other place connected with the
national defense or any other place where any vessels,
aircrafts, arms, munitions or other materials for use in
time of war are being made, or stored, for the purpose
of obtaining information respecting national defense,
with intent to use it to the injury of the Philippines or to
the advantage of any foreign nation.
b. By copying, taking, making or attempting or inducing
or aiding another to copy, take, make or obtain any
sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint,
plan, map instrument, appliance, document, writing or
note of anything connected with the national defense,
for the same purpose and with like intent as in par. A.
c. By receiving or obtaining or agreeing or attempting or
inducing or aiding another to receive or obtain from any
sources any of those data mentioned in par. B, code
book or signal book, knowing that it will be obtained or
disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of
this act.
d. By communicating or transmitting, or attempting
to communicate or transmit to any person not entitled to
receive it, by willfully retaining and failing to deliver it on
demand to any officer or employee entitled to receive it,
the offender being in possession of, having access to,
control over, or being entrusted with any of the data
mentioned in par. B, or code book or signal book.
e. By permitting, through gross negligence, to be removed
from its proper place or custody or delivered to anyone
in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted
or destroyed any of the data mentioned in par B, code
book or signal book, the offender being entrusted with
or having lawful possession or control of the same.
2. Unlawfully disclosing information affecting national
defense.
Ways of violating Sec. 2:
a. By communicating, delivering or transmitting or
attempting or aiding or inducing another to do it, to any
foreign government or any faction or party or military or
naval force within a foreign country, whether
recognized or unrecognized by the Philippines, or to
any representative, officer, employee, subject or citizen
thereof, any of the data mentioned in par. B of Sec. 1
hereof, code book or signal book.
b. In time of war, by collecting, recording, publishing or
communicating or attempting to elicit any information
with respect to the movement, number, description,
condition, or disposition of any of the armed forces,
ships, aircraft, or war materials of the Philippines, or
with respect to the plans or conduct of any military,
naval or air operations or with respect to any works or
measures undertaken for the fortification or defense of
any place, or any other information relating to the public
defense, which might be useful to the enemy.
3. Disloyal acts or words in time of peace.
Ways of violating Sec. 3:
a. By advising, counseling, urging or in any other manner
by causing insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or refusal
of duty of any member of the military, naval or air forces
of the Philippines.
b. By distributing any written or printed matter which
advises, counsels, or urges such insubordination,
disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty.
4. Disloyal acts or words in time of war.
Ways of violating Sec. 4:
a. By willfully making or conveying false reports or false
statements with intent to interfere with the operations or
success of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.
b. To promote the success of its enemies, by willfully
causing or attempting to cause insubordination,
disloyalty, mutiny or refusal of duty in the Armed Forces
of the Philippines.
c. By willfully obstructing the recruiting or enlistment
service.
5. Conspiracy to commit the preceding acts.
Requisites:
a. Two or more persons conspire to violate the provisions
of Sec. 1, 2, 3 or 4 of this Act; and
b. One or more of such persons do any act to effect the
object of the conspiracy.
6. Harboring or concealing violators of the Act.
Requisites:
a. The offender knows that a person has committed or is
about to commit an offense under this Act; and
b. The offender harbors or conceals such person.
7. Making any photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map or
graphical representation of vital military, naval and air
installations or equipment as defined by the Philippine
President as requiring protection against the general
dissemination of information relative thereto UNLESS he
obtains the permission of the commanding officer (or
higher authority).of post, camp or station concerned and
promptly submits the product obtained to the same
commanding officer (or higher authority) (Sec. 8).
8. Using or permitting or procuring the use of an aircraft for
the same purpose of violating #7 (Sec. 9).
9. Reproducing, publishing, selling, or giving away of
uncensored copies of those mentioned under #7 without
the permission of the commanding officer (or higher
authority (Sec. 10).
10. Destroying or injuring or attempting to injure or destroy
war material (when the country is at war) or national
defense material, premises or utilities (even if the
country is not at war) (Secs. 11 & 13).
11. Making or causing to be made in a defective manner, or
attempting to make or cause to be made in a defective
manner, war material (when the country is at war) or
national defense material (even if the country is not at
war) (Secs. 12 & 14).
Espionage Treason
Both are crimes not conditioned by the citizenship of
the offender.
May be committed both in Is committed only in time
time of peace and in time of war.
of war.
May be committed in Is limited to two ways of
many ways. committing the crime:
levying war, and adhering
to the enemy giving them
aid or comfort.
SECTION TWO: PROVOKING WAR AND DISLOYALTY
IN CASE OF WAR
ARTICLE 118
INCITING TO WAR OR GIVING
MOTIVES FOR REPRISALS
Elements:
1. That the offender performs unlawful or unauthorized acts;
and
2. That such acts:
a. Provoke or give occasion for a war involving or liable to
involve the Philippines, or
b. Expose Filipino citizens to reprisals on their persons
and property.
Note: Intention of the accused is immaterial.
This is committed in time of peace.
Penalty is higher when the offender is a public officer
or employee.
Reprisal
It is an act of self-help on the part of the injured state,
responding after an unsatisfied demand to an act contrary to
international law on the part of the offending state. (Naulilaa
Incident Arbitration, Portuguese-German Arbitral Tribunal,
1928)
ARTICLE 119
VIOLATION OF NEUTRALITY
Elements:
1. That there is a war in which the Philippines is not
involved;
2. That there is a regulation issued by a competent authority
for the purpose of enforcing neutrality; and
3. That the offender violates such regulation.
Neutrality
The condition of a nation that in time of war, it takes no part
in the dispute but continues peaceful dealings with the
belligerents.
There must be a regulation issued by competent authority
(President or the Chief of Staff of the AFP) for the
enforcement of neutrality.
ARTICLE 120
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
HOSTILE COUNTRY
Elements:
1. That it is made in time of war in which the Philippines is
involved;
2. That the offender makes correspondence with the:
a. Enemy country or
b. Territory occupied by the enemy troops;
3. That the correspondence is either:
a. Prohibited by the Government; or
b. Carried on in ciphers or conventional signs; or
c. Contains notice or information which might be useful to
the enemy
Correspondence
Communication by means of letters; or it may refer to the
letters which pass between those who have friendly or
business relations.
Even if the correspondence contains innocent matters, if the
correspondence has been prohibited by the government, it
is punishable because of the possibility that some
information useful to the enemy might be revealed
unwittingly.
Prohibition by the Government is NOT essential when the
correspondence is carried on in ciphers or useful to the
enemy.
If the offender intended to aid the enemy by giving such
notice or information, the crime amounts to treason; hence
the penalty is the same as that for treason. (Reyes, The
Revised Penal Code Book II, 17th ed., 2008 p. 31).
Circumstances qualifying the offense
The following must concur:
1. That the notice or information might be useful to the
enemy;
2. That the offender intended to aid the enemy.
ARTICLE 121
FLIGHT TO ENEMYS COUNTRY
Elements:
1. That there is a war in which the Philippines is involved;
2. That the offender owes allegiance to the Government;
3. That the offender attempts to flee or go to the enemy
country; and
4. That going to the enemy country is prohibited by the
competent authority.
An alien resident may be guilty of flight to enemy country,
because an alien owes allegiance to the Philippine
government albeit temporary.
Mere attempt to flee or go to enemy country consummates
the crime.
Article 121 must be implemented by the Government. If
fleeing or going to an enemy country is not prohibited by
competent authority, the crime defined in Article 121 cannot
be committed.
SECTION THREE: PIRACY AND MUTINY ON THE HIGH
SEAS
ARTICLE 122
PIRACY IN GENERAL AND MUTINY
ON THE HIGH SEAS OR IN PHILIPPINE WATERS
Piracy
It is robbery or forcible depredation on the high seas, without
lawful authority and done with animo furandi (intention to
steal) and in the spirit and intention of universal hostility
(People vs. Lol-lo, G.R. No. 17958 February 27, 1922).
Two ways or modes of committing piracy:
1. By attacking or seizing a vessel on the high seas or in
Philippine waters;
2. By seizing in the vessel while on the high seas or in
Philippine waters the whole or part of its cargo, its
equipment or personal belongings of its complement or
passengers.
Elements of piracy:
1. That a vessel is on the high seas or in Philippine waters;
2. That the offenders are NOT members of its complement
or passengers of the vessel; and
3. That the offenders:
a. Attack or seize the vessel; or
b. Seize the whole or part of the cargo of said vessel, its
equipment or personal belongings of its complement or
passengers.
High seas
Waters which are beyond the boundaries of the low-water
mark, although such waters may be in the jurisdictional
limits of a foreign government; parts of the sea that are not
included in the exclusive economic zone, in the territorial
seas, or in the internal waters of a state, or in the
archipelagic waters of an archipelagic state (United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea).
Philippine waters
Shall refer to all bodies of water, such as but not limited to
seas, gulfs, bays around, between and connecting each of
the islands of the Philippine Archipelago, irrespective of its
depth, breadth, length or dimension, and all other waters
belonging to the Philippines by historic or legal title,
including territorial sea, the sea-bed, the insular shelves,
and other submarine areas over which the Philippines has
sovereignty or jurisdiction (Sec. 2, P.D. 532).
Piracy is a crime not against any particular state but against
all mankind. It may be punished in the competent
tribunal of any country where the offender may be found or
into which he may be carried.
Mutiny
The unlawful resistance to a superior, or the raising of
commotions and disturbances on board a ship against the
authority of its commander
Piracy under RPC Mutiny
Place of commission: Either in Philippine waters or on
the high seas
The persons who attack Mutiny is committed by
a vessel or seize its members of the crew or
cargo are strangers to passengers.
the vessels.
3. Directly or indirectly abets the commission of piracy.
ARTICLE 123
QUALIFIED PIRACY
Qualifying Circumstances:
1. Whenever the offenders have seized the vessel by
boarding or firing upon the same;
2. Whenever the pirates have abandoned their victims
without means of saving themselves; or
3. Whenever the crime is accompanied by murder,
homicide, physical injuries, or rape.
The crimes mentioned in the article which are qualified are
piracy and mutiny on the high seas.

Intent to gain is The offenders may only Qualified piracy is a SPECIAL COMPLEX CRIME
essential. intend to ignore the punishable by reclusion perpetua to death, regardless of the
ships officers or they number of victims.
may be prompted by a
desire to commit Offenders are not liable for the separate crimes of murder,
plunder. homicide, physical injuries, or rape.

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 532 Qualified Mutiny

Anti-Piracy and Anti-Highway When the second or the third circumstance accompanies
Robbery Law of 1974 the crime of mutiny mentioned under Art. 122, mutiny is
then qualified. First circumstance may not qualify the crime
Vessel of mutiny, because in mutiny, the offenders are
Any vessel or watercraft used for (a) transport of insiders of the vessel (Boado, Notes and Cases on the
passengers and cargo or (b) for fishing. Revised Penal Code, 2008 p. 376).

Piracy under REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6235

Piracy under RPC ANTI-HIJACKING LAW
PD 532
Punishes piracy Punishes piracy Aircraft is in flight from the moment all exterior doors
committed either in committed in Philippine are closed following embarkation until the same doors are
Philippine waters or on waters only. again opened for disembarkation.
the high seas.
Acts Punished:
Offenders: Non- Offenders: Any person
passengers or non- (may be a passenger, 1. Usurping or seizing control of an aircraft of Philippine
members of the crew, in crew or a stranger). registry while it is in flight; or compelling the pilots thereof
short, strangers to the to change its course or destination;
vessel. Note: When the aircraft is not in flight, the usurpation or
seizure of the aircraft may amount to coercion or threat.
When death results, the crime is homicide or murder, as
Aiding or Abetting of Piracy the case may be.
Any person who shall knowingly aid or abet piracy will be
considered as an accomplice in the commission of piracy 2. Usurping or seizing control of an aircraft of foreign
and punished according to the rules under the RPC. registry, while within Philippine territory, or compelling the
pilots thereof to land in any part of Philippine territory;
Requisites:
1. Knowingly aids or protects pirates;
2. Acquires or receives property taken by such pirates, or in Under this Act, it is not required that the aircraft be a public
any manner derives any benefit therefrom; and utility. (Boado,2008, p. 379).

Aggravating circumstances to acts punished under 1
and 2:
a. When the offender has fired upon the pilot, member of the
crew, or passenger of the aircraft;
b. When the offender has exploded or attempted to
explode any bomb or explosive to destroy the aircraft;
c. Whenever the crime is accompanied by murder,
homicide, serious physical injuries or rape. (Thus, such
common crimes are considered aggravating
circumstances only; they are not separated from or
complexed with the crime of hijacking).
3. Carrying or loading on board an aircraft operating as a
public utility passenger aircraft in the Philippines
flammable, corrosive, explosive or poisonous substances;
Under this act, mere carrying or loading of explosive,
corrosive, etc. brings about criminal liability (Boado,
p.379).
4. Loading, shipping, or transporting on board a cargo
aircraft operating as a public utility in the Philippines,
flammable, corrosive, or poisonous substance if not done
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Air
Transportation Office.
Note: There is no attempted hijacking since it is punishable
under a special law and attempted stage is not punishable
under the said law.
TITLE TWO:
CRIMES AGAINST THE FUNDAMENTAL
LAW OF THE STATE
All offenses in this Title are required to be committed by
public officers except offending the religious feelings.
CHAPTER ONE: ARBITRARY
DETENTION OR EXPULSION,
VIOLATION OF DWELLING,
PROHIBITION, INTERRUPTION, AND
DISSOLUTION OF PEACEFUL
MEETINGS AND CRIMES AGAINST
RELIGIOUS WORSHIP (ARTS. 124-133)
SECTION ONE: ARBITRARY DETENTION AND
EXPULSION
ARTICLE 124
ARBITRARY DETENTION
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That he detains a person; and
3. That the detention is without legal grounds.
Detention
The actual confinement of a person in an enclosure, or in
any manner detaining and depriving him of his liberty
(People v. Gungon, G.R, No. 119574, March 19, 1998,
citing People v. Domasian, G.R. No. 95322, March 1, 1993).
Detention need not involve any physical restraint.
Psychological restraint is sufficient. If the acts and actuations
of the accused can produce such fear in the mind of the
victim sufficient to paralyze the latter, to the extent that the
victim is compelled to limit his own actions and movements
in accordance with the wishes of the accused, then the
victim is, for all intents and purposes, detained against his
will (Astorga vs. People, G. R. No. 154130 Oct. 1, 2003).
Legal grounds for the detention of persons:
1. The commission of a crime.
2. Violent insanity or other ailment requiring compulsory
confinement of the patient in a hospital.
Note: This list is not exclusive so long as the ground is
considered legal (e.g. in contempt of court, under
quarantine, or a foreigner to be deported).
The public officer liable for arbitrary detention must be
vested with authority to detain or order the detention of
persons accused of a crime, but when they detain a person
they have no legal grounds therefor.
If the detention is perpetrated by other public officers NOT
vested with authority or any private individual, the crime
committed is illegal detention (Art. 267 or 268).
The penalty for Arbitrary Detention depends upon the period
of detention involved. A greater penalty is imposed if the
period is longer.
Arrest without a warrant is the usual cause of arbitrary
detention. The crime of unlawful arrest is, however,
absorbed in the crime of arbitrary detention.
Arrest without warrant when LAWFUL:
1. When, in his presence, the person to be arrested has
committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to
commit an offense;
In his presence
When the officer sees the offense being committed,
although at a distance, or hears the disturbance created
thereby and proceeds at once to the scene thereof, or
when the offense is continuing or has not
 been consummated at the time the arrest is made, the
offense is said to be committed in his presence. (U.S. vs.
Samonte, G.R. No. 5649, September 6, 1910).
2. When an offense has in fact just been committed, and he
has probable cause to believe based on personal
knowledge of facts and circumstances that the person to
be arrested has committed it;
Personal Knowledge of facts in arrests without warrant
must be based upon probable cause, which means an
actual belief or reasonable grounds of suspicion (U.S. vs.
Santos, G.R. No. 12779, September 10, 1917).
3. When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has
escaped from a penal establishment, or place where he is
serving final judgment or temporarily confined while his
case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred
from one confinement to another. (Sec. 5, Rule 113,
Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure)
Periods of detention penalized
a. If the detention has not exceeded 3 days.
b. If the detention has continued more than 3 days but
not more than 15 days.
c. If the detention has continued more than 15 days but
not more than 6 months.
d. If the detention has exceeded 6 months.
Arbitrary Detention Unlawful Arrest
Committed by a public Committed by either
officer authorized to private individual or
arrest and detain a public officer who
person but he does so feigned to arrest a
without lawful cause. person without any legal
cause, for the purpose of
delivering him to the
proper authorities.
ARTICLE 125
DELAY IN THE DELIVERY OF DETAINED PERSONS
TO THE PROPER
JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That he has detained a person for some legal ground
(Sec. 5, Rule 113, Rules of Court); and
3. That he fails to deliver such person to the proper judicial
authorities within:
a. 12 hrs for offenses punishable by light penalties or
their equivalent.
b. 18 hrs for offenses punishable by correctional penalties
or their equivalent.
c. 36 hrs for offenses punishable by afflictive penalties or
their equivalent.
Circumstances considered in determining liability of
officer detaining a person beyond legal period:
1. The means of communication;
2. The hour of arrest; and
3. Other circumstances such as the time of surrender and
the material possibility for the fiscal to make the
investigation and file in time the necessary information.
Delivery to proper authorities
It means filing of an Information against the person
arrested with the corresponding court or judge. It does not
mean physical delivery.
Proper judicial authorities
It refers to the courts of justice or judges of said courts
vested with judicial power to order the temporary detention
or confinement of a person charged with having committed
a public offense.
Reason for Article 125
It is intended to prevent any abuse resulting from confining a
person without informing him of his offense and without
permitting him to go on bail.
A private individual who makes a lawful arrest must also
comply with requirements under Art. 125. If he fails to
comply, he is liable for the crime of ILLEGAL DETENTION
under Art. 267 or 268.
The illegality of the detention is not cured by the filing of
information in court.
Art. 125 applies only when the arrest is made without a
warrant of arrest but lawful. It does NOT apply when the
arrest is by virtue of a warrant of arrest, in which case he
can be detained indefinitely. He must, however, be delivered
without unnecessary delay to the nearest police station or
jail.
The reason for this is that there is already a complaint or
information filed against him with the court which issued the
order or warrant of arrest and it is not necessary to deliver
the person thus arrested to that court.
Where a judge is not available, the arresting officer is duty-
bound to release a detained, if the maximum hours for
detention provided under Article 125 of the Revised Penal
Code has already expired. Failure to cause the release may
result in an offense under Article 125. (Albior vs. Auguis,
A.M. P-01-1472, June 26, 2003).
Person arrested may request for a preliminary ARTICLE 127
investigation but must sign a waiver of Art. 125. EXPULSION

Delivery to proper authorities Two acts punished:

It means filing of an Information against the person arrested
with the corresponding court or judge. It does not mean
physical delivery.
Delay in the Delivery of
Arbitrary Detention Detained Persons to
the Proper Judicial
Author
The detention is illegal The detention is legal in
from the beginning. the beginning but the
illegality of the detention
starts from the expiration
of any of the periods of
time specified in Art.
125, without the person
detained having been
delivered to the proper
judicial authority
ARTICLE 126
DELAYING RELEASE
1. By expelling a person from the Philippines;
2. By compelling a person to change his residence.
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That he expels any person from the Philippines, or
compels a person to change his residence; and
3. That the offender is not authorized to do so by law.
Exception: There is no expulsion in cases of ejectment,
expropriation or when the penalty of destierro is imposed.
Only the President of the Philippines is authorized to deport
aliens under the Revised Administrative Code.
Only the court by a final judgment can order a person to
change residence.
SECTION TWO: VIOLATION OF DOMICILE
ARTICLE 128
VIOLATION OF DOMICILE

Three acts punished: Acts Punished

1. By delaying the performance of a judicial or executive
order for the release of a prisoner;
2. By unduly delaying the service of the notice of such order
to said prisoner;
3. By unduly delaying the proceedings upon any petition for
the liberation of such person.
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That there is a judicial or executive order for the release
of a prisoner or detention prisoner, or that there is a
proceeding upon a petition for the liberation of such
person; and
3. That the offender without good reason delays either:
a. The service of the notice of such order to the prisoner;
b. The performance of such judicial or executive order for
the release of the prisoner; or
c. The proceedings upon a petition for the release of
such person.
Note: Most likely to be violated by wardens or jailers.
1. By entering any dwelling against the will of the owner
thereof;
2. By searching papers or other effects found therein
without the previous consent of such owner;
3. By refusing to leave the premises, after having
surreptitiously entered said dwelling and after having
been required to leave the same.
Common elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee; and
2. That he is not authorized by judicial order to enter the
dwelling and/or to make a search for papers or other
effects.
Qualifying circumstances:
1. If committed at nighttime;
2. If any papers or effects, not constituting evidence of a
crime are not returned immediately after a search is made
by the offender.
The offender must be a public officer or employee. If he is a
private individual, or if the public officer is one whose
function does not include the duty to effect search and
seizure (Boado, 2008, p. 395), the crime committed is
TRESPASS TO DWELLING.
In the first mode, lack of consent would not suffice as the
law requires that the offenders entry must be over the
owners objection.
In the second mode, mere lack of consent is sufficient.
Silence of the owner of the dwelling before and during the
search, without search warrant, by a public officer, may
show implied waiver.
In the third mode, what is punished is the refusal to leave,
the entry having been made surreptitiously.
It is believed, however, that if the surreptitious entry had
been made through an opening not intended for that
purpose, the offender would be liable under the first mode
since it is entry over the implied objection of the inhabitant.
Although the Code speaks of the owner of the premises, it
would be sufficient if the inhabitant is the lawful occupant
using the premises as his dwelling, although he is not the
owner thereof.
The papers or other effects in the second mode must be
found in the dwelling (Reyes, 2008, p. 67).
Not being authorized by judicial order
A public officer or employee is authorized by judicial order
when he is armed with a search warrant duly issued by the
court. Hence, he is not authorized by judicial order when the
public officer has no search warrant. (Reyes, p. 66)
Against the will of owner
It presupposes opposition or prohibition by the owner,
WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, and not merely the
absence of consent. (Reyes, 2008, p. 66)
ARTICLE 129
SEARCH WARRANTS MALICIOUSLY OBTAINED
AND ABUSE IN THE SERVICE OF THOSE
LEGALLY OBTAINED
Acts Punished:
1. Procuring a search warrant without just cause.
Elements:
a. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
b. That he procures a search warrant; and
c. That there is no just cause.
2. Exceeding his authority or by using unnecessary severity
in executing a search warrant legally procured.
Elements:
a. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
b. That he has legally procured a search warrant; and
c. That he exceeds his authority or uses unnecessary
severity in executing the same.
Note: If in searching a house, the public officer destroys
furniture therein without any justification at all, he is guilty
under Article 129, as having used unnecessary severity in
executing the search warrant.
Search warrant
It is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of
the Philippines, signed by the judge and directed to a peace
officer, commanding him to search for personal property
described therein and bring it before the court. (Sec. 1, Rule
126, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure)
Requisites for the issuance of search warrant:
A search warrant shall not issue except upon probable
cause in connection with one specific offense to be
determined personally by the judge after examination under
oath or affirmation of the complainant and the
witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the
place to be searched and the things to be seized which
may be anywhere in the Philippines (Sec. 4, Rule 126,
Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure).
Test of lack of just cause
Whether the affidavit filed in support of the application for
search warrant has been drawn in such a manner that
perjury could be charged thereon and affiant can be held
liable for damages caused.
If the search warrant is secured through a false affidavit, the
crime punished by this article
CANNOT be complexed but will be a separate crime from
perjury since the penalty herein provided shall be IN
ADDITION TO the penalty of perjury.
A search warrant shall be valid for ten (10) days from its
date.
When papers or effects are obtained during unreasonable
searches and seizures, or under a search warrant issued
without probable cause and not in accordance with the
procedure prescribed, or in violation of the privacy of
communication and correspondence, the papers of effects
thus obtained are not admissible if presented as evidence.
Instances when a warrantless search and seizure is
valid:
1. Consented searches;
2. As an incident to a lawful arrest; Search Warrants
3. Searches of vessels and aircraft for violation of Maliciously Searching
immigration, customs, and drug laws; Violation of Domicile Without
Obtained and
4. Searches of moving vehicles; Domicile Abuse in the Witnesses
5. Searches of automobiles at borders or constructive Service of those
borders; Legally Obtained
6. Where the prohibited articles are in "plain view";
7. Searches of buildings and premises to enforce fire, There is no The public officer There was abuse
warrant. is armed with a in the
sanitary, and building regulations; and
warrant but such implementation of
8. "stop and frisk" operations (People v. Lopez, GR No.
was maliciously a valid warrant.
181747, September 29, 2008).
obtained.
Note: The officer, if refused admittance to the place of
directed search after giving notice of his purpose and SECTION THREE: PROHIBITION, INTERRUPTION, AND
authority, may break open any outer or inner door or DISSOLUTION OF PEACEFUL MEETINGS
window of a house or any part of a house or anything
therein to execute the warrant or liberate himself or any ARTICLE 131
person lawfully aiding him when unlawfully detained therein PROHIBITION, INTERRUPTION, & DISSOLUTION OF
(Sec. 7, Rule 126, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure). PEACEFUL MEETINGS

ARTICLE 130
SEARCHING DOMICILE WITHOUT WITNESSES
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That he is armed with a search warrant legally
procured;
3. That he searches the domicile, papers or other
belongings of any person; and
4. That the owner, or any member of his family or two
witnesses residing in the same locality are not present.
The papers or other belongings must be in the dwelling of
their owner at the time the search is made. It does not apply
to searches of vehicles or other means of transportation
because the searches are not made in dwelling (Reyes, The
Revised Penal Code Book II, 17th ed., 2008 p. 73).
Art. 130 does NOT apply to searches of vehicles or other
means of transportation.
Search without warrant under the Tariff and Customs Code
does not include a dwelling house.
Acts Punished:
1. Prohibiting, interrupting or dissolving without legal ground
the holding of a peaceful meeting;
To commit the crime under the first act:
a. The meeting must be peaceful; and
b. There is no legal ground for prohibiting, or interrupting
or dissolving that meeting (Reyes, p.77).
2. Hindering any person from joining any lawful association
or from attending any of its meetings;
3. Prohibiting or hindering any person from addressing,
either alone or together with others, any petition to the
authorities for the correction of abuses or redress of
grievances.
Common elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That he performs any of the acts mentioned above.
The right to freedom of speech and to peacefully assemble,
though guaranteed by our Constitution, is not absolute, for it
may be regulated in order that it may not be injurious to the
right of the community or society, and this power may be
exercised under the police power of the state, which is the
power to prescribe regulations to promote the good order or
safety and general welfare of the people.

The offender must be a stranger, and not a participant. If the

offender is a participant, the crime committed is unjust
vexation.

Interrupting and dissolving the meeting of municipal council

by a public officer is a crime against a legislative
body, not punished under Art. 131 but under Arts. 143 and
144 of the RPC.
If the offender is a private individual, the crime is disturbance
of public order under Art. 153.
SECTION FOUR: CRIMES AGAINST RELIGIOUS
WORSHIP
ARTICLE 132
INTERRUPTION OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That religious ceremonies or manifestations of any
religion are about to take place or are going on; and
3. That the offender prevents or disturbs the same.
Note: Qualified by violence or threats.
If the prohibition or disturbance is committed only in a
meeting or rally of a sect, it would be punishable under
Art.131.
ARTICLE 133
OFFENDING THE RELIGIOUS FEELINGS
Elements:
1. That the acts complained of were performed:
a. In a place devoted to religious worship (not
necessary that there is a religious ceremony going on);
or
b. During the celebration of any religious ceremony;
2. That the acts must be notoriously offensive to the
feelings of the faithful.
Religious ceremonies
Religious acts performed outside of a church, such as
processions and special prayers for burying dead persons.
Acts notoriously offensive to the feelings of the
faithful
The acts must be directed against religious practice or
dogma or ritual for the purpose of ridicule, as mocking or
scoffing at or attempting to damage an object of religious
veneration.
May be committed by a public officer or a private individual.
This is the only crime in Title Two which does
NOT require that the offender be a public officer.
Offense to feelings is judged from complainants point of
view.
There must be deliberate intent to hurt the feelings of the
faithful.
If the act is directed to the religious belief itself and the act is
notoriously offensive, the crime is offending the religious
feelings. Otherwise, it is only unjust vexation. (Boado, pp.
398-399)
TITLE THREE: CRIMES AGAINST
PUBLIC ORDER
ARTICLE 134
REBELLION/ INSURRECTION
Elements:
1. That there be:
a. Public uprising; and
b. Taking up of arms against the government.
2. For the purpose of either:
a. Removing from the allegiance to said Government or
its laws:
i. The territory of the Philippines, or any part thereof;
or
ii. Any body of land, naval or other armed forces; or
b. Depriving the Chief Executive or Congress, wholly or
partially, of any of their powers or prerogatives.
If the act is to deprive the Judiciary of its powers or
prerogatives, the crime committed is sedition.
Rebellion
More frequently used where the object of the movement is
to completely overthrow and supersede the existing
government. It is a crime of the masses, of the multitude. It
is a vast movement of men and a complex network of
intrigues and plots. The purpose of the uprising must be
shown. Without evidence to indicate the motive or purpose
of the accused, the crime does not constitute rebellion. It
may constitute other crimes like sedition or kidnapping.
Insurrection
More commonly employed in reference to a movement
which seeks merely to effect some change of minor
importance, or to prevent the exercise of governmental
authority with respect to particular matters or subjects.
Note: ACTUAL CLASH with the armed forces of the
Government is NOT necessary to convict the accused who
is in conspiracy with others actually taking arms against the
Government.
 Rebellion Treason populace, in order to coerce the government to give in to an
As to purpose unlawful demand shall be guilty of Terrorism.
1. To remove from the Violation by a subject of
allegiance to said his allegiance to his ARTICLE 134-A
COUP DETAT
Gov't or the laws the sovereign or to the
territory of the Phils. supreme authority of the
or any body of land, State. Elements:
naval or other armed 1. That the offender is a person or persons belonging to the
forces; military or police or holding any public office or
2. To deprive the Chief employment;
Executive or 2. That it is committed by means of a swift attack,
Congress of any of accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy, or
their powers. stealth;
Manner of commission 3. That the attack is directed against duly constituted
1. Public uprising; and 1. By levying war authorities of the Republic of the Philippines, or any
2. By taking arms against the Gov't; military camp or installation, or communication
against the Gov't. 2. By adhering to the networks, public utilities or other facilities needed for the
enemies of the exercise and continued possession of power; and
Phils., giving them 4. That the purpose of the attack is to seize or diminish
aid or comfort state power.
Time of commission
May be committed both Committed during time of The crime of coup detat may be committed with or without
during times of peace war. civilian participation.
and war.
State Power includes power of the President, Legislative
Proof needed for conviction
and Judicial Power, including police power.
Proved by showing the 1. Testimony of 2
purpose of the uprising; witnesses, at least to
Under Section 3 of the Human Security Act of 2007, a
there must be proof the same overt act;
person who commits an act punishable as coup detat
beyond reasonable or
including acts committed by private persons, thereby sowing
doubt. 2. Confession of
and creating a condition of widespread and extraordinary
accused in open
fear and panic among the populace, in order to coerce the
court.
government to give in to an unlawful demand, shall be guilty
of Terrorism.
Giving aid and comfort is not criminal in rebellion. Rebellion Coup detat
Persons acting as couriers or spies for rebels are guilty of Number of Offenders
rebellion. There must be a public May be committed by
Mere silence regarding the presence of rebels despite uprising. It must involve one person or a
knowledge of a rebellion is not punishable. a multitude of people. multitude.
Offenders
Rebellion cannot be complexed with, but absorbs other No qualifications Principal offender/s must
crimes committed in furtherance of rebellious movement. belong to the
There is no complex crime of rebellion with murder and military or police, or hold
other common crimes, whether such crimes are punishable any public office or
under a special law or general law (RPC) provided that such employment, with or
crimes are committed in furtherance or in pursuance of the without civilian support.
movement to overthrow the government (Ponce Enrile v. Purpose
Amin, G. R. No. 93335, September 13, 1990). Purpose: To destabilize
Purpose: To overthrow
the government. the government or
Under Section 3 of the Human Security Act of 2007, a diminish state power.
person who commits an act punishable as rebellion or
Means of commission
insurrection, thereby sowing and creating a condition of
Public uprising and Swift attack
widespread and extraordinary fear and panic among the by
taking up of arms accompanied
against the government. violence, intimidation, the accused is guilty only as a participant in the commission
threat, strategy or stealth of Rebellion under par. 2 of Art. 135 (People v. Lava, G.R.
directed against the No. L-4974 to 78, May 16, 1969).
government or any
military camp or Membership in a rebel organization does not automatically
installation or qualify criminal acts as absorbed in rebellion. It must be
communication conclusively demonstrated that the criminal acts were
networks, public utilities committed in furtherance of rebellion (People v. Lovedioro,
or other facilities needed G.R. No. 112235, G.R. No. 112235).
for the exercise and
continued possession of Political Crimes
power. In contrast to common crimes, are those directly aimed
against the political order, as well as such common crimes
ARTICLE 135 as may be committed to achieve a political purpose. The
PENALTY FOR REBELLION OR INSURRECTION OR decisive factor is the intent or motive.
COUP DETAT
Killing, robbing, etc., for private purposes or profit, without
Persons liable for rebellion, insurrection and/or coup any political motivation, would be separately punished and
detat: would not be absorbed in the rebellion (People vs.
A. The leaders Geronimo, et al., 100 Phil 90 [1956]).
1. Any person who
a. Promotes; ARTICLE 136
b. Maintains; orlkjhgfx CONSPIRACY & PROPOSAL TO COMMIT
c. Heads a rebellion or insurrection; or REBELLION, INSURRECTION
2. Any person who OR COUP D ETAT
a. Leads;
b. Directs; or Two Crimes penalized under this article:
c. Commands others to undertake a coup detat; 1. Conspiracy to commit rebellion; and
B. The participants 2. Proposal to commit rebellion.
1. Any person who
a. Participates; or Conspiracy to commit rebellion
b. Executes the commands of others in rebellion, or When two or more persons come to an agreement to rise
insurrection; publicly and take arms against the Government for any of
2. Any person in the government service who the purposes of rebellion and decide to commit it.
a.Participates; or
b.Executes directions or commands of others in Proposal to commit rebellion
undertaking a coup detat; When the person who has decided to rise publicly and take
3. Any person not in the government service who arms against the Government for any of the purposes
a. Participates; of rebellion proposes its execution to some other person or
b. Supports; persons.
c. Finances; This is an instance where the law punishes preparatory
d. Abets; or acts.
e. Aids in undertaking a coup detat.
ARTICLE 137
Who shall be deemed the leader of the rebellion, DISLOYALTY OF PUBLIC
insurrection or coup detat in case he is unknown? OFFICERS/EMPLOYEES
Any person who in fact:
1. Directed the others, Acts Punished:
2. Spoke for them, 1. Failing to resist a rebellion by all means in their power;
3. Signed receipts and other documents issued in their 2. Continuing to discharge the duties of their office under the
name, or control of the rebels;
4. Performed similar acts, on behalf of the rebels. 3. Accepting appointment to office under the rebels.

Being a mere assistant to a principal, guilty of rebellion, The offender must be a public officer or employee.
The crime presupposes the existence of rebellion by other d. To commit, for any political or social end, any act of
persons; the offender must not be in conspiracy with the hate or revenge against private persons or any social
rebels; otherwise, he himself will also be guilty of rebellion. class;
e. To despoil, for any political or social end, any person or
the government of all its property or any part thereof.
ARTICLE 138
INCITING TO REBELLION/ INSURRECTION
Sedition cannot be committed by one person. Article 189
Elements: states The crime of sedition is committed by persons who
1. That the offender does not take up arms or is not in open rise publicly and tumultuously. In Article 163, the word
hostility against the Government; tumultuous is given a definite meaning. It says that the
2. That he incites others to the execution of any of the acts disturbance shall be deemed to be tumultuous if caused
of rebellion; and by more than three persons who are armed or provided with
3. That the inciting is done by means of speeches, the means of violence.
proclamations, writings, emblems, banners or other
representations tending to the same end. Sedition Treason
In its more general In its more general
Proposal to Commit
Inciting to Rebellion sense, it is the raising of sense, it is the violation
Rebellion
commotions or by a subject of his
In both crimes, the offender induces another to disturbances in the allegiance to his
commit rebellion. State. sovereign.
The person who It is not required that the
proposes has decided to offender has decided to Sedition Rebellion
commit rebellion. commit rebellion.
In both, there must be public uprising.
The person who The act of inciting is done
It is sufficient that the There must be taking up
proposes the execution publicly.
public uprising is of arms against the
of the crime uses secret
tumultuous. Government.
means.
The purpose of the The purpose is always
In both, the crime of rebellion should not be actually
offenders may be political.
committed by the persons to whom it is proposed or
political or social.
who are incited. If they commit rebellion because of
the proposal or inciting, the proponent or the one Not necessarily against Always against the
inciting may become a principal by inducement in the the government. government.
crime of rebellion.

ARTICLE 139 Public uprising and an object of sedition must concur.

SEDITION
Elements:
1. That the offenders rise:
a. Publicly; and
b. Tumultuously;
2. That they employ force, intimidation, or other means
outside of legal methods;
3. That the offenders employ any of those means to attain
any of the following objects:
a. To prevent the promulgation or execution of any law
or the holding of any popular election;
b. To prevent the government or any public officer from
freely exercising its or his functions, or prevent the
execution of any Administrative Order;
c. To inflict any act of hate or revenge upon the person or
property of any public officer or employee;
In sedition, it is immaterial if the objective be completely
attained.
Mere public uprising for any of the objectives mentioned in
Art. 139 is punishable.
General Rule: Common Crimes are NOT absorbed in
sedition.
Exception: Sedition absorbs the use of unlicensed firearms
as an element thereof, pursuant to RA 8294.
ARTICLE 140
PENALTY FOR SEDITION
Persons liable:
1. The leader of the sedition; and
2. Other persons participating in the sedition.

ARTICLE 141
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT SEDITION
Only conspiracy to commit sedition is punishable and not
Proposal to commit sedition.
There must be an agreement both to attain an object of
sedition and to rise publicly and tumultuously.
ARTICLE 142
INCITING TO SEDITION
Acts Punished:
1. Inciting others to commit sedition by means of speeches,
proclamations, writings, emblems, cartoons,
banners, or other representations tending to the same
end;
2. Uttering seditious words or speeches which tend to
disturb the public peace;
3. Writing, publishing, or circulating scurrilous libels
against the Government or any of its duly constituted
authorities;
4. Knowingly concealing such evil practices.
Knowingly concealing such evil practices is ordinarily an
act of the accessory after the fact, but under this
provision, the act is treated and punished as that of the
principal.
Scurrilous
Means low, vulgar, mean, or foul.
Elements of Act no. 1:
1. That the offender does not take direct part in the crime of
sedition;
2. That he incites others to the accomplishment of any of the
acts which constitute sedition; and
3. That the inciting is done by means of speeches,
proclamations, writings, emblems, cartoons, banners, or
other representations tending to the same end.
Acts nos. 2 & 3 punishable when:
1. They tend to disturb or obstruct any lawful officer in
executing the functions of his office;
2. They tend to instigate others to cabal and meet together
for unlawful purposes;
3. They suggest or incite rebellious conspiracies or riots;
or
4. They lead or tend to stir up the people against the lawful
authorities or disturb the peace of the community, and the
safety and order of the Government.
Rules relative to seditious words:
Clear and present danger rule
It is required that there must be reasonable ground to
believe that the danger apprehended is imminent and that
the evil to be prevented is a serious one. There must be the
probability of serious injury to the State.
Present refers to the time element. It used to be identified
with imminent and immediate danger. The danger must not
only be probable but very likely inevitable.
Dangerous tendency rule
There is inciting to sedition when the words uttered or
published could easily produce disaffection among the
people and a state of feeling in them incompatible with a
disposition to remain loyal to the Government and obedient
to the laws. The dangerous tendency rule is generally
adopted in the Philippines.
Reason why seditious utterances are prohibited:
If the State were compelled to wait until the apprehended
danger became certain, then its right to protect itself would
come into being simultaneously with the overthrow of the
Government, when there would be neither prosecuting
officers nor courts for the enforcement of the law.
CHAPTER TWO: CRIMES AGAINST
POPULAR REPRESENTATION
(ARTS. 143-145)
SECTION ONE: CRIMES AGAINST LEGISLATIVE
BODIES AND SIMILAR BODIES
ARTICLE 143
ACTS TENDING TO PREVENT THE MEETING OF THE
ASSEMBLY AND SIMILAR BODIES
Elements:
1. That there be a projected or actual meeting of the
Congress or any of its committees or subcommittees,
constitutional commissions or committees or divisions
thereof, or of any provincial board or city or municipal
council or board;
2. That the offender, who may be any person, prevents
such meeting by force or fraud.
Force referred to here is one that produces an injury on the
person of another, and fraud involves falsification. Thus,
physical injuries and falsification will be complexed as a
necessary means to commit this crime.
 session, except in cases where such member has
ARTICLE 144 committed a crime punishable under the Code by a
DISTURBANCE OF PROCEEDINGS penalty higher than prision mayor.
Elements:
Elements: a. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
1. That there be a meeting of Congress or any of its b. That he arrests or searches any member of Congress;
committees or subcommittees, constitutional c. That the Congress, at the time of arrest or search, is
commissions or committees or divisions thereof, or any in regular or special session; and
provincial board or city or municipal council or board; and
2. That the offender does any of the following acts:
a. He disturbs any of such meetings; or Session
b. He behaves while in the presence of any such bodies in Refers to the entire period from its initial convening
such a manner as to interrupt its proceedings or to until its final adjournment.
impair the respect due it.
d. That the member arrested or searched has not
committed a crime punishable under the Code by a
Complaint for disturbance of proceedings must be filed by a penalty higher than prision mayor.
member of the legislative body.
Disturbance created by a participant in the meeting is not Parliamentary immunity does not protect members of
covered by Art. 144. Congress from responsibility before the legislative body
itself.
The same act may be made the basis for contempt since it
is coercive in nature while the crime under this Article is The 1987 Constitution exempts members of Congress from
punitive. arrest, while the Congress is in session, for all offenses
punishable by a penalty less than prision mayor.
SECTION TWO: VIOLATION OF PARLIAMENTARY
IMMUNITY It is not necessary that the member is actually prevented
from exercising any of his functions. It is sufficient that
ARTICLE 145 Congress is in session and the offender, in using force,
VIOLATION OF PARLIAMENTARY IMMUNITY intimidation, threats, or frauds, has the purpose to prevent a
member of the National Assembly from exercising any of his
Acts Punished: such prerogatives.
1. Using force, intimidation, threats, or frauds to prevent any
member from: Note: Sec. 11, Art. VI of the 1987 Constitution states that,
a. Attending the meetings of Congress or any of its A Senator or Member of the House of Representatives
committees or subcommittees, constitutional shall in all offenses punishable by not more than six years
commissions or committees or divisions thereof, or imprisonment, be privileged from arrest while Congress is in
from session while Art 145 of the RPC states penalty higher
b. Expressing his opinions or than prison mayor. To be consistent with the Constitution,
c. Casting his vote. the Constitution should prevail over Art. 145, and the
Constitution says 6 years, not prision mayor.
Elements:
a. That the offender uses force, intimidation, threats or
CHAPTER THREE: ILLEGAL
fraud; and
ASSEMBLIES AND ASSOCIATIONS
b. That the purpose of the offender is to prevent any (ARTS. 146-147)
member of Congress from
i. Attending the meetings of the Congress or any of
its committees or constitutional commissions, etc.; ARTICLE 146
or ILLEGAL ASSEMBLIES
ii. Expressing his opinions; or
iii. Casting his vote. Forms of Illegal Assemblies:
Note: The offender in Par. 1 may be any person. 1. Any meeting attended by armed persons for the purpose
of committing any of the crimes punishable under the
2. Arresting or searching any member while Congress is in RPC.
 ARTICLE 147
Requisites: ILLEGAL ASSOCIATIONS
a. That there is a meeting, gathering or group of persons,
whether in a fixed place or moving; Prohibited associations:
b. That the meeting is attended by armed persons; and Associations totally or partially organized for:
c. That the purpose of the meeting is to commit any of the 1. The purpose of committing any of the crimes punishable
crimes punishable under the RPC. under the RPC, or
2. Some purpose contrary to public morals.
Not all the persons present at the meeting of the first form
of illegal assembly must be armed. It is sufficient that at Public morals refer to matters which affect the interest
least 2 persons are armed. of society and public convenience and is not limited to
good customs.
If none of the persons present in the meeting are armed,
there is no crime of Illegal Assembly. Persons liable:
1. Founders, directors, and president of the association.
2. Any meeting in which the audience, whether armed or 2. Members of the association.
not, is incited to the commission of the crime of treason,
rebellion or insurrection, sedition, or assault upon a Illegal Assembly Illegal Association
person in authority or his agent.
It is necessary that there It is not necessary that
Requisites: is an actual meeting or there is an actual
a. That there is a meeting, a gathering or group of assembly of armed meeting.
persons, whether in a fixed place or moving; and persons for the purpose
b. That the audience, whether armed or not, is incited specified in Art. 146.
to the commission of the crime of treason, rebellion or
It is the meeting and It is the act of forming or
insurrection, sedition or direct assault.
attendance at such organizing and
meeting that are membership in the
It is necessary that the audience is actually incited. If in the punished. association that are
meeting the audience is incited to the commission of punished.
rebellion or sedition, the crimes committed are ILLEGAL
ASSEMBLY as regards the organizers or leaders or The persons liable are: The persons liable are:
persons merely present and INCITING TO REBELLION OR 1. The organizers or 1. The founders,
SEDITION insofar as the one inciting them is concerned. leaders of the directors and
meetings; and president; and
Persons liable in illegal assemblies: 2. The persons 2. The members.
1. The organizers or leaders of the meeting; present at the
2. Persons merely present at the meeting. meeting.
Organized for temporary More or less of some
Presumptions: purposes. duration and existence.
If any person carries an unlicensed firearm, it is presumed
that: Held in connection with Even acts contrary to
1. The purpose of the meeting insofar as he is concerned is crimes punishable under public morals are
to commit acts punishable under the RPC; and the RPC. included, thus may
2. He is considered a leader or organizer of the meeting. include crimes
The law does NOT distinguish whether or not the punishable by special
firearms are licensed or unlicensed. It only gives a laws.
presumption if the firearm used is unlicensed.

A person invited to give a speech in an illegal assembly or

meeting and incites the members of such assembly is guilty
of inciting to sedition only and not punishable under illegal
assembly.
 enumerated in defining the crimes of sedition & rebellion.
CHAPTER FOUR: ASSAULT UPON, AND
RESISTANCE & DISOBEDIENCE TO,
PERSONS IN AUTHORITY AND THEIR
AGENTS (ARTS. 148-152) Elements:
a. That the offender employs force or intimidation;
b. That the aim of the offender is to attain any of the
ARTICLE 152 purposes of the crime of rebellion or any of the objects
PERSONS IN AUTHORITY & AGENTS OF PERSONS IN of the crime of sedition; and
AUTHORITY c. That there is no public uprising.

Agent of a Offended party need NOT BE a person in authority or his

Public Officer Person in agent, he may be a private individual if the object is to
Person in
(PO) Authority (PA) attain an object of sedition.
Authority (APA)
Any person Any person Any person who, 2. Without public uprising, by attacking, by employing
who takes part directly vested by direct force or seriously intimidating or by seriously resisting any
in the with jurisdiction, provision of law person in authority (PA) or any of his agents (APA), while
performance whether as an or by election or engaged in the performance of official duties, or on the
of public individual or as a by appointment occasion of such performance.
functions in member of some by competent
the court or authority, is Elements:
government. governmental charged with the a. That the offender:
corporation, maintenance of i. Makes an attack includes any offensive or
board or public order and antagonistic movement or action of any kind
commission. the protection (equivalent to aggression),
and security of
ii.Employs force:
life and property. If the offended part is only an agent of a person in
authority, the force employed must be of serious as
Any person who comes to the aid of a person in authority to indicate determination to defy the law and its
may be considered as an agent of a person in authority. representative at all hazards.

A barangay chairman shall be deemed a PA.
A barrio councilman, barrio policeman and barangay leader
shall be deemed an APA.
Teachers, professors, and persons in charge with the
supervision of public or duly recognized private schools,
colleges and universities, and lawyers in the actual
performance of their professional duties or on the occasion
of such performance shall be deemed persons in authority,
in applying Arts. 148 and 151.
Directly vested with jurisdiction
Means the power or authority to govern and execute the
laws. (Reyes 2008., p. 137)
ARTICLE 148
DIRECT ASSAULT
iii. Makes a serious intimidation (unlawful coercion,
Two ways to commit:
1. Without public uprising, by employing force or
intimidation for the attainment of any of the purposes
However, it is important to determine whether the
victim is a PA or APA.
Where the force employed on the agent of a person
in authority is of a serious character, including
determination to defy the law and its
representative, the crime committed is direct assault.
If the victim is a PA, the degree of force employed
against him is immaterial as the mere laying of hands
on him is sufficient (U.S. vs Gumban, G.R. No. L-
13658, November 9, 1918).
If the victim is an APA, the violence, intimidation, or
resistance employed by the offender must be serious
(U.S. vs Tabiana, G.R. No. L-11847 February 1,
1918).
duress, putting someone in fear, exertion of an
influence in the mind which must be both immediate
and serious); or
 The resistance must be active, not passive (Reyes,
p. 135). .
iv. Makes a serious resistance (if not serious, crime
committed may be that under Article 151 or
resistance and disobedience);
b. That the person assaulted is a person in authority or his
agent;
c. That at the time of the assault the person in authority or
his agent:
i. Is engaged in the actual performance of official duties,
or
ii. That he is assaulted by reason of the past
performance of his official duties;
d. That the offender knows that the one he is assaulting
is a person in authority or his agent in the exercise of his
duties; and
e. That there is no public uprising.
Considered NOT in the actual performance of official
duties:
1. When the PA or APA exceeds his powers or acts
without authority;
2. Unnecessary use of force or violence;
3. Descended to matters which are private in nature.
Two kinds of direct assault of the second form:
1. Simple assault
2. Qualified assault
Direct assault is qualified when:
1. Committed with a weapon; or
2. Offender is a public officer or employee; or
3. Offender lays hands upon a person in authority.
Knowledge of the accused that the victim is a PA or APA
is essential.
Evidence of motive of the offender is important when the
person in authority or his agent who is attacked or
seriously intimidated is not in the actual performance of
his official duty.
Even when PA or APA agrees to fight, an attack made by
accused constitutes Direct Assault, except when the
attack is made in lawful defense; the character of a
person in authority or his agent is not laid off at will but
attaches to him until he ceases to be in office.
If Direct Assault is committed and as a result the PA or
APA is killed, the crime shall be the complex crime of
Direct Assault with Homicide or Murder, as the case may
be.
If Direct Assault is committed and the PA or APA suffers
Serious or Less Serious Physical Injuries, the crime shall
be a complex crime or Direct Assault with Serious or Less
Serious Physical Injuries.
The crime of slight physical injuries is absorbed in direct
assault if committed against an APA. If committed against
a PA, it will be considered as a separate offense.
The crime of direct assault is not committed when the PA
or APA is suspended or under suspension when he is
attacked.
If the accused was also acting in the performance of his
official duties, crime committed may be coercion or
physical injuries.
Direct Assault cannot be committed in times of rebellion
or sedition because Art. 148 requires that the assault be
without a public uprising (People v. Abalos, G.R. No.
88189, July 9, 1996).
ARTICLE 149
INDIRECT ASSAULT
Elements:
1. That an APA is the victim of any of the forms of direct
assault defined in Art. 148;
2. That a person comes to the aid of the APA;
3. That the offender makes use of force or intimidation
upon such person coming to the aid of the APA.
Indirect assault can be committed only when a direct assault
is also committed.
The offended party in indirect assault may be a private
person.
Under Art. 149, it was formerly required that (a) direct
assault is being committed against a PA or an APA; and
(b) a third party comes to the aid of the victim by virtue of
the latters order or request (U.S. v. Fortaleza, 12 Phil. 472).
However, because of the amendment of Art. 152 by
R.A. 1978, a private individual coming to the aid of a PA is
himself deemed an APA. Thus, the rules should be:
a. If the victim is a PA who is the subject of a Direct
Assault, and the 3rd person coming to his aid (who then
becomes an APA) is likewise attacked, the crime
committed against the 3rd person will be Direct
Assault, resistance or disobedience depending on the
degree of force or violence used by the offender.
b. If the victim is an APA, it depends: if Direct Assault is
 being committed against the APA, the attack against the The accused must have knowledge that the person giving
3rd person will constitute Indirect Assault; if only the order is a peace officer.
resistance or disobedience is being committed against
the agent, the attack against the 3rd person is either Direct Assault Resistance
physical injuries or coercion as the case may be
(Regalado p. 416-417). The PA or APA must be Only in actual
engaged in the performance of duties.
performance of official
ARTICLE 150 duties or that he is
DISOBEDIENCE TO SUMMONS ISSUED BY THE assaulted by reason
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, ITS COMMITTEES OR thereof.
SUBCOMMITTEES, BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL Force employed is Use of force is not so
COMMISSION, ITS COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEE serious. serious.
OR DIVISIONS
Attack or Employment of Attack or Employment of
Acts punished: Force is deliberate Force is not deliberate.
1. Refusing, without legal excuse, to obey summons of Committed in any of the Committed by resisting or
Congress, or any commission or committee chairman or following ways: seriously disobeying a
member authorized to summon witnesses; 1. By attacking; PA or APA.
2. Refusing to be sworn or placed under affirmation while 2. By employing force;
before such legislative or constitutional body or official;
3. By seriously
3. Refusing to answer any legal inquiry or to produce any
intimidating;
books, papers, documents, or records in his
4. By seriously resisting
possession, when required by them to do so in the
a person in authority
exercise of their functions;
or his agent
4. Restraining another from attending as a witness in such
legislative or constitutional body;
The disobedience contemplated consists in the failure or
5. Inducing disobedience to summons or refusal to be
refusal to obey a direct order from the PA or APA.
sworn by any such body or official.

The testimony of a person summoned must be upon In the crime of resistance and disobedience the offender
matters into which the legislature has jurisdiction to inquire. must have knowledge that the person arresting is a PA or
APA.

Any of the acts punished herein may also constitute

contempt.
ARTICLE 151
RESISTANCE & DISOBEDIENCE TO A PERSON IN
AUTHORITY OR THE AGENTS OF SUCH PERSON
Elements of resistance & serious disobedience:
1. That a PA or his APA is engaged in the performance of
official duty or gives a lawful order to the offender;
2. That the offender resists or seriously disobeys such
person in authority or his agent; and
3. That the act of the offender is not included in the
provisions of Arts. 148-150.
Elements of simple disobedience:
1. That an APA is engaged in the performance of official
duty or gives a lawful order to the offender;
2. That the offender disobeys such APA; and
3. That such disobedience is not of a serious nature.
Shall resist or seriously disobey
The word seriously is not used to describe resistance,
because if the offender seriously resisted a person in
authority or his agent, the crime is Direct Assault.
CHAPTER FIVE: PUBLIC DISORDERS
(ARTS. 153-156)
ARTICLE 153
TUMULTS & OTHER DISTURBANCES
OF PUBLIC ORDER
Acts punished:
1. Causing any serious disturbance in a public place, office
or establishment;
Note: If disturbance is not serious in nature, alarms and
scandals under Art. 155 is committed.
2. Interrupting or disturbing public performances, functions
or gatherings, or peaceful meetings, if the act is not
 included in Arts. 131-132;
3. Making an outcry tending to incite rebellion or sedition in
any meeting, association or public place;
Note: If outcry was premeditated to incite, the
crime committed is inciting to rebellion or sedition.
4. Displaying placards or emblems which provoke a
disturbance of public order in such place;
5. Burying with pomp the body of a person who has been
legally executed.
Article 153 should be applied.
If the person who disturbs or interrupts the meeting or
religious worship is a public officer, he shall be liable under
Art. 131 or 132.
Tumults and other disturbances can be complexed with
direct assault if the tumults and disturbances of public order
are directed against a PA or APA.

ARTICLE 154
Serious disturbance must be planned or intended. UNLAWFUL USE OF MEANS OF PUBLICATION AND
UNLAWFUL UTTERANCES
Outcry
To shout spontaneously subversive or provocative words Acts punished:
tending to stir up the people so as to obtain by means of 1. Publishing or causing to be published, by means of
force or violence any of the objects of rebellion or sedition. printing, lithography or any other means of publication, as
The outcry must be spontaneous, otherwise it would be news any false news which may endanger the public
the same as inciting to rebellion or sedition. order, or cause damage to the interest or credit of the
State;
Burying with pomp the body of a person Ostentatious
display of a burial. The offender must know that the news is false, to be
liable.
Inciting to Sedition or Public Disorder
Rebellion 2. Encouraging disobedience to the law or to the constituted
authorities or by praising, justifying or extolling any act
The outcry or displaying of The outcry is more or less punished by law, by the same means or by words,
emblems or placards should unconscious outburst utterances or speeches;
have been done with the which, although rebellious
idea aforethought of or seditious in nature, is not The act of the offender of encouraging disobedience to
inducing his hearers or intentionally calculated to the law or the authorities punishable under this paragraph
readers to commit the crime induce others to commit is different from inciting to sedition which requires that the
of rebellion or sedition. rebellion or sedition. people rise publicly.
At the outset, the meeting is At the outset, the meeting
unlawful. is lawful but becomes 3. Maliciously publishing or causing to be published any
unlawful after the outburst official resolution or document without authority, or before
described above. they have been published officially;

4. Printing, publishing or distributing (or causing the same)

The penalty next higher in degree shall be imposed upon books, pamphlets, periodicals, or leaflets which do not
persons causing any disturbance or interruption of a bear the real printers name, or which are classified as
tumultuous character. anonymous.

It is tumultuous if caused by more than three persons who
are armed or provided with the means of violence.
However, this is only a presumption juris tantum, hence if
the disturbance is in fact tumultuous it is immaterial that
there are no such armed persons. Conversely if the
gathering is not in fact tumultuous, it does not matter if there
are such armed persons present on that occasion.
Note: Actual public disorder or actual damage to the
credit of the State is not necessary. The mere possibility
of causing such damage is sufficient.
R.A. No. 248 prohibits the reprinting, reproduction or
republication of government publications and official
documents without previous authority.

If the act of disturbing or interrupting a meeting or religious If the printer/owner of the printing establishment took part
ceremony is not committed by public officers, or if committed in the preparation and publication of the libelous writings
by public officers they are participants therein, he shall be liable under Art. 360.

If the publication is both obscene and anonymous, the
offenses cannot be complexed as they involve different
acts separately punished under this Article and Art. 201
on obscene publications.
ARTICLE 155
ALARMS & SCANDALS
Acts punished:
1. Discharging any firearm, rocket, firecracker, or other
explosive within any town or public place, which produces
alarm or danger.
Note: The discharge of the firearm should not be directed
at a person. Otherwise, the offense committed would be
Discharge of Firearms under Art. 254.
It is the result, not the intent that counts. The act must
produce alarm or danger as a consequence.
The discharge may take place within ones own home
since the law does not distinguish as to where in town.
According to Viada, the discharge of firecrackers and
rockets during fiestas and festivals are not covered by the
law.
2. Instigating or taking an active part in any charivari or
other disorderly meeting offensive to another or
prejudicial to public tranquility.
Charivari
Includes a medley of discordant voices, a mock serenade
of discordant noises made on kettles, tins, horns, etc.
designed to annoy or insult.
The reason for punishing instigating or taking active part
in charivari and other disorderly meeting is to prevent
more serious disorders.
3. Disturbing the public peace while wandering about at
night or while engaged in any other nocturnal
amusements.
4. Causing any disturbance or scandal in public places while
intoxicated or otherwise, provided Art. 153 is not
applicable.
If the disturbance is of a serious nature, the case will fall
under Art. 153.
ARTICLE 156
DELIVERING PRISONERS FROM JAIL
Elements:
1. That there is a person confined in a jail or penal
establishment;
2. That the offender removes therefrom such person, or
helps the escape of such person.
Committed in two ways:
1. By removing a prisoner confined in jail or penal
institution to take away a person from confinement with
or without the active participation of the person released.
2. By helping said person to escape furnish material
means to facilitate escape.
The prisoner may be a detention prisoner or one
sentenced by virtue of a final judgment.
This article applies even if the prisoner is in the hospital or
asylum when he is removed or when the offender helps
his escape, because it is considered as an extension of
the penal institution.
If the offender is a public officer who is actually and
presently in custody or charge of the prisoner, (e.g. a
guard on duty) he is liable for infidelity in the custody of a
prisoner under Art. 223.
But if the crime committed by the prisoner for which he is
confined or serving sentence is treason, murder, or
parricide, the act of taking the place of the prisoner in
prison is that of an accessory under Art. 19, par. 3.
Liability of the prisoner who escapes:
a. If a DETENTION PRISONER, he is NOT criminally
liable.
b. If a CONVICT by FINAL JUDGMENT, he is liable for
evasion of service of his sentence (Art. 157).
If the delivery of the prisoner was committed through
bribery:
a. The BRIBER commits corruption of a public officer
(Art. 212) and delivering prisoners from jail.
b. The JAILER, if a public officer, commits infidelity in the
custody of prisoners (Art. 223) and bribery (Art. 210).
c. The PRISONER commits evasion of service of
sentence (Art. 157) if he is already convicted by final
judgment.
 Delivering Prisoners Infidelity in the Escape
from Jail Custody of Prisoners Flee from; to avoid; to get out of the way, as to flee to avoid
arrest (Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th ed., p. 640).
Offender: usually Offender: public officer
committed by an who had the prisoner in ARTICLE 158
outsider. It may also his custody or charge EVASION OF SERVICE OF SENTENCE ON THE
apply to an employee of who was in connivance
OCCASION OF DISORDERS, CONFLAGRATIONS,
the penal establishment, with the prisoner in the
EARTHQUAKES, OR OTHER CALAMITIES
provided he does not latters escape
have custody or charge Elements:
of such person. 1. That the offender is a convict by final judgment, and is
Prisoner: May be a convict or a detainee confined in a penal institution;
2. That there is disorder, resulting from:
a. Conflagration,
CHAPTER SIX: EVASION OF SERVICE b. Earthquake,
OF SENTENCE c. Explosion,
(ARTS. 157-159) d. Similar catastrophe,
e. Mutiny in which he has not participated;
ARTICLE 157 3. That the offender leaves the penal institution where he is
confined, on the occasion of such disorder or during the
EVASION OF SERVICE OF SENTENCE
mutiny;
4. That the offender fails to give himself up to the authorities
Elements:
within 48 hrs. following the issuance of a proclamation by
1. That the offender is a convict by final judgment;
the Chief Executive announcing the passing away of such
2. That he is serving his sentence, which consists in
calamity.
deprivation of liberty;
3. That he evades the service of his sentence by escaping What is punished is not the leaving of the penal institution,
during the term of his sentence. but the failure of the convict to give himself up to the
authorities within 48 hours after the proclamation
Circumstances qualifying the offense: announcing the passing away of the calamity.
If such evasion or escape takes place:
1. By means of unlawful entry (this should be by scaling); If the offender fails to give himself up, he shall suffer an
2. By breaking doors, windows, gates, walls, roofs or floors; increase of 1/5 of the time still remaining to be served under
3. By using picklocks, false keys, disguise, deceit, the original sentence, which shall not exceed 6 months. If
violence, or intimidation; the offender gives himself up, he is entitled to a deduction of
4. Through connivance with other convicts or employees of 1/5 of his original sentence.
the penal institution.
The following cannot commit evasion of service of sentence: Mutiny in this article implies an organized unlawful
a. Accused who escapes during appeal or a detention resistance to a superior officer; a sedition; a revolt (People
prisoner vs. Padilla, C.A., 46 O.G. 2151).
b. Minor delinquents
c. Deportees If one partakes in the mutiny, he will be liable for the
offenses which he committed during the mutiny whether or
not he returns.
If the accused escaped while the sentence of conviction was ARTICLE 159
under appeal, he is not liable under Article 157, the OTHER CASES OF EVASION OF SENTENCE
judgment not having become final, and this is true even if his
(CONDITIONAL PARDON)
appeal was later dismissed because he had escaped
(Curiano vs. Court of First Instance, G.R. L-8104, April 15,
Elements:
1955). 1. That the offender was a convict;
2. That he was granted a conditional pardon by the Chief
Persons convicted under this Article are disqualified from
Executive; and
the benefits of the Indeterminate Sentence Law.
3. That he violated any of the conditions of such pardon.
Violation of conditional pardon is a distinct crime. (This is
according to Reyes);
According to Regalado, however, there are actually two
views:
a. One is expressed in People v. Jose (75 Phil. 612)
which states that it is not a distinct crime, since the
penalty is only the recommitment of the convict to
serve the portion of the sentence remitted by the
pardon; hence it is only a continuation of the original
case.
b. The other view which is the more logical one is
expressed in People v. Martin (68 Phil. 122) which
states that since the code imposes a specific penalty
of prision correccional in its minimum period if the
unserved portion is less than six years, it is therefore a
distinct crime.
A conditional pardon is a contract between the Chief
Executive who grants the pardon and the convict who
accepts it.
Offender can be arrested and reincarcerated without trial
in accordance with Sec. 64(I) of the Revised
Administrative Code.
The condition imposed upon the prisoner that he should
not commit another crime, extends to offenses
punishable by special laws.
Offender must be found guilty of the subsequent offense
before he can be prosecuted under Art 159.
The court cannot require the convict to serve the
unexpired portion of the original sentence if it does not
exceed six years, the remedy is left to the President
who has the authority to recommit him to serve the
unexpired portion of his original sentence.
The period when convict was at liberty is not deducted in
case he is recommitted.
Violation of Evasion of Service of
Conditional Pardon Sentence
Infringes the terms of the Defeats the purpose of
contract. the law.
Does not affect public Disturbs public order.
order.
TITLE FOUR: CRIMES AGAINST
PUBLIC INTEREST
CHAPTER SEVEN: COMMISSION OF
ANOTHER CRIME DURING SERVICE OF
PENALTY IMPOSED FOR ANOTHER
PREVIOUS OFFENSE
ARTICLE 160
COMMISSION OF ANOTHER CRIME DURING THE
SERVICE OF PENALTY IMPOSED FOR ANOTHER
PREVIOUS OFFENSE (QUASI-RECIDIVISM)
Elements:
1. That the offender was already convicted by final judgment
of one offense;
2. That he committed a new felony before beginning to
serve such sentence or while serving the same.
A quasi-recidivist can be pardoned:
1. At the age of 70, if he shall have already served out his
original sentence (and not a habitual criminal); or
2. When he shall have completed it after reaching the said
age, unless by reason of his conduct or other
circumstances, he shall not be worthy of such clemency.
In reiteracion, the offender against whom it is considered
shall already have served out his sentence for the prior
offenses.
Quasi-recidivism is a SPECIAL AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCE which cannot be offset by ordinary
mitigating circumstances.
First crime for which the offender is serving sentence
need not be a felony; but the second crime must be a
felony.
The word another in Article 160 does not mean that the
new felony which is committed by a person already
serving sentence is different from the crime for which he
is serving sentence.
Only considered as final judgment when the accused
does not appeal anymore.
Quasi-recidivism does not require that the offense for
which the convict is serving and the new felony
committed be embraced in the same title of the RPC.
While in recidivism, both the first and the second
offenses must be embraced in the same title of the RPC.

SECTION 1: FORGING THE SEAL OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, THE
SIGNATURE OR STAMP OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE.
ARTICLE 161
COUNTERFEITING SEAL OF GOVERNMENT,
SIGNATURE AND STAMP OF PRESIDENT
Acts Punished:
1. Forging the Great Seal of the Government of the
Philippines;
2. Forging the signature of the President;
3. Forging the stamp of the President.
If the signature of the President is forged, it is not
falsification of public document, but forging the signature
of the Chief Executive.
ARTICLE 162
USE OF FORGED SIGNATURE, COUNTERFEIT
SEAL OR STAMP
Elements:
1. That the seal of the Republic was counterfeited, or the
signature or stamp of the Chief Executive was forged by
another person;
2. That the offender knew of the counterfeiting or forgery;
and
3. That he used the counterfeit seal or forged signature or
stamp.
The offender must NOT be the forger otherwise the crime
committed is forgery under Art. 161.
In using the forged signature or stamp of the President or
forged seal, the participation of the offender is in
effect that of an accessory. Although the general rule is
that he should be punished by a penalty two (2)
degrees lower, under Article 162 he is punished by a
penalty only one degree lower.
SECTION TWO:
COUNTERFEITING COINS
ARTICLE 163
MAKING AND IMPORTING AND UTTERING FALSE
COINS
Elements:
1. That there be false or counterfeited coins;
2. That the offender either made, imported or uttered such
coins; and
3. That in case of uttering such false or counterfeited
coins, he connived with the counterfeiters or importers.
A coin is false or counterfeited, if it is forged or if it is not
authorized by the Government as legal tender, regardless of
its intrinsic value.
Counterfeiting
Means the imitation of a legal or genuine coin.
There is counterfeiting when a spurious coin is made. There
must be an imitation of the peculiar design of a genuine
coin.
Uttering
Means to pass counterfeited coins
Uttering includes delivery or the act of giving them away.
It is uttered when it is paid even though the utterer may not
obtain the gain he intended.
Kinds of coins the counterfeiting of which is punished:
1. Silver coins of the Philippines or coin of the Central
Bank;
2. Coin of the minor coinage of the Philippines or the
Central Bank;
3. Coin of the currency of a foreign country.
Former coins withdrawn from circulation may be
counterfeited.
Pars. 1 and 2 of Art. 163 mention coin without any
qualifications.
As regards par. 3, the use of the word currency is not
correct because the Spanish text uses the word
moneda which embraces not only those that are legal
tender but also those out of circulation.
ARTICLE 164
MUTILATION OF COINS IMPORTATION AND
UTTERANCE OF MUTILATED COINS
Acts punished:
1. Mutilating coins of the legal currency, with the intent to
damage or to defraud another;
2. Importing or uttering such mutilated coins, with the
further requirement that there must be connivance with
the mutilator or importer in case of uttering.
The coin must be of legal tender or current coins of the
Philippines and not of a foreign country.
Mutilation
Means to take off part of the metal either by filing it or
substituting it for another metal of inferior quality. It is to
diminish by ingenious means the metal in the coin, and thus
diminish its intrinsic value.
ARTICLE 165
SELLING OF FALSE OR MUTILATED COIN, WITHOUT
CONNIVANCE
Acts Punished:
1. Possession of coin, counterfeited or mutilated by another
with intent to utter the same knowing that it is false or
mutilated;
Elements:
a. Possession;
b. With intent to utter; and
c. Knowledge.
2. Actually uttering false or mutilated coin, knowing it to be
false or mutilated.
Elements:
a. Actually uttering; and
b. Knowledge.
It does NOT require that the false coin is legal tender. But
if the coin being uttered or possessed with intent to utter
is a mutilated coin, it must be a legal tender coin.
The possession prohibited in Art. 165 is possession in
general, that is, not only actual, physical possession but
also constructive possession or the subjection of the thing
to ones control, otherwise offenders could easily evade
the law by the mere expedient of placing other persons in
actual, physical possession of the thing although retaining
constructive possession or actual control thereof (People
vs. Andrada, 11 C.A. Rep. 147).
Actually uttering false or mutilated coin, knowing it to be
false or mutilated, is a crime under Art. 165, even if the
offender was not in connivance with the counterfeiter or
mutilator.
SECTION THREE: FORGING TREASURY OR BANK
NOTES, OBLIGATIONS AND SECURITIES;
IMPORTING AND UTTERING FALSE OR FORGED
NOTES, OBLIGATIONS AND SECURITIES
ARTICLE 166
FORGING TREASURY OR BANK NOTES OR OTHER
DOCUMENTS PAYABLE TO BEARER; IMPORTING
AND UTTERING THE SAME
Acts punished:
1. Forging or falsification of treasury or bank notes or other
documents payable to bearer;
Forging
Committed by giving to a treasury or bank note or any
instrument payable to bearer or to order the appearance
of a true and genuine document.
Falsification
Committed by erasing, substituting, counterfeiting, or
altering by any means, the figures, letters, words, or signs
contained therein (Art. 169).
2. Importation of the same: it means to bring them into the
Philippines, which presupposes that the obligations or
notes are forged or falsified in a foreign country.
3. Uttering the same in connivance with forgers or importers:
it means offering obligations or notes knowing them to be
false or forged, whether such offer is accepted or not, with
a representation, by words or actions, that they are
genuine and with an intent to defraud.
What may be forged or falsified under Article 166:
1. Treasury or bank notes;
2. Certificates;
3. Other obligations and securities, payable to bearer.
The Code punishes forging or falsification of bank notes
and of documents of credit payable to bearer and issued
by the State more severely than counterfeiting of coins
because the first tends to bring such documents into
discredit and produces a lack of confidence on the part of
the holders of the said documents to the prejudice of the
interests of the society and the State. Moreover, it is
easier to forge or falsify such certificates, notes, etc. and
the profit derived therefrom is greater and the incentive for
its commission is more powerful. (U.S. vs. Gardner 3 Phil
403)
The falsification of Philippine National Bank (PNB) checks
is not forgery under Art. 166 of RPC but falsification of
commercial documents under Art 172 in connection with
Art. 171 of the Code.
ARTICLE 167
COUNTERFEITING, IMPORTING AND UTTERING
INSTRUMENTS NOT
PAYABLE TO BEARER
Elements:
1. That there be an instrument payable to order or other
document of credit NOT payable to bearer;
2. That the offender either forged, imported or uttered such
instrument; and
3. That in case of uttering, he connived with the importer or
forger.
 2. By erasing, substituting, counterfeiting, or altering by any
Counterfeiting under Art. 167 must involve an instrument means the figures, letters, words or signatures contained
payable to order or other document of credit not payable to therein.
bearer.
PD 247 penalizes defacement, mutilation, tearing, burning
Forgery of currency is punished so as to maintain the or destroying of Central Bank notes and coins.
integrity of the currency and thus insure the credit standing
of the government and prevent the imposition on the public It includes falsification and counterfeiting.
and the government of worthless notes or obligations
(People vs. Galano, C.A.,54 O.G. 5897, as cited in Reyes). Forgery Falsification
As used in Art. 169 refers The commission of any of
to the falsification and the eight (8) acts
The utterer should not be the forger, otherwise, connivance counterfeiting of treasury or mentioned in Art. 171 on
is obviously not required, for he can be held liable as a bank notes or any legislative (only the act of
forger of the instrument. (People vs. Orqueza, 14 C.A. Rep. instruments payable to the making alteration), public
730, as cited in Reyes) bearer or to order. or official, commercial, or
private documents, or
ARTICLE 168 wireless, or telegraph
ILLEGAL POSSESSION AND USE OF messages.
FALSE TREASURY OR BANK NOTES AND OTHER
INSTRUMENTS OF CREDIT ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT
R.A. No. 9194
Elements:
1. That the treasury or bank note or certificate or other Money laundering
obligation and securities payable to bearer or any Is a crime whereby the proceeds of an unlawful activity as
instrument payable to order or other document of credit herein defined are transacted, thereby making them appear
not payable to bearer is forged or falsified by another; to have originated from legitimate sources. It is
2. That the offender knows that any of these instruments is committed by the following:
forged or falsified; a. Any person knowing that any monetary instrument or
3. That he performs any of these acts: property represents, involves, or relates to, the proceeds
a. Using any of such forged or falsified instruments; or of any unlawful activity, transacts or attempts to transact
b. Possessing with intent to use, any of the forged or said monetary instrument or property.
falsified documents. b. Any person knowing that any monetary instrument or
property involves the proceeds of any unlawful activity,
Possession of false treasury or bank notes alone is not a performs or fails to perform any act as a result of which
criminal offense. For it to constitute an offense, possession he falicitates the offense of money laundering referred
must be with intent to use said false treasury or bank notes to in paragraph (a) above.
(People vs. Digoro, G.R. No. L-22032, March 4, 1966). c. Any person knowing that any monetary instrument or
property is required under this Act to be disclosed and
filed with the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC),
The accused must have knowledge of the forged character fails to do so" (Sec 4).
of the note.
Covered transaction'
A person in possession of falsified document and who It is a transaction in cash or other equivalent monetary
makes use of the same is presumed to be the material instrument involving a total amount in excess of Five
author of falsification. hundred thousand pesos (PhP 500,000.00) within one (1)
banking day (Sec 1).
ARTICLE 169
HOW FORGERY IS COMMMITTED Suspicious transaction
Are transactions with covered institutions, regardless of the
How committed: amounts involved, where any of the following circumstances
1. By giving to a treasury or bank note or any instrument exist:
payable to bearer or to order the appearance of a true 1. there is no underlying legal or trade obligation, purpose or
and genuine document; economic justification;
2. the client is not properly identified;
3. the amount involved is not commensurate with the
business or financial capacity of the client;
4. taking into account all known circumstances, it may be
perceived that the client's transaction is structured in
order to avoid being the subject of reporting
requirements under the Act;
5. any circumstances relating to the transaction which is
observed to deviate from the profile of the client and/or
the client's past transactions with the covered institution;
6. the transactions is in a way related to an unlawful activity
or offense under this Act that is about to be, is
being or has been committed; or
7. any transactions that is similar or analogous to any of
the foregoing (Sec 2).
Unlawful activity refers to any act or omission or series
or combination thereof involving or having direct relation
to following:
a. Kidnapping for ransom under Article 267 of Act No.
3815, otherwise known as the Revised Penal Code,
as amended;
b. Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of
Republic Act No. 9165, otherwise known as the
Comprehensive Dangerous Act of 2002;
c. Section 3 paragraphs B, C, E, G, H and I of republic
Act No. 3019, as amended, otherwise known as the
Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act;
d. Plunder under Republic Act No. 7080, as amended;
e. Robbery and extortion under Articles 294, 295, 296,
299, 300, 301 and 302 of the Revised Penal Code, as
amended;
f. Jueteng and Masiao punished as illegal gambling
under Presidential Decree No. 1602;
g. Piracy on the high seas under the Revised Penal
Code, as amended and Presidential under the
Revised Penal Code, as amended and Presidential
Decree No. 532;
h. Qualified theft under Article 310 of the Revised Penal
Code, as amended;
i. Swindling under Article 315 of the Revised PenalCode,
as amended;
j. Smuggling under Republic Act Nos. 455 and 1937;
k. Violations under Republic Act No. 8792, otherwise
known as the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000;
l. Hijacking and other violations under Republic Act
No. 6235; destructive arson and murder, as defined
under the Revised Penal Code, as amended,
including those perpetrated by terrorists against non-
combatant persons and similar targets;
m. Fraudulent practices and other violations under
Republic Act No. 8799, otherwise known as the
Securities Regulation Code of 2000;
n. Felonies or offenses of a similar nature that are
punishable under the penal laws of other countries
(Sec 3).
SECTION FOUR: FALSIFICATION OF LEGISLATIVE,
PUBLIC, COMMERCIAL AND PRIVATE DOCUMENTS
AND WIRELESS, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE
MESSAGES
ARTICLE 170
FALSIFICATION OF LEGISLATIVE DOCUMENTS
Elements:
1. That there be a bill, resolution or ordinance enacted or
approved or pending approval by either House of the
Legislature or any provincial board or municipal council;
2. The offender alters the same;
3. That he has no proper authority therefor; and
4. That alteration changed the meaning of the document.
The bill, resolution, or ordinance must be genuine.
Offender may be private individual or a public officer.
The act of falsification is limited to altering that which
changes its meaning. Hence, other acts of falsification,
even in legislative documents, are punished either in Art.
171 or under Art. 172.
R.A. 248 prohibits the reprinting, reproduction or
republication of government publications and official
documents without previous authority.
ARTICLE 171
FALSIFICATION BY PUBLIC OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR
NOTARY OR ECCLESIASTICAL MINISTER
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer, employee or notary
public or ecclesiastical minister;
The ecclesiastical minister is liable under this article if he
shall commit any of the acts of falsification with respect to
any record or document of such character that its
falsification may affect the civil status of persons.
2. That he takes advantage of his official position when:
a. He has the duty to make or prepare or otherwise
intervene in the preparation of the document;
b. He has the official custody of the document which he
falsifies.
If he did not take advantage of his official position, he
would be guilty of falsification of public document by a
private individual under Art. 172.
3. The offender falsifies a document.
Document
It is any written statement by which a right is established or
an obligation extinguished or by which a fact may be
proven or affirmed.
The document must be complete or at least it must have the
appearance of a true and genuine document.
The document must be of apparent legal efficacy.
In the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 7th (second part) and 8th mode of
falsification, there must be a GENUINE DOCUMENT.
In the other paragraphs of Art. 171, falsification may be
committed by simulating or fabricating a document.
Different Modes of Falsifying a Document:
A. Counterfeiting or imitating (feigning) any
handwriting, signature or rubric.
Requisites:
1. That there be an intent to imitate or an attempt to
imitate; and
2. The two signatures or handwritings, the genuine and
the forged bear some resemblance to each other.
Counterfeiting
Imitating any handwriting, signature or rubric
Imitating (feigning)
Simulating a signature, handwriting, or rubric out of one
which does not in fact exist
If there is no attempt whatsoever by the accused to
imitate the signatures of the other person so that they are
entirely unlike the genuine signature, the accused may be
found guilty under the second mode of falsifying a
document.
B.Causing it to appear that persons have participated in
an act or proceeding when they did not in fact so
participate.
Requisites:
1. That the offender caused it to appear in a document that
a person or persons participated in an act or proceeding;
and
2. That such persons did not in fact so participate in the act
or proceeding.
The imitation of the signature of the offended party is not
necessary in this mode of falsification.
C.Attributing to persons who have participated in any
act or proceeding statements other than those in fact
made by them.
Requisites:
1. That a person or persons participated in an act or
proceeding;
2. That such person or persons made statements in that
act or proceeding;
3. That the offender in making a document, attributed to
such person, statements other than those in fact made
by such person or persons.
D.Making untruthful statements in a narration of facts.
Requisites:
1. That the offender makes in a document statements in a
narration of facts;
2. That he has the legal obligation to disclose the truth
of the facts narrated by him;
3. That the facts narrated by the offender are absolutely
false; and
4. That the perversion of truth in the narration of facts was
made with the wrongful intent of injuring a third
person.
There must be narration of facts, not a conclusion of law.
Legal obligation means that there is a law requiring the
disclosure of the facts narrated.
The facts must be absolutely false. The crime of
falsification is not violated if there is some colorable truth
in the statements of the accused.
Wrongful intent not essential when the document falsified
is public document.
If the narration of facts is contained in an affidavit or a
statement required by law to be sworn to, the crime
committed is perjury.
The person making the narration of facts must be aware
of the falsity of the facts narrated by him (Reyes, p. 225).
E.Altering true dates.
Date must be essential.
The alteration of the date or dates in a document must
affect either the veracity of the document or the effects
thereof.

Alteration of dates in official receipts to prevent discovery
of malversation is falsification.
F. Making alteration or intercalation in a genuine
document which changes its meaning.
Requisites:
1. That there be an alteration (change) or intercalation
(insertion) on a document;
2. That it was made on a genuine document;
If the document is not genuine, the crime of estafa is
committed.
3. That the alteration or intercalation has changed the
meaning of the document;
4. That the change made the document speak something
false.
Alteration which speaks the truth is not falsification. The
idea of deception is inherent in the word alteration of
making the instrument speak something which the parties
did not intend it to speak.
G.Issuing in an authenticated form a document
purporting to be a copy of an original document
when no such original exists or including in such a
copy a statement contrary to or different from that of
the genuine original.
CANNOT be committed by a private individual or by a
notary public or public officer who DOES NOT take
advantage of his official position.
Intent to gain or prejudice is not necessary, because it is
the interest of the community which is intended to be
guaranteed by the strict faithfulness of the officials
charged with the preparation and preservation of the acts
in which they intervene.
H.Intercalating any instrument or note relative to the
issuance thereof in a protocol, registry or official
book.
ARTICLE 172
FALSIFICATION BY PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS AND USE
OF FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS
Acts punished:
1. Falsification of public, official or commercial
document by a private individual.
Elements:
a. The offender is a private individual or a public officer or
employee who did not take advantage of his official
position; and
b. That he committed any of the acts of falsification
enumerated in Art.171 (Pars.1-6);
c. That the falsification was committed in a public or
official or commercial document.
Public document
A document created, executed or issued by a public
official in response to the exigencies of the public service,
or in the execution of which a public official intervened;
any instrument authorized by a notary public or a
competent public official, with the solemnities required by
law.
Official document
A document which is issued by a public official in the
exercise of the functions of his office.
Commercial document
Any document defined and regulated by the Code of
Commerce or any other commercial laws.
2. Falsification of private document by any person.
Elements:
a. That the offender committed any of the acts of
falsification, except those in par. 7, enumerated in
Art.171;
b. That the falsification was committed in a private
document;
c. That the falsification caused damage to a third party or
at least the falsification was committed with the
intent to cause such damage.
Private document
A deed or instrument executed by a private person without
the intervention of a notary public or other person legally
authorized, by which document some disposition or
agreement is proved, evidenced or set forth.
Mere falsification of private document is not enough. Two
things are required:
i. He must have falsified the same; and
ii. He must have performed an independent act which
operates to the prejudice of third persons.
Damage need not be material, damage to ones honor is
included.
There is no crime of estafa through falsification of a private
document because the immediate effect of falsification of
private document is the same as that of estafa.
Generally, falsification is consummated when the genuine
document is altered or the moment the false document is
executed. It is immaterial that the offender did not achieve Falsification of
his objective. Falsification by
Public Officer
Private Individual
3. Use of falsified documents. The prejudice to a third Prejudice to third person
Elements: party is taken into is immaterial; what is
a. Introducing in a judicial proceeding account so that if punished is the violation
i. That the offender knew that the document was damage is not apparent, of public faith and the
falsified by another person; or at least if with no perversion of truth
ii. That the false document was embraced in Art. 171 intent to cause it, the
or in any of subdivision No.1 or 2 of Art. 172; falsification is not
iii. That he introduced said document in evidence in any punishable
judicial proceeding.
Note: No damage is required. There is no falsification of private document through
reckless imprudence.
b. Use in any other transaction
i. That the offender knew that the document was Falsification is consummated the moment the genuine
falsified by another person; document is altered or the moment the false document is
ii. That the false document was embraced in Art. 171 executed. It is immaterial that the offender did not achieve
or in any of subdivision No. 1 or 2 of Art. 172; his objective.
iii. That he used such document (not in judicial
proceeding); ARTICLE 173
iv. That the use of the false document caused damage FALSIFICATION OF WIRELESS, CABLE, TELEGRAPH
to another or at least it was used with intent to AND TELEPHONE MESSAGES AND USE OF SAID
cause damage. FALSIFIED MESSAGES

Note: Acts punished:

If a person knowingly offers in evidence a FALSE 1. Uttering fictitious wireless, telegraph, or telephone
WITNESS OR TESTIMONY, Art. 184 should apply. messages;
2. Falsifying wireless, telegraph or telephone messages.
If a person makes, presents or uses any record, Elements:
document, paper or object with knowledge of its falsity a. That the offender is an officer or employee of the
and with intent to affect the course or outcome of the Government or an officer or an employee of a private
investigation of, or official proceedings IN CRIMINAL corporation, engaged in the service of sending or
CASES, such person is liable under PD 1829. receiving wireless, cable or telephone message; and
b. That he commits any of the above acts.
Falsification of Falsification of
Public/Official or Private Document 3. Using such falsified messages.
Commercial Document With respect to No. 3, the offender need not be
When committed as a Even when connected to the government or to such corporation.
necessary means to committed as a Elements:
commit estafa, complex necessary means to a. That the accused knew that the wireless, cable,
crime is committed commit estafa, the telegraph or telephone message was falsified by any
crime is either estafa person specified in 1st paragraph of Art.173;
or falsification only, b. That the accused used such falsified dispatch; and
because in this type c. That the use of the falsified dispatch resulted in the
of falsification, an act prejudice of a third party, or that the use thereof was
independent of with the intent to cause such prejudice.
falsification is
required to show Act No. 1851, Sec. 4, punishes private individuals who
intent to defraud forge or alter telegram.

SECTION FIVE: FALSIFICATION OF MEDICAL
CERTIFICATES, CERTIFICATES OF MERIT OR
SERVICE AND THE LIKE
ARTICLE 174
FALSE MEDICAL CERTIFICATES, FALSE
CERTIFICATES OF MERIT OR SERVICE
Persons liable:
1. Physician or surgeon who, in connection with the
practice of his profession, issued a false certificate; The
crime is False Medical Certificate by a physician.
Public officer who issued a false certificate of merit or
service, good conduct or similar circumstances;
2. The crime is False Certificate of Merit or Service by a
public officer.
3. Private individual who falsified a certificate falling in the
classes mentioned in Nos. 1 and 2.
The crime is False Medical Certificate by a private individual
or False Certificate of Merit or Service by a private
individual.
Certificate
Is any writing by which testimony is given that a fact has or
has not taken place.
The phrase or similar circumstances in Art. 174 does not
seem to cover property, because the circumstance
contemplated must be similar to merit, service, or good
conduct.
ARTICLE 175
USING FALSE CERTIFICATES
Elements:
1. That a false certificate mentioned in the preceding article
was issued;
2. That the offender knew that the certificate was false; and
3. That he used the same.
When the false certificates in the preceding article is used in
a judicial proceeding, Art. 175 will apply. The use of false
document in judicial proceeding under Art 172 is limited to
those false documents mentioned in Arts. 171 and 172.
SECTION SIX: MANUFACTURING, IMPORTING AND
POSSESSION OF INSTRUMENTS OR IMPLEMENTS
INTENDED FOR THE COMMISSION OF
FALSIFICATION
ARTICLE 176
MANUFACTURING AND POSSESSION OF
INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLEMENTS FOR
FALSIFICATION
Acts punished:
1. Making or introducing into the Philippines any stamps,
dies, marks, or other instruments or implements for
counterfeiting or falsification;
2. Possessing with intent to use the instruments or
implements for counterfeiting or falsification made in or
introduced into the Philippines by another person.
It is not necessary that the implements confiscated form a
complete set for counterfeiting, it being enough that they
may be employed by themselves or together with other
implements to commit the crime of counterfeiting or
falsification.
Arts. 165 and 176 punish not only actual, physical
possession, but also constructive possession or the
subjection of the thing to ones control.
CHAPTER TWO: OTHER FALSITIES
(ARTS. 177- 184)
SECTION ONE: USURPATION OF AUTHORITY, RANK,
TITLE AND IMPROPER USE OF NAMES, UNIFORMS
AND INSIGNIA
ARTICLE 177
USURPATION OF AUTHORITY
OR OFFICIAL FUNCTIONS
Two offenses contemplated in Art. 177:
1. Usurpation of authority
2. Usurpation of official functions
How committed:
1. By knowingly misrepresenting oneself to be an officer,
agent or representative of the Government, whether local,
national or foreign;
Note: In usurpation of authority, the mere act of
knowingly and falsely representing oneself to be an
officer, etc. is sufficient. It is not necessary that he
performs an act pertaining to a public officer.
2. By performing any act pertaining to a person in authority
or public officer of the Government under the pretense of
official position and without authority.
Note: In usurpation of official functions, it is essential that
the offender should have performed an act pertaining to
a person in authority or public officer, in
 addition to other requirements.
Using Fictitious Name Concealing True Name
Usurper is one who introduces himself into an office that
is vacant, or who without color of title, ousts the Element of publicity must be Element of publicity is not
incumbent and assumes to act as an officer by expressing present. necessary.
some of the functions of the office (People vs. Buenaflor,
The purpose is either to The purpose is merely to
C.A., 72 O.G. 364, as cited in Reyes).
conceal a crime, to evade the conceal identity.
execution of a judgment, or to
It may be violated by a public officer.
cause damage.
It does not apply to an occupant under color of title.
Using Usurpa- Estafa Using
Republic Act No. 75 provides penalty for usurping Fictitious tion of (par. Fictitious
authority of diplomatic, consular or other official of a Name (Art. Civil 2a, Art. Name Under
foreign government in addition to the penalty imposed by 178) Status 315) P.D. 1829
the RPC. (Art. 348)
Purpose of Purpose Purpose Purpose of
There must be a positive, express, and explicit the offender is to enjoy is to publicly using a
representation on the part of the offender. is to (a) the rights defraud fictitious name
conceal a arising third is to conceal a
The acts performed must pertain to: crime; (b) from the persons crime, evade
1. The Government evade the civil status prosecution or
2. To any person in authority execution of of the the execution
3. To any public officer a judgment; person of a judgment
or (c) to imperson- or concealing
ARTICLE 178 cause ated. his true name
USING FICTITIOUS NAME AND damage to and other
CONCEALING TRUE NAME public personal
interest. circumstances
Elements: (Using Fictitious Name) for the same
1. That the offender uses a name other than his real name; purpose or
2. That he uses that fictitious name publicly; and purposes
3. That the purpose of the offender is
a. To conceal a crime; The crimes under this Article may be complexed with the
b. To evade the execution of a judgment; or crime of delivering prisoners from jail, but may not be
c. To cause damage to public interest. complexed with evasion of service of sentence.

COMMONWEALTH ACT NO. 142,

Damage must be to public interest. If damage is to
private interest, the crime will be estafa under Art. 315,
2(a).
Signing fictitious name in an application for passport is
publicly using such fictitious name (U.S. vs. To Lee Piu,
G.R. No. 11522, September 26, 1916).
Elements: (Concealing True Name)
1. That the offender conceals:
a. His true name, AND
b. All other personal circumstances;
2. That the purpose is only to conceal his identity.
Fictitious name
Any other name which a person publicly applies to himself
without authority of law.
as amended by REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6085
An Act Regulating the Use of Aliases
General rule: No person shall use any name different from
the one with which he was registered at birth in the office of
the local civil registry, or with which he was registered in the
Bureau of Immigration upon entry, or such substitute name
as may have been authorized by a competent court.
Exception: As pseudonym solely for literary, cinema,
television, radio or other entertainment purposes and in
athletic events where the use of pseudonym is a normally
accepted practice.
Any person desiring to use an alias shall apply for
authority therefor in proceedings like those legally provided
to obtain judicial authority for a change of name.
No person shall be allowed to secure such judicial authority
for more than one alias.
The petition for an alias shall set forth:
1. The persons baptismal and family name and the name
recorded in the civil registry, if different, his immigrants
name, if an alien, and his pseudonym, if he has such
names other than his original or real name,
2. The reason or reasons for the use of the desired alias.
The judicial authority for the use of alias, the Christian
name and the aliens immigrant name shall be recorded in
the proper local civil registry, and no person shall use any
name or names other than his original or real name
unless the same is or are duly recorded in the proper
local civil registry.
No person having been baptized with a name different
from that with which he was registered at birth in a local
civil registry, or in case of an alien, registered in the
Bureau of Immigration upon entry, or any person who
obtained judicial authority to use an alias, or who uses a
pseudonym, shall represent himself in any public or
private transaction or shall sign or execute any public or
private document without stating or affixing his real or
original name and all names or aliases or pseudonym he
is or may have been authorized to use.
ARTICLE 179
ILLEGAL USE OF UNIFORMS OR INSIGNIA
Elements:
1. That the offender makes use of insignia, uniform or dress;
2. That the insignia, uniform or dress pertains to an office
not held by the offender or to a class of persons of which
he is not a member; and
3. That said insignia, uniform or dress is used publicly and
improperly.
Wearing the uniform of an imaginary office is NOT
punishable. The office must actually exist.
An EXACT IMITATION of a uniform or dress is
UNNECESSARY.
Republic Act No. 493 punishes the wearing of insignia,
badge or emblem of rank of the members of the Armed
Forces of the Philippines or Constabulary.
Republic Act No. 75 punishes the unauthorized wearing of
any naval, military, police or other official uniform,
decoration or regalia of a foreign State or one nearly
resembling the same, with intent to deceive or mislead.
Executive Order No. 297 punishes the illegal manufacture,
sale, distribution and use of PNP uniforms, insignias and
other accoutrements.
SECTION TWO: FALSE TESTIMONY
False testimony
It is committed by any person who, being under oath, and
required to testify as to the truth of a certain matter at a
hearing before a competent authority, shall deny the truth or
say something contrary to it.
Three forms of false testimony
1. False Testimony in Criminal Cases (Arts. 180-181)
2. False Testimony in Civil Cases (Art. 182)
3. False Testimony in other cases (Art. 183)
ARTICLE 180
FALSE TESTIMONY AGAINST A DEFENDANT
Elements:
1. That there be a criminal proceeding;
2. That the offender testifies falsely under oath against the
defendant therein;
3. That the offender who gives false testimony knows that it
is false;
Good faith is a defense
4. That the defendant against whom the false testimony is
given is either acquitted or convicted in a final judgment.
Penalty depends upon the sentence of the defendant
against whom false testimony was given.
Defendant must be sentenced to at least a correctional
penalty or a fine, or must be acquitted.
The offender is liable even if his testimony was not
considered by court. The law intends to punish the mere
giving of false testimony.
The testimony must be complete.
Art. 180 applies to Special Penal Laws because Special
Penal Laws follow the nomenclature of the RPC.
ARTICLE 181
FALSE TESTIMONY FAVORABLE
TO THE DEFENDANT
The false testimony in favor of the defendant need not ARTICLE 183
directly influence the decision of the acquittal and it need not PERJURY
benefit the defendant.
Two ways of committing perjury:
Conviction or acquittal of defendant in principal case is not 1. By falsely testifying under oath;
necessary. 2. By making a false affidavit.

False testimony is punished not because of the effect it
actually produces but because of its tendency to favor or to
prejudice the defendant.
A defendant who falsely testifies in his own behalf in a
criminal case can only be guilty of Art. 181 when he
voluntarily goes upon the witness stand and falsely imputes
to some other person the commission of a grave offense. If
he merely denies the commission of the crime or his
participation therein, he should not be prosecuted for false
testimony (U.S. vs. Soliman, G.R. No. L-11555, January 6,
1917).
Testimony must be complete. Rectification made
spontaneously after realizing the mistake is not false
testimony.
ARTICLE 182
FALSE TESTIMONY IN
CIVIL CASES
Falsely testifying under oath must NOT be in a judicial
proceeding.
Testimony must be complete.
Elements:
1. That the accused made a statement under oath or
executed an affidavit upon a material matter;
2. That the statement or affidavit was made before a
competent officer authorized to receive and administer
oath;
3. That in that statement or affidavit, the accused made a
willful and deliberate assertion of a falsehood; and
4. That the sworn statement or affidavit containing the falsity
is required by law.
Note: However, in People v. Angangco (G.R. No. L- 47693,
Oct.12, 1943), the SC held that the statement need not be
required but that it was sufficient if it was AUTHORIZED by
law to be made.

Elements: Material matter

1. That the testimony must be given in a civil case; Is the main fact which is the subject of the inquiry or any
2. That the testimony must relate to the issues presented in circumstance which tends to prove that fact or any fact or
said case; circumstance which tends to corroborate or strengthen the
3. That the testimony must be false; testimony relative to the subject of inquiry, or which
4. That the false testimony must be given by the defendant legitimately affects the credit of any witness who testifies.
knowing it to be false; and
5. That the testimony must be malicious and given with an
intent to affect the issues presented in said case. Material Relevant Pertinent
Art. 182 is NOT applicable when the false testimony is given
in special proceedings. When it is When it tends in When it concerns
directed to any reasonable collateral matters
Civil case prove a fact in degree to which make more
An ordinary suit in a court of justice, by which one party issue. establish the or less probable
prosecutes another for the enforcement or protection of a probability or the proposition at
right, or the prevention or redress of a wrong and that every improbability of a issue.
other remedy is a special proceeding (People vs. fact in issue.
Hernandez 67 O.G. 8330).

The criminal action for false testimony must be suspended

when there is a pending determination of the falsity of the
subject testimonies of private respondents in the civil case
(Ark Travel Express vs. Judge Abrogar; G.R. No. 137010. Oath
August 29, 2003). Any form of attestation by which a person signifies that he is
bound in conscience to perform an act faithfully and
truthfully.
Affidavit
A sworn statement in writing; a declaration in writing, made
upon oath before an authorized magistrate or officer.
Art 183 governs in false testimony given in cases other than
those punished in Arts 180-182, and in actions for perjury.
Good faith or lack of malice is a defense in perjury.
There is no perjury if sworn statement is not material to the
principal matter under investigation.
There is no perjury through negligence or imprudence since
the word knowingly under Article 183 suggests that the
assertion of falsehood must be willful and deliberate.
Two contradictory sworn statements are not sufficient to
convict of perjury. The prosecution must prove which of the
two statements is false, and must show that statement to be
false by other evidence than the contradictory statement.
Competent person authorized to administer oath
A person who has a right to inquire into the questions
presented to him upon matters under his jurisdiction
Subornation of perjury
Is committed by a person who knowingly and willfully
procures another to swear falsely and the witness
suborned does testify under the circumstances rendering
him guilty of perjury.
Subornation of perjury is NOT expressly penalized in the
RPC, but the direct induction of a person by another to
commit a perjury may be punished under Art. 183 in relation
to Art. 17.
ARTICLE 184
OFFERING FALSE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE
Elements:
1. That the offender offered in evidence a false witness or
testimony;
2. That he knew the witness or testimony was false; and
3. That the offer was made in a judicial or official
proceeding.
Art. 184 does not apply when the offender induced a
witness to testify falsely. Art. 184 applies when the offender
knowingly presented a false witness, and the latter testified
falsely.
Testimony must be complete.
Penalty is that for false testimony if committed in a judicial
proceeding and the penalty is that for perjury if committed in
other official proceeding.
CHAPTER THREE:
FRAUDS (ARTS. 185-189)
SECTION ONE: MACHINATIONS, MONOPOLIES, AND
COMBINATIONS
ARTICLE 185
MACHINATIONS IN PUBLIC AUCTIONS
Acts punished:
1. Soliciting any gift or promise as a consideration for
refraining from taking part in any public auction.
Elements:
a. That there be a public auction;
b. That the accused solicited any gift or a promise from
any of the bidders;
c. That such gift or promise was the consideration for
his refraining from taking part in that public auction; and
d. That the accused had the intent to cause the reduction
of the price of the thing auctioned.
Consummated by mere solicitation.
2. Attempting to cause bidders to stay away from an auction
by threats, gifts, promises or any other artifice.
Elements:
a. That there be a public auction;
b. That the accused attempted to cause the buyers to stay
away from that public auction;
c. That it was done by threats, gifts, promises or any other
artifice; and
d. That the accused had the intent to cause the
reduction of the price of the thing auctioned.
Consummated by mere attempt.
ARTICLE 186
MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS
IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
Acts punished:
1. Combination or conspiracy to prevent free competition in
the market.
By entering into any contract or agreement or taking part
in any conspiracy or combination in the form of a trust or
otherwise, in restraint of trade or commerce or to prevent
by artificial means free competition in the market.
2. Monopoly to restrain free competition in the market.
By monopolizing any merchandise or object of trade or
commerce, or by combining with any other person or
persons to monopolize said merchandise or object in
order to alter the prices thereof by spreading false rumors
or making use of any other artifice to restrain free
competition in the market.
3. Making transactions prejudicial to lawful commerce or to
increase the market price of merchandise.
The person liable is the:
a. Manufacturer,
b. Producer,
c. Processor, or
d. Importer of any merchandise or object of commerce.
The crime is committed by (1) combining, (2) conspiring,
or (3) agreeing with any person.
The purpose is (1) to make transactions prejudicial to
lawful commerce, or (2) to increase the market price of
any merchandise or object of commerce manufactured,
produced, processed, assembled or imported into the
Philippines.
Mere conspiracy or combination is punished.
If the offense affects any food substance or other particles
of prime necessity, it is sufficient that initial steps are
taken.
When offense is committed by a corporation or
association, the president and directors or managers are
liable when they (1) knowingly permitted or (2) failed to
prevent the commission of such offenses.
SECTION TWO: FRAUDS IN COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRY
ARTICLE 187
IMPORTATION AND DISPOSITION OF FALSELY
MARKED ARTICLES OR MERCHANDISE MADE OF
GOLD, SILVER OR OTHER PRECIOUS METALS OR
THEIR ALLOYS
Articles or merchandise involved:
Those made of
1. Gold,
2. Silver,
3. Other precious metals, or
4. Their alloys.
Elements:
1. That the offender imports, sells or disposes any of those
articles or merchandise;
2. That the stamps, brands or marks of those articles or
merchandise fail to indicate the actual fineness or
quality of said metal or alloy; and
3. That the offender knows that the stamps, brands, or
marks fail to indicate the actual fineness or quality of said
metal or alloy.
Selling the misbranded articles is NOT necessary.
Art. 187 does not apply to the manufacturer of misbranded
articles. The manufacturer is liable for Estafa under Art. 315
subdivision 2(b) of the RPC.
Note: Arts. 188 and 189 have been REPEALED by the
Intellectual Property Code.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8293
Intellectual Property Code
Intellectual Property Rights consists of:
1. Copyright and Related Rights;
2. Trademarks and Service Marks;
3. Geographic Indications;
4. Industrial Designs;
5. Patents;
6. Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits;
and
7. Protection of Undisclosed Information
Technology transfer arrangements
Contracts or agreements involving the transfer of systematic
knowledge for the manufacture of a product, the application
of a process, or rendering of a service including
management contracts; and the transfer, assignment or
licensing of all forms of intellectual property rights, including
licensing of computer software except computer software
developed for mass market.
Criminal action for repetition of infringement
If infringement is repeated by the infringer or by anyone in
connivance with him after finality of the judgment of the
court against the infringer, the offenders shall, without
prejudice to the institution of a civil action for damages, be
criminally liable therefor.
The making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing a
patented product or a product obtained directly or indirectly
from a patented process, or the use of a patented process
without the authorization of the patentee constitutes patent
infringement.
Remedies for infringement
Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall
be liable:
1. To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court
may also order the defendant to desist from an
infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into
the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve
an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of
such goods.
2. Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs
such actual damages, including legal costs and other
expenses, as he may have incurred due to the
infringement as well as the profits the infringer may
have made due to such infringement, and in proving
profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only
and the defendant shall be required to prove every
element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual
damages and profits, such damages which to the court
shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as
penalty.
3. Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency
of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the
court may prescribe, sales invoices and other
documents evidencing sales, all articles and their a
packaging alleged to infringe copyright and
implements for making them.
4. Deliver under oath for destruction without any
compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as
all plates, molds, or other means for making such
infringing copies as the court may order.
5. Such other terms and conditions, including the payment
of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may
deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of
infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal
in a criminal case.
In an infringement action, the court shall also have the
power to order the seizure and impounding of any article
which may serve as evidence in the court proceedings
(Sec. 28, P.D. No. 49a).
In determining the number of years of imprisonment and the
amount of fine, the court shall consider the value of the
infringing materials that the defendant has produced
or manufactured and the damage that the copyright owner
has suffered by reason of the infringement.
Any person who at the time when copyright subsists in a
work has in his possession an article which he knows, or
ought to know, to be an infringing copy of the work for the
purpose of:
a. Selling, letting for hire, or by way of trade offering or
exposing for sale, or hire, the article;
b. Distributing the article for purpose of trade, or for any
other purpose to an extent that will prejudice the rights
of the copyright owner in the work; or
c. Trade exhibit of the article in public, shall be guilty of an
offense and shall be liable on conviction to
imprisonment and fine as above mentioned (Sec. 29,
P.D. No. 49a).
Unfair competition:
1. Any person, who is selling his goods and gives them the
general appearance of goods of another manufacturer or
dealer, either as to the goods themselves or in the
wrapping of the packages in which they are contained, or
the devices or words thereon, or in any other feature of
their appearance, which would be likely to influence
purchasers to believe that the goods offered are those of
a manufacturer or dealer, other than the actual
manufacturer or dealer, or who otherwise clothes the
goods with such appearance as shall deceive the public
and defraud another of his legitimate trade, or any
subsequent vendor of such goods or any agent of any
vendor engaged in selling such goods with a like purpose;
2. Any person who by any artifice, or device, or who
employs any other means calculated to induce the false
belief that such person is offering the services of another
who has identified such services in the mind of the public;
or
3. Any person who shall make any false statement in the
course of trade or who shall commit any other act
contrary to good faith of a nature calculated to discredit
the goods, business or services of another (Sec. 168.3,
Intellectual Property Code).
False Designations of Origin; False Description or
Representation
Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or
services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce
any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any
combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false
or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading
representation of fact, which:
1. Is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to
deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of
such person with another person, or as to the origin,
 sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or
commercial activities by another person; or
2. In commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents
the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic
origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or
commercial activities (Sec. 160, Intellectual Property
Code).
Liable to a civil action for damages and injunction by any
person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be
damaged by such act.
Independent of the civil and administrative sanctions
imposed by law the offender may also be criminally liable.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 455
Law on Smuggling
Acts punished:
1. That the merchandise must have been fraudulently or
knowingly imported contrary to law.
2. That the defendant if he is not the importer himself, must
have received, concealed, bought, sold or in any
manner facilitated the transportation, concealment, or sale
of the merchandise.
3. That he must be shown to have knowledge that the
merchandise had been illegally imported.
TITLE FIVE: CRIMES RELATED TO
OPIUM AND OTHER PROHIBITED
DRUGS
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9165
Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002
(Repealing RA No. 6425, otherwise known as the
Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972)
Definition of Terms (Sec. 3)
Controlled precursors and essential chemicals (CP/EC)
Include those listed in Tables I and II of the 1988 UN
Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances.
Dangerous Drugs (DD)
Include those listed in the Schedules annexed to the 1961
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the
1972 Protocol, and in the Schedules annexed to the 1971
Single Convention on Psychotropic Substances.
Financier
Any person who pays for, raises or supplies money for, or
underwrites any of the illegal activities prescribed under this
Act.
Protector/Coddler
Any person who knowingly and willfully consents to the
unlawful acts provided for in this Act and uses his/her
influence, power or position in shielding, harboring,
screening or facilitating the escape of any person he/she
knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe on or
suspects, has violated the provisions of this Act in order to
prevent the arrest, prosecution and conviction of the violator.
Pusher
Any person who sells, trades, administers, dispenses,
delivers or gives away to another, on any terms whatsoever,
or distributes, dispatches in transit or transports dangerous
drugs or who acts as a broker in any of such transactions, in
violation of this Act.
Prohibition on Plea-Bargaining (Sec. 23)
Any person charged under any provision of this Act
regardless of the imposable penalty shall NOT be allowed to
avail of the provisions of plea-bargaining.
Non-applicability of the Probation Law for Drug
Traffickers and Pushers (Sec. 24)
Any person convicted for drug trafficking or pushing under
this Act, regardless of the penalty imposed by the Court,
CANNOT avail of the privilege granted by the Probation
Law (PD No. 968, as amended).
Qualifying Aggravating Circumstances in the
Commission of a Crime by Offender under influence of
DD (Sec. 25)
Notwithstanding the provisions of the law to the contrary, a
positive finding for the use of dangerous drugs shall be a
QUALIFYING AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE in the
commission of a crime by an offender, and the applicable
penalty provided for in the RPC shall be applicable.
Confiscation and Forfeiture of Proceeds and
Instruments (Sec. 20)
All proceeds and properties derived from the unlawful acts
under this Act shall be confiscated and forfeited in favor of
the State.
Dangerous Drugs Test and Record Requirement
(Article III)
The following shall be subjected to undergo drug testing:
1. Applicants for drivers license.
2. Applicants for firearms license and for permit to carry
firearms outside of residence.
 All persons who by the nature of their profession carry
firearms shall undergo drug testing.
3. Students of secondary and tertiary schools.
4. Officers and employees of public and private offices
(whether domestic or overseas).
Shall be subjected to undergo a random drug test. Any
officer or employee found positive of use of dangerous
drugs shall be dealt with administratively which shall be
a ground for suspension or termination subject to the
provisions of Art. 282 of the Labor Code and pertinent
provisions of the Civil Service Law.
5. Officers and members of the military, police and other
law enforcement agencies shall undergo an annual
mandatory drug test.
6. All candidates for public office whether appointed or
elected both in the national or local government shall
undergo a mandatory drug test.
Note: The Court has held that the testing requirement as to
national officials whose qualifications have been expressly
set in the Constitution, such as the President, Vice
President, Senators and Congressmen, is unconstitutional.
Where the Constitution has expressly set out the
qualifications, these are exclusive and may not be
broadened nor circumscribed by legislative fia. (SJS v. DDB
and PDEA, G.R. No. 157870, November 3, 2008).
The testing requirement is no longer required for those
charged before the prosecutors office. The Court held that
such testing is unconstitutional as it effectively singles out its
subject and seeks to violate his rights against self-
incrimination and privacy. A person accused of an offense
does not consent to such testing and neither does he waive
his right to privacy simply by being a person accused of a
crime (SJS v. DDB and PDEA, G.R. No. 157870, November
3, 2008).
Those found to be positive for dangerous drugs shall be
subjected to the provisions of Sec. 15 (Use of Dangerous
Drugs), which involves rehabilitation for a minimum period of
6 months for the first offense, or imprisonment of 6 to 12
years for the second offense.
Acts Punished:
(For table of acts punished see Annex J)
1. Importation of dangerous drugs and/or controlled
precursors and essential chemicals (Section 4).
2. Sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery,
distribution and transportation of dangerous drugs and/or
controlled precursors and essential chemicals (Section 5).
In order to sustain a conviction for selling prohibited
drugs, the element of sale must be unequivocally
established. What the law proscribes is not only the act
of selling but also the act of delivering. What is important
is that the poseur-buyer received the drugs from the
accused (People v. Ponferada, G.R. No. 101004, March
17, 1993).
The following elements must concur:
a.The identity of the buyer and the seller, the object and
the consideration of the sale; and
b.The delivery of the thing sold and the payment
therefor (People v. Villahermosa, G.R. No. 186465,
June 2, 2011).
"Delivery" necessarily involves the knowledge on the
part of the one delivering that what he is delivering is
DD. If there is no evidence to show this knowledge,
accused will be acquitted (Boado,
p. 525). Deliver under RA 9165 is defined as
knowingly passing a dangerous drug to another,
personally or otherwise, and by any means, with or
without consideration (People v. Jumao-as, G.R.
No. 101334, February 14, 1994).
3. Maintenance of a den, dive or resort. (Section 6)
4. Employment in and visiting a den, dive or resort
(Section 7).
The violator must be aware of the nature of the place as
such, and in case of the visitor, he must also knowingly
visit the same.
5. Manufacture of dangerous drugs and/or controlled
precursors and essential chemicals (Section 8).
6. Illegal chemical diversion of controlled precursors and
essential chemicals (Section 9).
7. Manufacture or delivery of equipment, instrument,
apparatus and other paraphernalia for dangerous drugs
and/or controlled precursors essential chemicals (Sec.
10).
8. Possession of dangerous drugs (Sec. 11).
Elements
a. Unauthorized;
b. Either actual or constructive;
c. Irrespective of its quantity; and
d. With intent to possess or with full knowledge that
what was possessed was any of the prohibited drugs.
9. Possession of equipment, instrument, apparatus and
other paraphernalia for dangerous drugs (Sec. 12).
The possession of such equipment, instrument,
apparatus and other paraphernalia fit or intended for any
of the purposes enumerated in the preceding
 paragraph shall be prima facie evidence that the
possessor has smoked, consumed, administered to
himself/herself, injected, ingested or used a dangerous
drug and shall be presumed to have violated Section 15
of this Act (Sec. 12).
10. Possession of dangerous drugs during parties, social
gatherings or meetings or in the proximate company of
at least 2 persons (Sec. 13).
11. Possession of equipment, instrument, apparatus and
other paraphernalia for dangerous drugs during parties,
social gatherings or meetings or in the proximate
company of at least 2 persons (Sec. 14).
12. Use of dangerous drugs (Sec. 15).
This Section shall not be applicable where the person
tested is also found to have in his/her possession such
quantity of any dangerous drug provided for under Sec.
11 of this Act, in which case the provisions stated
therein shall apply (Sec. 15).
13. Cultivation or culture of plants classified as
dangerous drugs or are sources thereof (Sec. 16).
14. Failure to maintain and keep records of transactions
on dangerous drugs and/or controlled precursors and
essential chemicals (Sec. 17).
15. Unnecessary prescription of dangerous drugs (Sec.
18).
16. Unlawful prescription of dangerous drugs (Sec. 19).
Rules on Possession, Sale and Use of Prohibited Drugs
and/or Paraphernalia
1. When the seller is apprehended, the quantity he is
possessing must be equal to that being sold by him. If so,
it will be illegal sale only, possession being absorbed by
the sale. But if the quantity possessed by him is greater
than the quantity negotiated, he is still liable for illegal
possession equal to the excess amount.
2. Possession of instruments for administering drugs is
punished separately. But if possession of pipe is when he
is smoking the same, possession of pipe is absorbed. If
he is found possessing the pipe and opium and he is not
smoking, two crimes are committed: illegal possession of
opium and illegal possession of opium pipe.
3. An offender who is tested positive for use and is found to
be in possession of any quantity of dangerous drugs shall
be punished for possession only (Section 115 in relation
to Section 15).
Other Acts Punished Under RA 9165
1. Misappropriation, misapplication or failure to account
seized, confiscated or surrendered DD, CP/EC and
plants which are sources of DD, instruments,
paraphernalia or lab equipment, including proceeds/
properties obtained from the unlawful act (Sec. 27).
2. Benefitting from the proceeds of trafficking of dangerous
drugs (Sec. 27).
3. Receiving financial/material contributions from persons
found guilty of trafficking dangerous drugs (Sec. 27).
The person liable under Sec. 27 is a public officer or
employee.
4. Planting of dangerous drugs, controlled precursors or
essential chemicals as evidence (Sec. 29).
5. Consenting or knowingly tolerating any violation of RA
9165 in the case of a partner, president, director,
manager, trustee, estate administrator, or officer of a
partnership, corporation, association or any juridical
entity (Sec. 30).
6. Knowingly consenting to, tolerating, or authorizing the
use of a vehicle, vessel, aircraft, equipment or other
facility, as an instrument in the importation, sale,
trading, administration, dispensation, delivery,
distribution, transportation or manufacture of
dangerous drugs, or chemical diversion if the same are
owned by or under the control or supervision of the
officers of juridical entities (Sec. 30).
7. Violating any rule or regulation issued by the DDB
pursuant to RA 9165 (Sec. 32).
8. Issuance of a false or fraudulent dangerous drug test
result (Sec. 37).
9. Violation of the confidentiality rule on records of drug
dependents under voluntary submission (Sec. 72).
10. Failure or refusal to appear as a witness for any violation
of this act (Sec. 91).
11. Delay or bungling in the handling of the prosecution of
drug related cases (Sec. 92).
Custody and Disposition of Confiscated, Seized,
Surrendered Dangerous Drugs, Paraphernalia etc. (Sec.
21)
The PDEA shall take charge and have custody of all DD,
CP/EC and equipment/ paraphernalia confiscated, seized or
surrendered for proper disposition.
1. Physical inventory and photograph the articles seized in
the presence of the accused, his representative or
counsel, a representative from the media and the DOJ,
and any elected public official who shall be required to
sign the copies of the inventory and be given a copy
thereof.
2. Submit the article within 24 hours to the PDEA Forensic
Laboratory for a qualitative and quantitative examination.
3. Certification of the results of the laboratory examination
within 24 hours from the receipt of the subject items.
When the volume of the subject does not allow the
completion of the examination within 24 hours, a partial
laboratory report shall be issued, with a final
 certification to follow within the next 24 hours.
4. Filing of the criminal case in court.
5. Ocular inspection by the Court of the subject seized,
confiscated or surrendered.
6. Within the next 24 hours, the burning or destroying of
the items in the presence of the accused or his
counsel, representative from the media, DOJ, civil
society, and any elected public official.
7. Sworn certification of the burning or disposal is issued by
the DDB.
8. Submission of the sworn certificate of destruction or
burning to the court.
9. After promulgation of judgment by the court, the
representative sample, with leave of court, shall be
turned over to the PDEA which shall destroy the same
within 24 hours from its receipt.
10. The DDB shall be informed of the termination of the
case.
Chain of Custody
The duly recorded authorized movements and custody of
seized drugs or controlled chemicals or plant sources of
dangerous drugs or laboratory equipment of each stage,
from the time of seizure/confiscation to receipt in the
forensic laboratory to safekeeping to presentation in court
for destruction. Such record of movements and custody of
seized item shall include the identity and signature of the
person who held temporary custody of the seized item, the
date and time when such transfer of custody were made in
the course of safekeeping and use in court as evidence, and
the final disposition (Sec. 1(b) of the Dangerous Drugs
Board Resolution No. 1, Series of 2002, implementing RA
9165).
Note: Non-compliance with the procedure outlined in
Section 21(a), of Republic Act No. 9165, shall not render
void and invalid such seizures of and custody over said
items, for as long as the integrity and evidentiary value of
the seized items are properly preserved by the
apprehending officers (People v. Lopez, GR No. 181747,
September 29, 2008).
Attempt or Conspiracy to commit the following
unlawful acts shall be penalized by the same penalty
prescribed for the commission of the same as provided
under the Act (Sec. 26):
1. Importation of any DD and/or CP/EC;
2. Sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery,
distribution and transportation of any DD and/or CP/EC;
3. Maintenance of a den, dive or resort where any DD is
used in any form;
4. Manufacture of any DD and/or CP/EC; and
5. Cultivation or culture of plants which are sources of
dangerous drugs.
Criminal Liability of Government Officials and
Employees (Sec. 28)
If the violators are government officials and employees,
maximum penalties of the unlawful act plus absolute
perpetual disqualification from any public office shall be
imposed.
Additional Penalty if Offender is an Alien (Sec. 31)
In addition to the penalties prescribed in the unlawful act
committed, any alien who violates such provisions of this
Act shall, after service of sentence, be deported immediately
without further proceedings, unless death is the penalty.
Immunity from Prosecution and Punishment
Requisites: (Sec. 33)
1. The accused should be prosecuted for violation of Sec.
7, 11, 12, 14, 15, and 19 of the said Act;
2. Voluntarily gives information of any of these acts: Sec.
4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, and 16; violation of any other
provisions of the Act if committed by a drug syndicate
including any information leading to the whereabouts,
identities, and arrests of any/ all of the syndicate
members;
Drug Syndicate
Any organized group of two (2) or more persons
forming or joining together with the intention of
committing any offense prescribed under this Act.
3. He willingly testifies against any of the individuals; and
4. His information and testimony has complied with the
following:
a. It is necessary for the conviction of the above
persons;
b. It is not yet in the possession of the State;
c. It can be substantially corroborated in his material
points;
d. The witness has not been convicted of a crime
involving moral turpitude except when there is no other
direct evidence available for his prosecution other than
the testimony of the witness;
e. The witness shall strictly and faithfully comply without
delay with any conditions/ undertaking lawfully imposed
by the State;
f. The witness does not appear to be the most guilty; and
g. There is no direct evidence available for the State
except for the testimony of the witness.
Grounds for termination of immunity (Sec. 34)
1. If the testimony is false, malicious, or made only to
harass, molest or prejudice the accused.
2. Failure or refusal to testify without just cause, when
lawfully obliged to do so.
3. Violating any condition for immunity.
Effect of termination of immunity: (Sec. 34)
The immunity shall cease and the witness shall be
prosecuted or cited for contempt.
Voluntary submission of a drug dependent to
confinement, treatment and rehabilitation (Sec. 54)
The drug dependent may, by himself/herself or through
his/her parent, spouse, guardian or relative within the 4th
degree of consanguinity or affinity, apply to the Board or its
duly recognized representative, for treatment and
rehabilitation of the drug dependency.
Upon such application, the Board shall bring forth the matter
to the Court which shall order that the applicant be
examined for drug dependency.
1. If positive:
a. The court shall issue an order for rehabilitation and
treatment to a center for not less than 6 months; or
b. May be placed in the care of DOH accredited physician
if there is no near or accessible center; OR
when the drug dependent is under 18 years old, and
first time offender, and non-confinement in a center will
not pose a serious danger to his/ her family or
community.
Confinement in a center shall not exceed 1 year, after
which time the Court, as well as the Board, shall be
apprised by the head of the treatment and rehabilitation
center of the status of said drug
dependent and determine whether further
confinement will be for the welfare of the drug
dependent and his/her family or community.
Exemption from the Criminal Liability under the
Voluntary Submission Program (Sec. 55):
Requisites:
1. He/she has complied with the rules and regulations of the
center, the applicable rules and regulations of the Board,
including the after-care and follow-up program for at least
18 months following temporary discharge from
confinement in the Center.
2. He/she has never been charged or convicted under this
Act.
3. He/she has no record of escape from a center.
4. He/she poses no serious danger to himself/herself,
his/her family or the community by his/her exemption
from criminal liability.
Compulsory confinement of a drug dependent who
refuses to apply under the voluntary submission
program (Sec. 61):
Notwithstanding any law, rule and regulation to the contrary,
any person determined and found to be dependent on
dangerous drugs shall, upon petition by the Board or any of
its authorized representative, be confined for treatment and
rehabilitation in any Center duly designated or accredited for
the purpose.
Such petition may be filed by any person authorized by the
Board with the RTC of the province or city where such
person is found.
Prescription of the offense charged against a drug
dependent under the Compulsory Submission Program
(Sec. 63)
It will not run during the time that the drug dependent is
under confinement in a Center or otherwise under the
treatment and rehabilitation program approved by the Board.
Suspension of Sentence of a First-Time Minor Offender
(Sec. 66)
Accused: over 15 years old at the time of violation of Sec.
11 of this Act but not more than 18 years old at the time
when the judgment should have been promulgated after
having been found guilty of said offense. Suspension may
be given subject to the following conditions:
1. Has not been previously convicted of violating any
provision of CDDA of 2002, DDA of 1972, RPC, or any
special penal laws;
2. Has not been previously committed to a Center or to the
care of a DOH-accredited physician; and
3. Board favorably recommends it.
However, Sec. 38 of R.A. No. 9344( Juvenile Justice and
Welfare Act) provides for the AUTOMATIC SUSPENSION
of sentence of a child in conflict with the law, even if he/she
is already 18 years of age or more at the time he/she is
found guilty of the offense charged. It reads:
Sec. 38. Automatic Suspension of Sentence. Once the
child who is under eighteen (18) years of age at the time of
the commission of the offense is found guilty of the offense
charged, the court shall determine and ascertain any civil
liability which may have resulted from the offense
committed. However, instead of pronouncing the judgment
of conviction, the court shall place the child in conflict with
the law under suspended sentence, without need of
application: Provided, however, That suspension of
sentence shall still be applied even if the juvenile is already
eighteen (18) of age or more at the time of the
pronouncement of his/her guilt.
Upon suspension of sentence and after considering the
various circumstances of the child, the court shall impose
the appropriate disposition measures as provided in the
Supreme Court on Juvenile in Conflict with the Law.
The above-quoted provision makes no distinction as to the
nature of the offense committed by the child in conflict with
the law, unlike P.D. No. 603 and A.M. No. 02-1-18- SC. The
said P.D. and Supreme Court (SC) Rule provide that the
benefit of suspended sentence would not apply to a child in
conflict with the law if, among others, he/she has been
convicted of an offense punishable by death, reclusion
perpetua or life imprisonment. In construing Sec. 38 of R.A.
No. 9344, the Court is guided by the basic principle of
statutory construction that when the law does not
distinguish, we should not distinguish. Since R.A. No. 9344
does not distinguish between a minor who has been
convicted of a capital offense and another who has been
convicted of a lesser offense, the Court should also not
distinguish and should apply the automatic suspension of
sentence to a child in conflict with the law who has been
found guilty of a heinous crime (People of the Philippines vs
Richard O. Sarcia G.R. No. 169641 September 10, 2009).
Discharge After Compliance with Conditions of
Suspended Sentence of a First-Time Minor Offender
(Sec. 67)
If the first time minor offender under suspended sentence
complies with the rules and regulations of the Board, the
court, upon recommendation of the Board, shall discharge
the accused and dismiss all proceedings.
The minor shall not thereafter be held guilty of perjury or of
concealment or misrepresentation by reason of his/her
failure to acknowledge the case or recite any fact related
thereto in response to any inquiry made of him for any
purpose.
The privilege of suspended sentence shall be availed of only
ONCE by an accused drug dependent who is a first- time
offender over fifteen (15) years of age at the time of the
commission of the violation of Section 15 (Use of
Dangerous Drugs) but not more than eighteen (18) years of
age at the time when judgment should be promulgated
(Sec. 68).
Dangerous Drugs Board and Philippine Drug
Enforcement Agency (Article IX)
Dangerous Drugs Board
Shall be the policy-making and strategy-formulating body in
the planning and formulation of policies and programs on
drug prevention and control.
Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA)
Shall serve as the implementing arm of the Board, and
shall be responsible for the efficient and effective law
enforcement of all the provisions on any dangerous drug
and/or controlled precursor and essential chemical as
provided in the Act.
Among the powers and duties of the PDEA is to prepare for
prosecution or cause the filing of appropriate criminal and
civil cases for violation of all laws on dangerous drugs,
controlled precursors and essential chemicals, and other
similar controlled substances, and assist, support and
coordinate with other government agencies for the proper
and effective prosecution of the same. (Sec. 84 [h])
The PDEA shall be the lead agency in the investigation of
any violation of RA No. 9165 (Sec. 86, last par.).
Limited Applicability of RPC to RA 9165 Notwithstanding
any law, rule or regulation to the contrary, the provisions of
the RPC shall not apply to the provisions of this Act, except
in the case of minor offenders. Where the offender is a
minor, the penalty for acts punishable by life imprisonment
to death shall be reclusion perpetua to death (Sec. 98).
TITLE SIX: CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC
MORALS
CHAPTER ONE: GAMBLING AND
BETTING (ARTS. 195-199)
Arts. 195-199 and provisions of PD 483 and 449 are
repealed insofar as they are inconsistent with PD 1602,
which provides for stiffer penalties for violation of the
Gambling Laws.
Gambling
Is any game or scheme, whether upon chance or skill,
wherein wagers consisting of money, articles of value or
representative of value are at stake or made.
1. Any person taking part, directly or indirectly in any
illegal or unauthorized activities or games of cockfighting,
jueteng, jai alai or horse racing to include bookie
operations and game fixing, numbers, bingo and other
forms of lotteries; cara y cruz, pompiang and the
 like; 7-11 and any game using dice; black jack, lucky nine,
poker and its derivatives, monte, baccarat, cuajo,
pangguigue and other card games; pak que, high and
low, mahjong, domino and other games using plastic tiles
and the like; slot machines, roulette, pinball and other
mechanical contraptions and devices; dog racing, boat
racing, car racing and other forms of races; basketball,
boxing, volleyball, bowling, pingpong and other forms of
individual or team contests to include game fixing, point
shaving and other machinations; banking or percentage
game, or any other game or scheme, whether upon
chance or skill, wherein wagers consisting of money,
articles of value or representative of value are at stake or
made;
2. Any person knowingly permitting any form of gambling
previously enumerated to be carried on in an inhabited
or uninhabited place or in any building, vessel or other
means of transportation owned or controlled by him.
Elements:
a. That a gambling game was carried on in an inhabited
or uninhabited place or in any building, vessel or other
means of transportation;
b. That the place, building, vessel or other means of
transportation is owned or controlled by the offender;
and
c. That the offender permitted the carrying on of such
game, knowing that it is a gambling game.
1. Any person knowingly permitting any form of gambling to
be carried on in a place which has a reputation of a
gambling place or where prohibited gambling is
frequently carried on therein, or in a public or government
building or barangay hall;
4. The maintainer or conductor of the above gambling
schemes.
Maintainer
It is the person who sets up and furnishes the means with
which to carry on the gambling game or scheme.
Conductor
It is the person who manages or carries on the gambling
game or scheme.
5. A government official who is a maintainer, conductor or
banker of the gambling schemes, or the player, promoter,
referee, umpire, judge or coach in case of game fixing,
point shaving and other machinations.
6. Any person who knowingly and without lawful purpose in
any hour of any day, possesses any lottery list, paper or
other matter containing letters, figures, signs or symbols
pertaining to or in any manner used in the games of
jueteng, jai alai or horse racing bookies and similar games
of lotteries and numbers which have taken place or about
to take place.
7. Any barangay official who, with knowledge of the
existence of the gambling house or place in his
jurisdiction fails to abate the same or take action in
connection therewith.
8. Any security officer, security guard, watchman, private or
house detective of hotels, villages, buildings, enclosures
and the like which have the reputation of a gambling place
or where gambling activities are being held.
Proof that the game took place or is about to take place is
not necessary.
A mere bystander or spectator in a gambling game is not
criminally liable, because he does not take part therein,
directly or indirectly. The law does not make the mere
presence in a gambling house an offense (U.S. vs.
Palma, G.R. No. 2188, May 5, 1905).
Lottery
It is a scheme for the distribution of prizes by chance among
persons who have paid, or agreed to pay, a valuable
consideration for the chance to obtain a prize (U.S. v. Filart,
G.R. No. L-10263, May 13, 1915).
Elements of lottery:
1. Consideration;
2. Chance;
3. Prize or some advantage or inequality in amount or
value which is in the nature of a prize.
There is no lottery when there is full value for money and
the prize is merely incidental (Reyes, p. 343).
ARTICLE 196
IMPORTATION SALE AND POSSESSION OF
LOTTERY TICKETS OR ADVERTISEMENTS
Acts punished relative to lottery tickets or
advertisements:
1. By importing into the Philippines from any foreign place or
port any lottery ticket or advertisement.
2. By selling or distributing the same in connivance with the
importer.
3. By possessing, knowingly and with intent to use, lottery
tickets or advertisements.
4. By selling or distributing the same without connivance
with the importer.
The possession of any lottery ticket or advertisement is
prima facie evidence of an intent to sell, distribute or use the
same.
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 483
 Penalizing Betting, Game-fixing or
Point-Shaving and Machinations in
Sport Contests
Note: This repealed Article 197 (Betting in Sports
Contests) of RPC.
Acts punished: Game-fixing, point-shaving, game
machination, in connection with the games of basketball,
volleyball, softball, baseball; chess, boxing bouts, jai- alai,
pelota and all other sports contests, games or races; as
well as betting therein except as may be authorized by law
(Sec. 2).
Definitions:
1. Betting betting money or any object or article of value
or representative of value upon the result of any game,
races and other sports contests.
2. Game-fixing any arrangement, combination, scheme or
agreement by which the result of any game, races or
sports contests shall be predicted and/or known other
than on the basis of the honest playing skill or ability of
the players or participants.
3. Point-shaving any such arrangement, combination,
scheme, or agreement by which the skill or ability of any
player or participant in a game, race or sports contest to
make points or scores shall be limited deliberately in
order to influence the result thereof in favor of one or the
other team, player or participant therein.
4. Game machination any other fraudulent, deceitful,
unfair or dishonest means, method, manner or practice
employed for the purpose of influencing the result of any
game, race or sports contest (Sec 1).
Liability of offenders:
When the offender is an official, such as promoter, referee,
umpire, judge, or coach in the game, race, sports contests,
or the manager or sponsor of any participating team,
individual, or player therein, or participants or players in
such games, races, or other sports contests, he shall, upon
conviction, be punished by prision correccional in its
maximum period and a fine of 2,000 pesos with subsidiary
imprisonment in case of insolvency, at the discretion of the
court. This penalty shall also be imposed when the
offenders compose a syndicate of five or more persons.
In case of any other offender, he shall, upon conviction, be
punished by prision correccional in its medium period and a
fine of 1,000 pesos with subsidiary imprisonment in case of
insolvency at the discretion of the court.
When the offender is an official or employee of any
government office or agency concerned with the
enforcement or administration of laws and regulations on
sports, the penalty provided for in the preceding paragraph
shall be imposed. In addition, he shall be disqualified from
holding any public office or employment for life. If he is an
alien, he may be deported (Section 3).
ARTICLE 198
ILLEGAL BETTING ON HORSE RACES
Acts punished in illegal betting on horse races:
1. By betting on horse races during the periods not allowed
by law.
2. By maintaining or employing a totalizer or other device
or scheme for betting on races or realizing profit
therefrom, during the periods not allowed by law.
Totalizer
It is a machine for registering and indicating the number and
nature of bets made on horse races.
Horse Races are allowed during:
1. Sundays not reserved
2. 24 Saturdays
3. Legal Holidays EXCEPT:
a. Independence Day
b. Rizal Day
c. Registration or Voting day
d. Holy Thursday
e. Good Friday
ARTICLE 199
ILLEGAL COCKFIGHTING
Modified by: PD 449
Under PD 449, the following may be held liable:
1. Any person who, directly or indirectly, participates in
cockfights, by betting money or other valuable things in a
day other than those permitted by law.
2. Any person who, directly or indirectly, organizes
cockfights at which bets are made in a day other than
those permitted by law.
3. Any person who, directly or indirectly, participates in
cockfights, by betting money or other valuable things at a
place other than a licensed cockpit.
4. Any person who, directly or indirectly, organizes
cockfights at which bets are made at a place other than
a licensed cockpit.
5. Owner, manager or lessee of the cockpit who shall permit
gambling of any kind on the premises of the cockpit or
place of cockfighting during cockfights.
Cockfighting is allowed during:
1. Sundays
2. Legal Holidays EXCEPT: The acts must be performed in a public place or within
a. Rizal Day public knowledge or view.
b. Independence Day
c. National Heroes Day Hence, distinction should be made as to the place where the
d. Holy Thursday offensive act was committed, whether in the public place or
e. Good Friday in a private place:
f. Election or Referendum Day 1. In public place, the criminal liability arises irrespective of
g. During the Registration days for election or whether the immoral act is open to the public view. In
referendum short public view is not required.
3. During local fiestas for not more than 3 days 2. When act offensive to decency is done in a private place,
4. During provincial, city or municipal, agricultural, public view or public knowledge is required.
commercial or industrial fair, carnival or exposition for a
similar period of three days. When the acts were performed in a private house and seen
by one person, the crime was not committed. This
CHAPTER TWO: OFFENSES AGAINST
circumstance does not constitute the degree of publicity
DECENCY AND GOOD CUSTOMS
(ARTS. 200-202)
which is an essential element of the crime.

ARTICLE 201
ARTICLE 200 IMMORAL DOCTRINES, OBSCENE
GRAVE SCANDAL PUBLICATIONS AND EXHIBITIONS,
AND INDECENT SHOWS
Elements:
1. That the offender performs an act or acts; Persons Liable:
2. That such act or acts be highly scandalous as offending 1. Those who shall publicly expound or proclaim doctrines
against decency or good customs; openly contrary to public morals.
3. That the highly scandalous conduct is not expressly falling 2. The authors of obscene literature, published with their
within any article of the RPC; and knowledge in any form; the editors publishing such
4. That the act or acts complained of be committed in a literature; and the owners/operators of the
public place or within the public knowledge or view. establishment selling the same.

Decency Mere possession of obscene materials is not

Means proprietary of conduct; proper observance of the
requirements of modesty, good taste, etc.
Customs
Established usage, social conventions carried on by
tradition and enforced by social disapproval of any violation
thereof.
punishable.
The crime of illegal publication is also committed when
the real printers name is not divulged.
The author of obscene literature is liable only when it is
published with his knowledge.

Grave scandal Those who, in theaters, fairs, cinematographs or any

Consists of acts which are offensive to decency and good
customs which, having been committed publicly, have given
rise to public scandal to persons who have accidentally
witnessed the same.
The act punishable by Article 200 are those which by their
publicity and character can cause public scandal among the
person witnessing them, besides being contrary to morals
and good customs (People vs. Dumlao, C.A., 380
O.G.3715).
If the act or acts of the offender are punished under another
article of the RPC, Art. 200 is NOT applicable.
other place, exhibit indecent or immoral plays, scenes,
acts or shows which are proscribed and shall include
those which:
a. Glorify criminals or condone crimes;
b. Serve no other purpose but to satisfy the market for
violence, lust or pornography;
c. Offend any race or religion;
d. Tend to abet traffic in and use of prohibited drugs; and
e. Are contrary to law, public order, morals, good
customs, established policies, lawful orders, decrees
and edicts.
3. Those who shall sell, give away or exhibit films, prints,
engravings, sculptures or literature which are offensive
 to morals.
What is punished is the distribution of indecent literature,
etc., to many people and not merely the isolated, casual
or occasional act of giving such kind of literature to a
single recipient (People v. Tempongko, 1
C.A. Rep. 317).
The purpose of the law is to protect the morals of the
public
Publicity is essential.
Morals
Imply conformity with the generally accepted standards of
goodness or rightness in conduct or character, sometimes,
specifically, to sexual conduct.
Obscene
It means something offensive to chastity, decency or
delicacy (People v. Kottinger, G.R. No. L-20569, October
29, 1923).
The Test of Obscenity
The test is whether the tendency of the matter charged as
obscene, is to deprave or corrupt those whose minds are
open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands
such a publication may fall and alsowhether or not such
publication or act shocks the ordinary and common sense of
men as an indecency.
Indecency
It is an act against the good behavior and a just delicacy.
Mere nudity in pictures or paintings is not an obscenity. The
proper test is whether the motive of the picture, as indicated
by it, is pure or impure; or whether it is naturally calculated
to excite impure imaginations (People vs. Serrano, CA-G.R.
No. 5566-R, November 24, 1950).
Mere possession of obscene materials, without intention to
sell, exhibit, or give them away, is not punishable under
Article 201, considering the purpose of the law is to prohibit
the dissemination of obscene materials to the public
(Fernando vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 169751,
December 6, 2006).
Disposition of prohibited articles:
The disposition of the literature, films, prints, engravings,
sculptures, paintings or other materials involved in the
violation shall be governed by the following rules:
1. Upon conviction of the offender to be forfeited in
favor of the government to be destroyed.
2. Where the criminal case against the violator results in an
acquittal to be forfeited in favor of the government to
be destroyed, after forfeiture proceedings conducted by
the chief constabulary.
3. The person aggrieved by the forfeiture action of the
Chief of Police may, within 15 days after his receipt of the
copy of the decision, appeal the matter to the Secretary of
the National Defense for review. The decision of the
Secretary of the National Defense shall be final and
unappealable (Sec. 2, P.D. 969).
Obscene publications and indecent shows under RA
7610
Any person who shall hire, employ, use, persuade, induce
or coerce a child to perform in obscene exhibition and
indecent shows, whether live or in video, pose, or model in
obscene publications or pornographic materials or to
sell or distribute the said materials shall suffer the penalty of
prision mayor in its medium period.
If the child used as a performer, subject or seller/distributor
is below twelve (12) years of age, the penalty shall be
imposed in its maximum period.
Any ascendant, guardian or person entrusted in any
capacity with care of a child who shall cause and/ or allow
such child to be employed or to participate in an obscene
play, scene, act, movie or show in any other acts covered by
this section shall suffer the penalty of prision mayor in its
medium period (Sec. 9).
ARTICLE 202
VAGRANTS AND PROSTITUTES
Note: Republic Act No. 10158 (2012) decriminalized
vagrancy.
Persons Liable:
1. Any person having no apparent means of subsistence,
who has the physical ability to work and who neglects to
apply himself to some lawful calling (Mendicant).
2. Any person found loitering about public or semipublic
buildings or places or tramping or wandering about the
country or the streets without visible means of support.
The absence of visible means of support or a lawful
calling is necessary to convict one for loitering around
saloons, dram shops, and gambling houses (U.S. v. Hart,
26 Phil. 149).
3. Any idle or dissolute person who lodges in houses of ill-
fame; ruffians or pimps and those who habitually
associate with prostitutes (Vagrant).
4. Any person who, not being included in the provisions of
 other articles of this Code, shall be found loitering in any
inhabited or uninhabited place belonging to another
without any lawful or justifiable purpose.
5. Prostitutes
Art. 202 is NOT applicable to minors
Persons below eighteen (18) years of age shall be exempt
from prosecution for the crimes of vagrancy and prostitution
under Art. 202 of the RPC, of mendicancy under PD 1563,
and sniffing of rugby under PD 1619, such prosecution
being inconsistent with the United Nations Convention on
the Rights of the Child: Provided, That said persons shall
undergo appropriate counseling and treatment program.
(Sec. 58, RA 9344 otherwise known as the Juvenile Justice
and Welfare Act of 2006).
Prostitutes
Women who, for money or profit habitually indulge in sexual
intercourse or lascivious conduct.
Dissolutes
Lax, unrestrained, immoral.
Ruffians
Violent or lawless individuals.
Pimp
One who provides gratification for the lust of others.
Persons Liable under PD 1563 or the Mendicancy Law:
1. Mendicant himself
2. Any person who abets mendicancy by giving alms directly
to mendicants, exploited infants, and minors on public
roads, sidewalks, parks and bridges.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9208
THE ANTI-TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS ACT OF
2003
Trafficking in Persons
It is the recruitment, transportation, transfer or harboring, or
receipt of persons with or without the victims consent or
knowledge, within or across national borders by means of
threat or use of force, or other forms of coercion, abduction,
fraud, deception, abuse of power or of position, taking
advantage of the vulnerability of the person or, the giving or
receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of
a person having control over another person for the purpose
of exploitation which includes at a minimum, the exploitation
or the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual
exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery, servitude or
the removal or sale of
organs (Sec 3).
Acts of Trafficking in Persons
It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or juridical, to
commit any of the following acts:
1. To recruit, transport, transfer, harbor, provide, or
receive a person by any means, including those done
under the pretext of domestic or overseas employment or
training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of prostitution,
pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery;
2. To introduce or match for money, profit, or material,
economic or other consideration, any person or, as
provided for under R.A. No. 6955, any Filipino woman to
a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose of
acquiring, buying, offering, selling, or trading him/her to
engage in prostitution, pornography;
3. To offer or contract marriage, real or simulated, for the
purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling, or trading
them to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual
exploitation, forced labor or slavery, involuntary servitude
or debt bondage;
4. To undertake or organize tours and travel plans
consisting of tourism packages or activities for the
purpose of utilizing and offering persons for prostitution,
pornography or sexual;
5. To maintain or hire a person to engage in prostitution or
pornography;
6. To adopt or facilitate the adoption of persons, for the
purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual
exploitation, forced-labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or
debt-bondage;
7. To recruit, hire, adopt, transport or abduct a person, by
means of threat or use of force, fraud, deceit, violence,
coercion, or intimidation for the purpose of removal or
sale of organs of said person;
8. To recruit, transport or adopt a child to engage in armed
activities in the Philippines or abroad (Sec. 4).
TITLE SEVEN: CRIMES COMMITTED
BY PUBLIC OFFICERS
ARTICLE 203
WHO ARE PUBLIC OFFICERS
Requisites:
To be a public officer one must be
1. Taking part in the performance of public functions in the
government, or performing in said Government or in
any of its branches public duties as an employee, agent
or subordinate official, of any rank or class; and
2. That his authority to take part in the performance of
public functions or to perform public duties must be
 a. By direct provision of the law; or
b. By popular election; or
c. By appointment by competent authority.
The term public officers embraces every public servant
from the highest to the lowest. For the purposes of the RPC,
it obliterates the standard distinction in the law of public
officers between officer and employee. cannot be presumed and the judge knew that the judgment
Temporary performance of public functions by a laborer
makes him a public officer.
CHAPTER TWO: MALFEASANCE AND
MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE
(ARTS. 204-212)
SECTION ONE: DERELICTION OF DUTY
Misfeasance
Improper performance of some act which might lawfully be
done.
Malfeasance
The performance of some act which ought not to be done.
Nonfeasance
Omission of some act which ought to be performed.
ARTICLE 204
KNOWINGLY RENDERING
UNJUST JUDGMENT
Elements:
1. That the offender is a judge;
2. That he renders a judgment in a case submitted to him for
decision;
3. That the judgment is unjust; and
4. That the judge knows that his judgment is unjust.
Judgment
It is the final consideration and determination of a court of
competent jurisdiction upon the matters submitted to it, in an
action or proceeding.
Unjust judgment
It is one which is contrary to law, or is not supported by
evidence, or both.
An unjust judgment is rendered knowingly when it is made
deliberately and maliciously.
Knowingly means consciously, intelligently, willfully, or
intentionally (Blacks Law Dictionary, 5th ed., 784).
Sources of unjust judgment:
1. Error;
2. Ill-will or revenge; or
3. Bribery.
There is no liability at all for a mere error in good faith.
There must be evidence that the judgment is unjust for it
is unjust. The Supreme Court must have declared the
judgment as unjust in a certiorari, prohibition, or
administrative proceeding.
Art. 204 has no application to members of a collegiate court
who reach their conclusions in consultation and accordingly
render their collective judgment after due deliberation (In
Re: Laureta, G.R. No. 68635, May 14, 1987).
ARTICLE 205
JUDGMENT RENDERED THROUGH NEGLIGENCE
Elements:
1. That the offender is a judge;
2. That he renders a judgment in a case submitted to him for
decision;
3. That the judgment is manifestly unjust; and
4. That it is due to his inexcusable negligence or ignorance.
Manifestly Unjust Judgment
It is so manifestly contrary to law, that even a person having
a meager knowledge of the law cannot doubt the injustice.
Therefore, there is no need for a declaration by the
Supreme Court that the same is unjust in order to result in
conviction (Albert).
Abuse of discretion or mere error of judgment is NOT
punishable.
ARTICLE 206
UNJUST INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
Elements:
1. That the offender is a judge;
2. That he performs any of the following acts:
a. Knowingly renders unjust interlocutory order or decree;
or
b. Renders a manifestly unjust interlocutory order or
decree through inexcusable negligence or ignorance.
Interlocutory order
It is an order which is issued by the court between the
commencement and the end of a suit or action and which
decides some point or matter, but which, however, is not a
final decision of the matter in issue.
Test: Does it leave something to be done in the trial court
with respect to the merits of the case? If it does, it is
interlocutory; if it does not, it is final.
Example: An order granting preliminary injunction or an
order appointing a receiver is an interlocutory order.
ARTICLE 207
MALICIOUS DELAY IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF
JUSTICE
Elements:
1. That the offender is a judge;
2. That there is a proceeding in his court;
3. That he delays the administration of justice; and
4. That the delay is malicious, that is, the delay is caused
by the judge with deliberate intent to inflict damage on
either party in the case.
Mere delay without malice is NOT a felony under this article.
If the delay is NOT malicious, but committed through gross
negligence, the crime committed is that under RA 3019,
Sec. 3(e).
ARTICLE 208
PROSECUTION OF OFFENSES; NEGLIGENCE AND
TOLERANCE
Acts punished:
1. By maliciously refraining from instituting prosecution
against violators of the law.
2. By maliciously tolerating the commission of a crime.
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or officer of the law
who has a duty to cause the prosecution of, or to
prosecute offenses;
2. That knowing the commission of the crime, he does not
cause the prosecution of the criminal or knowing that a
crime is about to be committed he tolerates its
commission; and
3. That the offender acts with malice and deliberate intent to
favor the violator of the law.
Negligence means neglect of the duties of his office by
maliciously failing to move the prosecution and punishment
of the delinquent.
Malice is an important element in this Article. Maliciously
signifies deliberate intent.
The guilt of the offender is a prejudicial question to the
liability of the officer charged under this provision.
Who Can Be Offenders in Art. 208?
1. Public officer
Officers of the prosecution department, whose duty is to
institute criminal proceedings for felonies upon being
informed of their perpetration.
2. Officer of the law
Includes all those who, by reason of the position held by
them, are duty-bound to cause prosecution and
punishment of offenders.
The fiscal or the city attorney, as prosecuting officer, is
under no compulsion to file the corresponding information
based upon as complaint, where he is not convinced that
the evidence gathered or presented would warrant the filing
of an action in court.
Liability of public officer who, having the duty of prosecuting
the offender, harbored, concealed, or assisted in the escape
of the latter, is that of the principal in the crime of dereliction
of duty in the prosecution of offense.
Note: Any person who solicits, accepts, or agrees to accept
any benefit in consideration of abstaining from, discounting,
or impeding the prosecution of a criminal offender is liable
under PD 1829.
ARTICLE 209
BETRAYAL OF TRUST BY AN
ATTORNEY OR SOLICITOR
REVELATION OF SECRETS
Acts punished:
1. Causing damage to his client, either:
a. By any malicious breach of professional duty; or
b. Inexcusable negligence or ignorance.
If no damage is caused, attorney may be held
administratively or civilly liable.
2. Revealing any of the secrets of his client learned by him
in his professional capacity.
Damage is NOT necessary.
3. Undertaking the defense of the opposing party in the
same case without the consent of his first client after
having undertaken the defense of said first client or after
having received confidential information from said
 client.
If the client consents to the attorneys taking the defense
of the other party, there is no crime.
Procurador judicial
A person who had some practical knowledge of law and
procedure, but not a lawyer, and was permitted to represent
a party in a case before an inferior court.
SECTION TWO: BRIBERY
ARTICLE 210
DIRECT BRIBERY
Acts Punished:
1. By agreeing to perform, or by performing in consideration
of any offer, promise, gift or present, an act constituting a
crime, in connection with the performance of his official
duties.
3. That such offer or promise be accepted, or gift or present
received by the public officer
a. With a view to committing some crime; or
b. In consideration of the execution of an act which does
not constitute a crime, but the act must be unjust; or
c. To refrain from doing something which it is his official
duty to do;
4. That the act which the offender agrees to perform or
which he executes be connected with the performance
of his official duties.
The provisions of Art. 210 are made applicable to
assessors, arbitrators, appraisal and claim
commissioners, experts or any other persons performing
public duties (Art. 210, last par.).
The act which the public officer agrees to perform must be
connected with the performance of official duties.

The acceptance of the offer or promise is enough to For the purpose of punishing bribery, the temporary
consummate the crime. Absent such acceptance, only the performance of public functions is sufficient to constitute a
person making the offer or promise is liable for Attempted person a public officer.
Corruption of a Public Officer.
The thing offered or accepted may be money, property,
2. By accepting a gift in consideration of the execution of an services or anything else of value. It must have a value or
act which does not constitute a crime, in connection with be capable of pecuniary estimation (Reyes, p. 387).
the performance of his official duty.
ARTICLE 211
The gift must be accepted by the public officer. It may be INDIRECT BRIBERY
received by the public officer himself or through a third
person. Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
If the offer is not accepted by the public officer, only the 2. That he accepts gifts; and
person offering the gift or present is criminally liable for 3. That the said gifts are offered to him by reason of his
attempted corruption of public officer under Article 212 in office.
relation to Article 6. The public officer is not liable.
Direct Bribery Indirect Bribery
The act must be unjust.
As to consideration
3. By agreeing to refrain, or by refraining, from doing In both crimes the public officer receives gift.
something which it is his official duty to do, in
consideration of a gift or promise. As to existence of agreement
There is an agreement No such agreement
The third form of direct bribery differs from prevaricacion between the public exists.
(Art. 208) in that in bribery, the offender refrained from officer and the giver of
doing his official duty in consideration of a gift received or gift or present.
promised. This element is not necessary in the crime of
prevaricacion.

Elements of direct bribery:

1. That the offender be a public officer;
2. That the offender accepts an offer or a promise or
receives a gift or present by himself or through another;
As to necessity of the performance of the act
The offender agrees to It is not necessary that
perform or performs an the officer should do
act or refrains from any particular act or
doing something, even promise to do an
because of the gift or act, as it is enough that
promise. he accepts gifts offered
to him by reason of his
office.
There is no attempted or frustrated indirect bribery because
it is committed by accepting gifts offered to the public officer
by reason of his office. If he does not accept the gifts, he
does not commit the crime. If he accepts the gifts, it is
consummated.
It is considered indirect bribery even if there was a sort of an
agreement between public officer and giver of gift.
Receiving of gifts by public officials and employees, and
giving of gifts by private persons, on any occasion, including
Christmas is punishable.
Note: PD 46 punishes:
1. Any public official or employee who receives, directly or
indirectly; and
2. Any private person who gives, or offers to give:
Any gift, present or other valuable thing to any occasion,
when such gift, present or other valuable
thing is given by reason of the formers official position,
whether the same is for past favors or the giver hopes
or expects to receive a favor or better treatment in the
future from the public official or employee concerned in
the discharge of his official functions.
Included within the prohibition is the throwing of parties or
entertainments in honor of the official or employees or his
immediate relatives.
ARTICLE 211-A
QUALIFIED BRIBERY
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer entrusted with law
enforcement;
2. That the offender refrains from arresting or prosecuting
an offender who has committed a crime punishable by
reclusion perpetua and/or death; and
Note: If the crime committed is punishable by a penalty
less than reclusion perpetua, the public officer is liable
under Article 208 and direct bribery.
3. That the offender refrains from arresting or prosecuting
the offender in consideration of any promise, gift or
present.
The guilt of the offender is a prejudicial question to the
liability of the officer charged under this provision.
ARTICLE 212
CORRUPTION OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS
Elements:
1. That the offender makes offers or promises or gives gifts
or presents to a public officer; and
2. That the offers or promises are made or the gifts or
presents given to a public officer, under circumstances
that will make the public officer liable for direct bribery or
indirect bribery.
This article is concerned with the liability of the person who
shall have made the offers or promises or given the gifts to
the public officer.
The crime is attempted if the offer, promise, gift or present
was refused and consummated if accepted.
PD 749 grants immunity from prosecution to givers of bribes
and other gifts and to their accomplices if they willingly
testify against public officers or employees in bribery and
other graft cases. For the immunity to be enjoyed, the
following conditions must concur:
a. The information must refer to consummated violations of
Arts. 210, 211, 212 of the RPC; R.A. 3019, as
amended; Sec. 345 of the Internal Revenue Code and
Sec. 3604 of the Tariff and Customs Code and other
provisions of said Codes penalizing abuse or
dishonesty on the part of the public officials concerned;
and other laws, rules and regulations punishing acts of
graft, corruption and other forms of official abuse;
b. The information and testimony are necessary for the
conviction of the accused public officer;
c. Such information and testimony are not yet in the
possession of the State;
d. Such information and testimony can be corroborated on
its material points; and
e. The informant or witness has not been previously
convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (Sec. 1).
The immunity shall not attach if the information turned out to
be false and malicious or made only for the purpose of
harassing, molesting or in any way prejudicing the public
officer denounce (Sec. 2).
 PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 749
GRANTING IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION TO
GIVERS OF BRIBES AND OTHER GIFTS AND TO
THEIR ACCOMPLICES IN BRIBERY AND OTHER
GRAFT CASES AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICERS
Persons Granted Immunity
Any person who voluntarily gives information and willingly
testifies against public official or employee for any
violation of :
1. Articles 210, 211 and 212 of RPC;
2. R.A. No. 3019, as amended;
3. Section 345 of the Internal Revenue Code and other
provisions of the said Codes penalizing abuse or
dishonesty on the part of the public officials concerned;
4. Other laws, rules and regulations punishing acts of grafts,
corruption, and other forms of official abuse (Sec 1).
This immunity may be enjoyed by such informant or witness
notwithstanding that he offered or gave the bribe or gift to
the public official or is an accomplice for such gift or bribe-
giving. Provided, the following conditions concur:
1. The information must refer to consummated violations of
any of the above-mentioned provisions of law, rules and
regulations;
2. The information and testimony are necessary for the
conviction of the accused public officer;
3. Such information and testimony are not yet in the
possession of the State;
4. Such information and testimony can be corroborated on
its material points; and
5. The informant or witness has not been previously
convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (Sec1).
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 3019
As amended by
RA 3047, PD 77, & BP 195
Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act
Section 2. Definition of Terms
Government
The national government, the local government, the
GOCCs and all other instrumentalities or agencies of the
government.
Public officer
Includes elective and appointive officials and employees,
permanent or temporary, whether in the classified or
unclassified or exempt service receiving compensation,
even nominal from the government.
Receiving any gift
Includes the act of accepting directly or indirectly a gift from
a person other than a member of the public officer's
immediate family, in behalf of himself or of any member of
his family or relative within the fourth civil degree, either by
consanguinity or affinity, even on the occasion of a family
celebration or national festivity like Christmas, if the value of
the gift is under the circumstances manifestly excessive.
In the case of Pecho vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 111399,
November 14, 1994, the SC held that violation of Section
3(e) thereof is punishable only in its consummated stage. In
said case, the SC said that in case of special laws such as
RA 3019, the application of Article 6 in relation to Article 10
of the Revised Penal Code will depend on how such laws
define the offenses therein.
Section 3. Corrupt Practices of Public Officials:
The corrupt practices herein enumerated are in addition to
acts or omissions of public officers already penalized by
existing law.
1. Persuading, inducing or influencing another public officer
to perform an act constituting a violation of rules and
regulations duly promulgated by competent authority or
an offense in connection with the official duties of the
latter, or allowing himself to be persuaded, induced, or
influenced to commit such violation or offense.
Persons Liable:
a. Public officer who persuades, induces, or influences
another public officer.
b. Public officer who is persuaded, induced or
influenced.
Requesting or receiving any gift, present, or benefit is
not required in this provision (Reyes, p.399).
2. Directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift,
present, share, percentage, or benefit, for himself or for
any other person, in connection with any contract or
transaction between the government and any other party,
wherein the public officer in his official capacity has to
intervene under the law.
The lack of demand is immaterial. After all, Sec. 3(b) of
RA 3019 uses the word or between requesting and
receiving.
There must be a clear intention on the part of the public
officer to take the gift so offered and consider it as his or
her own property from then on. Mere physical receipt
 unaccompanied by any other sign, circumstance or act to
show acceptance is not sufficient to lead the court to
conclude that the crime has been committed (Peligrino v.
People, G.R. No. 136266, August 31, 2001).
This section refers to a public officer whose official
intervention is required by law in a contract or transaction
(Jaravata v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. L- 56170, January
31, 1984).
A transaction, like a contract, is one which involves
some consideration as in credit transactions (Soriano v.
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. L-65952, July 31, 1984).
3. Directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift,
present or other pecuniary or material benefit, for himself
or for another, from any person for whom the public
officer, in any manner or capacity has secured or
obtained, or will secure or obtain, any government permit
or license, in consideration for the help given or to be
given, without prejudice to Sec. 13 of this Act.
4. Accepting or having any member of his family accept
employment in a private enterprise which has pending
official business with him during the pendency thereof or
within 1 year after its termination.
5. Causing any undue injury to any party, including the
government, or giving any private party any unwarranted
benefits, advantage or preference in the discharge of his
official, administrative or judicial functions through
manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable
negligence. This provision shall apply to officers and
employees of offices or Government corporations
charged with the grant of licenses or permits or other
concessions.
To be held liable under said section, the act of the
accused which caused undue injury must have been done
with manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross
inexcusable negligence.
The undue injury must be specified, quantified and proven
to the point of moral certainty (Llorente vs.
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 122166, March 11, 1998).
If the act was committed with malice, the crime committed
may be that under Art. 207 (malicious delay in the
administration of justice) of the RPC.
Gross negligence
Negligence characterized by the want of even slight
care, acting or omitting to act in a situation where there is
a duty to act, not inadvertently but willfully and
intentionally with a conscious indifference to
consequences in so far as other persons may be
affected. It is the omission of that care which even
inattentive and thoughtless men never fail to take on their
property (Alejandro v. People, G.R. No. 81031, February
20, 1989). In case of public officials, there is gross
negligence when a breach of duty is flagrant and palpable
(Quibal v. Sandiganbayan, G. R. No. 109991, May 22,
1995).
The last sentence of this paragraph is intended to make
clear the inclusion of officers and employees of offices or
government corporations which, under the ordinary
concept of public officer may not come within the term. It
is a strained construction of the provision to read it as
applying exclusively to public officers charged with the
duty of granting license or permits or other concessions
(Mejorada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. L-51065-72 June
30, 1987).
6. Neglecting or refusing, after due demand or request,
without sufficient justification, to act within reasonable
time on any matter pending before him for the purpose of
obtaining, directly or indirectly, from any person interested
in the matter some pecuniary or material benefit or
advantage, or for the purpose of favoring his own interest
or giving undue advantage in favor of or discriminating
against any other interested party.
7. Entering on behalf of the Government, into any contract
or transaction manifestly and grossly disadvantageous to
the same, whether or not the public officer profited or will
profit thereby.
It is not necessary that the public officer profited or will
profit from the contract or transaction. It is the
commission of the act as defined by law and not the
character thereof that determines whether the
provision has been violated (Marcos v.
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 126995, October 6, 1998).
8. Directly Directly or indirectly having financial or pecuniary
interest in any business, contract or transaction in
connection with which he intervenes or takes part in his
official capacity, or in which he is prohibited by the
Constitution or by law from having any interest.
What is contemplated in this section is the actual
intervention in the transaction in which one has financial
or pecuniary interest in order that liability may attach
(Trieste v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. L-70332- 43,
November 13, 1986).
9. or indirectly becoming interested, for personal gain, or
having material interest in any transaction or act
requiring the approval of a board, panel or group of
 which he is a member; and which exercises discretion in
such approval, even if he votes against the same or
does not participate in the action of the board,
committee, panel or group.
Interest for personal gain shall be presumed against
those public officers responsible for the approval of
manifestly unlawful, inequitable, or irregular
transactions or acts by the board, panel or group to
which they belong.
10. Knowingly approving or granting any license, permit,
privilege or benefit in favor of any person not qualified for
or not legally entitled to such license, permit, privilege or
advantage, or of a mere representative or dummy of one
who is not qualified or entitled.
Requesting or receiving any gift, present or benefit is
not required in this provision.
11. Divulging valuable information of a confidential
character, acquired by his office or by him on account
of his official position to unauthorized persons, or
releasing such information in advance of its authorized
release date.
If damage was caused, Article 229 (revelation of
secrets by an officer) under the RPC is committed.
Section 4. Prohibition on Private Individuals
1. Taking advantage of family or close personal relation
with public official who has to intervene in some
business, transaction, application, request or contract of
the government with any other person, by directly or
indirectly requesting or receiving any present, gift, or
material or pecuniary advantage from such public official.
Family relation
Includes the spouse or relatives by consanguinity or
affinity in the third civil degree.
Close personal relation
Includes close personal friendship, social and fraternal
connections, and professional employment all giving rise
to intimacy which assures free access to such public
officer.
2. Knowingly inducing or causing any public official to
commit any of the offenses defined in Section 3.
Section 5. Prohibition on certain relatives
The spouse or any relative, by consanguinity or affinity,
within the 3RD CIVIL DEGREE, of the President, the Vice-
President, Senate President, or the Speaker of the House of
Representatives is prohibited to intervene directly or
indirectly, in any business, transaction, contract or
application with the government.
Exceptions to the provisions:
a. Any person who, prior to the assumption of office of any
of those officials to whom he is related, has been already
dealing with the government along the same line of
business, nor to any transaction, contract or application
already existing or pending at the time of such
assumption of public office.
b. Any application filed by him, the approval of which is not
discretionary on the part of the official or officials
concerned but depends upon compliance with the
requisites provided by law, or rules or regulations issued
pursuant to law.
c. Any act lawfully performed in an official capacity or in the
exercise of a profession.
Section 6. Prohibition on Members of Congress
Members of Congress during their term are prohibited to
acquire or receive any personal pecuniary interest in any
specific business enterprise which will be directly and
particularly favored or benefited by any law or resolution
authored by them.
The prohibition shall also apply to any public officer who
recommended the initiation in Congress of the enactment or
adoption of any law or resolution and acquires or receives
any such interest during his incumbency.
The member of Congress or other public officer, who,
having such interest prior to the approval of a law or
resolution authored or recommended by him, continues for
thirty days after such approval to retain his interest also
violates this section.
Section 8. Prima facie evidence of and dismissal due to
unexplained wealth
A public official who has been found to have acquired during
his incumbency, whether in his name or the name
of other persons, an amount of property and/or money
manifestly out of proportion to his salary and to his other
lawful income.
Ground for forfeiture of unexplained wealth.
Section 11. Prescription of offenses
15 years prescriptive period of all offenses under the Act.
Section 12. Termination of office
No public officer is allowed to resign or retire:
1. Pending investigation, criminal or administrative or
2. Pending a prosecution against him
3. For any offense under the Act or under the provisions of
the RPC on Bribery.
Section 13. Suspension and loss of benefits
Any public officer against whom any criminal prosecution
under a valid information under RA 3019 or the provisions of
RPC on bribery is pending in court, shall be suspended from
office. If convicted by final judgment, he shall lose all
retirement or gratuity benefits, but if acquitted, he shall be
entitled to reinstatement and salaries and benefits he failed
to receive.
It is mandatory for the Court to place under preventive
suspension a public officer accused before it. Imposition of
suspension, however, is not automatic or self-operative. A
pre-condition is the existence of a valid information,
determined at a pre-suspension hearing. Once a proper
determination of the validity of the information has been
made, it becomes the ministerial duty of the Court to issue
the order of preventive suspension. (Segovia v.
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 124067, March 27, 1998)
Section 14. Exception
Unsolicited gifts or presents of small or insignificant value
offered or given as a mere ordinary token of gratitude of
friendship according to local custom or usage.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7080
ANTI-PLUNDER ACT
Means or schemes to acquire ill-gotten wealth: (Sec.1
[d])
1. Through misappropriation, conversion, misuse or
malversation of public funds or raids on the public
treasury;
2. By receiving directly or indirectly, any commission, gift,
share, percentage, kickbacks or any other form of
pecuniary benefit from any person and/or entity in
connection with any government contract/project or by
reason of his office/position;
3. By the illegal or fraudulent conveyance or disposition of
assets belonging to the government;
4. By obtaining, receiving or accepting, directly or
indirectly, any shares of stock, equity or any other form of
interest or participation including the promise of future
employment in any business enterprise or undertaking;
5. By establishing agricultural, industrial or commercial
monopolies or other combinations and/or implementing
decrees and orders intended to benefit particular persons
or special interests;
6. By taking undue advantage of official position, authority,
relationship, connection or influence to unjustly enrich
himself or themselves at the expense and to the damage
and prejudice of the Filipino people and the Republic of
the Philippines.
These should be committed by a combination or through a
series of acts. There should be at least two acts otherwise
the accused should be charged with the particular crime
committed and not with plunder. A COMBINATION means
at least two acts of a different category while a SERIES
means at least two acts of the same category (Estrada vs.
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 21, 2001).
Section 2. Definition of the Crime of Plunder; Penalties
Plunder
A crime committed by any public officer, by himself or in
connivance with his family, relatives by affinity or
consanguinity, business associates, subordinates or other
persons, by amassing, accumulating or acquiring ill-gotten
wealth in the aggregate amount or total value of at least 50
million pesos.
Penalty: Reclusion Perpetua to Death
Mitigating and extenuating circumstances shall be
considered by the courts in the imposition of penalty.
Section 4. Rule of Evidence
It is NOT necessary to prove each and every criminal act
done. A pattern of overt or criminal acts indicative of the
over-all unlawful scheme or conspiracy shall be sufficient.
PATTERN consists of at least a combination or series of
overt or criminal acts enumerated in subsections (1) to (6) of
Sec. 1(d) (Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560,
November 21, 2001).
Section 6. Prescription of Crimes
The crime punishable under this Act shall prescribe in 20
years. However, the right of the State to recover properties
unlawfully acquired by public officers from them or from their
nominees or transferees shall not be barred by prescription
or laches or estoppel.
Plunder is a crime malum in se because the constitutive
crimes are mala in se. The elements of mens rea must be
proven in a prosecution for plunder (Estrada vs.
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 21, 2001).
 CHAPTER THREE: FRAUDS AND
ILLEGAL EXACTIONS AND
TRANSACTIONS
(ARTS. 213-216)
ARTICLE 213
FRAUDS AGAINST THE TREASURY AND SIMILAR OF
OFFENSES
Acts Punished:
1. By entering into an agreement with any interested party
or speculator or making use of any other scheme, to
defraud the Government, in dealing with any person with
regard to furnishing supplies, the making of contracts, or
the adjustment or settlement of accounts relating to public
property or funds.
2. By demanding, directly or indirectly, the payment of sums
different from or larger than those authorized by law, in
the collection of taxes, licenses, fees, and other imposts.
3. By failing voluntarily to issue a receipt, as provided by
law, for any sum of money collected by him officially, in
the collection of taxes, licenses, fees and other imposts.
4. By collecting or receiving, directly or indirectly, by way of
payment or otherwise, things or objects of a nature
different from that provided by law, in the collection of
taxes, licenses, fees and other imposts.
Elements of frauds against public treasury (Par. 1):
1. That the offender be a public officer;
2. That he should have taken advantage of his office, that is,
he intervened in the transaction in his official capacity;
3. That he entered into an agreement with any interested
party or speculator or made use of any other scheme with
regard to
a. Furnishing supplies
b. The making of contracts, or
c. The adjustment or settlement of accounts relating to
public property or funds
4. That the accused had intent to defraud the Government.
The offender must have the duty as public officer to deal
with any person with regard to furnishing supplies, making
of contracts, or the adjustment or settlement of accounts
relating to public property or funds.
This crime is consummated by merely entering into an
agreement with any interested party or speculator or by
merely making use of a scheme to defraud the
government. It is not necessary that the government is
actually defrauded by reason of the transaction. It is
sufficient that the public officer who acted in his official
capacity had the intent to defraud the Government.
Elements of illegal exactions (Pars. 2-4):
1. The offender is a public officer entrusted with the
collection of taxes, licenses, fees and other imposts; and
2. He is guilty of any of the following acts or omissions:
a. Demanding, directly or indirectly, the payment of
sums different from or larger than those authorized by
law; or
b. Failing voluntarily to issue a receipt, as provided by
law, for any sum of money collected by him officially; or
c. Collecting or receiving, directly or indirectly, by way of
payment or otherwise, things or objects of a nature
different from that provided by law.
Mere demand for larger or different amount is sufficient to
consummate a crime.
When there is deceit in demanding a greater fee than that
prescribed by law, the crime committed is estafa and not
illegal exaction.
A tax collector who collected a sum larger than that
authorized by law and spent the same is guilty of illegal
exaction and malversation.
Officers or employees of the Bureau of Internal Revenue or
Bureau of Customs are not covered by this article. The
National Internal Revenue Code or the Administrative Code
applies.
ARTICLE 214
OTHER FRAUDS
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he takes advantage of his official position; and
3. That he commits any of the frauds or deceits enumerated
in Arts. 315 to 318 (estafa, other forms of swindling,
swindling a minor, and other deceits).
The penalty (special disqualification) under this article is in
addition to the penalties prescribed in the Articles violated.
Not a crime but considered as a special aggravating
circumstance.
ARTICLE 215
PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
Elements:
1. That the offender is an appointive public officer;
 Examples: justices, judges or fiscals, employees engaged
in the collection and administration of public funds
2. That he becomes interested, directly or indirectly, in any
transaction of exchange or speculation;
3. That the transaction takes place within the territory
subject to his jurisdiction; and
4. That he becomes interested in the transaction during
his incumbency.
The transaction must be one of exchange or speculation,
such as buying and selling stocks, commodities, land, etc.,
hoping to take advantage of an expected rise and fall in
price.
Purchasing of stocks or shares in a company is simply an
investment and is not a violation of the article. But buying
regularly securities for resale is speculation.
ARTICLE 216
POSSESSION OF PROHIBITED INTEREST BY A
PUBLIC OFFICER
Persons liable:
1. Public officer who, directly or indirectly, became interested
in any contract or business in which it was his official duty
to intervene.
2. Experts, arbitrators, and private accountants who, in like
manner, took part in any contract or transaction
connected with the estate or property in the appraisal,
distribution or adjudication of which they had acted.
3. Guardians and executors with respect to the property
belonging to their wards or the estate.
Actual fraud is NOT necessary, the act is punished because
of the possibility that fraud may be committed or that the
officer or private person (such as an expert, arbitrator,
private accountant, guardian and executor) may place his
own interest above that of the government or party which he
represents.
Intervention must be by virtue of public office held. The
official who intervenes in contracts which have no
connection with his office cannot commit the crime defined
under this Article.
CHAPTER FOUR: MALVERSATION OF
PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY
(ARTS. 217-222)
ARTICLE 217
MALVERSATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY
PRESUMPTION OF MALVERSATION
Malversation is also called embezzlement (Reyes, The
Revised Penal Code Book II, 17th ed., 2008 p. 425).
Acts punished:
1. By appropriating public funds or property.
To appropriate public funds or property includes every
attempt to dispose of the same without right.
2. By taking or misappropriating the same.
3. By consenting, or through abandonment or negligence,
permitting any other person to take such public funds or
property.
4. By being otherwise guilty of the misappropriation or
malversation of such funds or property.
Common elements:
1. That the offender be a public officer.
2. That he had custody or control of funds or property by
reason of the duties of his office.
3. That those funds or property were public funds or
property for which he was accountable.
4. That he appropriated, took, misappropriated or
consented, or through abandonment or negligence,
permitted another person to take them.
Custody
Means guarding or keeping safe; care.
Accountable Officer
A public officer who, in the discharge of his office, receives
money or property of the government which he is bound to
later account for. It is the nature of the duties of, not the
nomenclature used for, or the relative significance of the title
to, the position which controls in the determination
(Tanggote v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 103584, September
2, 1994).
Funds or property must be received in official capacity.
Hence, if the public officer had no authority to receive the
money and he misappropriated the same, the crime is
estafa, not malversation.
The penalty for malversation is the same whether committed
with malice or through negligence or imprudence.
Nature of the duties of the public officer, not the name of the
office, is controlling.
Malversation may be committed by private individuals
in the following cases:
1. Those in conspiracy with public officers guilty of
malversation.
2. Those who are accessory or accomplice to a public
officer.

The provisions of Article 217 shall apply to (1) private
individuals who, in any capacity whatsoever, have charge
of national, provincial or municipal funds, revenues or
property, and to (2) any administrator or depositary of
funds or property attached or seized or deposited by
public authority.
3. Custodian of public funds or property in whatever
capacity.
4. Depositary or administrator of public funds or property.
Presumption
When demand is made to the accountable officer to account
for the funds and property and the same is not forthcoming,
this shall be a prima facie evidence that he has put such
missing funds or property to personal use.
The return of the funds malversed is only mitigating, not
exempting circumstance.
Demand is NOT necessary in malversation. Damage to the
government is also not necessary.
Malversation is principally distinguished from estafa
by:
1. The public or private character of the accused.
2. The nature of the funds.
3. The fact that conversion is not required in malversation.
4. The rule that there is no need of prior demand in
malversation.
5. The absence of a requirement of damage in malversation.
Malversation can be committed through abandonment or
negligence. Negligence is the omission to do something
which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations
which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs,
would do, or the doing of something which a prudent and
reasonable man would do.
The failure of a public officer to have duly forthcoming any
public funds or property with which he is chargeable, upon
demand by any duly authorized officer, shall be prima facie
evidence that he has put such missing funds or property to
personal uses.
Direct Evidence Not Required in Malversation
Direct evidence is not necessary to prove malversation
because the law presumes that malversation was committed
when after there has been complete, thorough and reliable
audit, there is a discrepancy in the funds or property. As
such, when the officer cannot overthrow the presumption in
law, he may be held liable for malversation
although no directevidence has been presented yet
(Cabella v. Sandiganbayan, 197 SCRA 94 [1991]).
ARTICLE 218
FAILURE OF ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER
TO RENDER ACCOUNTS
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer, whether in the service
or separated therefrom;
2. That he must be an accountable officer for public funds or
property;
3. That he is required by law or regulation to render
accounts to the Commission on Audit, or to a provincial
auditor; and
4. That he fails to do so for a period of two months after
such accounts should be rendered.
Demand for accounting is NOT necessary.
It is NOT necessary that there be misappropriation. If there
is misappropriation, he would be liable also for malversation
under Art. 217.
ARTICLE 219
FAILURE OF RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC OFFICER TO
RENDER ACCOUNTS BEFORE LEAVING THE
COUNTRY
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he must be an accountable officer for public funds or
property; and
3. That he must have unlawfully left (or be on the point of
leaving) the Philippines without securing from the
Commission on Audit a certificate showing that his
accounts have been finally settled.
The act of leaving the country must be unauthorized or
not permitted by law.
ARTICLE 220
ILLEGAL USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That there is a public fund or property under his
administration;
3. That such public fund or property has been appropriated
by law or ordinance; and
4. That he applies the same to a public use other than that
for which such fund or property has been
appropriated by law or ordinance.
The crime under this Article is also referred to as
TECHNICAL MALVERSATION. The word administrator does not include judicial
administrator appointed to administer the estate of a
The public funds or property must be appropriated by law or deceased person because he is not in charge of any
ordinance for a particular purpose. property attached, impounded, or placed in deposit by
public authority. Conversion of effects in his trust makes
Illegal Use of Public him liable for estafa.
Malversation
Funds or Property
Private property is included, provided it is attached,
The offenders are accountable public officers in both seized, or deposited by public authority.
crimes.
The offender does not The offender in certain CHAPTER FIVE: INFIDELITY OF PUBLIC
derive any personal gain cases profits from the OFFICERS
or profit. proceeds of the crime. (ARTS. 223-230)

The public fund or The public fund or

property is applied to property is applied to the SECTION ONE: INFIDELITY IN THE CUSTODY OF
another public use. personal use and benefit PRISONERS
of the offender or of
another person.
ARTICLE 223
CONNIVING WITH OR CONSENTING TO EVASION
ARTICLE 221
FAILURE TO MAKE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR Elements:
PROPERTY 1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he had in his custody or charge, a prisoner, either
Acts Punished: detention prisoner or prisoner by final judgment;
1. By failing to make payment by a public officer who is 3. That such prisoner escaped from his custody; and
under obligation to make such payment from Government 4. That he was in connivance with the prisoner in the latters
funds in his possession. escape.

Elements: Connivance with the prisoner (agreement between the

a. Public officer has government funds in his
possession;
b. He is under obligation to make payment from such
funds; and
c. He fails to make the payment, maliciously.
2. By refusing to make delivery by a public officer who has
been ordered by competent authority to deliver any
property in his custody or under his administration.
ARTICLE 222
OFFICERS INCLUDED IN THE PRECEDING
PROVISIONS
Private individuals who may be liable under Art. 217-
221:
1. Private individuals who, in any capacity whatsoever, have
charge of any national, provincial or municipal funds,
revenue or property
2. Administrator or depository of funds or property
attached, seized, or deposited by public authority even if
such property belongs to a private individual. (example:
sheriffs and receivers)
prisoner and the public officer) in his escape is an
indispensable element of the offense.
Classes of prisoners involved:
1. If the fugitive has been sentenced by final judgment to any
penalty.
2. If the fugitive is held only as detention prisoner for any
crime or violation of law or municipal ordinance.
A detention prisoner is a person in legal custody, arrested
for, and charged with, some crime or public offense.
Leniency, laxity and release of detention prisoner who
could not be delivered to the judicial authority within the
time fixed by law, are not considered infidelity in the
custody of prisoners.
There is real and actual evasion of service of sentence
when the custodian permits the prisoner to obtain a
relaxation of his imprisonment and to escape the
punishment of being deprived of his liberty, thus making
the penalty ineffectual, although the convict may not
 have fled (U.S. vs. Bandino, G.R. No. L-9964, February
11,1915).
ARTICLE 224
EVASION THROUGH NEGLIGENCE
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he is charged with the conveyance or custody of a
prisoner, either detention prisoner or prisoner by final
judgment; and
3. That such prisoner escapes through his negligence.
Not every negligence or distraction of a guard is penalized.
It is only that positive carelessness that is short of deliberate
non-performance of his duties as guard that is the gravamen
of the crime of infidelity under Art. 224 (People v. Reyes, et
al., C.A., 59 O.G. 6664).
The fact that the public officer recaptured the prisoner who
had escaped from his custody does not afford complete
exculpation.
A policeman who, assigned to guard a prisoner, falls asleep,
with the result that the prisoner escapes, is guilty of
negligence in the custody of a prisoner (People vs. Guiab,
G.R. No. 39631, May 6, 1934).
Liability of escaping prisoner:
1. If the fugitive is serving sentence by reason of final
judgment, he is liable for evasion of the service of
sentence under Art. 157.
2. If the fugitive is only a detention prisoner, he does not
incur criminal liability.
Any public officer who has direct custody of a detained
person under the provisions of this Act and who, by
deliberate act, misconduct or inexcusable negligence
causes or allows the escape of such detained person shall
be guilty of an offense (Human Security Act of 2007, R.A.
9372, Section 44).
ARTICLE 225
ESCAPE OF PRISONER UNDER THE CUSTODY OF A
PERSON NOT A PUBLIC OFFICER
Elements:
1. That the offender is a private person;
2. That the conveyance or custody of a prisoner or person
under arrest is confided to him;
3. That the prisoner or person under arrest escapes; and
4. That the offender consents to the escape of the prisoner
or person under arrest, or that the escape takes place
through his negligence.
Art. 225 is NOT applicable if a private person was the one
who made the arrest and he consented to the escape of the
person he arrested.
SECTION TWO: INFIDELITY IN THE CUSTODY OF
DOCUMENTS
ARTICLE 226
REMOVAL, CONCEALMENT, OR DESTRUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS
Elements:
1. That the offender be a public officer;
Note: Only public officers who have been officially
entrusted with the documents or papers can be held liable
under Article 226. If the offender is a private individual,
estafa is committed if there is damage caused. If there is
no damage, the crime is malicious mischief.
2. That he removes, conceals or destroys documents or
papers;
The removal must be for illicit purpose when the intention
of the offender is
a. to tamper with it, or
b. to profit by it, or
c. to commit an act constituting a breach of trust in the
official care thereof.
Papers include checks, promissory notes, and paper
money.
3. That the said documents or papers should have been
entrusted to such public officer by reason of his office; and
4. That damage, whether serious or not, to a third party or to
the public interest should have been caused.
The document must be complete and one by which a right
can be established or an obligation could be extinguished.
The removal must be for an illicit purpose.
The crime of removal of public document in breach of official
trust is consummated upon its removal or secreting away
from its usual place in the office and after the offender had
gone out and locked the door, it being immaterial whether
he has or has not actually accomplished the illicit purpose
for which he removed said document.
Damage in this article may consist in mere alarm to the
public or in the alienation of its confidence in any branch of justifiable reasons; and
the government service. 3. That damage, great or small, be caused to public
interest.
ARTICLE 227
OFFICER BREAKING SEAL Sec 3 (k) of RA 3019 is violated if there is no damage
caused in revealing the secret.
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer; This article punishes minor official betrayals, infidelities
2. That he is charged with the custody of papers or property; of little consequence, affecting usually the
3. That these papers or property are sealed by proper administration of justice, executive or official duties, or
authority; and the general interest of the public order.
4. That he breaks the seals or permits them to be broken.
5. Secrets must affect public interest, if not, the revelation
Damage or intent to damage is not necessary. would constitute no crime at all.

2. By delivering wrongfully papers or copies of papers of

ARTICLE 228 which he may have charge and which should not be
OPENING OF CLOSED DOCUMENTS published.

Elements: Elements of No. 2:

1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That any closed papers, documents, or objects are
entrusted to his custody;
3. That he opens or permits to be opened said closed
papers, documents, or objects; and
4. That he does not have the proper authority.
The closed document must be entrusted to the custody of
the accused by reason of his office.
If in opening closed papers or objects, the public officer
broke the seal, the offense would be breaking seal under
Art. 227 and not the crime of opening a closed document,
because the offender must be a public officer not included
in the preceding article.
Damage or intent to cause damage is NOT an element of
this offense.
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he has charge of papers;
3. That those papers should not be published;
4. That he delivers those papers or copies thereof to a
third person;
5. That the delivery is wrongful; and
6. That damage be caused to public interest
Charge
Means control or custody. If the public officer is merely
entrusted with the papers but not with the custody, he is not
liable under this provision.
Damage is an element of the offenses defined in Art. 229. A
higher penalty is provided if serious damage is caused
otherwise a lower penalty is imposed. This indicates that the
lesser penalty refers to causing damage which is not
serious.

SECTION THREE: REVELATION OF SECRETS Infidelity in the

Revelation of Secrets Custody of
ARTICLE 229 by an Officer Document/Papers by
REVELATION OF SECRETS BY AN OFFICER Removing the Same
The papers contain The papers do not
Acts punished: secrets and therefore contain secrets but their
1. By revealing any secret known to the offending public should not be removal is for an illicit
published, and the purpose.
officer by reason of his official capacity.
public officer having
charge thereof removes
Elements of No. 1:
and delivers them
1. That the offender is a public officer;
wrongfully to a third
That he knows of a secret by reason of his official
person.
capacity;
2. That he reveals such secret without authority or
 ARTICLE 230
PUBLIC OFFICER REVEALING SECRETS OF PRIVATE
INDIVIDUAL
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he knows of the secrets of a private individual by
reason of his office; and
3. That he reveals such secrets without authority or
justifiable reason.
If the offender is a lawyer, the crime under Art. 209 is
committed.
If the offender is a private individual, the crime under Art.
290 or 291 is committed.
Revelation to one person is necessary and sufficient, for
public revelation is not required.
It is NOT necessary that damage is suffered by the private
individual. The reason for this provision is to uphold faith and
trust in public service.
CHAPTER SIX: OTHER OFFENSES OR
IRREGULARITIES BY PUBLIC
OFFICERS
(ARTS. 231-245)
SECTION ONE: DISOBEDIENCE, REFUSAL OF
ASSISTANCE AND MALTREATMENT OF PRISONERS
ARTICLE 231
OPEN DISOBEDIENCE
Elements:
1. That the offender is a judicial or executive officer;
2. That there is a judgment, decision or order of a superior
authority;
3. That such judgment, decision or order was made
within the scope of the jurisdiction of the superior authority
and issued with all legal formalities; and
4. That the offender without any legal justification openly
refuses to execute said judgment, decision or order,
which he is duty bound to obey.
ARTICLE 232
DISOBEDIENCE TO ORDER OF SUPERIOR OFFICER
WHEN SAID ORDER WAS SUSPENDED BY INFERIOR
OFFICER
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That an order is issued by his superior for execution;
3. That he has for any reason suspended the execution of
such order;
4. That his superior disapproves the suspension of the
execution of the order; and
5.That the offender disobeys his superior despite the
disapproval of the suspension.
This article does NOT apply if the order of the superior is
illegal.
ARTICLE 233
REFUSAL OF ASSISTANCE
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That a competent authority demands from the offender
that he lend his cooperation towards the administration of
justice or other public service; and
3. That the offender fails to do so maliciously.
There must be damage to the public interest or to a third
party.
If the offender is a private individual, he may be held liable
for contempt.
ARTICLE 234
REFUSAL TO DISCHARGE ELECTIVE OFFICE
Elements:
1. That the offender is elected by popular election to a
public office;
2. That he refuses to be sworn in or to discharge the duties
of said office; and
3. That there is no legal motive for such refusal to be
sworn in or to discharge the duties of said office.
ARTICLE 235
MALTREATMENT OF PRISONERS
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee;
2. That he has under his charge a prisoner convicted by
final judgment or a detention prisoner;
3. That he maltreats such prisoner in either of the following
manners:
a. By overdoing himself in the correction or handling
of a prisoner or detention prisoner under his charge
either:
i. by the imposition of punishments not authorized by
the regulations; or
ii. by inflicting such punishments (those authorized)
in a cruel and humiliating manner; or
b. By maltreating such prisoner to extort a
 confession or to obtain some information from the
prisoner.
The public officer or employee must have actual charge of
the prisoner.
To be a detention prisoner, the person arrested must be
placed in jail even for a short while.
Offender may also be held liable for physical injuries or
damage caused. There is no complex crime of maltreatment
of prisoners with serious or less serious physical injuries, as
defined in Art. 48.
REPUBLIC ACT N0. 9745
Anti-Torture Act of 2009
Torture"
Refers to an act by which severe pain or suffering, whether
physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for
such purposes as
1. obtaining from him/her or a third person information or a
confession;
2. punishing him/her for an act he/she or a third person
has committed or is suspected of having committed; or
3. intimidating or coercing him/her or a third person; or for
any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when
such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation
of or with the consent or acquiescence of a person in
authority or agent of a person in authority.
Punishable Acts
1. Physical torture is a form of treatment or punishment
inflicted by a person in authority or agent of a person in
authority upon another in his/her custody that causes
severe pain, exhaustion, disability or dysfunction of one
or more parts of the body, such as:
a. Systematic beating, headbanging, punching,
kicking, striking with truncheon or rifle butt or other
similar objects, and jumping on the stomach;
b. Food deprivation or forcible feeding with spoiled
food, animal or human excreta and other stuff or
substances not normally eaten;
c. Electric shock;
d. Cigarette burning; burning by electrically heated
rods, hot oil, acid; by the rubbing of pepper or other
chemical substances on mucous membranes, or
acids or spices directly on the wound(s);
e. The submersion of the head in water or water
polluted with excrement, urine, vomit and/or blood
until the brink of suffocation;
f. Being tied or forced to assume fixed and stressful
bodily position;
g. Rape and sexual abuse, including the insertion of
foreign objects into the sex organ or rectum, or
electrical torture of the genitals;
h. Mutilation or amputation of the essential parts of the
body such as the genitalia, ear, tongue, etc.;
i. Dental torture or the forced extraction of the teeth;
j. Pulling out of fingernails;
k. Harmful exposure to the elements such as sunlight
and extreme cold;
l. The use of plastic bag and other materials placed
over the head to the point of asphyxiation;
m. The use of psychoactive drugs to change the
perception, memory. alertness or will of a person,
such as:
i. The administration or drugs to induce confession
and/or reduce mental competency; or
ii. The use of drugs to induce extreme pain or certain
symptoms of a disease; and
n. Other analogous acts of physical torture; and
2. "Mental/Psychological Torture" refers to acts
committed by a person in authority or agent of a
person in authority which are calculated to affect or
confuse the mind and/or undermine a person's dignity
and morale, such as:
a. Blindfolding;
b. Threatening a person(s) or his/fher relative(s) with
bodily harm, execution or other wrongful acts;
c. Confinement in solitary cells or secret detention
places;
d. Prolonged interrogation;
e. Preparing a prisoner for a "show trial", public display
or public humiliation of a detainee or prisoner;
f. Causing unscheduled transfer of a person deprived
of liberty from one place to another, creating the
belief that he/she shall be summarily executed;
g. Maltreating a member/s of a person's family;
h. Causing the torture sessions to be witnessed by the
person's family, relatives or any third party;
i. Denial of sleep/rest;
j. Shame infliction such as stripping the person naked,
parading him/her in public places, shaving the
victim's head or putting marks on his/her body
against his/her will;
k. Deliberately prohibiting the victim to communicate with
any member of his/her family; and
l. Other analogous acts of mental/psychological torture.
Who are Criminally Liable
1. Any person who actually participated Or induced another
in the commission of torture or other cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment or punishment or
2. Those who cooperated in the execution of the act of 4. That he abandons his office to the detriment of the public
torture or other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment service.
or punishment by previous or simultaneous acts shall be
liable as principal Qualifying circumstance when the abandonment of the
office has for its purpose to evade the discharge of the
Any superior military, police or law enforcement officer or duties of preventing, prosecuting or punishing any of the
senior government official who issued an order to any lower crimes falling within Title 1 and Chapter 1 Title 3 of Book 2
ranking personnel to commit torture for whatever purpose of the RPC.
shall be held equally liable as principals.
Negligence and
SECTION TWO: ANTICIPATION, PROLONGATION Abandonment of
Tolerance in
AND ABANDONMENT OF THE DUTIES AND Office
Prosecution of Offenses
POWERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE (Art. 238)
(Art. 208)

ARTICLE 236 Committed by any Committed only by public

ANTICIPATION OF DUTIES OF public officer. officers who have the duty
A PUBLIC OFFICE to institute prosecution for
the punishment of
Elements: violations of the law.
1. That the offender is entitled to hold a public office or The public officer The public officer does not
employment, either by election or appointment; abandons his office to abandon his office but he
2. That the law requires that he should first be sworn in evade the discharge of fails to prosecute an
and/or should first give a bond; his duty. offense by dereliction of
3. That he assumes the performance of the duties and duty or by malicious
powers of such office; and tolerance of the
4. That he has not taken his oath of office and/or given the commission of offenses.
bond required by law.
SECTION THREE: USURPATION OF POWERS
ARTICLE 237
AND UNLAWFUL APPOINTMENTS
PROLONGING PERFORMANCE
OF DUTIES AND POWERS
ARTICLE 239 USURPATION
Elements: OF LEGISLATIVE POWERS
1. That the offender is holding a public office;
2. That the period provided by law, regulations or special Elements:
1. That the offender is an executive or judicial officer;
provisions for holding such office, has already expired;
2. That he:
and
a. Makes general rules or regulations beyond the scope
3. That he continues to exercise the duties and powers of
of his authority; or
such office.
b. Attempts to repeal a law; or
c. Suspends the execution thereof.
Officers contemplated:
A public officer who has been suspended, separated, ARTICLE 240
declared overage, or dismissed cannot continue to perform USURPATION OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
the duties of his office.
Elements:
ARTICLE 238 1. That the offender is a judge;
ABANDONMENT OF OFFICE 2. That he:
a. Assumes a power pertaining to the executive
authorities; or
Elements:
b. Obstructs the executive authorities in the lawful
1. That the offender is a public officer;
exercise of their powers.
2. That he formally resigns from his position;
There must be written or formal resignation
Legislative officers are not liable for usurpation of powers.
3. That his resignation has not yet been accepted; and
 ARTICLE 241
USURPATION OF JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS
Elements:
1. That the offender is an officer of the executive branch of
the Government;
2. That he:
a. Assumes judicial powers; or
b. Obstructs the execution of any order or decision
rendered by any judge within his jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 242
DISOBEYING REQUEST FOR DISQUALIFICATION
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That a proceeding is pending before such public officer;
3. That there is a question brought before the proper
authority regarding his jurisdiction, which is not yet
decided;
4. That he has been lawfully required to refrain from
continuing the proceeding; and
5. That he continues the proceeding.
ARTICLE 243
ORDERS OR REQUESTS BY EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS TO ANY JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
Elements:
1. That the offender is an executive officer;
2. That he addresses any order or suggestion to any
judicial authority; and
3. That the order or suggestion relates to any case or
business coming within the exclusive jurisdiction of the
courts of justice.
ARTICLE 244
UNLAWFUL APPOINTMENTS
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he nominates or appoints a person to a public office;
3. That such person lacks the legal qualifications therefor;
and
4. That the offender knows that his nominee or appointee
lacks the qualification at the time he made the
nomination or appointment.
The offense is committed by nominating or by appointing.
Nominate is different from recommend. Recommending,
knowing that the recommendee has no qualification, is not a
crime.
There must be a law providing for the qualifications of a
person to be nominated or appointed to a public office.
SECTION FOUR: ABUSES AGAINST CHASTITY
ARTICLE 245
ABUSES AGAINST CHASTITY PENALTIES
Ways of committing abuses against chastity:
1. By soliciting or making immoral or indecent advances to
a woman interested in the matters pending before the
offending officer for decision, or with respect to which
he is required to submit a report to or consult with a
superior officer.
2. By soliciting or making immoral or indecent advances to a
woman under the offenders custody.
3. By soliciting or making immoral or indecent advances to
the wife, daughter, sister or relative within the same
degree by affinity of any person in the custody of the
offending warden or officer.
Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer;
2. That he solicits or makes immoral or indecent advances
to a woman; and
3. That such woman must be
a. Interested in matters pending before the offender for
decision, or with respect to which he is required to
submit a report to or consult with a superior officer; or
b. Under the custody of the offender who is a warden or
other public officer directly charged with the care and
custody of prisoners or persons under arrest; or
c. The wife, daughter, sister or relative within the same
degree by affinity of the person in the custody of the
offender.
The mother of the person in the custody of the offender is
NOT included.
Solicit
Means to propose earnestly and persistently something
unchaste and immoral to a woman.
This crime is consummated by mere proposal. If the
offender succeeds in committing a crime against chastity,
the solicitation and advances are considered merely as
preparatory acts.
Proof of solicitation is NOT necessary when there is sexual
intercourse.
Note: See also RA 7877, the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act
of 1995 which applies where the accused demands,
requests or otherwise requires any sexual favors from the
victim in a work, education or training-related environment.
TITLE EIGHT: CRIMES AGAINST
PERSONS
SECTION ONE: PARRICIDE, MURDER, HOMICIDE
ARTICLE 246
PARRICIDE
Elements:
1. That a person is killed;
2. That the deceased is killed by the accused; and
3. That the deceased is the father, mother, or child, whether
legitimate or illegitimate, or a legitimate other ascendant
or other descendant, or the legitimate spouse, of the
accused.
Cases of parricide when the penalty shall NOT be
reclusion perpetua to death:
1. Parricide through negligence (Art. 365).
2. Parricide by mistake (Art. 249).
3. Parricide under exceptional circumstances (Art. 247).
The child should not be less than 3 days old; otherwise
the crime is infanticide. (Art. 255)
Relationship of the offender with the victim is the
essential element of the crime. Hence:
a. If a person wanted to kill a stranger but by mistake
killed his own father, he will be held liable for parricide
BUT Art. 49 will apply as regards the proper penalty to
be imposed, that is, the penalty for the lesser offense
in its maximum period.
b. A stranger who cooperates and takes part in the
commission of the crime of parricide is not guilty of
parricide but only of homicide or murder, as the case
may be. The key element in parricide is the
relationship of the offender with the victim (People vs.
Dalag, G.R. No. 129895, April 30, 2003).
c. The relationship between the offender and the victim
must be alleged.
The law does NOT require knowledge of relationship, thus,
a person who killed another not knowing that the latter was
his son will still be held guilty of parricide.
The fact that the husband only intended to maltreat his wife
does not exempt him from liability for resulting and more
serious crime committed (People vs. Tomotorgo,
G.R. No. L-47941, April 30, 1985).
Legitimacy need NOT be alleged when the accused killed
his (1)father, (2) mother or (3) child.
However with respect to the other ascendant, descendant or
spouse, the relationship MUST be legitimate.
An adopted child is considered as a legitimate child BUT
since the relationship is exclusive between the adopter and
the adopted child, killing the parents of the adopter is
not considered parricide of other (legitimate)
ascendants.
ARTICLE 247
DEATH OR PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED UNDER
EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES
Elements:
1. That a legally married person or a parent surprises his
spouse or his daughter, the latter under 18 years of age
and living with him, in the act of committing sexual
intercourse with another person;
2. That he or she kills any or both of them, or inflicts upon
any or both of them any serious physical injury, in the
act or immediately thereafter; and
3. That he has not promoted or facilitated the prostitution of
his wife or daughter, or that he or she has not consented
to the infidelity of the other spouse.
The requisites of Art. 247 must be established by the
evidence of the defense and accused cannot enter into a
conditional plea of guilty and be sentenced with destierro
since the prosecution will have to charge the defendant with
parricide and/or homicide, in case death results, or of
serious physical injuries in other cases.
For Art. 247 to apply, the offender must prove that he
actually surprised his wife and (her paramour) in flagrante
delicto, and that he killed the man during or immediately
thereafter. Evidence of the victims promiscuity, is
inconsequential to the killing (People vs. Puedan, G.R. No.
139576, September 2, 2002).
Surprise
To come upon suddenly and unexpectedly.
Sexual intercourse does NOT include preparatory acts.
Immediately thereafter
The discovery, the escape, the pursuit and the killing must
all form part of one continuous act (U.S. vs. Vargas, et al.,
G.R. 1053, May 7, 1903).

The accused must be a legally married person and the word
spouse shall include wife.
The parent need NOT be legitimate.
No liability for less serious or slight physical injuries suffered
by third persons during the commission of the act under this
article
Justification for Art. 247
The law considers the spouse or parent as acting in a
justified burst of passion.
ARTICLE 248
MURDER
Murder
Unlawful killing of any person which is not parricide or
infanticide, provided that any of the following circumstances
is present:
1. With treachery, taking advantage of superior strength,
with the aid of armed men, or employing means to
weaken the defense, or of means or persons to insure or
afford impunity;
2. In consideration of a price, reward or promise;
3. By means of inundation, fire, poison, explosion,
shipwreck, stranding of a vessel, derailment or assault
upon a railroad, fall of an airship, by means of motor
vehicles, or with the use of any other means involving
great waste and ruin;
4. On occasion of any calamities enumerated in the
preceding paragraph, or of an earthquake, eruption of a
volcano, destructive cyclone, epidemic, or any other
public calamity;
5. With evident premeditation; or
6. With cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly augmenting
the suffering of the victim, or outraging or scoffing at his
person or corpse (As amended by RA No. 7659).
Elements:
1. That a person was killed;
2. That the accused killed him;
3. That the killing was attended by any of the qualifying
circumstances mentioned in Art. 248; and
4. That the killing is not parricide or infanticide.
Rules for the application of the circumstances which
qualify the killing to murder:
1. That murder will exist with only one of the circumstances
described in Art. 248.
2. Where there are more than one qualifying circumstance
present, only one will qualify the killing, with the rest to be
considered as generic aggravating circumstances.
3. That when the other circumstances are absorbed or
included in one qualifying circumstance, they cannot be
considered as generic aggravating.
4. That any of the qualifying circumstances enumerated in
Art. 248 must be alleged in the information.
Outraging (physical act)
Means to commit an extremely vicious or deeply insulting
act.
Scoffing (verbal act)
Means to jeer, and implies a showing of irreverence.
Dismemberment of a dead body is one manner of outraging
or scoffing at the corpse of the victim and qualifies the killing
to murder (People vs. Guillermo, G.R. No. 147786, January
20, 2004).
If homicide or murder is committed with the use of an
unlicensed firearm, such use of an unlicensed firearm shall
be considered as an aggravating circumstance. (R.A. No.
8294, Sec. 1)
Treachery and Evident Premeditation are inherent in murder
by means of Poison BUT the Use of Poison is not inherent
in murder. It only becomes inherent if there is intent to kill
and the poison is used as a means to kill.
ARTICLE 249
HOMICIDE
Homicide
The unlawful killing of any person, which is NOT parricide,
murder or infanticide.
Intent to kill is conclusively presumed when death results;
evidence of intent to kill is important only in attempted or
frustrated homicide.
Intent to kill is usually shown by the kind of weapon used
and part of the body wounded.
Elements:
1. That a person was killed;
2. That the accused killed him without any justifying
circumstance;
3. That the accused had the intention to kill, which is
presumed; and
4. That the killing was not attended by any of the qualifying
circumstances of murder, or by that of parricide or
infanticide.
The use of an unlicensed firearm is an aggravating
circumstance in homicide and is NOT to be considered as a
separate offense (RA No. 8294, Sec. 1).
Corpus Delicti
Actual commission of the crime charged and not the body of
the person killed.
Accidental Homicide
Is the death of a person brought about by a lawful act
performed with proper care and skill and without homicidal
intent. e.g. death in boxing bout. There is NO FELONY
committed in this case.
In an attempted or frustrated homicide, the offender must
have the intent to kill the victim. If there is no intent to kill on
the part of the offender, he is liable for physical injuries.
In all crimes against persons in which the death of the victim
is an element of an offense, there must be satisfactory
evidence of (1) the fact of death and (2) the identity of the
victim.
When there is no way of determining how the attack was
committed, treachery cannot be considered and the
accused is guilty of homicide only (People vs. Dela Cruz,
G.R. No. 152176, October 1, 2003).
There is no such crime as frustrated homicide through
imprudence.
ARTICLE 250
PENALTY FOR FRUSTRATED PARRICIDE, MURDER,
OR HOMICIDE
Courts may impose a penalty two degrees lower for
frustrated parricide, murder or homicide.
Courts may impose a penalty three degrees lower for
attempted parricide, murder or homicide.
This provision is permissive, NOT MANDATORY.
An attempt on or conspiracy against the life of the Chief
Executive, member of his family, any member of his cabinet
or members of latters family is punishable by death (PD
1110-A).
ARTICLE 251
DEATH CAUSED IN A TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY
Elements:
1. That there be several persons;
2. That they did not compose groups organized for the
common purpose of assaulting and attacking each other
reciprocally, otherwise, they may be held liable as co-
conspirators;
3. That these several persons quarreled and assaulted one
another in a confused and tumultuous manner;
4. That someone was killed in the course of the affray;
5. That it cannot be ascertained who actually killed the
deceased; and
6. That the person or persons who inflicted serious physical
injuries or who used violence can be identified.
Persons liable:
1. The person or persons who inflicted the serious physical
injuries are liable.
2. If it is not known who inflicted the serious physical
injuries on the deceased ALL the persons who used
violence upon the person of the victim are liable, but with
lesser liability.
Tumultuous affray
A melee or free-for-all, where several persons not
comprising definite or identifiable groups attack one another
in a confused and disorganized manner resulting in the
death or injury of one or some of them.
Tumultuous affray exists when at least four persons took
part.
When the quarrel is between a distinct group of individuals,
one of whom was sufficiently identified as the principal
author of the killing, as against a common, particular victim,
it is not a "tumultuous affray" within the meaning of Art. 251
of the RPC (People vs. Unlagada,
G.R. No. 141080, September 17, 2002). In such a case, the
crime committed is homicide under Art. 249.
The victim may be a participant or non-participant thereof.
ARTICLE 252
PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED IN A TUMULTUOUS
AFFRAY
Elements:
1. That there is a tumultuous affray as referred to in Art. 251;
2. That a participant or some participants thereof suffer
serious physical injuries or physical injuries of a less
serious nature only;
3. That the person responsible therefor cannot be identified;
and
4. That all those who appear to have used violence upon the
person of the offended party are known.
Injured/victim must be a participant in the affray.
Only those who used violence are punished, because if the The crime is discharge of firearm even if the gun was not
one who caused the physical injuries is known, he will be pointed at the offended party when it was fired, as long as it
liable for the physical injuries actually committed, and not was initially aimed by the accused at or against the offended
under this article. party.

ARTICLE 253 If the firearm was not aimed against or at another person,
GIVING ASSISTANCE TO SUICIDE the crime committed is alarms and scandals.

Acts punished: No offense for Illegal discharge of firearms through

1. By assisting another to commit suicide, whether the imprudence.
suicide is consummated or not.
2. By lending his assistance to another to commit suicide SECTION TWO: INFANTICIDE AND ABORTION
to the extent of doing the killing himself.
ARTICLE 255
A person who attempts to commit suicide is not criminally INFANTICIDE
liable even if an innocent third person or property is hurt or
damaged. Infanticide
It is the killing of any child less than three days of age,
The penalty for giving assistance to suicide if the offender is whether the killer is the parent or grandparent, any other
the father, mother, child or spouse of the one committing relative of the child, or a stranger.
suicide is the same since the law does not distinguish.
Elements:
1. That a child was killed;
Euthanasia or Mercy-Killing 2. That the deceased child was less than three days (72
Is a practice of painlessly putting to death a person suffering hours) of age; and
from some incurable disease. 3. That the accused killed the said child.

A doctor who resorted to euthanasia may be held liable for No crime of infanticide is committed if the child has been
murder under Art. 248 since euthanasia is not giving dead or if, although born alive, it could not sustain an
assistance to suicide BUT doing the killing himself. independent life when it was killed.

In euthanasia, the person killed does not want to die. Father or mother or other legitimate ascendant who kills a
child less than three days old shall suffer the penalty for
ARTICLE 254 parricide.
DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
Other person who kills or who cooperates with the mother or
Elements: maternal grandparent in killing a child less than three days
1. That the offender discharges a firearm against or at old will suffer the penalty for murder.
another person; and
2. That the offender has no intention to kill that person. Only the mother and the maternal grandparents of the child
are entitled to the mitigating circumstance of concealing the
It is not applicable to police officers in the performance of dishonor.
their duties.
The delinquent mother who claims concealing dishonor
The PURPOSE of the offender is only to intimidate or must be of good reputation and good morals.
frighten the offended party.
Treachery is inherent in infanticide.
If in the discharge of firearm, the offended party is hit and
wounded, there is a complex crime of discharge of firearm
with serious or less serious physical injuries; BUT if only
slight physical injuries were inflicted, there is no complex
crime (BUT two separate crimes) since such physical
injuries constitutes a light felony.
 ARTICLE 256
INTENTIONAL ABORTION
Intentional abortion
Willful killing of the fetus in the uterus or the violent
expulsion of the fetus from the maternal womb which results
in the death of the fetus.
Ways of Committing Intentional Abortion:
1. By using any violence upon the person of the pregnant
woman;
2. By acting, without using violence and without the
consent of the woman (by administering drugs or
beverages upon such pregnant woman without her
consent; and
3. By acting, with the consent of the pregnant woman, by
administering drugs or beverages.
Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman;
2. That violence is exerted, or drugs or beverages
administered, or that the accused otherwise acts upon
such pregnant woman;
3. That as a result of the use of violence or drugs or
beverages upon her, or any other act of the accused, the
fetus dies, either in the womb or after having been
expelled therefrom; and
4. That the abortion is intended.
Person liable in Intentional Abortion:
1. The person who intentionally caused the abortion under
Art. 256.
2. The pregnant woman if she consented under Art. 258.
As long as the fetus dies as a result of the violence used or
the drugs administered, the crime of abortion exists, even if
the fetus is over or less than 6 months, or is full term.
If the fetus could sustain an independent life (the fetus must
have had an intrauterine life of not less than 7 months) after
its separation from the maternal womb, and it is killed, the
crime is infanticide, not abortion.
Fetus must die in consummated abortion. If it is intentional
abortion and the fetus does not die, it is frustrated
intentional abortion when all the acts of execution have
been performed by the offender.
If the abortion is not intended and the fetus does not die, in
spite of the violence intentionally exerted, the crime may
only be physical injuries. There is no crime of frustrated
unintentional abortion, in view of the lack of intention to
cause an abortion.
If there is no intention to cause abortion and no violence,
there is no abortion of any kind.
ARTICLE 257
UNINTENTIONAL ABORTION
Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman;
2. That violence is used upon such pregnant woman
without intending an abortion;
3. That the violence is intentionally exerted; and
4. That as a result of the violence, the fetus dies, either in
the womb or after having been expelled therefrom.
Violence refers to actual physical force.
CONFLICTING VIEWS: The offender must have known of
the womans pregnancy (People v. Carnaso, C.A., 61 OG
3623) However, in US v. Jeffrey (GR No. 5597, March 5,
1910), it was ruled that knowledge of such pregnancy was
not necessary.
In the case of People vs. Salufrania (G.R. No. L-50884
March 30, 1988), the Supreme Court ruled that despite
knowledge of the accused of his wifes pregnancy, the intent
to cause the abortion has not been sufficiently established,
thus, the accused is only liable for the complex crime of
parricide (for the death of wife) with unintentional abortion
(for the death of the fetus in the mothers womb).
If grave threats were made to cause abortion, a complex
crime of grave threats and intentional abortion is committed.
If light threats were made, two separate crimes of light
threats and intentional abortion are committed.
There is a complex crime of homicide with unintentional
abortion (People v. Genoves, 33 O.G. 2201).
There is complex crime of parricide with abortion (People
v. Villanueva, G.R. No. 95851 March 1, 1995).
ARTICLE 258
ABORTION PRACTICED BY THE WOMAN HERSELF
OR HER PARENTS
Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman who has suffered an
abortion;
2. That the abortion is intended; and
3. That the abortion is caused by
a. The pregnant woman herself;
 b. Any other person, with her consent; or
c. Any of her parents, with her consent, for the purpose
of concealing her dishonor.
Under a and c above, the woman is liable under Art.
258; while the third person under b is liable under Art.
256.
If the purpose is other than to conceal the womans
dishonor, abortion by any of her parents falls under Art.
256.
Liability of the pregnant woman is mitigated if her (not
including the maternal grandparents) purpose is to
conceal her dishonor.
There is no mitigation for parents of the pregnant
woman even if the purpose is to conceal dishonor in
abortion, unlike in infanticide.
ARTICLE 259
ABORTION PRACTICED BY A PHYSICIAN OR
MIDWIFE IN DISPENSING OF ABORTIVES
Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman who has suffered an
abortion;
2. That the abortion is intended;
3. That the offender, who must be a physician or midwife,
causes, or assists in causing the abortion; and
4. That said physician or midwife takes advantage of his or
her scientific knowledge or skill.
The penalties provided for intentional abortion shall be
imposed in the maximum period upon the physician or
midwife. They are severely punished because they incur a
heavier guilt in making use of their knowledge for the
destruction of human life, where it should be used only for
its preservation.
If abortion was not intended or was a result of a mistake, no
crime is committed.
If the woman is not really pregnant, an impossible crime is
committed.
As to PHARMACISTS, the Elements are:
1. That the offender is a pharmacist;
2. That there is no proper prescription from a physician;
and
3. That the offender dispenses any abortive.
This crime is consummated by dispensing an abortive
without proper prescription from a physician. It is not
necessary that the abortive was actually used.
It is immaterial that the pharmacist knows that the abortive
would be used for abortion. Otherwise, he shall be liable as
an accomplice in the crime of abortion should abortion result
from the use thereof.
SECTION THREE: DUEL
ARTICLE 260
RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS
IN A DUEL
Acts punished:
1. By killing ones adversary in a duel;
2. By inflicting upon such adversary physical injuries; and
3. By making a combat although no physical injuries have
been inflicted.
Persons liable:
1. The person who killed or inflicted physical injuries upon
his adversary or both combatants in any other case, as
principals.
2. The seconds, as accomplices.
Duel
A formal or regular combat previously concerted between
two parties in the presence of two or more seconds of lawful
age on each side, who make the selection of arms and fix all
other conditions of the fight.
Seconds
The persons who make the selection of the arms and fix the
other conditions of the fight.
Self defense cannot be invoked if there was a pre-
concerted agreement to fight, but if the attack was made by
the accused against his opponent before the appointed
place and time, there is an unlawful aggression, hence self-
defense can be claimed.
If death results, penalty is the same as that for homicide.
ARTICLE 261
CHALLENGING TO A DUEL
Acts Punished:
1. By challenging another to a duel;
2. By inciting another to give or accept a challenge to a
duel; and
3. By scoffing or decrying another publicly for having
refused to accept a challenge to fight a duel.
Persons liable:
1. Challenger
2. Instigators
A challenge to fight, without contemplating a duel, is not
challenging to a duel. The person making the challenge
must have in mind a formal combat to be concerted
between him and the one challenged in the presence of two
or more seconds.
CHAPTER TWO: PHYSICAL INJURIES
(ARTS. 262-266)
ARTICLE 262
MUTILATION
Two kinds:
1. By intentionally mutilating another by depriving him, either
totally or partially, of some essential organ for
reproduction (castration).
Elements:
a. That there be castration, that is, mutilation of organs
necessary for generation, such as penis or ovarium;
and
b. That the mutilation is caused purposely and
deliberately, that is, to deprive the offended party of
some essential organ for reproduction.
Note: Intentionally depriving the victim of the
reproductive organ does not necessarily involve the
cutting off of the organ or any part thereof. It suffices that
it is rendered useless.
2. By intentionally making other mutilation, that is, by
lopping or clipping off any part of the body of the
offended party, other than the essential organ for
reproduction, to deprive him of that part of the body
(mayhem).
The law looks NOT only to the result but also to the
intention or purpose of the act. Mutilation is always
intentional.
The intention of the offender to deprive the victim of the
body part whether by castration or mayhem is essential
and must thus exist in either case.
Cruelty, as understood in Art 14 (21), is inherent in
mutilation and, in fact, that is the only felony where the
said circumstance is an integral part and is absorbed
therein. If the victim dies, the crime is murder qualified
by cruelty, but the offender may still claim and prove
that he had no intention to commit so grave a wrong.
ARTICLE 263
SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES
How committed:
1. By wounding;
2. By beating;
3. By assaulting; or
4. By administering injurious substance.
Serious physical injuries
1. When the injured person becomes insane, imbecile,
impotent or blind in consequence of the physical injuries
inflicted;
Impotence
Means inability to copulate.
Blindness must be complete; it must be of both eyes.
2. When the injured person
a. Loses the use of speech or the power to hear or to
smell, or loses an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm, or a
leg;
b. Loses the use of any such member; or
c. Becomes incapacitated for the work in which he was
theretofore habitually engaged, in consequence of the
physical injuries inflicted.
Loss of power to hear must be of both ears; if one ear
only, such injury falls under paragraph
Loss of use of hand or incapacity for usual work must be
permanent.
3. When the person injured
a. Becomes deformed, or
b. Loses any other member of his body, or
c. Loses the use thereof, or
d. Becomes ill or incapacitated for the performance of
the work in which he was habitually engaged for more
than 90 days, in consequence of the physical injuries
inflicted.
In paragraphs 2 and 3, the offended party must have a
vocation or work at the time of the injury.
4. When the injured person becomes ill or incapacitated for
labor for more than 30 days (but must not be more than
90 days), as a result of the physical injuries inflicted.
30 days < X 90 days
Paragraph 4 speaks of incapacity for any kind of labor. A scar produced by an injury constitutes deformity
within the meaning of paragraph 3 of this article.

Note: Hospitalization for more than 30 days may mean Attempted or

either illness or incapacity for labor for more than 30 Physical Injuries
Frustrated Homicide
days.
The offender inflicts Attempted homicide
This crime is considered a formal crime since it is physical injuries. may be committed, even
punished based on the gravity of the injuries inflicted. if no physical injuries are
What is penalized in the crime of injuries is the result. inflicted.
Thus, it is always consummated and cannot be Offender has no intent to The offender has an
committed in the attempted or frustrated stage. kill the offended party. intent to kill the offended
party.
If a robbery is committed and the injured person suffers
that enumerated under numbers 3 and 4, the crime/s
committed is/are: Qualifying Circumstances:
a. Special complex crime of robbery with serious 1. Offense committed against persons enumerated in the
physical injuries if the injured person is not crime of parricide.
responsible for the robbery. 2. With the attendance of circumstance which qualifies
b. Separate crimes of robbery and serious physical the crime to murder.
injuries if the injured person is a robber.
HOWEVER, the qualified penalties are NOT applicable to
There must be NO INTENT TO KILL; otherwise, the parents who inflict serious physical injuries upon their
crime would be attempted or frustrated homicide, children by excessive chastisement.
parricide or murder, as the case maybe.
ARTICLE 264
Where the category of the offense of serious physical ADMINISTERING INJURIOUS
injuries depends on the period of illness or incapacity for SUBSTANCE OR BEVERAGES
labor, there must be evidence of that length of that
Elements:
period; otherwise, the offense shall only be slight
physical injuries. 1. That the offender inflicted upon another any serious
physical injury;
Serious physical injuries may be committed by reckless 2. That it was done by knowingly administering to him any
imprudence or by simple imprudence or negligence injurious substances or beverages or by taking advantage
under Art. 365 in relation to Art. 263. of his weakness of mind or credulity; and
3. That he had no intent to kill.
Insanity
Means loss of reason or will; failure to determine right It is frustrated murder if there was intent to kill.
from wrong; failure to perceive things as they are.
Administering injurious substance
Lessening of efficiency due to injury is not incapacity. Means introducing into the body the substance.

Work If the accused did not know of the injurious nature of the
Includes studies or preparation for a profession. substances he administered, he shall not be liable under this
Aricle.

Requisites of deformity: Art. 264 does not apply when the physical injuries that result
1. Physical ugliness; are less serious or light, they will be treated under Art. 265
2. Permanent and definite abnormality; and or 266, as the case may be.
3. Must be conspicuous and visible.
ARTICLE 265
The injury to cause deformity is one that cannot be LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES
replaced by nature.
Elements:
1. The offended party is incapacitated for labor for 10
 days or more but not more than 30 days, or needs
medical attendance for the same period; and
10 days X 30 days
2. The physical injuries must not be those described in the
preceding articles.
Qualified Less Serious Physical Injuries:
1. A fine not exceeding P500, in addition to arresto mayor,
shall be imposed for less serious physical injuries when:
a. There is manifest intent to insult or offend the injured
person; or
b. There are circumstances adding ignominy to the
offense.
1. A higher penalty is imposed when the victim is either:
a. The offenders parent, ascendant, guardian, curator or
teacher; or
b. Persons of rank or persons in authority, provided the
crime is not direct assault.
The law includes 2 subdivisions, to wit:
1. The inability for work; and
2. The necessity for medical attendance
Therefore, although the wound required medical attendance
for only 2 days, yet, if the injured party was prevented from
attending to his ordinary labor for a period of 29 days, the
physical injuries sustained are denominated as less serious.
In the absence of proof as to the period of the offended
partys incapacity for labor or of required medical
attendance, offense committed is only slight physical
injuries.
There must be proof as to the period of the required medical
attendance (People v. Penesa, 81 Phil. 398, Aug. 19, 1948).
ARTICLE 266
SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES
AND MALTREATMENT
Kinds:
1. Physical injuries which incapacitated the offended party
for labor from one to nine days, or required medical
attendance during the same period;
2. Physical injuries which did not prevent the offended
party from engaging in his habitual work or which did not
require medical attendance; and
3. Ill-treatment of another by deed without causing any
injury.
Example: Any physical violence which does not produce
injury, such as slapping the face of the offended party,
without causing a dishonor.
When there is no evidence of actual injury, it is only slight
physical injuries.
Supervening event converting the crime into serious
physical injuries after the filing of the information for slight
physical injuries can still be the subject of a new charge.
If physical injuries were inflicted with an intent to insult or
humiliate the injured person, the intent to insult or humiliate
shall be:
Considered as an aggravating circumstance of ignominy in
case of serious physical injuries.
Considered in increasing the penalty and qualifying the
crime in case of less serious physical injuries.
Separate crime of slander by deed in case of slight physical
injuries.
Physical Injuries Mutilation
No SPECIAL There is a SPECIAL
INTENTION to clip INTENTION to clip off
off some part of the some part of the body so
body so as to deprive as to deprive him of such
he offended party of part.
such part.
ANTI-HAZING LAW
(R.A. No. 8049)
Hazing
It is an initiation rite or practice as a prerequisite for
admission into membership in a fraternity, sorority or
organization by placing the recruit, neophyte or applicant in
some embarrassing or humiliating situations such as
forcing him to do menial, silly, foolish, and similar activities
or otherwise subjecting him to physical or psychological
suffering or injury.
Allowed Initiation Rites (Section 2)
Those that have prior written notice to the school authorities
or head of organization 7 days before the conduct of such
initiation. The written notice shall contain the following:
1. Period of the initiation activities which shall not exceed 3
days.
2. Names of those to be subjected to such activities.
3. Undertaking that no physical violence be employed by
anybody.
What acts are punishable: All acts so long as it caused
physical injuries at the very least.
Persons liable:
1. Officers and members of the fraternity, sorority or
organization who actually participated in the infliction of
physical harm shall be liable as principals if the person
subjected to hazing suffers any physical injury or dies as
a result thereof.
2. Owner of the place where the hazing is conducted shall
be liable as an accomplice when he has actual
knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to
take any action to prevent the same from occurring.
3. Parents shall be liable as principals when they have
actual knowledge of the hazing conducted in the home of
one of the officers or members of the fraternity, sorority or
organization, but failed to prevent the same.
4. School authorities and faculty members shall be liable
as accomplices when they consent to the hazing or
have actual knowledge thereof, but failed to take any
action to prevent the same from occurring.
5. Officers, former officers or alumni of the organization,
group, fraternity or sorority shall be liable as principals if
they actually planned the hazing, although not present
when the acts constituting the hazing were committed.
6. Officers or members of the organization, group, fraternity
or sorority shall be liable as principals if they knowingly
cooperated in carrying out the hazing by inducing the
victim to be present thereat.
7. The fraternity or sororitys adviser shall be liable as
principal - if he was present when the acts constituting
the hazing were committed and failed to take any action
to prevent the same.
The presence of any person (i.e. whether or not member
of the fraternity/sorority) during the hazing is prima facie
evidence of participation therein as a principal UNLESS he
prevented the commission of the prohibited acts.
The mitigating circumstance that there was no intention to
commit so grave a wrong shall NOT APPLY (Sec. 4, par. e,
R.A. No. 8049).
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9262
ANTI-VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND THEIR
CHILDREN ACT OF 2004
Violence against women and their children refers to any
act or a series of acts committed by any person against a
woman who is his wife, former wife, or against a woman
with whom the person has or had a sexual or dating
relationship, or with whom he has a common child, or
against her child whether legitimate or illegitimate, within or
without the family abode, which result in or is
likely to result in physical, sexual, psychological harm or
suffering, or economic abuse including threats of such acts,
battery, assault, coercion, harassment or arbitrary
deprivation of liberty. It includes, but is not limited to, the
following acts:
1. "Physical Violence" refers to acts that include bodily or
physical harm;
2. "Sexual violence" refers to an act which is sexual in
nature, committed against a woman or her child. It
includes, but is not limited to:
a. rape, sexual harassment, acts of lasciviousness,
treating a woman or her child as a sex object,
making demeaning and sexually suggestive remarks,
physically attacking the sexual parts of the victim's
body, forcing her/him to watch obscene publications
and indecent shows or forcing the woman or her
child to do indecent acts and/or make films thereof,
forcing the wife and mistress/lover to live in the
conjugal home or sleep together in the same room
with the abuser;
b. acts causing or attempting to cause the victim to
engage in any sexual activity by force, threat of force,
physical or other harm or threat of physical or other
harm or coercion;
c. Prostituting the woman or child.
3. "Psychological violence" refers to acts or omissions
causing or likely to cause mental or emotional suffering
of the victim such as but not limited to intimidation,
harassment, stalking, damage to property, public ridicule
or humiliation, repeated verbal abuse and mental
infidelity. It includes causing or allowing the victim to
witness the physical, sexual or psychological abuse of a
member of the family to which the victim belongs, or to
witness pornography in any form or to witness abusive
injury to pets or to unlawful or unwanted deprivation of
the right to custody and/or visitation of common children.
4. "Economic abuse" refers to acts that make or attempt to
make a woman financially dependent which includes, but
is not limited to the following:
a. withdrawal of financial support or preventing the
victim from engaging in any legitimate profession,
occupation, business or activity, except in cases
wherein the other spouse/partner objects on valid,
serious and moral grounds as defined in Article 73 of
the Family Code;
b. deprivation or threat of deprivation of financial
resources and the right to the use and enjoyment of
the conjugal, community or property owned in
common;
c. destroying household property;
 d. controlling the victims' own money or properties or
solely controlling the conjugal money or properties
(Sec 3).
Punishable Acts
The crime of violence against women and their children is
committed through any of the following acts:
1. Causing physical harm to the woman or her child;
2. Threatening to cause the woman or her child physical
harm;
3. Attempting to cause the woman or her child physical
harm;
4. Placing the woman or her child in fear of imminent
physical harm;
5. Attempting to compel or compelling the woman or her
child to engage in conduct which the woman or her
child has the right to desist from or desist from conduct
which the woman or her child has the right to engage
in, or attempting to restrict or restricting the woman's
or her child's freedom of movement or conduct by force
or threat of force, physical or other harm or threat of
physical or other harm, or intimidation directed against
the woman or child. This shall include, but not limited to,
the following acts committed with the purpose or effect
of controlling or restricting the woman's or her child's
movement or conduct:
a. Threatening to deprive or actually depriving the
woman or her child of custody to her/his family;
b. Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or
her children of financial support legally due her or her
family, or deliberately providing the woman's children
insufficient financial support;
c. Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her
child of a legal right;
d. Preventing the woman in engaging in any legitimate
profession, occupation, business or activity or
controlling the victim's own mon4ey or properties, or
solely controlling the conjugal or common money, or
properties;
6. Inflicting or threatening to inflict physical harm on oneself
for the purpose of controlling her actions or decisions;
7. Causing or attempting to cause the woman or her child
to engage in any sexual activity which does not
constitute rape, by force or threat of force, physical
harm, or through intimidation directed against the
woman or her child or her/his immediate family;
8. Engaging in purposeful, knowing, or reckless conduct,
personally or through another, that alarms or causes
substantial emotional or psychological distress to the
woman or her child. This shall include, but not be limited
to, the following acts:
a. Stalking or following the woman or her child in public
or private places;
b. Peering in the window or lingering outside the
residence of the woman or her child;
c. Entering or remaining in the dwelling or on the
property of the woman or her child against her/his
will;
d. Destroying the property and personal belongings or
inflicting harm to animals or pets of the woman or her
child; and
e. Engaging in any form of harassment or violence;
9. Causing mental or emotional anguish, public ridicule or
humiliation to the woman or her child, including, but not
limited to, repeated verbal and emotional abuse, and
denial of financial support or custody of minor children of
access to the woman's child/children (Sec.5).
CHAPTER THREE: RAPE
(ARTS. 266-A 266-D)
ARTICLE 266-A
THE ANTI-RAPE LAW (RA 8353)
Classification of Rape
1. Traditional Rape under Art. 335 carnal knowledge of a
woman against her will; in this case, the offender is
always a man and the offended party is always a woman.
2. Sexual Assault under R.A. 8353 this is committed
when the offender inserts his penis to another persons
mouth or anal orifice or by inserting an instrument or
object into the genital or anal orifice of another person.
The offender and the offended party can either be a man
or a woman in the case of the insertion of any instrument
or object.
How rape is committed:
1. By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman
under any of the following circumstances:
a. Through force, threat or intimidation;
b. When the offended party is deprived of reason or
otherwise unconscious;
c. By means of fraudulent machinations or grave abuse of
authority;
d. When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of
age or is demented, even though none of the
circumstances mentioned above be present.
Elements:
a. That the offender is a man;
b. That the offender had carnal knowledge of a woman;
and
c. That such act is accomplished under any of the
 following circumstances:
i. By using force, threat or intimidation; or
ii. When the woman is deprived of reason or
otherwise unconscious; or
iii. By means of fraudulent machination or grave
abuse of authority; or
iv. When the woman is under 12 years of age or
demented.
Notes: The offender must not have known that the
victim is demented, otherwise qualified rape is
committed.
Circumstance (iv) does not only pertain to chronological
age but also to mental age (People vs. Atento, G.R. No.
84728 April 26, 1991).
2. By any person who, under any of the circumstances
mentioned in paragraph 1, shall commit an act of sexual
assault by inserting his penis into another persons
mouth or anal orifice, or any instrument or object, into
the genital or anal orifice of another person.
Elements:
a. That the offender commits an act of sexual assault;
b. That the act of sexual assault is committed by any of
the following means:
i. By inserting his penis into another persons
mouth or anal orifice; or
ii. By inserting any instrument or object into the
genital or anal orifice of another person.
c. That the act of sexual assault is accomplished under
any of the circumstances enumerated under the first
act of committing rape.
Under R.A. 8353, the crime of rape can now be committed
by a male or a female.
To be CONSUMMATED, it is not essential that there be a
complete penetration of the female organ, neither is it
essential that there be a rupture of the hymen.
However, there must be sufficient and convincing proof that
the penis indeed touched the labias or slid into the female
organ, and not merely stroked the external surface thereof,
for the accused to be convicted of consummated rape.
Absent of any showing of the slightest penetration of the
female organ, it can only be attempted rape, if not acts of
lasciviousness (People vs. Campuhan, G.R. No. 129433,
March 30, 2000).
For a charge for rape by sexual assault with the use of ones
fingers or any other object to be consummated, there should
be evidence of at least the slightest
penetration of the sexual organ and not merely a brush or
graze of its surface (People v. Dela Cruz, GR No. 180501,
December 24, 2008).
There is NO crime of FRUSTRATED RAPE. The slightest
penetration or mere touching of the genitals consummates
the crime of rape.
There is ATTEMPTED RAPE when there is no penetration
of the female organ because not all the acts of execution
were performed. However, there must be an intention to
have carnal knowledge of the woman against her will.
Acknowledgment of the consummated act is not considered
giving of consent.
In Statutory Rape (when the girl is under 12 years of age),
the offenders knowledge of the victims age is
IMMATERIAL.
When the girl is under 12 years of age, rape is committed
although she consented to the sexual act or even if the girl
is a prostitute. The law does not consider that kind of
consent as voluntary, as the offended party under 12 years
of age cannot have a will of her own.
If the offended woman is below 12 years of age, it is always
rape. Her mental, and not only the chronological age is
considered. Thus, it is still rape if the woman is 13 years old
with a mental capacity of a 5 year old. Furthermore, the
amendatory law has added the more glaring and
unfortunate situation of a demented girl. Example: 31 year
old mental retardate with the mental capacity of a 5-year-old
(People vs. Manlapaz, G.R. No. L-41819, Feb. 28, 1978).
Force employed against the victim of rape need not be of
such character as could not be resisted. It is enough that the
force used is sufficient to consummate the culprits purpose
of copulating with the victim.
The test is whether the threat or intimidation produces a
reasonable fear in the mind of victim that if she resists or
does not yield to the desires of thee accused, the threat
would be carried out.
If the woman contributed in some way to the consummation
of the act, this may constitute an offense other than rape.
Intimidation
Includes the moral kind; Intimidation must be viewed in light
of the victims perception and judgment at the time of rape
and not by any hard and fast rule.

Having sex with a deaf-mute is not rape in the absence of
proof that she is imbecile.
There is NO crime of rape if liquor or drug is used to induce
the victims consent so as to incite her passion and it did not
deprive her of her will power.
Moral ascendancy or influence exercised by the accused
over the victim substitutes for the element of physical force
or intimidation in cases of rape.
Rape Shield Rule Character of the woman is immaterial
in rape. It is no defense that the woman is of unchaste
character, provided the illicit relations were committed with
force and violence, etc.
Rape may be committed using the fingers under the second
act, but the instrument or object other than the penis must
be inserted into the genital or anal orifice of another person
(Obaa v. Hon. Soriano, G.R. No. 60353. Aug. 21, 2001).
ARTICLE 266-B
QUALIFIED RAPE
Rape under both acts of committing it is qualified by
the following:
1. When rape is committed with the use of a deadly weapon
or by two or more persons;
2. When by reason or occasion of rape, the victim has
become insane;
3. When the rape is attempted and a homicide is
committed by reason of or on the occasion of rape
(special complex crime);
4. When by reason of or on occasion of rape, homicide is
committed (special complex crime);
5. When the victim is under 18 years of age and the
offender is a parent, ascendant, step-parent, guardian,
relative by consanguinity or affinity within the third civil
degree, or the common law spouse of the parent of the
victim;
The statement that the victim is the minor daughter of
the offender is not enough. It is essential that the
information must state the exact age of the victim at the
time of the commission of the crime (People v. Baniguid,
G.R. No. 137714, Sept. 8, 2000).
The relationship of stepdaughter and stepfather
presupposes a legitimate relationship between the
victims mother and the offender, i.e., they were married
after the marriage of the victims mother to her father was
dissolved (People vs. Melendres, G.R. 133999-
4001, Aug. 31, 2000).
When the victim is under the custody of the police or
military authorities or any law enforcement or penal
institution;
6. When the rape is committed in full view of the spouse,
parent, or any of the children or other relatives within the
third civil degree of consanguinity;
7. When the victim is a religious engaged in legitimate
religious vocation or calling and is personally known to be
such by the offender before or at the time of the
commission of the crime;
8. When the victim is a child below 7 years old;
9. When the offender knows that he is afflicted with
HIV/AIDS or any other sexually transmissible disease
and the virus or disease is transmitted to the victim;
10. When committed by any member of the AFP or para-
military units thereof of the PNP or any law enforcement
agency or penal institution, when the offender took
advantage of his position to facilitate the commission of
the crime;
11. When by reason or on the occasion of the rape, the
victim has suffered permanent physical mutilation or
disability;
12. When the offender knew of the pregnancy of the
offended party at the time of the commission of the
crime;
13. When the offender knew of the mental disability,
emotional disorder and/or physical disability of the
offended party at the time of the commission of the
crime.
Rape with homicide is a special complex crime, but when
homicide is committed NOT by reason or on the occasion of
rape, there is no special complex crime of rape with
homicide.
ARTICLE 266-C
EFFECT OF PARDON
Effects of pardon:
1. The subsequent valid marriage between the offender and
the offended party shall extinguish:
a. The criminal action or
b. The penalty already imposed.
2. The subsequent forgiveness of the wife to the legal
husband shall extinguish the criminal action or the
penalty, PROVIDED that the crime shall not be
extinguished or the penalty shall not be abated if the
marriage is void ab initio. This is an exception to the rule
that forgiveness by the offended party shall not extinguish
the penal action in crimes against persons.

Since rape is now a crime against persons, marriage
extinguishes the penal action only as to the principal, i.e. the
husband, but not as to the accomplices and accessories.
The principle does not apply where MULTIPLE RAPE was
committed because while marriage with one defendant
extinguishes the criminal liability, its benefits cannot be
extended to the acts committed by the others of which he is
a co-principal.
Prior to RA No. 8353, a husband cannot be guilty of rape
committed upon his wife because of the matrimonial
consent which she gave when she assumed the marriage
relation. However, under Art 266-C of RA No. 8353, a
husband may be guilty of rape of his wife if it is the legal
husband who is the offender.
ARTICLE 266-D
PRESUMPTIONS
Evidence which may be accepted in the prosecution of
rape:
1. Any physical overt act manifesting resistance against the
act of rape in any degree from the offended party; or
2. Where the offended party is so situated as to render
him/her incapable of giving his/her consent.
TITLE NINE: CRIMES AGAINST
PERSONAL LIBERTY AND SECURITY
SECTION ONE: ILLEGAL DETENTION
ARTICLE 267
KIDNAPPING AND SERIOUS
ILLEGAL DETENTION
Elements:
1. That the offender is a private individual who is not any of
the parents of the victim nor a female; (People vs.
Ponce, G.R. No. 171653, April 24, 2007);
2. That he kidnaps or detains another, or in any other
manner deprives the latter of his liberty;
3. That the act of detention or kidnapping must be illegal;
and
The detention is illegal when not ordered by competent
authority or not permitted by law.
4. That in the commission of the offense, any of the
following circumstances is present:
a. That the kidnapping or detention lasts for more than 3
days; or
b. That it is committed simulating public authority; or
c. That any serious physical injuries are inflicted upon
the person kidnapped or detained or threats to kill him
are made; or
d. That the person kidnapped or detained is a minor,
female, or a public officer (People vs. Mercado, G.R.
No. L-65152, August 30, 1984).
It is NOT necessary that the victim be placed in an
enclosure. It may consist not only in placing a person in an
enclosure but also in detaining him or depriving him in any
manner of his liberty, as long as the victim is detained or
deprived in any manner of his liberty.
The original Spanish version of Art. 267 of the RPC used
the term "lock up" (encarcerar) rather than "kidnap"
(sequestrator or raptor) which "includes not only the
imprisonment of a person but also the deprivation of his
liberty in whatever form and for whatever length of time"
(People v. Baldogo, G.R. Nos. 128106-07, January 24,
2003).
The crime is committed when the offender left the child in
the house of another, where the child had freedom of
locomotion but not the freedom to leave it at will because of
his tender age (People v. Acosta, 60 O.G. 6999).
When Death Penalty is imposed
1. If the purpose is to extort ransom;
Ransom
It is the money, price, or consideration paid or demanded
for redemption of a captured person or persons, a
payment that releases from captivity.
2. When the victim is killed or dies as a consequence of the
detention;
3. When the victim is raped; or
4. When the victim is subjected to torture or dehumanizing
acts.
The essence of the crime of kidnapping is the actual
deprivation of the victims liberty coupled with the intent of
the accused to effect it (People v. Pavillare G.R. No.
129970, April 5, 2000).
If the person killed, tortured or raped is not the same victim
of kidnapping or detention, the crimes may be complexed or
considered as separate offenses.
The essential element or act which makes the offense
kidnapping is the deprivation of an offended partys liberty
under any of the four circumstances enumerated.
Illegal Detention Arbitrary Detention
But when the kidnapping or detention was committed for the Committed by a private Committed by a public
purpose of extorting ransom, it is not necessary that one or individual who officer or employee who
any of such circumstances enumerated in the first par. of unlawfully kidnaps, detains a person without
Art. 267 be present. Actual demand for ransom is NOT detains or otherwise legal ground.
necessary. deprives a person of
liberty.
Where the person kidnapped is killed in the course of the
Crime is against Crime against the
detention, regardless of whether the killing was purposely
personal liberty and fundamental laws of the
sought or was merely an afterthought, the kidnapping and
security. State.
murder or homicide can no longer be complexed under Art.
48 nor be treated as separate crimes but shall be punished
as a special complex crime under the last paragraph of Art. Kidnapping with Rape Forcible Abduction
267, as amended by RA 7659. with Rape
Lewd design came after At the outset, there is
Regardless of the number of the victims killed, there is only the intent to kidnap the already lewd design.
one crime of special complex crime of kidnapping with victim.
homicide or murder, as the case may be. However, if the It is a special complex It is a complex crime
person killed is not the kidnap victim, it shall be treated as a crime. under Article 48 since
separate crime of homicide or murder, as the case may be. forcible abduction is a
necessary means of
When the victim is a minor and the accused is any of the committing the crime of
parents, the penalty is that provided for in Art. 271 par.2, rape.
RPC. If there is an attempted If there is an attempted
rape, it shall be rape, the crime
Where there is no showing that the accused intended to considered a separate committed is only
deprive their victims of their liberty for some time and for crime. forcible abduction, the
some purpose, and there being no appreciable interval former being an
between their being taken and their being shot from which expression of the lewd
kidnapping may be inferred, the crimes committed were design.
murder and frustrated murder and not the complex crimes of If there are multiple If there are multiple
kidnapping with murder and kidnapping with frustrated rapes, there is only one rapes, only one is
murder. special complex crime complexed with forcible
of Kidnapping with abduction and the rest
Rape. shall be considered as
If the primary and ultimate purpose of the accused is to kill
separate crimes.
the victim, the incidental deprivation of the victims liberty
does not constitute the felony of kidnapping but is merely a
preparatory act to the killing, and hence, is merged into, or ARTICLE 268
absorbed by, the killing of the victim (People v. Delim, G.R. SLIGHT ILLEGAL DETENTION
No. 142773, Jan. 28, 2003).
Elements:
There is no kidnapping with murder, but only murder where 1. That the offender is a private individual;
a 3-year old child was gagged, hidden in a box where he 2. That he kidnaps or detains another, or in any manner
died and ransom asked. The demand for ransom did not deprives him of his liberty;
convert the offense into kidnapping with murder. The 3. That the act of kidnapping or detention is illegal; and
defendant was well aware that the child would be suffocated 4. That the crime is committed without the attendance of the
to death in a few moments after she left. The demand for circumstances enumerated in Art. 267.
ransom is only a part of the diabolic scheme of the
defendant to murder the child, to conceal his body and then Liability is mitigated when the following
demand money before the discovery of the cadaver (People circumstances concur:
vs. Lora, G.R. No.49430, March 30, 1982). 1. Offender voluntarily releases the person so kidnapped or
detained within three days from the commencement of
the detention
2. Without having attained the purpose intended; and
3. Before the institution of criminal proceedings against him. SECTION TWO: KIDNAPPING OF MINORS

ARTICLE 270
When the victim is female, the detention is under Art 267; KIDNAPPING & FAILURE TO RETURN A MINOR
voluntary release is not mitigating there.
Elements: (EF)
Liability of accomplice in Slight Illegal Detention 1. That the offender is entrusted with the custody of a minor
The same penalty of reclusion temporal shall be incurred by person (less than 18 years old); this is the essential
anyone who shall furnish the place for the perpetration of element
the crime. His participation is raised to that of a real co- 2. That he deliberately fails to restore the said minor to his
principal. If the crime is under Article 267, he is a mere parents or guardian;
accomplice unless there was conspiracy.
ARTICLE 269 This may also be committed by the mother or father of the
UNLAWFUL ARREST child. When committed by either parent, penalty is only
arresto mayor.
Elements:
1. That the offender arrests or detains another person; Kidnapping and failure to return a minor (Art. 270) is
2. That the purpose of the offender is to deliver him to the necessarily included in Kidnapping and Serious Illegal
proper authorities; and Detention of Minor (Par. 4 of Art. 267), but what
3. That the arrest or detention is unauthorized by law or differentiates them are the following:
there is no reasonable ground therefor.
Kidnapping and Kidnapping and
The offender is any person, whether a public officer or a Serious Illegal Failure to Return a
private individual. However, the public officer must not be Detention of Minors Minor
vested with the authority to arrest or detain a person or
must not act in his official capacity. Otherwise, Art. 124 is Offender is not Offender is entrusted
applicable and not Art. 269. entrusted with the with the custody of the
custody of the victim. minor.

Unlawful Arrest Other Illegal Detention What is punished is the What is punished is the
Illegal detaining or deliberate failure of the
Purpose of locking up or kidnapping of the offender having the
detaining the victim is to minor. custody of the minor to
deliver him to the proper Any other case. restore him to his
authorities, and parents or guardian.
develops to be unlawful.
ARTICLE 271 INDUCING
No period of detention is fixed by law under Art. 269 but the A MINOR TO ABANDON
motive of the offender is controlling. HIS HOME

Elements:
Delay in the Delivery of Unlawful Arrest
1. That a minor (less than 18 years old) is living in the
Detained Persons
home of his parents or guardian or the person entrusted
Detention is for some legal Detention is not with his custody; and
ground authorized by law 2. That the offender induces said minor to abandon such
home.
Committed by
Committed by failing to
making an arrest
deliver such person to the Inducement must be (a) actual, (b) committed with criminal
not authorized by
proper judicial authority within intent and (c) determined by a will to cause damage.
law
a certain period
The crime committed may be exploitation of minors
depending on the purpose of the inducement.
To induce ARTICLE 274
Means to influence; to prevail on; to move by persuasion; or SERVICES RENDERED UNDER
to incite by motives. COMPULSION IN PAYMENT OF DEBT

Father or mother may commit crimes under Arts. 270 & 271
where they are living separately and the custody of the
minor children has been given to one of them.
It is not necessary that the minor actually abandons the
home.
Elements:
1. That the offender compels a debtor to work for him,
either as household servant or farm laborer;
2. That it is against the debtors will; and
3. That the purpose is to require or enforce the payment of
a debt.

The minor should not leave his home on his own free will Note: Creditor-Debtor relationship between the offender
(People v. Ricarte C.A. 49 O.G. 974). and the offended party must exist, otherwise, the crime
committed is coercion.
SECTION THREE:
SLAVERY AND SERVITUDE There is no violation of this article if a debtor is compelled to
work as an office janitor because this article specifically
ARTICLE 272 provides that the debtor is compelled to work as a
SLAVERY household servant or farm laborer (Reyes, The Revised
Penal Code Book II, 17th ed., 2008 p. 597).
Elements:
1. That the offender purchases, sells, kidnaps or detains a Services Rendered
human being; and Exploitation of Child
under Compulsion in
2. That the purpose of the offender is to enslave such Labor
Payment of Debt
human being.
Victim is a minor Does not distinguish
Qualifying circumstance: When the purpose of the whether the victim is a
offender is to assign the offended party to some immoral minor or not
traffic. Minor is compelled to Debtor himself is the
render services for the one compelled to work
If the victim is female, the crime committed may be that supposed debt of his for the offender.
under Art. 341 or white slave trade. parent or guardian.
Service of minor is not Limited to household
The purpose must be determined, if the purpose is to
limited to household and farm work.
enslave the victim, it is slavery; otherwise, it is kidnapping or
and farm work.
illegal detention.
If in other capacities,
crime committed may
ARTICLE 273
be coercion.
EXPLOITATION OF CHILD LABOR

Elements:
1. That the offender retains a minor in his service; CHAPTER TWO: CRIMES AGAINST
SECURITY
2. That it is against the will of the minor; and
(ARTS. 275-289)
3. That it is under pretext of reimbursing himself of a debt
incurred by an ascendant, guardian or person entrusted
with the custody of such minor. SECTION ONE: ABANDONMENT OF HELPLESS
PERSONS AND EXPLOITATION OF MINORS
Note the phrase against the (minors) latters will; hence, if
the minor consents to the offenders retaining his services, ARTICLE 275
there is no violation of this article. ABANDONMENT OF PERSONS IN DANGER AND
ABANDONMENT OF ONES OWN VICTIM

Acts punished:
1. By failing to render assistance to any person whom the
 offender finds in an uninhabited place wounded or in
danger of dying when he can render such assistance
without detriment to himself, unless such omission shall
constitute a more serious offense.
Elements:
a. The place is uninhabited;
b. The accused found there a person wounded or in
danger of dying;
c. The accused can render assistance without
detriment to himself; and
d. The accused fails to render assistance.
2. By failing to help or render assistance to another whom
the offender has accidentally wounded or injured.
3. By failing to deliver a child under seven years of age
whom the offender has found abandoned, to the
authorities or to his family, or by failing to take him to a
safe place.
Uninhabited place
It is determined by possibility of person receiving assistance
from another. The place may still be
considered uninhabited in legal contemplation even if there
are many houses around but the possibility of
receiving assistance is remote.
The child under seven years of age must be found in an
unsafe place.
It is immaterial that the offender did not know that the child
is under seven years.
ARTICLE 276
ABANDONING A MINOR
Elements:
1. That the offender has the custody of a child;
2. That the child is under seven years of age;
3. That he abandons such child; and
4. That he has no intent to kill the child when the latter is
abandoned.
If there is intent to kill and the child dies, the crime would be
murder, parricide, or infanticide, as the case may be. If the
child does not die, it is attempted or frustrated murder,
parricide or infanticide, as the case may be.
Intent to kill cannot be presumed from the death of the child.
The ruling that intent to kill is conclusively presumed from
the death of the victim of the crime is applicable only
to crimes against persons, and not to crimes against
security, particularly the crime of abandoning a minor under
Art. 176.
If the intent in abandoning the child is to lose its civil status,
the crime under Art. 347 (concealment or abandonment of a
legitimate child) is committed.
Circumstances Qualifying the Offense:
1. When the death of the minor resulted from such
abandonment; or
2. If the life of the minor was in danger because of the
abandonment.
The act must be conscious and deliberate such that the
abandonment deprives the child of the care and protection
from danger to his person.
ARTICLE 277
ABANDONMENT OF MINOR ENTRUSTED WITH HIS
CUSTODY;
INDIFFERENCE OF PARENTS
Acts punished:
1. By delivering a minor to a public institution or other
persons without the consent of the one who entrusted
such minor to the care of the offender or, in the absence
of that one, without the consent of the proper
authorities.
Elements of Abandonment of Minor:
1.That the offender has charge of the rearing or
education of a minor;
2.That he delivers said minor to a public institution or
other persons and;
3.That the one who entrusted such child to the
offender has not consented to such act, or if the
one who entrusted such child to the offender is
absent, the proper authorities have not consented to
it.
2. By neglecting his (offenders) children by not giving them
the education which their station in life requires and
financial condition permits.
Elements of Indifference of Parents:
1. That the offender is a parent;
2. That he neglects his children by not giving them
education;
3. That his station in life requires such education and his
financial condition permits it.
Failure to give education must be due to deliberate desire to
evade such obligation.
 mentioned in paragraph two, or to accompany any
The "neglect of child" punished under Art. 59(4) of PD 603 is habitual vagrant or beggar, the offender being any
also a crime (known as "indifference of parents") penalized person.
under the second paragraph of Art. 277 of the RPC (De
Guzman v. Perez, et al. G.R. No. 156013, July 25, 2006). Must be of such nature as to endanger the life or safety of
The detention is illegal when not ordered by competent the minor.
authority or not permitted by law.
Qualifying Circumstance: Delivery of the child is made in
consideration of any price, compensation or promise.
Abandonment of
Minor by Persons Abandonment of Inducing A Minor to
Exploitation of Minors
Entrusted with Minor Abandon his Home
(Art 278, par. 5)
Custody (Art. 271)
The purpose of inducing No such purpose.
The custody of the The custody of the the minor to abandon
offender is specific, that offender is stated in the home is to follow
is, the custody for the general. any person engaged in
rearing or education of any of the callings
the minor. mentioned.
Minor is under 18 years Minor is under 7 years Victim is under 16 years Victim is a minor (under
of age. of age. of age. 18 years of age).
Minor is delivered to a Minor is abandoned in
public institution or such a way as to
other person. deprive him of the care R.A. 7610 punishes abuse, exploitation and discrimination
and protection that his of minors
tender years need.
ARTICLE 279
ADDITIONAL PENALTIES FOR
ARTICLE 278
OTHER OFFENSES
EXPLOITATION OF MINORS
Imposition of the penalties prescribed in the preceding
Acts Punished:
articles (Art 275-278) shall not prevent the imposition upon
1. Causing any boy or girl under 16 years of age to perform
the same person of the penalty provided for any other
any dangerous feat of balancing, physical strength, or
felonies defined and punished under the RPC.
contortion, the offender being any person.
2. Employing children under 16 years of age who are not
SECTION TWO: TRESPASS TO DWELLING
children or descendants of the offender in exhibitions of
acrobat, gymnast, rope-walker, diver, or wild animal
ARTICLE 280
tamer, the offender being an acrobat, etc., or circus
QUALIFIED TRESPASS TO DWELLING
manager or engaged in a similar calling.
3. Employing any descendant under 12 years of age in
Elements:
dangerous exhibitions enumerated in the next preceding
1. That the offender is a private person;
paragraph, the offender being engaged in any of said
2. That he enters the dwelling of another;
callings.
3. That such entrance is against the will of the owner or
4. Delivering a child under 16 years of age gratuitously to
occupant.
any person following any calling enumerated in
paragraph two, or to any habitual vagrant or beggar, the
Rationale: To protect and preserve by law the privacy of
offender being an ascendant, guardian, teacher, or
ones dwelling.
person entrusted in any capacity with the care of such
child.
Qualifying Circumstance: If committed by means of
5. Inducing any child under 16 years of age to abandon the
violence/intimidation.
home of its ascendants, guardians, curators or teachers
to follow any person engaged in any calling
 Simple Trespass to Qualified Trespass to another crime HOWEVER, if there is no overt act of crime
Dwelling Dwelling intended to be done, what is committed is trespass to
Offender enters the Offender enters the dwelling.
dwelling of another and dwelling of another
the entrance is against against the latters will Trespass may be committed by the owner of a dwelling (i.e.
the latters will. and the offense is lessor enters the house leased to another against the latter's
committed by means of will).
violence or intimidation.
If the offender is a public officer or employee, the crime
committed is violation of domicile.
Dwelling place
Means any building or structure exclusively devoted for rest
Cases to which the provision of this article is NOT
and comfort. It is not necessary that it be the permanent
dwelling of the person. applicable:
1. If the entrance to anothers dwelling is made for the
Determining factor of whether a building is a dwelling purpose of preventing some serious harm to himself,
depends upon the use to which it is put. the occupants of the dwelling or a third person.
2. If the purpose is to render some service to humanity or
In general, all members of a household must be presumed justice.
to have authority to extend an invitation to enter the house. 3. If the place where entrance is made is a caf, tavern, inn
and other public house, while the same are open.

Note: A person who believes that a crime has been

To commit trespass, the entrance by the accused should be
committed against him has every right to go after the culprit
against the presumed/implied or express prohibition of the
and arrest him without any warrant even if in the process he
occupant. Lack of permission does not amount to
enters the house of another against the latters will. (Sec. 6,
prohibition.
Rule 113, Rules of Court)
There is an implied prohibition when entrance is made
through means not intended for ingress. ARTICLE 281
OTHER FORMS OF TRESPASS
Rule: Whoever enters the dwelling of another at late hour of
Elements:
the night after the inmates have retired and closed their
doors does so against their will. Prohibition in this case is 1. That the offender enters the closed premises or the
presumed. fenced estate of another;
2. That the entrance is made while either of them is
If a person was killed after trespass by the offender, the uninhabited;
following crimes are committed: 3. That the prohibition to enter be manifest; and
a. If there was no intent to kill when he entered separate 4. That the trespasser has not secured the permission of the
crimes of homicide or murder and qualified trespass to owner or the caretaker thereof.
dwelling.
b. If there was intent to kill when he entered the crime of Qualified
Other Forms of
homicide/murder with dwelling as an aggravating Trespass to
Trespass
circumstance. Dwelling

Prohibition must be in existence prior to or at the time of Offender is a private The offender is any
entrance. person. person.

Prohibition is not necessary when violence or intimidation is Offender enters a Offender enters closed
employed by the offender (qualified trespass). dwelling house. premises or fenced
estate.
Violence/Intimidation may be the method by which one may Place entered is Place entered is
pass the threshold of the dwelling of another or the conduct inhabited. uninhabited.
immediately after the entrance of the offender.

Ordinarily, all trespassers have intention to commit

 Act constituting the It is the entering the
crime is entering the closed premises or the
dwelling against the will fenced estate without
of the owner. securing the
permission of the
owner or caretaker
thereof.
Prohibition to enter is Prohibition to enter
express or implied. must be manifest.
property, or upon that of the latters family, of any
wrong;
b. That such wrong amounts to a crime; and
c. That the threat is not subject to a condition.
The third form of grave threats must be serious in the sense
that it is deliberate and that the offender persists in the idea
involved in his threats.

Premises Grave Threats Light Threats

Signifies distinct and definite locality. It may mean a room,
shop, building or definite area, but in either case, locality is Act threatened Act threatened does not
fixed. amounts to a crime. amount to a crime.

SECTION THREE: Threats Coercion

THREATS AND COERCION
Intimidation is Intimidation or Violence
ARTICLE 282 essential. is the essence of the
GRAVE THREATS crime.
Intimidation is future Force or Violence must
Acts punished: and conditional. be imminent, actual and
1. By threatening another with the infliction upon his person, immediate.
honor, or property or that of his family of any
wrong amounting to a crime and demanding money or Intimidation is directed Intimidation is directed
against the victim or his against the victim only.
imposing any other condition even though not
unlawful, and the offender attained his purpose. (with family.
condition)
Qualifying Circumstance: If threat was made in writing
Elements of Grave Threats where the offender or through a middleman.
attained his purpose:
a. That the offender threatens another person with the Intimidation (promise of future harm or injury) is the
infliction upon the latters person, honor or property, essence of the crime.
or upon that of the latters family, of any wrong;
b. That such wrong amounts to a crime; The crime of threats is consummated the moment the threat
c. That there is a demand for money or that any other comes to the knowledge of the person threatened.
condition is imposed, even though not unlawful; and
d. That the offender attains his purpose. Threats made in connection with the commission of other
crimes are absorbed by the latter.
2. By making such threat without the offender attaining his
purpose (with condition; elements for this act are the If there is another crime actually committed or the objective
same with the first except that the purpose is not of the offender is another crime, and the threat is only a
attained). means to commit it or a mere incident to its commission, the
threat is absorbed by the other crime.
3. By threatening another with the infliction upon his person,
honor or property or that of his family of any wrong If the threat was made with the deliberate purpose of
amounting to a crime, the threat not being subject to a creating in the mind of the person threatened the belief that
condition (without condition). the threat would be carried into effect, the crime committed
is grave threats, and the minor crime which accompanied it
Elements of Grave Threats NOT subject to a should be disregarded.
condition:
a. That the offender threatens another person with When the offender demands the money or property on the
the infliction upon the latters person, honor, or spot, the crime is not grave threats BUT robbery with
intimidation. Bond to Keep the Bond for a Good
Peace Behavior
Note: Under PD 1829, the following acts purpose of which
is to prevent a person from appearing in the investigation of, If the offender fails to If he shall fail to give
or official proceedings in criminal cases is punishable: give the bond, he shall bail, he shall be
a. Threatening directly or indirectly another with the be detained for a sentenced to destierro.
infliction of any wrong upon his person, honor or property period not exceeding 6
or that of any immediate member or members of his months (if prosecuted
family; or for grave/less grave
b. Imposing a condition, whether lawful or unlawful. felony) or not
exceeding 30 days (if
ARTICLE 283 prosecuted for light
LIGHT THREATS felony).

Elements: ARTICLE 285

1. That the offender makes a threat to commit a wrong;
2. That the wrong does not constitute a crime;
3. That there is a demand for money or that other condition
is imposed even though not unlawful; and
4. That the offender has attained his purpose or, that he
has not attained his purpose.
Light threats are committed in the same manner as grave
threats except that the act threatened to be committed
should not be a crime.
OTHER LIGHT THREATS
Acts Punished:
1. Threatening another with a weapon, or drawing such
weapon in a quarrel, unless it be in lawful self-defense.
2. Orally threatening another, in the heat of anger, with
some harm constituting a crime, without persisting in
the idea involved in his threat.
3. Orally threatening to do another any harm not
constituting a felony.

Note: Blackmailing may be punished under Art. 283. Where the threats are directed to a person who is absent
and uttered in a temporary fit of anger, the offense is only
ARTICLE 284 other light threats.
BOND FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR
Grave Threats and
When a person is required to give bail bond: Other Light Threats
Light Threats
1. When he threatens another under the circumstances
mentioned in Art. 282. No demand for money. In certain cases,
2. When he threatens another under the circumstances demand for money is
mentioned in Art. 283. material.
No condition imposed. In certain cases,
Bond to Keep the Bond for a Good imposed condition is
Peace Behavior material.
Provides for bond to Provides for bond for Threat is not Threat is deliberate.
keep the peace. good behavior. deliberate.
Not made applicable to Applicable only to
any particular case. cases of grave threats ARTICLE 286
and light threats. GRAVE COERCION
It is a distinct penalty. It is an additional
Two Ways of Committing Grave Coercion:
penalty.
1. By preventing another by means of violence, threats or
intimidation, from doing something not prohibited by law
(Preventive).

If the thing prevented from execution is prohibited by

law, there will be no coercion.
2. By compelling another, by means of violence, threats or 2. If the coercion is committed to compel another to
intimidation, to do something against his will, whether it perform any religious act.
be right or wrong (Compulsive). 3. If the coercion is committed to prevent another from
performing any religious act.
Preventive Compulsive
Grave Coercion Unjust Vexation
The act prevented to The act compelled to
be done must not be be done by another
prohibited by law. against his will may or Use of violence upon
may not be prohibited the offended party in There is no violence or
by law. preventing or intimidation.
compelling him to do
When PREVENTING is not considered Coercion: Under something against his
Art. 132: When a public officer prevents the ceremonies of a will.
religious group.

Under Art. 143: When a person prevents the meeting of a Grave Coercion Illegal Detention
legislative assembly.
Intent to deprive the Intent to deprive is
Under Art. 145: When a person prevents a member of offended party of his present.
Congress from attending meetings, expressing his opinions liberty is not clear (i.e.
or casting his vote through the use of force or intimidation. may freely leave the
house but is compelled
Under Article 287: When the violence is employed to seize to return).
anything belonging to the debtor of the offender.
Maltreatment of
In grave coercion, the act of preventing by force must be Grave Coercion
Prisoners
made at the time the offended party was doing or about to
do the act to be prevented. If the act was already done If the offended party is If the offended party is
when violence is exerted, the crime is unjust vexation. not a prisoner, a prisoner, extracting
(People vs. Madrid, C.A., 53 O.G. 711) extracting information information using force
using force or or intimidation is
intimidation is coercion. maltreatment.
When COMPELLING is not considered Coercion: Under
Art. 127: When a public officer compels a person to change There is no grave coercion where the accused acted in
his residence. good faith in the performance of his duty.

Under Art. 267: When a person kidnaps his debtor to Coercion is always consummated even if the offended party
compel him to pay. did not accede to the purpose of the coercion.

Elements: ARTICLE 287

1. That a person prevented another from doing
something not prohibited by law, or by compelling him to
do something against his will, be it right or wrong;
2. That the prevention or compulsion be effected by
violence, threats or intimidation; and
3. That the person that restrained the will and liberty of
another has no right to do so, or in other words, that the
restraint is not made under authority of law or in the
exercise of any lawful right.
When PRISION MAYOR shall be imposed:
1. If the coercion is committed in violation of the exercise of
the right of suffrage.
LIGHT COERCION
Elements:
1. That the offender must be a creditor;
2. That he seizes anything belonging to his debtor;
3. That the seizure of the thing be accomplished by
means of violence or a display of material force
producing intimidation; and
4. That the purpose of the offender is to apply the same to
the payment of the debt.
Unjust Vexation (Art. 287, par. 2)
Includes any human conduct which although not productive
of some physical or material harm would, however, unjustly
annoy or vex an innocent person.
In determining whether the crime of unjust vexation is
committed, the offender's act must have caused annoyance,
irritation, vexation, torment, distress or disturbance to the
mind of the person to whom it is directed.
It is distinguished from grave and light coercions by the
absence of violence.
Light coercion will be unjust vexation when the element of
violence is absent.
ARTICLE 288
OTHER SIMILAR COERCIONS (COMPULSORY
PURCHASE OF MERCHANDISE & PAYMENT OF
WAGES BY MEANS OF TOKENS)
Acts Punished:
1. Forcing or compelling, directly or indirectly, or knowingly
permitting the forcing or compelling of the laborer or
employee of the offender to purchase merchandise or
commodities of any kind from him
Elements:
a. That the offender is any person, agent or officer of
any association or corporation;
b. That he or such firm or corporation has employed
laborers or employees; and
c. That he forces or compels, directly or indirectly, or
knowingly permits to be forced or compelled, any of
his or its laborers or employees to purchase
merchandise or commodities of any kind from him
or from said firm or corporation.
2. Paying the wages due his laborer or employee by means
of tokens or objects other than the legal tender currency
of the Philippines, unless expressly requested by such
laborer or employee.
Elements:
a. That the offender pays the wages due a laborer or
employee employed by him by means of tokens or
objects;
b. That those tokens or objects are other than the legal
tender currency of the Philippines; and
c. That such employee or laborer does not expressly
request that he be paid by means of tokens or
objects.
Inducing an employee to give up any part of his wages by
force, stealth, intimidation, threat or by any other means is
unlawful under Art. 116 of the Labor Code, not under the
RPC. Wages shall be paid in legal tender and the use of
tokens, promissory notes, vouchers, coupons, or any other
form alleged to represent legal tender is absolutely
prohibited even when expressly requested by the employee.
ARTICLE 289
FORMATION, MAINTENANCE, & PROHIBITION OF
COMBINATION OF CAPITAL OR LABOR THROUGH
VIOLENCE OR THREATS
Elements:
1. That the offender employs violence or threats, in such a
degree as to compel or force the laborers or employers
in the free and legal exercise of their industry or work;
and
2. That the purpose is to organize, maintain or prevent
coalitions of capital or laborers or lockout of employers.
The act should not be a more serious offense.
Peaceful picketing is allowed. When the picketers employ
violence or if they make threats, they shall be held liable for
coercion.
Preventing employee from joining any registered labor
organization is punished under the Labor Code, not under
the RPC.
CHAPTER THREE: DISCOVERY AND
REVELATION OF SECRETS
(ARTS. 290-292)
ARTICLE 290
DISCOVERING SECRETS THROUGH
SEIZURE OF CORRESPONDENCE
Elements:
1. That the offender is a private individual or even a public
officer not in the exercise of his official function;
2. That he seizes the papers or letters of another;
3. That the purpose is to discover the secrets of such other
person; and
4. That the offender is informed of the contents of the
papers or letters seized.
Seize ARTICLE 291
To place in the control of someone a thing or to give him the REVEALING SECRETS WITH
possession thereof. It is not necessary that in the act, there ABUSE OF OFFICE
should be force or violence.
Elements:
Qualifying Circumstance: Offender reveals the contents of 1. That the offender is a manager, employee or servant;
such paper or letter of another to a third person. 2. That he learns the secrets of his principal or master in
such capacity;
Prejudice is not an element of this offense. 3. That he reveals such secrets.
There must be taking possession of papers or letters of
another even for a short time. Secrets must be learned by reason of their employment.
Damage is not necessary.
If the purpose of seizure is to cause damage, estafa is
committed. ARTICLE 292 REVELATION
If the purpose is to harass or annoy, the crime is unjust OF INDUSTRIAL SECRETS
vexation.
Elements:
1. That the offender is a person in charge, employee or
Public Officer workman of a manufacturing or industrial
Seizure of establishment;
Revealing Secrets of
Private Individual Correspondence 2. That the manufacturing/industrial establishment has a
secret of the industry which the offender has learned;
Public officer comes to Private individual
3. That the offender reveals such secrets;
know the secret of any seizes the papers or
4. That prejudice is caused to the owner.
private individual by letters of another.
reason of his office.
Secrets must relate to manufacturing process.
The secret is not It is necessary that the
necessarily contained offender seizes the Prejudice is an essential element in this offense because
in papers or letters. papers or letters of Article 292 says to the prejudice of the owner thereof.
another to discover the
secret of the latter. TITLE TEN: CRIMES AGAINST
Reveals the secret It is not necessary that PROPERTY
without justifiable there by a secret, and
reason. if there is a secret ARTICLE 293
discovered, it is not WHO ARE GUILTY OF ROBBERY
necessary that it be
revealed. Robbery
Act punished is the Act punished is the It is the taking of personal property belonging to another,
revelation of secrets by seizure of with intent to gain, by means of violence against, or
the officer by reason of correspondence so as intimidation of any person, or using force upon anything.
his office. to discover the secrets
of the offended party. Classification of Robbery:
1. Robbery with violence against, or intimidation of persons
(Arts. 294, 297 and 298).
Article 290 NOT applicable to:
2. Robbery by use of force upon things (Arts. 299 and 302).
1. Parents, guardians, or persons entrusted with the
custody of minors with respect to the papers or letters of
the children or minors placed under their care or Elements of Robbery in general:
custody; 1. That there be personal property (bienes muebles)
2. Spouses with respect to the papers or letters of either of belonging to another;
them. 2. That there is unlawful taking (apoderamiento or
asportacion) of that property;
3. That the taking must be with intent to gain (animus
 lucrandi); and
4. That there is violence against or intimidation of any
person or force used upon things.
Personal property
As long as the personal property does not belong to the
accused who has a valid claim thereover, it is immaterial
whether said offender stole it from the owner, a mere
possessor, or even a thief of the property.
The property taken must be personal property, for if real
property is occupied or real right is usurped by means of
violence against or intimidation of persons, the crime is
usurpation (Reyes, p. 653).
Classification of personal property under the Civil Code
does not apply. The test is whether or not the object is
susceptible of appropriation and transportation (Regalado).
Prohibited articles may be the subject matter of robbery.
Unlawful taking
1. Unlawful taking means appropriating a thing belonging to
another and placing it under one's control or possession.
2. Unlawful taking is COMPLETE:
a. Robbery with violence against or intimidation of
persons offender has already the possession of the
thing even if he has no opportunity to dispose of it.
b. Robbery with force upon things the thing must be
brought outside the building for consummated robbery
to be committed.
Intent to gain
Intent to gain is presumed from the unlawful taking of
personal property.
The elements of personal property belonging to another
and that of intent to gain must concur.
If the accused, with intent to gain, took from another,
personal property which turned out to be his own property,
the property not belonging to another, he cannot be held
liable for robbery; even if in the taking the accused used
violence against or intimidation of person, or force upon
anything.
If he took personal property from another, believing that it
was his own property, but in reality it belonged to the
offended party, there being no intent to gain, he cannot be
held liable for robbery, even if the accused used violence
against or intimidation of person, or force upon things.
Thus, if the property turns out to be the offenders own
property, an impossible crime is committed.
If there was no intent to gain, estafa or coercion may be
committed.
Violence or Intimidation
Must be present BEFORE the taking of personal property is
complete. But when the violence results in homicide, rape,
intentional mutilation or any of the serious physical injuries
penalized in Par. 1 and 2 of Art 263, the taking of the
personal property is robbery complexed with any of those
crimes under Art. 294, even if the taking was already
complete when the violence was used by the offender.
Art. 294 applies only where robbery with violence against or
intimidation of persons takes place without entering an
inhabited house under the circumstances in Art. 299. When
both circumstances are present, the offense shall be
considered as a complex crime under Art. 48, and the
penalty shall be for the graver offense in the maximum
period (Napolis v. CA, No. L- 28865, Feb 28, 1972).
If it is the owner who forcibly takes the personalty from its
lawful possessor, the crime is estafa under Art. 316(3) since
the former cannot commit robbery on his own property even
if he uses violence or intimidation.
Whenever violence against or intimidation of any person is
used, the taking of personal property is always robbery. If
there is no violence or intimidation, but only force upon
things, the taking is robbery only if the force is used either to
enter the building or to break doors, wardrobes, chests, or
any other kind of locked or sealed furniture or receptacle
inside the building or to force them open outside after taking
the same from the building.
In the absence of this element, the crime committed is theft.
Intimidation does not need to be physical since it can also
be psychological.
To determine the number of robberies committed, check if
all the elements of robbery based on the provisions of the
different means of committing the crime are present. If in
each case, the elements of a certain kind of robbery are
present, then it constitutes one count of robbery already.
SECTION ONE: ROBBERY WITH VIOLENCE AGAINST
OR INTIMIDATION OF PERSONS
ARTICLE 294
ROBBERY WITH VIOLENCE AGAINST OR
INTIMIDATION OF PERSONS
Acts Punished:
1. (a) When by reason or on occasion of the robbery, the
crime of homicide is committed; (b) or when the robbery is
accompanied by rape or intentional mutilation or arson.
2. When by reason or on occasion of such robbery any of
the physical injuries resulting in insanity, imbecility,
impotency or blindness is inflicted. (subdivision 1 of Art.
263)
3. When by reason or on occasion of robbery, any of the
physical injuries penalized in subdivision 2 of Art. 263 is
inflicted.
When the person injured
a. Loses the use of speech or the power to hear or to
smell, or loses an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm, or a leg;
b. Loses the use of any such member; or
c. Becomes incapacitated for the work in which he was
therefore habitually engaged, in consequence of the
physical injuries inflicted;
4. (a) If the violence or intimidation employed in the
commission of the robbery is carried to a degree clearly
unnecessary for the commission of the crime; or (b) When
in the course of its execution, the offender shall
have inflicted upon ANY PERSON NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS COMMISSION physical
injuries covered by subdivisions 3 and 4 of Art. 263.
When the person injured
a. Becomes deformed; or
b. Loses any other member of his body; or
c. Loses the use thereof; or
d. Becomes ill or incapacitated for the performance of the
work in which he was habitually engaged for more
than 90 days, in consequence of the physical injuries
inflicted; or
e. When the injured person becomes ill or incapacitated
for labor for more than 30 days (but must not be more
than 90 days), as a result of the physical injuries
inflicted.
5. If the violence employed by the offender does not cause
any of the serious physical injuries defined in Art. 263, or
if the offender employs intimidation only. (simple robbery)
These offenses are known as SPECIAL COMPLEX
CRIMES. Crimes defined under this article are the following:
1. Robbery with homicide
2. Robbery with rape
3. Robbery with intentional mutilation
4. Robbery with arson
5. Robbery with serious physical injuries
Robbery with Homicide
The term homicide is used in its generic sense and
includes any kind of killing, whether parricide or murder or
where several persons are killed and the name of this
special complex crime shall remain as robbery with
homicide. The qualifying circumstance (e.g. treachery in
murder) will only become an aggravating circumstance.
The juridical concept of robbery with homicide does not limit
the taking of life to one single victim. All the homicides or
murder are merged in the composite, integrated whole that
is robbery with homicide so long as all the killings were
perpetrated by reason or on the occasion of the robbery
(People vs. Madrid, G.R. No. L- 3023, January 3, 1951).
Homicide may precede robbery or may occur after robbery.
What is essential is that the offender must have intent to
take personal property before the killing.
Where the offenders intention to take personal property of
the victim arises as an afterthought, where his original intent
was to kill, he is guilty of two separate crimes of homicide or
murder, as the case may be, and theft.
The phrase by reason covers homicide committed before
or after the taking of personal property of another, as long
as the motive of the offender in killing is to deprive the victim
of his personal property which is sought to be accomplished
by eliminating an obstacle, killing a person after robbery to
do away with a witness or to defend the possession of the
stolen property.
There is robbery with homicide even if the person
killed was a bystander and not the person robbed or even if
it was one of the offenders. The law does not require the
victim of the robbery be also the victim of homicide.
Robbery with homicide exists even if the death of the victim
supervened by mere accident. It is sufficient that a homicide
resulted by reason or on the occasion of the robbery.
(People v. Mangulabnan, G.R. No. L-8919, September 28,
1956).
When homicide is committed by reason or on the occasion
of the robbery, all those who took part as principals in the
robbery would also be held liable as principals of the single
and indivisible felony of robbery with homicide although they
did not actually take part in the killing, unless it clearly
appears that they endeavored to prevent the same. (People
vs. Hernandez, G.R. No. 139697, June 15, 2004).
Robbery with Rape
In robbery with rape, the law uses the phrase when the
robbery shall have been accompanied by rape. But like in
robbery with homicide, the offender must have the intent to
take the personal property belonging to another with intent
to gain, and such intent must precede the rape.
Robbery with rape does not cover robbery with attempted
rape since what is provided by the RPC is a special complex
crime of robbery with rape. Robbery with attempted rape
cannot be complexed under Art. 48 since one crime is not a
necessary means of committing the other nor can both be
results of a single act.
If rape was the primary objective of the accused, and his
taking of the jewels of the victim was not with intent to gain
but just to have some tokens of her supposed consent to the
coition, the accused committed two distinct crimes of rape
and unjust vexation. (People vs. Villarino, CA-G.R. No.
6342-R, November 26, 1951).
All the robbers may be held liable for robbery with rape
even if not all of them committed the crime of rape based on
the concept of conspiracy. (People vs. Balacanao,
G.R. No. 118133, February 28, 2003)
Par 1 of this article also applies even if the victim of the
rape committed by the accused was herself a member of
the gang of robbers.
Note: There is no crime of Robbery with Multiple Homicide
or Robbery with Multiple Counts of Rape. Although there be
more than one instance of homicide/murder or rape, they
shall be considered as embraced under one special
complex crime of either Robbery with Homicide or Robbery
with Rape.
Neither shall the additional rape/s or homicide/s be
considered aggravating. Unless and until a law is passed
providing that the additional rape/s (or homicide/s) may be
considered aggravating, the Court must construe the penal
law in favor of the offender as no person may be brought
within its terms if he is not clearly made so by the statute
(People vs. Sultan, G. R. No. 132470, April, 27, 2000).
Robbery with Arson
In the case of robbery with arson, it is essential that the
robbery precedes the arson. There must be an intent to
commit robbery and no killing, rape or intentional mutilation
should be committed in the course of the robbery, or else,
arson will only be considered an aggravating circumstance
of the crime actually committed.
Robbery with Serious Physical Injuries
Par 2 and par. 3 of this article also apply even when the
serious physical injuries referred to therein are inflicted upon
a co-robber.
Under the 4th act punishable, clause A, the violence need
not result in serious physical injuries. The first clause in Art
294 par 4 requires only that the violence be unnecessary for
the commission of the crime.
To be considered as robbery with physical injuries, the
injuries inflicted must be serious; otherwise, they shall be
absorbed in the robbery. However, if the less serious or
slight physical injuries were committed after the robbery was
consummated, that would constitute a separate offense.
Under clause B, it is required that the physical injuries be
inflicted in the course of the execution of the robbery and
that any of them was inflicted upon any person not
responsible for the commission of the robbery.
Simple Robbery
Par. 5 is known as simple robbery because they only
involve slight or less serious physical injuries, which are
absorbed in the crime of robbery as an element thereof.
Violence or intimidation may enter at any time before the
owner is finally deprived of his property. This is so because
asportation is a complex fact, a whole divisible into parts, a
series of acts, in the course of which personal violence or
intimidation may be injected.
Threats to Extort Robbery thru
Money Intimidation
Intimidation is Intimidation is actual
conditional or future. and immediate.
Intimidation may be Intimidation is personal.
through an intermediary.
Intimidation may refer to Intimidation is directed
person, honor or only to the person of the
property of the offended victim.
party or of his family.
The gain of the culprit is The gain of the culprit is subdivision 1 of Art. 263 (Par. 2), despoblado and cuadrilla
not immediate. immediate. will each be considered only as a generic aggravating
circumstance.

Robbery Bribery ARTICLE 296

The victim is deprived of He parts with his DEFINITION OF A BAND AND PENALTY INCURRED
his money, property by money, in a sense, BY THE MEMBERS THEREOF
force or intimidation. voluntarily.
Outline:
1. When at least four armed malefactors take part in the
Robbery Grave Coercion commission of a robbery, it is deemed committed by a
In both crimes, there is violence used by the band.
2. When any of the arms used in the commission of
offender
robbery is not licensed, the penalty upon all malefactors
With intent to gain. No intent to gain. shall be the maximum of the corresponding penalty
provided by law without prejudice to the criminal liability
ARTICLE 295 for illegal possession of firearms.
ROBBERY WITH PHYSICAL INJURIES, 3. Any member by a band who was present at the
COMMITTED IN AN UNINHABITED PLACE AND BY commission of a robbery by the band, shall be punished
A BAND OR WITH THE USE OF FIREARM ON A as principal of any assaults committed by the band,
STREET, ROAD OR ALLEY unless it be shown that he attempted to prevent the same.

Qualified Robbery with Violence Against or

Intimidation of Persons: Art. 296, just like Art. 295, also applies only to robbery under
Nos. 3, 4, and 5 of Article 294 if committed: pars. 3, 4 and 5 of Art. 294, and not to robbery with
1. In an uninhabited place (despoblado); or homicide, rape, intentional mutilation, arson or the physical
2. By a band (en cuadrilla); or injuries in par. 1 of Art. 263.
3. By attacking a moving train, street car, motor vehicle, or
airship; or PD 1866 penalizes illegal possession of firearm in addition
4. By entering the passengers compartments in a train, or to criminal liability for robbery by a band. Under R.A. No.
in any manner taking the passengers by surprise in their 8294, the use of unlawful firearms in murder and homicide is
respective conveyances; or now considered not as a separate crime but merely a
5. On a street, road, highway, or alley, and the intimidation special aggravating circumstance.
is made with use of firearms, the offender shall be
punished by the maximum period or the proper penalties Use of unlicensed firearm by a band in the commission of
prescribed in Art. 294. robbery with physical injuries cannot be offset by a generic
mitigating circumstance.
This article provides for five special aggravating
circumstances which, because they impose the penalty in Requisites for liability for the acts of other members of
the maximum period and cannot be offset by a generic the band:
mitigating circumstance, are also considered as qualifying 1. He was a member of the band;
circumstances. 2. He was present at the commission of a robbery by that
band;
Robbery with Robbery in an 3. The other members of that band committed an assault;
Violence Against or Uninhabited Place and
Intimidation of and by a Band 4. He did not attempt to prevent the assault.
Persons
Robbery by a band - all are liable for any assault committed
Despoblado and en Both must concur. by the band, unless the others attempted to prevent the
cuadrilla need not assault.
concur.
Proof of conspiracy is not necessary when four or more
If the crime committed is robbery with homicide, rape, armed persons committed robbery.
mutilation or arson (Par. 1) or with physical injuries under
The circumstance that the robbery was committed by a
band would only be appreciated as an ordinary aggravating
circumstance in Robbery with Homicide. No such crime as
robbery with homicide in band (People vs. Apduhan, Jr.,
G.R. No. L-19491, August 30, 1968).
ARTICLE 297
ATTEMPTED AND FRUSTRATED ROBBERY
COMMITTED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES
Special Complex Crime: When by reason or on occasion
of an attempted or frustrated robbery, a homicide is
committed.
Homicide under this article is also used in its generic
sense to include any other unlawful killing. However, if the
killing legally constituted murder or parricide, the offense will
continue to be covered by Art. 297 with the technical name
stated therein, but the penalty shall be for murder or
parricide because Art. 297 states, unless the homicide
(killing) committed shall deserve a higher penalty under this
Code.
The penalty is the same whether the robbery is attempted or
frustrated.
If homicide is not consummated, the crimes of robbery and
attempted or frustrated homicide:
1. May be complexed (Article 48); or
2. Considered as separate crimes; or
3. Considered as one crime, one absorbing the other.
If physical injuries were inflicted on the victim, but no
intent to kill was proved and the victim did not die, the
liability of the offender may be as follows:
1. If the physical injuries were by reason of the attempted or
frustrated robbery as the means for the commission of the
latter, the injuries are absorbed by the latter and the crime
shall only be attempted or frustrated robbery.
2. If the physical injuries were inflicted only on the
occasion of the aborted robbery but not employed as a
means of committing the latter, these will be separate
crimes of attempted or frustrated robbery and physical
injuries.
3. If both killing and physical injuries were committed on
that occasion, the crime will be penalized in accordance
with Art. 297 but the physical injuries will be absorbed.
When the offense committed is attempted or frustrated
robbery with serious physical injuries, Art. 48 is applicable,
since the felony would fall neither under Art. 294 which
covers consummated robbery with homicide nor under Art.
297 which covers attempted or frustrated robbery with
homicide. However, for Art. 48 to apply, serious physical
injuries must be employed as a necessary means of
committing robbery.
ARTICLE 298
EXECUTION OF DEEDS BY MEANS OF VIOLENCE
OR INTIMIDATION
Elements:
1. That the offender has intent to defraud another;
2. That the offender compels him to sign, execute, or deliver
any public instrument or document; and
3. That the compulsion is by means of violence or
intimidation.
Art. 298 is not applicable if the document is void (Reyes, p.
698).
SECTION TWO: ROBBERY WITH THE USE OF FORCE
UPON THINGS
ARTICLE 299
ROBBERY IN AN INHABITED HOUSE/PUBLIC
BUILDING OR EDIFICE DEVOTED TO WORSHIP
Elements: (Subdivision A)
1. The offender entered
a. an inhabited house;
b. a public building; or
c. an edifice devoted to religious worship;
2. The entrance was effected by any of the following means:
a. Through an opening not intended for entrance or
egress; or
b. By breaking any wall, roof, floor, door, or window; or
c. By using false keys, picklocks or similar tools; or
d. By using any fictitious name or pretending the exercise
of public authority.
3. That once inside the building, the offender took
personal property belonging to another with intent to gain.
Any of the four means described in subdivision (a) of Art.
299 must be resorted to by the offender TO ENTER a
house, not to get out.
The wall broken must be an outside wall, not a wall between
rooms in a house or building, because the breaking of a wall
must be for the purpose of entering.
But if a room is occupied by a person as his separate
dwelling, the breaking of the rooms wall may give rise to
robbery.
False keys
Genuine keys stolen from the owner or any keys other than
those intended by the owner for use in the lock forcibly
opened by the offender.
The genuine key must be stolen, not taken by force or
intimidation from the owner.
Picklock or similar tools
Those specially adopted to the commission of robbery.
The false key or picklock must be used for entering the
building.
The whole body of the culprit must be inside the building to
constitute entering.
Not every physical force exerted by the offender is covered
by Art. 299, hence breaking store windows to steal
something but without entry, is only theft.
Elements: (Subdivision B)
1. Offender is inside a dwelling house, public building or
edifice devoted to religious worship, regardless of the
circumstances under which he entered it.
2. The offender takes personal property belonging to
another with intent to gain under any of the following
circumstances:
a. by the breaking of internal doors, wardrobes, chests, or
any other kind of sealed furniture or receptacle; or
b. by taking such furniture or objects away to be broken
open outside the place of the robbery.
Entrance into the building by any means mentioned in
subdivision (a) of Art. 299 is not required in robbery under
subdivision (b) of the same article.
The term door under this subdivision refers only to doors
lids or opening sheets of furniture or other portable
receptacles NOT to outside doors of house or building.
It is estafa or theft, if the locked or sealed receptacle is not
forced open in the building where it is kept or taken
therefrom to be broken outside.
ARTICLE 300
ROBBERY IN AN UNINHABITED
PLACE AND BY A BAND
Under this Article, Robbery with Force Upon Things is
qualified when committed in an uninhabited place AND by a
band, as distinguished from Qualified Robbery with
Violence or Intimidation of Persons (Art. 295) which is
committed in an uninhabited place OR by a band.
ARTICLE 301
WHAT IS AN INHABITED HOUSE, PUBLIC BUILDING
OR BUILDING DEDICATED TO RELIGIOUS WORSHIP
AND THEIR DEPENDENCIES
Inhabited House
Means any shelter, ship, or vessel constituting the dwelling
of one or more persons, even though the inhabitants
thereof shall temporarily be absent therefrom when the
robbery is committed.
Dependencies of an inhabited house, public building or
building dedicated to religious worship
All interior courts, corrals, warehouses, granaries, barns,
coachhouses, stables, or other departments or enclosed
places
1. Contiguous to the building or edifice,
2. Having an interior entrance connected therewith, and
3. Which form part of the whole.
Orchards and other lands used for cultivation or production
are not included in the terms of the next preceding
paragraph, even if closed, contiguous to the building and
having direct connection therewith.
Public Building
Includes every building owned by the Government or
belonging to a private person, used or rented by the
Government, although temporarily unoccupied by the same.
ARTICLE 302
ROBBERY IN AN UNINHABITED PLACE
OR IN A PRIVATE BUILDING
Elements:
1. That the offender entered an uninhabited place or a
building which was not a dwelling house, not a public
building, or not an edifice devoted to religious worship;
2. That any of the following circumstances was present:
a. The entrance was effected through an opening not
intended for entrance or egress;
b. A wall, roof, floor, or outside door or window was
broken;
c. The entrance was effected through the use of false
keys, picklocks or other similar tools;
d. A door, wardrobe, chest, or any sealed or closed
furniture or receptacle was broken; or
e. A closed or sealed receptacle was removed, even if the
same be broken open elsewhere;
2. That with intent to gain, the offender took therefrom
 personal property belonging to another.
The only difference between Arts. 299 and 302 is that the
use of fictitious name or simulation of public authority can be
used only in Art. 299 which refers to inhabited buildings and
not in Art. 302 which involves uninhabited or other places.
While Art. 302 provides for robbery in an uninhabited
place, it actually means an uninhabited house.
Building
Any kind of structure used for storage or safekeeping of
personal property (U.S. v. Magsino, G.R. No. 1339.
November 28, 1903).
When the property taken is a mail matter during any of the
robberies defined in Arts. 294, 295, 297, 299, 300 & 302,
the penalties next higher than those provided in said articles
shall be imposed.
The taking of large cattle is now punished under P.D. No.
533.
ARTICLE 303
ROBBERY OF CEREALS, FRUITS, OR FIREWOOD IN
AN UNINHABITED PLACE OR PRIVATE BUILDING
Penalty is one (1) degree lower when cereals, fruits, or
firewood are taken in robbery with force upon things.
Cereals
Are seedlings which are the immediate product of the soil.
The palay must be kept by the owner as seedling or taken
for that purpose by the robbers.
ARTICLE 304
POSSESSION OF PICKLOCKS
OR SIMILAR TOOLS
Elements:
1. That the offender has in his possession picklocks or
similar tools;
2. That such picklocks or similar tools are specially adopted
to the commission of robbery; and
3. That the offender does not have lawful cause for such
possession.
Actual use of picklocks or similar tools is not necessary in
illegal possession thereof.
If the person who makes such tools is a locksmith, the
penalty is higher.
ARTICLE 305
FALSE KEYS
Inclusions:
1. Tools not mentioned in the next preceding article.
2. Genuine keys stolen from the owner.
3. Any keys other than those intended by the owner for use
in the lock forcibly opened by the offender.
A master key is a picklock and its possession is punishable.
A lost or misplaced key found by another and not returned
to its rightful owner is considered as a genuine key stolen
from the owner.
CHAPTER TWO: BRIGANDAGE
(ARTS. 306-307)
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE 532
Modified Arts. 306 & 307
Definition of Terms (Section 2)
Philippine waters
Refer to all bodies of water, such as but not limited to seas,
gulfs, bays around, between and connecting each of the
Islands of the Philippine Archipelago, irrespective of its
depth, breadth, length or dimension, and all other waters
belonging to the Philippines by historic or legal title,
including territorial sea, the sea-bed, the insular shelves,
and other submarine areas over which the Philippines has
sovereignty or jurisdiction.
Vessel
Any vessel or watercraft used for transport of passengers
and cargo from one place to another through Philippine
waters and includes all kinds and types of vessels or boats
used in fishing.
Philippine highway
Refer to any road, street, passage, highway and bridges or
other parts thereof, or railway or railroad within the
Philippines used by persons, or vehicles, or locomotives or
trains for the movement or circulation of persons or
transportation of goods, articles, or property or both.
Highway robbery/Brigandage
Seizure of any person for ransom, extortion or other
unlawful purposes, or the taking away of the property of
another by means of violence against or intimidation of
persons or force upon things or other unlawful means, ARTICLE 306
committed by any person on any Philippine highway. BRIGANDAGE

Elements:
1. The robbery should take place along the Philippine
highway;
2. The act of robbery must be indiscriminate. It should not
be an isolated case; and
3. The victim was not predetermined. The robbery must be
directed not only against specific, intended or perceived
victims, but against any and all prospective victims.
Any person who aids or protects highway robbers or abets
the commission of highway robbery or brigandage shall be
considered as an ACCOMPLICE.
The object of the decree is to deter and punish lawless
elements who commit acts of depredation upon persons
and properties of innocent and defenseless inhabitants who
travel from one place to another thereby disturbing the
peace and tranquility of the nation and stunting the
economic and social progress of the people (People v.
Pulusan, G.R. No. 110037, May 21, 1998).
Brigandage
A crime committed by more than three armed persons who
form a band of robbers for the purpose of committing
robbery in the highway or kidnapping persons for the
purpose of extortion or to obtain ransom, or for any other
purpose to be attained by means of force and violence.
Elements:
1. There be at least four armed persons;
2. They formed a band of robbers; and
3. The purpose is any of the following:
a. To commit robbery in a highway; or
b. To kidnap persons for the purpose of extortion or to
obtain ransom; or
c. To attain by means of force and violence any other
purpose.
Presumption of law as to brigandage:
All are presumed to be highway robbers or brigands, if any
of them carries an unlicensed firearm.

A conviction for highway robbery under this decree requires Brigandage may be committed without the use of firearms.
proof that the accused were organized for the purpose of The term armed covers arms and weapons in general, not
committing robbery indiscriminately (ibid.). necessarily firearms.

Punishable Acts: The only things to prove are:

1. Piracy (Section 3) 1. That there is an organization of more than three armed
2. Highway robbery/brigandage (Section 3) persons forming a band of robbers;
3. Aiding pirates or highway robbers/ brigands or abetting 2. That the purpose of the band is any of those enumerated
piracy or highway robbery/ brigandage (Section 4) in Art. 306;
3. That they went upon the highway or roamed upon the
country for that purpose;
4. That the accused is a member of such band.
Brigandage
PD 532 The term highway includes streets within, as well as roads
(Art. 306, RPC)
outside the cities.
Mere conspiracy to Mere formation of a
constitute the offense band for any purpose
Brigandage Robbery in Band
of brigandage is not indicated in the law is
punishable punishable. Purpose: commit Purpose: commit robbery,
(presupposes that acts robbery in highway; or to not necessarily in
defined are actually kidnap persons for highways.
committed). ransom; or any other
purpose attained by
Offenders need not Offenders must be a
force and violence.
constitute a band. One band of robbers.
person can commit the Agreement is to commit Agreement is to commit a
crime. several robberies. particular robbery.
Mere formation is Actual commission of
punished. robbery is necessary.
 ARTICLE 307
AIDING OR ABETTING A
BAND OF BRIGANDS
Elements:
1. That there is a band of brigands;
2. That the offender knows the band to be of brigands; and
3. That the offender does any of the following acts:
a. That he aids, abets, or protects such band of
brigands;
b. That he gives them information on the movements of
the police or other peace officers of the government;
or
c. That he acquires or receives property taken by such
brigands.
It shall be presumed that the person performing any of the
acts provided in this article has performed knowingly, them
unless the contrary is proven.
CHAPTER THREE: THEFT
(ARTS. 308-311)
ARTICLE 308
WHO ARE LIABLE FOR THEFT
Theft
Is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but
without violence or intimidation of persons nor force upon
things, shall take the personal property of another without
the latters consent.
Elements:
1. That there be taking of personal property;
2. That said property belongs to another;
3. That the taking be done with intent to gain;
4. That the taking be done without the consent of the owner;
and
5. That the taking be accomplished without the use of
violence against or intimidation of persons or force upon
things.
Theft is likewise committed by:
1. Any person who, having found lost property, shall fail to
deliver the same to the local authorities or to its owner. It
is necessary to prove:
a. The time of the seizure of the thing;
b. That it was a lost property belonging to another; and
c. That the accused having had the opportunity to return
or deliver the lost property to its owner or to the local
authorities, refrained from doing so.
The term lost property embraces loss by stealing.
The finder in law can also be held liable for theft under
this paragraph.
2. Any person who, after having maliciously damaged the
property of another, shall remove or make use of the fruits
or object of the damage caused by him.
3. Any person who shall enter an enclosed estate or a field
where trespass is forbidden or which belongs to another
and without the consent of its owner; shall hunt or fish
upon the same or shall gather fruits, cereals, or other
forest or farm products.
Elements:
a. That there is an enclosed estate or a field where
trespass is forbidden or which belongs to another;
b. That the offender enters the same;
c. That the offender hunts or fishes upon the same or
gathers fruits, cereals, or other forest or farm products
in the estate or field; and
d. That the hunting or fishing or gathering of products is
without the consent of the owner.
The fishing referred to in this article is not fishing in the
fishpond or fishery; otherwise it is qualified theft under
Art.310.
Theft is not a continuing offense.
In theft, the phrase used is shall take personal property
of another, not shall take away such property.
Theft Robbery
The offender does not use There is violence or
violence or intimidation or intimidation or force upon
does not enter a house or things.
building through any of the
means specified in Art. 299
or Art. 302 in taking
personal property of
another with intent to gain.
It suffices that consent on It is necessary that the
the part of the owner is taking is against the will of
lacking. the owner.
From the moment the offender gained possession of the
thing, even if the culprit had no opportunity to dispose of the
same, the unlawful taking is complete (People vs. Salvilla,
GR. No. 86163, April 26, 1990).
The ability of the offender to freely dispose of the property
stolen is not a constitutive element of the crime of theft. It
finds no support or extension in Article 308, whether as a
descriptive or operative element of theft or as the mens
rea or actus reus of the felony (Valenzuela vs. People of the
Philippines, G. R. No. 160188, June 21, 2007).
Theft is not limited to an actual finder of lost property who
does not return or deposit it with the local authorities but
includes a policeman to whom he entrusted it and who
misappropriated the same, as the latter is also a finder in
law.
Theft of electricity is also punishable under RA 7832, the
Anti-Electricity and Electric Transmission Lines/Materials
Pilferage Act of 1994.
ARTICLE 309
PENALTIES
The basis of penalty in Theft is:
1. The value of the thing stolen, and in some cases,
2. The value and the nature of the property taken, or
3. The circumstances or causes that impelled the culprit to
commit the crime.
The offender is liable for theft of whole car taken to another
place, even if only the tires are taken away (People v.
Carpio, 54 Phil. 48).
ARTICLE 310
QUALIFIED THEFT
There is qualified theft in the following instances:
1. If theft is committed by a domestic servant
2. If committed with grave abuse of confidence
3. If the property stolen is (a) motor vehicle, (b) mail matter
or (c) large cattle
4. If the property stolen consists of coconuts taken from the
premises of plantation.
5. If the property stolen is taken from a fishpond or fishery
6. If property is taken on the occasion of fire, earthquake,
typhoon, volcanic eruption, or any other calamity,
vehicular accident or civil disturbance
Elements:
1. Taking of personal property;
2. That the said property belongs to another;
3. That the said taking be done with intent to gain;
4. That it be done without the owners consent;
5. That it be accomplished without the use of violence or
intimidation against persons, nor of force upon things; and
6. That it be done with grave abuse of confidence (People v.
Puig, G.R. Nos. 173654-765, August 28, 2008).
Penalty for qualified theft is two degrees higher than that
provided in Art. 309.
Theft by domestic servant is always qualified, and it is not
necessary to show that it was committed with grave abuse
of confidence.
To constitute grave abuse of confidence, in the second
kind of qualified theft, there must be allegation in the
information and proof of a relation, by reason of
dependence, guardianship or vigilance between the
accused and the offended party, that has created a high
degree of confidence between them, which the accused
abused. (People v. Koc Song, G.R. No. L-45043, Aug. 28,
1936)
ANTI CARNAPPING ACT of 1972
(R.A. 6539)
Carnapping
Taking, with intent to gain, of motor vehicle belonging to
another without the latters consent, or by means of violence
against or intimidation of persons, or by using force upon
things.
Motor Vehicle
Any vehicle which is motorized using the streets which are
public, not exclusively for private use, comes within the
concept of motor vehicle. It includes all vehicles propelled by
power, other than muscular power.
If the OWNER, DRIVER OR OCCUPANT of a carnapped
vehicle is killed or raped in the course of the commission of
the carnapping or on the occasion thereof, the penalty of
reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed.
Since Sec. 14 of RA 6539 uses the words IS KILLED, no
distinction must be made between homicide and murder.
If the motor vehicle was not taken by the offender but was
delivered by the owner or the possessor to the offender,
who thereafter misappropriated the same, the crime is either
qualified theft or estafa
Qualified Theft only: If material or physical possession
was given to the offender.
Estafa only: If material plus juridical possession were given
to the offender.
CATTLE RUSTLING LAW of 1974
(P.D. 533)
Cattle Rustling
Is defined as the taking away by any means, method or
scheme, without the consent of the owner/raiser, of any
large cattle whether or not for profit or gain, or whether
committed with or without violence against or intimidation of
persons or force upon things. It includes the killing of large
cattle or taking it as meat or hide without the consent of the
owner/raiser.
Large Cattle
Shall include the cow, carabao, horse, mule, ass, or other
domesticated member of the bovine family. Goats are not
large cattle.
Presumption of Cattle Rustling
Failure to exhibit the required documents by any person
having in his possession, control, or custody of large cattle,
upon demand by competent authorities shall be prima facie
evidence that the large cattle in his possession, control and
custody are the fruits of the crime of cattle rustling.
LAW ON ILLEGAL FISHING
(P.D. 534)
Illegal Fishing
The act of any person to catching, taking or gathering or
causing to be caught, taken or gathered fish or
fishery/aquatic products in Philippine waters with the use of
explosives, obnoxious or poisonous substances or by the
use of electricity.
Dealing in illegally caught fish or fishery/aquatic
products
Any person who possesses or deals in, sells or in any
manner disposes of, for profit, any fish, fishery/aquatic
products which have been illegally caught, taken or
gathered shall, upon conviction, be punished by
imprisonment.
HIGHGRADING OR THEFT OF GOLD
(P.D. 581)
Highgrading or Theft of Gold
The act of any person who shall take gold-bearing ores or
rocks from a mining claim or mining camp or shall remove,
collect or gather gold-bearing ores or rocks in place or shall
extract or remove the gold from such ores or rocks, or shall
prepare and treat such ores or rocks to recover or extract
the gold content thereof, without the consent of the operator
of the mining claim.
Presumption: Unauthorized possession by any person
within a mining claim or mining camp of gold-bearing ores or
rocks or of gold extracted or removed from such ores or
rocks shall be prima facie evidence that they have been
stolen from the operator of a mining claim (Sec. 2).
ANTI FENCING LAW
(P.D. 1612)
Elements:
1. Crime of robbery or theft has been committed;
2. Accused, who is not a principal or accomplice in the
commission of the crime of robbery or theft, buys,
receives, possesses, keeps, acquires, conceals, sells, or
disposes of, or shall buy and sell, or in any other manner
deal any article, item, object or anything of value which he
knows, or should be known to him, to have been derived
from the proceeds of said crime;
3. Accused knows or should have known that said article,
item, object or anything of value has been derived from
the proceeds of theft or robbery; and
4. Accused has intent to gain for himself or another.
Section 2. Definition of Terms.
Fencing
The act of any person who, with intent to gain for himself or
for another, shall buy, receive, possess, keep, acquire,
conceal, sell, or dispose of, or shall buy and sell, or in any
other manner deal any article, item, object or anything of
value which he knows, or should be known to him, to have
been derived from the proceeds of the crime of robbery or
theft.
Section 5. Presumption of Fencing.
Mere possession of any good, article, item, object, or
anything of value which has been the subject of robbery or
thievery shall be prima facie evidence of fencing.
Section 6. Clearance/Permit to Sell Used/ Second Hand
Articles.
All stores, establishments or entities dealing in the buy
and sell of any good, article, item, object or anything of
value shall, before offering the same for sale to the public,
secure the necessary clearance or permit from the station
commander of the Philippine National Police in the town or
city where such store, establishment or entity is located.
Any person who fails to secure the required
clearance/permit shall also be punished as a fence.
Fencing is not a continuing offense. The court of the place
where fencing was committed has jurisdiction over the case.
The place where robbery or theft took place is insignificant.
An accessory to the crime of robbery or theft may also be
held liable for fencing.
 PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 401
Penalizing the Unauthorized Installation of Water,
Electrical or Telephone Connections, the Use of
Tampered Water or Electrical Meters, and other Acts
(March 1, 1974)
Acts punished:
1. The use of tampered water or electrical meters to steal
water or electricity;
2. The stealing or pilfering of water and/or electrical meters,
electric and/or telephone wires;
3. Knowingly possessing stolen or pilfered water and/or
electrical meters and stolen or pilfered electric and/or
telephone wires.
Theft of electricity can also be committed by any of the
following means:
1. Turning back the dials of the electric meter;
2. Fixing the electric meter in such a manner that it will not
register the actual electric consumption;
3. Under-reading of electric consumption; and
4. Tightening screw or rotary blades to slow down the
rotation of the same (People v. Relova, No. L- 45129,
March 6, 1987).
PENALIZING TIMBER SMUGGLING OR ILLEGAL
CUTTING OF LOGS FROM PUBLIC FORESTS AND
FOREST RESERVES AS QUALIFIED THEFT
(P.D. NO. 330)
Any person, whether natural or juridical who directly or
indirectly cuts, gathers, removes, or smuggles timber, or
other forest products, either from any of the public forest,
forest reserves and other kinds of public forest, whether
under license or lease, or from any privately owned forest
land in violation of existing laws, rules and regulations shall
be guilty of the crime of qualified theft.
P.D. NO. 705
REVISING PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 389,
OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE FORESTRY REFORM
CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
Acts punished:
1. Cutting, gathering and/or collecting timber or other
products without license from any forest land or timber
from alienable and disposable public lands or from private
lands shall be guilty of qualified theft under Arts. 309 and
310 of the RPC;
2. Entering and occupying or possessing, or making kaingin
for his own private use or for others any forest land
without authority or destroying in any manner such forest
land or part thereof, or causing any damage to
the timber stand and other products and forest growths
found therein;
3. Grazing or causing to graze without authority livestock in
forest lands, grazing lands and alienable and
disposable lands which have not as yet been disposed of
in accordance with Public Land Act;
4. Occupying for any length of time without permit any
portion of the national parks system or cutting,
destroying, damaging, or removing timber or any
species of vegetation or forest cover and other natural
resources found therein or mutilating, defacing, or
destroying objects of natural beauty or of scenic value
within areas of the natural park system;
5. Selling or offering for sale any log, lumber, plywood or
other manufactured wood products in the international or
domestic market, unless he complies with the grading
rules established or to be established by the Government.
ARTICLE 311
THEFT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE NATIONAL
LIBRARY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM
Theft of property on National Library and Museum has a
fixed penalty regardless of its value. But if the crime is
committed with grave abuse of confidence, the penalty for
qualified theft shall be imposed, because Art. 311 says
unless a higher penalty should be provided under the
provisions of this Code.
CHAPTER FOUR: USURPATION
(ARTS. 312-313)
ARTICLE 312
OCCUPATION OF REAL PROPERTY OR USURPATION
OF REAL RIGHTS IN PROPERTY
Elements:
1. That the offender takes possession of any real property
or usurps any real rights in property;
2. That the real property or real rights belong to another;
3. That violence against or intimidation of persons is used
by the offender in occupying real property or usurping
real property or usurping real right in property; and
4. That there is intent to gain.
Acts punished:
1. By taking possession of any real property belonging to
another by means of violence against or intimidation of
persons.
2. By usurping any real rights in property belonging to
another by means of violence against or intimidation of
persons.
There is only civil liability if there is no violence or
intimidation in taking possession.
Art. 312 does not apply when the violence or intimidation
took place subsequent to the entry. Violence or intimidation
must be the means used in occupying real property or in
usurping real rights and not in retaining possession.
When there is no intent to gain, crime committed is
coercion.
When there is no violence or intimidation used and there is
no intent to gain, the crime is only malicious mischief.
Art. 312 only provides a penalty of fine. However, the
offender shall also suffer the penalty for acts of violence
executed by him. Art. 48 on complex crimes does not apply.
Criminal action for usurpation of real property does not bar a
civil action for forcible entry.
Republic Act No. 947 punishes entering or occupying of
public agricultural land including public lands granted to
private individuals.
Squatters As defined under Urban Development and
Housing Act, they are:
1. Those who have the capacity or means to pay rent or for
legitimate housing but are squatting anyway.
2. Those who were awarded lots but sold or lease them out.
3. Those who are intruders of lands reserved for socialized
housing, pre-empting possession by occupying the
same.
Occupation of Real
Property or
Theft/Robbery
Usurpation of Real
Rights in Property
Personal property is Real property or real
taken. right is involved
ARTICLE 313
ALTERING BOUNDARIES OR LANDMARK
Elements:
1. That there be boundary marks or monuments of towns,
provinces, or estates, or any other marks intended to
designate the boundaries of the same; and
2. That the offender alters said boundary marks.
Altering
Is understood in its general and indefinite meaning. Any
alteration is enough to constitute the material element of the
crime.
CHAPTER FIVE:
CULPABLE INSOLVENCY (ART. 314)
ARTICLE 314
FRAUDULENT INSOLVENCY
Elements:
1. That the offender is a debtor, that is, he has obligations
due and demandable;
2. That he absconds with his property; and
3. That there be prejudice to his creditors.
Actual prejudice is required.
Real property may be the subject matter of fraudulent
insolvency.
Unlike in the Insolvency Law, Art. 314 does not require for
its application that the criminal act should have been
committed after the institution of insolvency proceedings. It
is not necessary that the defendant should have been
adjudged bankrupt or insolvent.
CHAPTER SIX: SWINDLING AND OTHER
DECEITS (ARTS. 315-318)
ARTICLE 315
SWINDLING/ESTAFA
Elements in general:
1. That the accused defrauded another by abuse of
confidence, or by means of deceit; and
2. That damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary
estimation is caused to the offended party or third
persons.
Damage or prejudice may consist of:
1. Offended party being deprived of his money or property
as a result of the defraudation;
2. Disturbance in property rights;
3. Temporary prejudice.
Note: Profit or gain must be obtained by the accused
personally and mere negligence in allowing another to
benefit from the transaction is not estafa.
I. Estafa with Unfaithfulness or Abuse of Confidence
E. stafa with unfaithfulness (Article 315, No. 1-A)
Elements:
1. That the offender has an onerous obligation to
deliver something of value;
 2. That he alters its substance, quantity or quality;
3. That damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary
estimation is caused to the offended party or third
persons.
It is estafa even if the obligation be based on an
immoral or illegal obligation.
When there is no agreement as to the quality of thing
to be delivered, the delivery of the thing not
acceptable to the complainant is not estafa.
E. stafa with abuse of confidence (Article 315 No.1- B)
Elements:
1. That money, goods, or other personal property be
received by the offender in trust, or on commission,
or for administration, or under any other obligation
involving the duty to make delivery of, or to return,
the same;
Money, goods or other personal property must be
received by the offender under certain kind of
transaction transferring juridical possession to him.
When the thing is received by the offender from the
offended party (1) in trust, or (2) on commission, or
(3) for administration, the offender acquires both
material and juridical possession of the thing
received.
2. That there be misappropriation or conversion of such
money or property by the offender, or denial
on his part of such receipt;
3. That such misappropriation or conversion or denial is
to the prejudice of another; and
4. That there is demand made by the offended party to
the offender.
The 4th element is not necessary when there is
evidence of misappropriation of the goods by the
defendant.
Note: The second element shows three ways in
which estafa under this paragraph may be
committed:
a. Misappropriation of the thing received;
b. Conversion of the thing received; or
c. Denial of the receipt of the thing received.
Definition of Terms
1. Misappropriation (M) the act of taking something
for ones own benefit.
2. Conversion the act of using or disposing of
anothers property as if it was ones own; thing has
been devoted to a purpose or use other than that
agreed upon.
3. Material Possession (MP) the actual physical
possession of personal property, where the
possessor cannot claim a better right to such
property than that of its owner.
4. Juridical Possession (JP) is present when the
possession of the personal property arises from a
lawful causation, contract or agreement, express or
implied, written or unwritten or by virtue of a
provision of law.
In such a case, the possessor of the property has a
better right to it than the owner and may set up his
possession thereof against the latter due to the lawful
transaction between them.
5. Ownership (O) There is ownership of the personal
property when there is no obligation to return exactly
the same property given or lent to the possessor.
Take Note:
1. If the offender has been given Material Possession of
the personal property and he Misappropriates the same,
he is liable for the crime of THEFT.
MP + M = Theft
2. If the offender has been given Juridical Possession and
Material Possession of the personal property and he
Misappropriates the same, he is liable for the crime of
ESTAFA.
JP + MP + M = Estafa
3. If the person has been given the Ownership, Juridical
Possession, and Material Possession of the personal
property and he misappropriates the same, he is NOT
criminally liable and incurs only a CIVIL LIABILITY.
O + JP + MP + M = NO CRIME
The contracts of deposit, commodatum, lease, quasi-
contract of solutio indebiti and trust receipt transactions are
examples of obligations involving the duty to return or make
delivery.
The thing to be delivered or returned by the offender must
be the very object which he received.
The person prejudiced need not necessarily be the owner of
the property.
As for the element of demand, the law does NOT require
demand as a condition precedent to the crime of Estafa
embezzlement. The consummation of the crime of estafa with abuse of Malversation
does not depend on the fact that a request for a return of the confidence
money is first made and refused in order that the author of Offenders are entrusted with funds or property.
the crime should comply with the obligation to return the
Considered as continuing offenses.
sum misapplied (Nepomuceno v. People, G.R. No. 166246,
April 30, 2008). The funds or property Usually public funds or
are private. property.
Demand under this kind of estafa need NOT be formal or Offender is a private Offender who is
written (Asejo v. People, G.R. No. 157433, July 24, 2007). individual or even a usually a public officer
public officer who is is accountable for
Exceptions: not accountable for public funds or
1. When the offenders obligation to comply is subject to a public funds or property.
period, and property.
2. When the accused cannot be located despite due There is no estafa Malversation can be
diligence. through negligence. committed through
abandonment or
Is Novation a Ground to Extinguish Criminal Liability negligence.
under Estafa? Crime is committed by Crime is committed by
NO. The Novation of the contract or obligation AFTER misappropriating, appropriating, taking
criminal liability for Estafa has been INCURRED is NOT a converting or denying or misappropriating or
ground to extinguish the offenders criminal liability. having received consenting, or
Novation is not one of the grounds for the extinguishment money, goods, or through abandonment
of criminal liability under Art. 89 of the RPC. other personal or negligence,
property. permitting any other
HOWEVER, where such novation, occurs BEFORE the person to take the
criminal liability for Estafa has been incurred, that is when public funds or
not all the elements therefore are present, then no criminal property.
liability attaches. Criminal liability for Estafa already
committed is not affected by compromise or novation of
C. Estafa by taking undue advantage of the
contract, for it is a public offense which must be prosecuted
signature in blank (Article 315, No. 1-C)
and punished by the state at its own volition (People vs.
Elements:
Florido, 12 C.A. Rep. 551).
1. That the paper with the signature of the offended party
be in blank;
Theft Estafa 2. That the offended party should have delivered it to the
The offender takes The offender receives offender;
the thing without the the thing from the 3. That above the signature of the offended party a
owners consent. offended party. document is written by the offender without authority
The offender acquires The offender acquires to do so; and
only the material or also the juridical 4. That the document so written creates a liability of, or
physical possession possession of the causes damage to the offended party or any third
of the thing. thing and the offender person.
misappropriates it.
Note: If the paper with the signature in blank is stolen
Note: If an object was received to be sold, but instead it the crime is falsification of documents by making it
was pledged, estafa is committed. appear that he participated in a transaction when in
fact he did not.
If an object was to be pledged, but instead it was sold,
theft is committed. II. Estafa by Means of Deceit (Article 315, No. 2)
Elements:
1. That there must be false pretense, fraudulent act or
fraudulent means;
2. That such false pretense, act or fraudulent means
must be made or executed prior to or simultaneously
 with the commission of the fraud;
3. That the offended party must have relied on the false
pretense, fraudulent act, or fraudulent means, that is,
he was induced to part with his money or property
because of the false pretense, fraudulent act, or
fraudulent means; and
4. That as a result thereof, the offended party suffered
damage.
There is no deceit if the complainant was aware of the
fictitious nature of the pretense.
It is indispensable that the element of deceit, consisting
in the false statement or fraudulent representation of
the accused, be made prior to, or at least
simultaneously with, the delivery of the thing by the
complainant, it being essential that such false
statement or fraudulent representation constitutes the
very cause or the only motive which induces the
complainant to part with the thing.
Fraudulent
The acts must be characterized by, or founded on,
deceit, trick or cheat.
Ways of commission:
A.Article 315 No. 2 (A):
1. By using a fictitious name.
2. By falsely pretending to possess (a) power, (b)
influence, (c) qualifications, (d) property, (e) credit,
(f) agency, (g) business or imaginary transactions.
3. By means of other similar deceits.
There is use of fictitious name when a person uses a
name other than his real name. Thus, when a person
found a pawnshop ticket in the name of another and,
using the name of that another person, redeemed
the jewelry mentioned therein, he committed estafa
by using fictitious name (People vs. Yusay, G.R. No.
L-26957, September 2, 1927).
The offender must be able to obtain something from
the offended party because of the false pretense,
that is, without which the offended party would not
have parted with it.
ILLEGAL RECRUITMENT
Under the Migrant Workers Act
(R.A. No. 8042 as amended by R.A. No. 10022)
Illegal Recruitment
Any act of canvassing, enlisting, hiring, or procuring
workers, including referring contract services, promising
or advertising for employment abroad, whether for profit or
not, when undertaken by a non-licensee or non- holder of
authority.
Any such non-licensee or non-holder of authority who, for
a fee, offers and promises employment abroad to two or
more persons shall be deemed so engaged in illegal
recruitment.
It shall likewise include the acts enumerated under Sec. 5
of R.A. No. 10022, whether committed by any person,
whether a non-licensee, non-holder, licensee or holder of
authority.
Economic Sabotage:
1. Illegal recruitment by syndicate committed by a
group of three (3) or more persons conspiring or
confederating with one another.
2. Large Scale Illegal Recruitment committed against
three (3) or more persons.
Penalty for Illegal Recruitment involving economic
sabotage is punishable by life imprisonment and fine of
P2,000,000 to P5,000,000.
In People v. Calonzo (G.R. Nos. 115150-55, Sept. 27,
1996), The SC reiterated the rule that a person
convicted for illegal recruitment under the Labor Code,
as amended, can be convicted for estafa, under Art 315
(par. 2), if the elements of the crime are present.
B. Article 315 No. 2 (B)
By altering, the quality, fineness or weight of anything
pertaining to his art or business.
C. Article 315 No. 2 (C)
By pretending to have bribed any Government
employee.
The accused, by pretending to have bribed a
government employee, can be held further liable for
such calumny in a criminal action for either slander or
libel depending on how he recounted the supposed
bribery.
However, the crime committed is corruption of
 public officer if the money was indeed given.
D. Article 315 No. 2 (D)
Elements:
1. That the offender postdated a check, OR issued
a check in payment of an obligation; and
2. That such postdating or issuing a check was
done when the offender had no funds in the
bank, or his funds deposited therein were not
sufficient to cover the amount of the check.
The issuance by the offender of the check (whether
postdated or not), prior to or simultaneous with the
transaction, must be for the purpose of contracting
the obligation, otherwise if the check is issued in
payment of a preexisting obligation, no estafa is
committed, only a civil liability.
If the check was issued by the debtor only for
security of the creditor, as in the nature of
promissory notes but not to be encashed, no estafa
will be involved.
Good faith is a defense in a charge of estafa by
postdating or issuing a check (People v. Villapando,
56 Phil 31).
Estafa by issuing a bad check is a continuing
offense.
There is prima facie evidence of deceit when the
drawer fails to pay or make arrangement for
payment three (3) days after receiving notice of
dishonor.
The payee or person receiving the check must be
damaged or prejudiced (Reyes, p.825).
BOUNCING CHECKS LAW
(B.P. Blg. 22)
Offenses Punished under BP 22:
A. Making or Drawing and issuing a check knowing at
the time of issue that he does not have sufficient funds.
Elements:
1. That a person makes or draws and issues any check
to apply on account or for value;
2. That the person knows that at the time of issue he
does not have sufficient funds or credit with the
drawee bank for the payment of such check upon its
presentment; and
3. That the check is subsequently dishonored by the
drawee bank for insufficiency of funds or credit, or
would have been dishonored for the same reason
had not the drawer, without any valid reason,
ordered the bank to stop payment.
Requisites for Criminal Liability under BP 22
1. A person makes, draws or issues a check as
payment for account or for value;
2. That the check was dishonored by the bank due to
a lack of funds, insufficiency of funds or account
already closed;
3. The payee or holder of such check gives a written
notice of dishonor and demand for payment; and
4. That the maker, drawer or issuer, after receiving
such notice and demand, refuses or fails to pay the
value of the check within FIVE BANKING DAYS.
It is not the making, drawing, or issuance, nor the
dishonor of the check which gives rise to a violation of
BP 22, but rather the failure to make good the check
within FIVE BANKING DAYS from receipt of the Notice
of Dishonor and Demand for Payment.
Take Note: While the written notice of dishonor and
demand is not an element in the violation of BP 22, the
failure to give such notice to the maker, drawer or
issuer of the bouncing check is FATAL to an action to
hold the latter criminally liable.
The full payment of the amount appearing in the check
within five banking days from notice of dishonor is a
"complete defense" against BP 22. The absence of a
notice of dishonor necessarily deprives an accused an
opportunity to preclude criminal prosecution.
Accordingly, procedural due process clearly enjoins that
a notice of dishonor be actually served on the maker,
drawer or issuer of the check. He has a right to demand
that the notice of dishonor be actually sent to and
received by him to afford him the opportunity to avert
prosecution under B.P. 22 (Lina Lim Lao v. People,
G.R. No. 119178, June 20, 1997).
F. ailing to keep sufficient funds to cover the full amount
of the check.
Elements:
1. That a person has sufficient funds with the drawee
bank when he makes or draws and issues a check;
2. That he fails to keep sufficient funds or to maintain a
credit to cover the full amount if presented within a
period of 90 days from the date of appearing thereon;
and
3. That the check is dishonored by the drawee bank.
Note: The 90-day period stated above is NOT an element obligation as he issued that check to apply on
of the violation of BP 22 by failing to keep sufficient funds. account.
As such, the maker, drawer or issuer of the check is not
discharged from his duty to maintain a sufficient balance BP 22 Estafa (RPC)
in his account for a reasonable time even beyond the 90- Endorser is not Endorser who acted
day period. A reasonable time according to current liable. with deceit knowing
banking practice is 6 months or 180 days, after which the that the check is
check becomes stale. worthless will be
criminally liable.
Thus, where a check is presented beyond the 90-day Malum prohibitum Malum in se
period, but within 180 days from the date indicated Issuance of check It is the means to
therein, and it is dishonored due to a failure to maintain a is for value or on obtain the valuable
sufficient balance, the maker, drawer or issuer shall still account. consideration from
be liable for violation of BP 22 (Wong v. CA, GR No. the payee (debt is
117857, February 2, 2001). not preexisting).
Deceit and damage False pretenses or
Gravamen of BP 22 is the issuance of a worthless or bum are not elements of deceit and damage,
check. the crime; the or at least intent to
gravamen of the cause damage, are
Evidence of Knowledge of Insufficient Funds: Refusal offense is the essential and the
of drawee bank to pay the check due to insufficiency of issuance of the false pretenses
funds when presented within 90 days from the date of the unfunded check. must be prior to or
check shall be prima facie knowledge of insufficiency of simultaneous with
funds, unless the drawer or maker pays the holder the the damage
amount due thereon or makes arrangements for the caused.
payment thereof by the drawee within five (5) banking The drawer is given Given 3 days after
days after receipt of notice that the check was 5 days after receiving notice of
dishonored. receiving notice of dishonor.
dishonor within
Under SC Administrative Circular 12-2000, as which to pay or
clarified by A.C. 13-2001: make arrangements
for payment.
Where the circumstances of both the offense and the That there are no That there are no
offender clearly indicate good faith or a clear mistake of funds or no funds or there are
fact without taint of intelligence, the imposition of fine sufficient funds at insufficient funds at
alone should be considered as the more appropriate the time of issuance the time of
penalty. or at the time of issuance.
presentment if
The Administrative Circular merely lays down a RULE OF made within 90
PREFERENCE in the application of the penalties days.
provided for in B.P. 22. The circular does not delete the The maker or Not necessary that
penalty of imprisonment, for should the judge decide that drawer and issuer the drawer should
imprisonment is the more appropriate penalty; the circular knows at the time of know at the time
ought not to be a hindrance. issue that he does that he issued the
not have sufficient check that the
Prosecution under BP 22 shall be without prejudice to any fund in or credit funds deposited in
liability for any violation in the RPC. with the drawee the bank were not
bank for the sufficient to cover
The fine under BP 22 is based on the amount of the payment of the the amount of the
check and is without regard to the amount of damage check in full. check.
caused.

The accused will be liable for the dishonor of the check

even if it was issued in payment of a preexisting legal
 BP 22 Estafa (RPC) 2. That the offender removed, concealed or
Mere issuance of a No presumption of destroyed any of them; and
check that is knowledge arises. 3. That the offender had intent to defraud another.
dishonored gives
rise to the Infidelity in
presumption of Custody of Estafa
knowledge of Document
insufficiency of
funds. Same manner of committing the crime.
Offender is a public The offender is a
E.Article 315, No. 2(E) officer who is private individual or
1. By obtaining food, refreshment or officially entrusted public officer who is
accommodation at hotel, inn, restaurant, with the document. not officially
boarding house, lodging house or apartment entrusted with the
house without paying therefor, with intent to documents.
defraud the proprietor or manager thereof; Intent to defraud is There is intent to
2. By obtaining credit at any of the said not necessary. defraud.
establishments by the use of any false pretense;
3. By abandoning or surreptitiously removing any If there is no intent to defraud, the crime committed
part of his baggage from any of the said is malicious mischief.
establishments after obtaining credit, food,
refreshment or accommodation therein, without ARTICLE 316
paying therefor. OTHER FORMS OF SWINDLING

III. Estafa Through the Following Fraudulent Means Persons liable:

E. stafa by inducing another to sign any document
(Article 315 No. 3A)
Elements:
1. That the offender induced the offended party to
sign a document;
2. That deceit be employed to make him sign the
document;
3. That the offended party personally signed the
document; and
4. That prejudice be caused.
Note: If offended party willingly signed the
document and there was deceit as to the character
or contents of the document, the crime committed
is falsification. BUT where the accused made
representation as to mislead the complainant as to
the character of the documents, it is considered
estafa.
B.Estafa by resorting to some fraudulent practice
to insure success in gambling (Article 315 No.
3B)
C.Estafa by removing, concealing or destroying
documents (Article 315 No. 3C)
Elements:
1. That there be court record, office files,
documents or any other papers;
1. Any person who, pretending to be the owner of any real
property, shall convey, sell, encumber or mortgage the
same.
Elements:
a. That the thing be immovable, such as a parcel of land
or a building; (property must actually exist)
b. That the offender who is not the owner of said
property should represent that he is the owner thereof;
c. That the offender should have executed an act of
ownership (selling, leasing, encumbering or
mortgaging the real property);
d. That the act be made to the prejudice of the owner or a
third person.
Note: If the thing is not existing, the crime is estafa by
means of false pretenses under Article 315 (2a).
2. Any person who, knowing that real property is
encumbered, shall dispose of the same, although such
encumbrance be not recorded.
Elements:
a. That the thing disposed of be real property.
b. That the offender knew that the real property was
encumbered, whether the encumbrance is
recorded or not. (principle of constructive notice does
not apply)
c. That there must be express representation by the
offender that the real property is free from
 encumbrance.
d. That the act of disposing of the real property be
made to the damage of another.
Note: If the thing is a personalty, Article 319 applies.
Encumbrance
Includes every right or interest in the land which exists
in favor of third persons
3. The owner of any personal property who shall wrongfully
take it from its lawful possessor, to the prejudice of the
latter or any third person.
Elements:
a. That the offender is the owner of personal property;
b. That said personal property is in the lawful possession
of another;
c. That the offender wrongfully takes it from its lawful
possessor; (if from unlawful possessor, Art. 429 of the
Civil Code applies)
d. That prejudice is thereby caused to the possessor or
third person.
Note: The crime will still be estafa even if the owner takes
the personalty from the lawful possessor under the
modes of taking in theft or robbery which latter crimes
cannot be committed by the owner on his property
(Regalado, 2008).
4. Any person who, to the prejudice of another, shall
execute any fictitious contract.
5. Any person who shall accept any compensation for
services not rendered or for labor not performed.
This act requires fraud as an essential element. If there is
no fraud, it only becomes solutio indebiti, with the civil
obligation to return the wrong payment.
6. Any person who shall sell, mortgage or encumber real
property with which the offender guaranteed the fulfillment
of his obligation as surety.
Elements:
a. That the offender is a surety in a bond given in a criminal
or civil action;
b. That he guaranteed the fulfillment of such obligation
with his real property or properties;
c. That he sells, mortgages, or, in any manner encumbers
said real property; and
d. That such sale, mortgage or encumbrance is (1) without
express authority from the court, or (2) made before the
cancellation of his bond, or (3) before being relieved from
the obligation contracted by him.
Since the penalty of fine prescribed in Art. 316 is based on
the value of the damage caused, mere intent to cause
damage is not sufficient. There must be actual damage
caused by the act of the offender. (Reyes, p. 848)
ARTICLE 317
SWINDLING A MINOR
Elements:
1. That the offender takes advantage of the inexperience or
emotions or feelings of a minor;
2. That he induces such minor to assume an obligation, or
to give release, or to execute a transfer of any property
right;
3. That the consideration is some loan of money, credit, or
other personal property; (if real property, Art. 318 applies;
minor cannot convey real property without judicial
authority); and
4. That the transaction is to the detriment of such minor.
ARTICLE 318
OTHER DECEITS
Acts Punished:
1. By defrauding or damaging another by any other deceit
not mentioned in the preceding articles.
2. By interpreting dreams, by making forecasts, telling
fortunes, by taking advantage of the credulity of the public
in any other manner, for profit or gain.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8484
ACCESS DEVICES REGULATION ACT OF 1998
Definition of terms
1. Access Device any card, plate, code, account number,
electronic serial number, personal identification
number, or other telecommunications service,
equipment, or instrumental identifier, or other means of
account access that can be used to obtain money, good,
services, or any other thing of value or to initiate a
transfer of funds (other than a transfer originated solely by
paper instrument).
2. Counterfeit Access Device any access device that is
counterfeit, fictitious, altered, or forged, or an identifiable
component of an access device or counterfeit access
device.
3. Unauthorized Access Device any access device that
is stolen, lost, expired, revoked, canceled, suspended, or
obtained with intent to defraud.
4. Access Device Fraudulently Applied for any access
device that was applied for or issued on account of the
use of falsified document, false information, fictitious
identities and addresses, or any form of false
 pretense or misrepresentation.
5. Consumer a natural person.
6. Credit Card any card, plate, coupon book, or other
credit device existing for the purpose of obtaining
money, goods, property, labor or services or any thing of
value on credit.
7. Device Making or Altering Equipment any
equipment, mechanism or impression designed or
primarily used for making or altering or re-encoding an
access device or a counterfeit access device.
8. Finance Charges represent the amount to be paid by
the debtor incident to the extension of credit such as
interest or discounts, collection fees, credit investigation
fees, and other service charges.
9. Open-end-credit plan a consumer credit extended on
an account pursuant to a plan under which:
a. The creditor may permit the person to make purchase
or obtain loans, from time to time, directly from the
creditor or indirectly by use of credit card, or other
service;
b. The person has the privilege of paying the balance; or
c. A finance charge may be computed by the creditor
from time to time on an unpaid balance.
9. Penalty Charges such amount, in addition to interest,
imposed on the credit card holder for non-
payment of an account within a prescribed period.
11. Produce includes design, alter, authenticate,
duplicate or assemble.
12. Trafficking transferring, or otherwise disposing of, to
another, or obtaining control of, with intent to
transfer or dispose of.
Acts Prohibited (Section 9)
The following acts shall constitute access device fraud
and are hereby declared to be unlawful:
1. Producing, using, trafficking in one or more counterfeit
access devices;
2. Trafficking in one or more unauthorized access devices
or access devices fraudulently applied for;
3. Using, with intent to defraud, an unauthorized access
device;
4. Using an access device fraudulently applied for;
5. Possessing one or more counterfeit access devices or
access devices fraudulently applied for;
6. Producing, trafficking in, having control or custody of,
or possessing device-making or altering equipment
without being in the business or employment, which
lawfully deals with the manufacture, issuance, or
distribution of such equipment;
7. Inducing, enticing, permitting or in any manner
allowing another, for consideration or otherwise to
produce, use, traffic in counterfeit access devices,
unauthorized access devices or access devices
fraudulently applied for;
8. Multiple imprinting on more than one transaction
record, sales slip or similar document, thereby making it
appear that the device holder has entered into a
transaction other than those which said device holder
had lawfully contracted for, or submitting, without being
an affiliated merchant, an order to collect from the
issuer of the access device, such extra sales slip
through an affiliated merchant who connives therewith,
or, under false pretenses of being an affiliated
merchant, present for collection such sales slips, and
similar documents;
9. Disclosing any information imprinted on the access
device, such as, but not limited to, the account number
or name or address of the device holder, without the
latter's authority or permission;
10. Obtaining money or anything of value through the use
of an access device, with intent to defraud or with intent
to gain and fleeing thereafter;
11. Having in one's possession, without authority from the
owner of the access device or the access device
company, an access device, or any material, such as
slips, carbon paper, or any other medium, on which the
access device is written, printed, embossed, or
otherwise indicated;
12. Writing or causing to be written on sales slips, approval
numbers from the issuer of the access
device of the fact of approval, where in fact no such
approval was given, or where, if given, what is written
is deliberately different from the approval actually given;
13. Making any alteration, without the access device
holder's authority, of any amount or other information
written on the sales slip;
14. Effecting transaction, with one or more access devices
issued to another person or persons, to
receive payment or any other thing of value;
15. Without the authorization of the issuer of the access
device, soliciting a person for the purpose of:
a. Offering an access device; or
b. Selling information regarding or an application to
obtain an access device; or
16. Without the authorization of the credit card system
member or its agent, causing or arranging for another
person to present to the member or its agent, for
payment, one or more evidence or records of
transactions made by credit card.
Conspiracy to commit access device fraud. (Section
11) are punishable under this code.
Frustrated and attempted access device fraud
(Section 12) is also punishable.
Accessory to access device fraud (Section 13) Any
person who, with intent to gain for himself or for another,
buys, receives, possesses, keeps, acquires, conceals, sells,
or disposes of, shall buy and sell, or in any manner deal in
any article, item, object or anything of value which he knows
or should be known to him, to have been acquired through
the use of counterfeit access device or an unauthorized
access device or an access device known to him to have
been fraudulently applied for, shall be considered as an
accessory to an access device. Said person shall be
prosecuted under this Act or under the Anti-Fencing Law of
1979 (Presidential Decree No. 1612) whichever imposes the
longer prison term as penalty for the consummated offense.
Presumption and prima facie evidence of intent to
defraud (Section 14)
The mere possession, control or custody of:
a. An access device, without permission of the owner or
without any lawful authority;
b. A counterfeit access device;
c. Access device fraudulently applied for;
d. Any device-making or altering equipment by any person
whose business or employment does not lawfully deal
with the manufacture, issuance, or distribution of access
device;
e. An access device or medium on which an access device
is written, not in the ordinary course of the possessor's
trade or business; or
f. A genuine access device, not in the name of the
possessor, or not in the ordinary course of the
possessor's trade or business, shall be prima facie
evidence that such device or equipment is intended to
be used to defraud.
A cardholder who abandons or surreptitiously leaves the
place of employment, business or residence stated in his
application or credit card, without informing the credit card
company of the place where he could actually be found, if at
the time of such abandonment or surreptitious leaving, the
outstanding and unpaid balance is past due for at least
ninety (90) days and is more than Ten thousand pesos
(P10,000.00), shall be prima facie presumed to have used
his credit card with intent to defraud.
CHAPTER SEVEN: CHATTEL
MORTGAGE (ART. 319)
ARTICLE 319
REMOVAL, SALE OR PLEDGE OF MORTGAGED
PROPERTY
Acts punished:
A. By knowingly removing any personal property mortgaged
under the Chattel Mortgage Law to any
province or city other than the one in which it is located
at the time of execution of the mortgage, without the
written consent of the mortgagee or his executors,
administrators or assigns.
Removal of Mortgaged Property
Elements:
1. That personal property is mortgaged under Chattel
Mortgage Law;
2. That the offender knows that such property is so
mortgaged;
3. That he removes such mortgaged personal property
to any province or city other than the one
in which it was located at the time of the execution of
the mortgage;
4. That the removal is permanent; and
5. That there is no written consent of mortgagee,
executors, administrators, or assigns to such
removal.
The removal of the mortgaged personal property must
be coupled with intent to defraud.
A third person, other than the mortgagor, may be held
liable
If the mortgagee elected to file a suit for collection, not
foreclosure, thereby abandoning the mortgage as basis
for relief, the removal of the property is not a violation
of par 1 of Art 319.
Chattel mortgage must be valid and subsisting.
B. By selling or pledging personal property already pledged,
or any part thereof, under the terms of the Chattel
Mortgage Law, without the consent of the mortgagee
written on the back of the mortgage and noted on the
record thereof in the office of the register of deeds of
the province where such property is located.
Sale or Pledge of Mortgaged Property
Elements:
1. Personal property is already pledged under Chattel
Mortgage Law;
2. Offender, who is the mortgagor, sells or pledges the
same property or any part thereof; and
3. No consent of mortgagee written on the back of the
mortgage and noted on the record thereof in the
Office of the Register of Deeds.
Damage to the mortgagee is not essential.
 Disposing of definite purpose such as but not limited to hotels, motels,
Estafa
Encumbered Property transient dwellings, public conveyances or stops or
The property involved is The property involved is terminals, regardless of whether the offender had
personal property. real property. knowledge that there are persons in said building or
Selling or pledging of To constitute estafa, it is edifice at the time it is set on fire and regardless also of
personal property sufficient that the real whether the building is actually inhabited or not;
already pledged or property mortgaged be 3. Any train or locomotive, ship or vessel, airship or airplane,
mortgaged is committed sold as free, even devoted to transportation or conveyance, or for public
by the mere failure to though the vendor may use, entertainment or leisure;
obtain the consent of the have obtained the 4. Any building, factory, warehouse installation and any
mortgagee in writing, consent of the appurtenances thereto, which are devoted to the service
even if the offender mortgagee in writing. of public utilities; or
should inform the 5. Any building the burning of which is for the purpose of
purchaser that the thing concealing or destroying evidence of another violation of
sold is mortgaged. law, or for the purpose of concealing bankruptcy or
The purpose of the law The purpose is to defrauding creditors or to collect from insurance.
is to protect the protect the purchaser,
mortgagee. whether the first or the There is also Destructive Arson: (Art. 320, RPC)
second. 1. When the arson is committed by 2 or more persons,
regardless of whether their purpose is merely to burn or
destroy the building or the burning merely constitutes an
CHAPTER EIGHT: ARSON AND OTHER
CRIMES INVOLVING DESTRUCTIONS overt act in the commission of another violation of the law.
(ARTS. 320-326B) 2. When any person shall burn:
a. Any arsenal, shipyard, storehouse or military power or
fireworks factory, ordinance, storehouse, archives or
ARTICLE 320-326-B general museum of the Government; or
REPEALED BY PD 1613 b. In an inhabited place, any storehouse or factory of
PD 1613 AMENDING THE LAW ON ARSON inflammable or explosive materials.

Kinds of Arson:
1. Arson (Sec. 1, PD No. 1613)
2. Destructive arson (Art. 320, as amended by RA No.
7659)
3. Other cases of arson (Sec. 3, PD No. 1613)
Arson
When any person burns or sets fire to the property of
another, or his own property under circumstances which
expose to danger the life or property of another. (Sec. 1, PD
1613); It is the malicious destruction of property by fire.
Other cases of Arson: (Sec. 3, PD 1613)
Burning of:
1. Any building used as offices of the Government or any of
its agencies;
2. Any inhabited house or dwelling;
3. Any industrial establishment, shipyard, oil well or mine
shaft, platform or tunnel;
4. Any plantation, farm, pasture land, growing crop, grain
field, orchard, bamboo grove or forest;
5. Any rice mill, sugar mill, cane mill, or mill central; or
6. Any railway or bus station, airport, wharf, or warehouse.

Destructive Arson (Art. 320, RPC)
Burning of:
1. One (1) or more buildings or edifices, consequent to one
single act of burning, or as a result of simultaneous
burnings, or committed on several or different occasions;
2. Any building of public or private ownership, devoted to the
public in general or where people usually gather or
congregate for a definite purpose such as, but not limited
to, official governmental function or business, private
transaction, commerce, trade workshop, meetings and
conferences, or merely incidental to a
Special Aggravating Circumstance on Arson (Sec. 4, PD
1613):
1. If committed with intent to gain.
2. If committed for the benefit of another.
3. If the offender is motivated by spite or hatred towards the
owner or occupant of the property burned.
4. If committed by a syndicate planned or carried out by
three or more persons
Prima facie evidence of Arson (Sec. 6, PD 1613):
1. If the fire started simultaneously in more than one part of
the building or establishment.
2. If substantial amount of flammable substances or
materials are stored within the building not of the offender
nor for the household.
3. If gasoline, kerosene, petroleum or other flammable or
combustible substances or materials soaked therewith or
containers thereof, or any mechanical, electrical,
chemical, or electronic contrivance designed to start a
fire, or ashes or traces of any of the foregoing are found
in the ruins or premises of the burned building or property.
4. If the building or property is insured for substantially
more than its actual value at the time of the issuance of
the policy.
5. If during the lifetime of the corresponding fire insurance
more than two fires have occurred in the same or other
premises owned or under the control of the offender
and/or insured.
6. If shortly before the fire, a substantial portion of the
effects insured and stored in a building or property had
been withdrawn from the premises except in the ordinary
course of business.
7. If a demand for money or other valuable consideration
was made before the fire in exchange for the desistance
of the offender or for the safety of the person or property
of the victim.
Conspiracy to commit arson is punished. (Sec. 7, PD
1613)
The building which is the object of arson including the
land on which it is situated shall be confiscated and
escheated to the State. (Sec. 8, PD 1613)
Examples of Attempted, frustrated or consummated
arson:
a. A person, intending to burn a wooden structure, collects
some rags, soaks them in gasoline and places them
beside the wooden wall of the building. When he is
about to light a match to set fire to the rags, he is
discovered by another who chases him away.
The crime committed is attempted arson, because the
offender commences the commission of the crime directly
by overt acts (placing the rags soaked in gasoline beside
the wooden wall of the building and lighting a match) but he
does not perform all the acts of execution (the setting of fire
to the rags) due to the timely intervention of another who
chases away the offender.
If that person is able to light or set fire to the rags but the fire
was put out before any part of the building was burned, it is
frustrated.
But if before the fire was put out, it had burned a part of
the building, it is consummated.
b. The crime is classified only as frustrated arson, inasmuch
as the defendant performed all the acts conceive to the
burning of said house, but nevertheless, owing to causes
independent of his will, the criminal act which he intended
was not produced. The offense committed cannot be
classified as consummated arson by the burning of said
inhabited house, for the reason that no part of the building
had yet commenced to burn, although, as the piece of
sack and the rag, soaked in kerosene oil, had been
placed near partition of the entresol, the partition might
have started to burn, had the fire not been put out on
time. (U.S. v. Valdez; G.R. No. L-14128, Dec. 10, 2918)
c. Any charring of the wood of a building, whereby the fiber
of the wood is destroyed, is sufficient. It is necessary that
the wood should be ablaze.
And the mere fact that a building is scorched or
discolored by heat is not sufficient to constitute
consummated arson.
The offense is committed by a syndicate if it is planned or
carried out by a group of three or more persons.
If a part of the building commences to burn, the crime is
consummated arson, however small is the portion burned.
When there is fire, the crime committed is either frustrated
(e.g. set fire to the blankets but fire was put out before
any part of the building was burned) or consummated
arson, never attempted.
There is no complex crime of arson with homicide. If by
reason of or on the occasion of arson, death results, the
penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed.
The crime of homicide is absorbed.
CHAPTER NINE: MALICIOUS MISCHIEF
(ARTS. 327-331)
Malicious Mischief
Is the willful damaging of anothers property for the sake of
causing damage due to hate, revenge or other evil motive.
 ARTICLE 327
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF
Elements:
1. That the offender deliberately caused damage to the
property of another;
2. That such act does not constitute arson or other crimes
involving destruction; and
3. That the act of damaging anothers property be committed
merely for the sake of damaging it.
This third element presupposes that the offender acted
due to hate, revenge or other evil motive. This crime
cannot be committed thru reckless imprudence or thru
violence in the course of a fight.
If there is no malice in causing the damage, the obligation is
only civil.
Damage
In malicious mischief means not only loss but also a
diminution of what is a mans own. Thus, damage to
anothers house includes defacing it.
Damage of property must not result from a crime.
Malicious mischief does not necessarily involve moral
turpitude.
It is theft when there is intent to gain as when the offender
removes or makes use of the fruits or objects of the damage
(Art 308, par 2) .
ARTICLE 328
SPECIAL CASES OF MALICIOUS MISCHIEF
1. Causing damage to obstruct the performance of public
functions;
2. Using poisonous or corrosive substances;
3. Spreading any infection or contagion among cattle;
4. Causing damage to the property of the National
Museum or National Library, or to any archive or registry,
waterworks, road, promenade, or any other thing used in
common by the public.
These are called qualified malicious mischief.
The mischief mentioned in the first case (no. 1) is to be
distinguished from sedition (Art. 139), in that the element of
public and tumultuous uprising is not present in this crime.
ARTICLE 329
OTHER MISCHIEFS
Mischiefs not included in the next preceding article and are
punished according to the value of damage caused.
ARTICLE 330
DAMAGE AND OBSTRUCTION TO MEANS OF
COMMUNICATION
Person liable: Any person who shall damage any railway,
telegraph or telephone lines.
Qualifying circumstance: Damage shall result in the
derailment of cars, collision or other accident.
For the purpose of the provisions of Art. 330, the electric
wires, traction cables, signal system, and other things
pertaining to railways, shall be deemed to constitute an
integral part of a railway system. Art. 330 does not apply
when the telegraph or telephone do not pertain to railways.
ARTICLE 331
DESTROYING OR DAMAGING STATUES, PUBLIC
MONUMENTS OR PAINTINGS
Persons liable:
1. Any person who shall destroy or damage statues or any
other useful or ornamental public monuments.
2. Any person who shall destroy or damage any useful or
ornamental painting of a public nature.
CHAPTER TEN: EXEMPTION FROM
CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CRIMES
AGAINST PROPERTY
(ART. 332) (ARTS. 327-331)
ARTICLE 332
PERSONS EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Crimes involved in the exemption:
1. Theft
2. Swindling (estafa)
3. Malicious mischief
Persons exempted:
1. Spouses, ascendants and descendants, or relatives by
affinity in the same line.
2. The widowed spouse with respect to the property which
belonged to the deceased spouse before the same shall
have passed to the possession of another.
3. Brothers and sisters and brothers in law and sisters in
 law, if living together.
4. Stepfather, adopted father, natural children, concubine,
paramour included as ascendants by affinity.
Also applies to common-law spouses.
No criminal liability but only civil liability shall result from the
commission of any of the said crimes.
The exemption does not apply to strangers participating in
the commission of the crime.
The exemption does not apply if the crimes of theft,
swindling and malicious mischief are complexed with
another crime.
2. That she has sexual intercourse with a man not her
husband; and
3. That as regards the man with whom she has sexual
intercourse, he must know her to be married.
Adultery is committed even if the marriage is
subsequently declared void.
The death of the paramour will not bar prosecution
against the unfaithful wife, because the requirement that
both offenders be included in the complaint is absolute
only when the offenders are alive.
The death of the offended party will not terminate the
proceedings.

Crimes against chastity are also referred to as private Each occasion of sexual intercourse constitutes a crime
crimes, or crimes which cannot be prosecuted de officio, of adultery.
because of the requirement that the prosecution thereof be
upon a sworn written complaint of the offended party or The criminal liability is mitigated when adultery is
certain persons authorized by law. committed while abandoned by spouse without
justification.
The crimes against chastity which cannot be
prosecuted de officio are: Abandonment without justification is not an exempting
a. Adultery (Art. 333) circumstance but is merely mitigating.
b. Concubinage (Art. 334)
c. Acts of lasciviousness with or without consent (Arts. 336, There is no crime of frustrated adultery.
339)
d. Seduction whether qualified or simple (Arts. 337, 338), Acquittal of one of the defendants will not automatically
and acquit the other:
e. Abduction which may be forcible or consented (Arts. 342, a. There may not be a joint criminal intent, although there
343) is a joint physical act.
But corruption of minors (Art. 340) and white slave trade b. One of the parties may be insane and the other is
(Art. 341) can be prosecuted de officio. sane.
c. The man may not know that the woman is married.
d. The death of the woman during the pendency of the
TITLE ELEVEN: CRIMES action cannot defeat the trial and conviction of the man.
e. A married man who does not know of the married
AGAINST CHASTITY
status of the woman may be liable for concubinage, if
he appears to be guilty of any of the acts defined in Art.
CHAPTER ONE: ADULTERY AND 334.
CONCUBINAGE (ARTS. 333-334)

Requirements for pardon:

ARTICLE 333 1. Must come before the institution of the criminal
ADULTERY prosecution; and
2. Both offenders must be pardoned.
Who are liable?
1. The married woman who engages in sexual intercourse There is an implied pardon:
with a man not her husband. Act of intercourse with offending spouse subsequent to the
2. The man who, knowing of the marriage of the woman, adulterous conduct.
has sexual intercourse with her.
When there is consent, whether implied or expressed, of the
Elements: husband, he cannot institute a criminal complaint for
1. That the woman is married; adultery.
Under the law there can be no accomplice in the crime of
adultery, although in fact there can be such an accomplice.
Recrimination
Husbands illicit relationship does not absolve but may
mitigate wifes liability for adultery.
ARTICLE 334
CONCUBINAGE
Who are liable?
1. The married man.
2. The woman who knew that the man was married.
Elements:
1. That the man must be married;
2. That he committed any of the following acts:
a. Keeping a mistress in the conjugal dwelling (mistress
must live therein as such);
b. Having sexual intercourse under scandalous
circumstances with a woman who is not his wife
(proof of actual sexual relations not required as long as
it can be inferred);
c. Cohabiting with her in any other place (as husband and
wife);
3. As regards the woman, she must know him to be
married.
Conjugal dwelling
Means the home of the husband and wife even if the wife
happens to be temporarily absent on any account.
Scandalous circumstances are not necessary to make a
husband guilty of concubinage by keeping a mistress in the
conjugal dwelling.
Scandal consists in any reprehensible word or deed that
offends public conscience, redounds to the detriment of the
feelings of honest persons, and gives occasion to the
neighbors spiritual damage or ruin.
Cohabit means to dwell together, in the manner of
husband and wife, for some period of time, as distinguished
from occasional transient interviews for unlawful intercourse.
Adultery is more severely punished than concubinage.
Reason: Because adultery makes possible the introduction
of another mans blood into the family so that the offended
husband may have another mans son bearing his
(husbands) name and receiving support from him.
Art. 335 has been repealed by RA No. 8353 (Anti-Rape Law
of 1997) effective Oct. 22, 1997. Provisions on Rape are
found in Arts. 266-A to 266-D under Crimes Against
Persons.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9995
ANTI-PHOTO AND VIDEO VOYEURISM ACT OF 2009
Photo or video voyeurism means the act of taking photo
or video coverage of a person or group of persons
performing sexual act or any similar activity or of capturing
an image of the private area of a person or persons without
the latter's consent, under circumstances in which such
person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy, or
the act of selling, copying, reproducing, broadcasting,
sharing, showing or exhibiting the photo or video coverage
or recordings of such sexual act or similar activity through
VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and similar means or
device without the written consent of the person/s involved,
notwithstanding that consent to record or take photo or
video coverage of same was given by
such person's
Prohibited Acts
1. To take photo or video coverage of a person or group of
persons performing sexual act or any similar activity or to
capture an image of the private area of a person/s such
as the naked or undergarment clad genitals, public area,
buttocks or female breast without the consent of the
person/s involved and under circumstances in which the
person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy;
2. To copy or reproduce, or to cause to be copied or
reproduced, such photo or video or recording of sexual
act or any similar activity with or without consideration;
3. To sell or distribute, or cause to be sold or distributed,
such photo or video or recording of sexual act, whether it
be the original copy or reproduction thereof; or
4. To publish or broadcast, or cause to be published or
broadcast, whether in print or broadcast media, or show
or exhibit the photo or video coverage or recordings of
such sexual act or any similar activity through VCD/DVD,
internet, cellular phones and other similar means or
device.
CHAPTER TWO: ACTS OF
LASCIVIOUSNESS (ART. 336)
ARTICLE 336
ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS
Elements:
1. That the offender commits any act of lasciviousness or
 lewdness; any person; bestiality, masturbation, lascivious exhibition of
2. That the act of lasciviousness is committed against a the genitals or pubic area of a person.
person of either sex;
3. That it is done under any of the following Who must prosecute criminal actions
circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation; or R.A. 7610 Acts of
b. When the offended party is deprived of reason or Lasciviousness
otherwise unconscious; or Complaints on cases of
c. By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of unlawful acts committed
authority; or against the children as The offenses
d. When the offended party is under 12 years of age or enumerated herein may of seduction,
is demented. be filed by the following: abduction and
acts of
The crime is unjust vexation in the absence of any of the a. Offended party; lasciviousness shall
above-mentioned circumstances (circumstances of rape). b. Parents or guardians; not be prosecuted
c. Ascendant or except upon a
Attempted Rape Acts of Lasciviousness collateral relative complaint filed by the
within the third degree offended party or her
The acts performed by There is no intent to have
of consanguinity; parents,
offender clearly indicate sexual intercourse.
d. Officer, social worker grandparents or
that his purpose was to
or representative of a guardian, nor, in any
lie with the offended
licensed child-caring case, if the offender
woman, it is attempted.
institution; has been expressly
The lascivious acts are The lascivious acts are e. Officer or social pardoned by any of
but the preparatory acts the final objective sought worker of the them. If the offended
to the commission of by the offender. Department of Social party dies or
rape. Welfare and becomes
Manner of commission is the same. Development; incapacitated before
f. Barangay chairman; she can file
The performance of lascivious character is common the complaint, and
to both. or
g. At least three (3) she has no
concerned known
Lewd obscene, lustful, indecent, lecherous. parents,
responsible citizens
where the violation grandparents or
What constitutes lewd or lascivious conduct must be guardian, the State
occurred(Sec. 27)
determined from the circumstances of each case. The shall initiate the
presence or absence of the lewd designs is inferred from criminal action in her
the nature of the acts themselves and the environmental behalf (Section
circumstances. 5,
Rule 110, Revised
There can be no attempted and frustrated acts of Rules on Criminal
lasciviousness. Procedure).

In People v. Jalosjos (GR No. 132876-279, Nov. 16, 2001), CHAPTER THREE: SEDUCTION,
the SC adopted the definition of lascivious conduct in CORRUPTION OF MINORS, AND WHITE
SLAVE TRADE
Sec. 32, Art. XIII of the Implementing Rules and Regulations
(ARTS. 337-341)
of RA 7610, which reads as follows:

The intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, ARTICLE 337

of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh or buttocks; QUALIFIED SEDUCTION
or the introduction of any object into the genitalia, anus or
mouth of any person, whether of the same or opposite sex, Seduction
with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or
arouse or gratify the sexual desire of
Means enticing a woman to unlawful sexual intercourse by
promise of marriage or other means of persuasion without
use of force.
Two classes:
1. Seduction of a virgin over 12 years and under 18 years of
age by persons who abuse their authority or the
confidence reposed in them.
2. Seduction of a sister by her brother or descendant by her
ascendant, regardless of her age and reputation.
Elements:
1. That the offended party is a virgin;
2. She must be over 12 and under 18 years of age;
3. That the offender had sexual intercourse with her; and
4. That there is abuse of authority, confidence or
relationship on the part of the offender.
Virgin
Refers to a woman of chaste character or a woman of
good reputation. Virginity in this sense does NOT mean
physical virginity.
Virginity is presumed if the woman is unmarried and of good
reputation.
If there is no sexual intercourse and only acts of lewdness
are performed, the crime is acts of lasciviousness under Art.
339.
The following are the OFFENDERS:
1. Those who abused their authority:
a. Persons in public authority
b. Guardian
c. Teacher
d. Person who, in any capacity, is entrusted with the
education or custody of the woman seduced
2. Those who abused confidence reposed in them:
a. Priest
b. House servant
c. Domestic
3. Those who abused their relationship:
a. Brother who seduced his sister
b. Ascendant who seduced his descendant
A domestic is different from a house servant, it means
any person living under the same roof as a member of the
same household, and includes boarders or house-guests
but not transients or visitors.
The fact that the girl gave her consent to the sexual
intercourse is no defense. In the same way, lack of
consent of the girl is not an element of the offense.
The seduction of a sister or descendant is known as
incest. Virginity of the sister or descendant is not required
and she may be over 18 years of age. Relationship must
be by consanguinity. The relationship need not be
legitimate.
ARTICLE 338
SIMPLE SEDUCTION
Elements:
1. That the offended party is over 12 and under 18 years of
age;
2. That she must be of good reputation, single or widow;
3. That the offender has sexual intercourse with her; and
4. That it is committed by means of deceit.
Deceit generally takes the form of unfulfilled promise of
marriage.
It is not required in simple seduction that the victim be a
virgin.
The gist of qualified seduction is the abuse of authority,
confidence, or relationship as the means of committing the
crime. In simple seduction, it is the use of deceit. But in both
kinds of seduction, there must be sexual intercourse.
ARTICLE 339
ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS WITH THE CONSENT OF
THE OFFENDED PARTY
Elements:
1. That the offender commits acts of lasciviousness or
lewdness;
2. That the acts are committed upon a woman who is a
virgin or single or a widow of good reputation, under 18
years of age but over 12 years, or a sister or descendant
regardless of her reputation or age; and
3. That the offender accomplishes the acts by abuse of
authority, confidence, relationship or deceit.
Acts of Acts of
Lasciviousness Lasciviousness with
Consent of the
Offended Party
Both treat of acts of lasciviousness.
The offended party is a The offended party
female or a male. should only be female.
 The acts are committed The acts of
under circumstances lasciviousness are Sec. 5. Child Prostitution and other Sexual Abuse
which, had there been committed under the Children whether male or female, who for
carnal knowledge, circumstances which,
would amount to rape. had there been carnal money, profit or other consideration or due to the coercion
knowledge, would or influence of any adult syndicate or group, indulge in
amount to either sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct are deemed to be
qualified seduction or children exploited in prostitution and other sexual abuse.
simple seduction.

There is an oversight in the law where the victim is exactly
12 years of age. If the victim is below 12, the crime will be
rape, or unconsented acts of lasciviousness or forcible
abduction. Hence Art. 339 stating over 12 years of age
should be construed as twelve years of age and over, thus
construing the doubt in favor of the accused.
ANTI-SEXUAL HARRASMENT ACT
(R.A. No. 7877)
Persons liable:
Employer, employee, manager, supervisor, teacher,
professor, instructor, coach, trainor, or any other person
having authority, influence, or moral ascendancy over
another in a work, education or training-related environment.
Persons liable:
1. Those who engage in or promote, facilitate or induce
child prostitution which include, but are not limited to the
following:
a. Acting as a procurer of a child prostitute.
b. Inducing a person to be a client of a child prostitute by
means of written or oral advertisements or other similar
means.
c. Taking advantage of influence or relationship to
procure a child as a prostitute.
d. Threatening or using violence towards a child to
engage him/her as a prostitute.
e. Giving monetary consideration, goods or other
pecuniary benefit to a child with the intent to engage
such child in prostitution.

2. Those who commit the act of sexual intercourse or

Acts Punished: lascivious conduct with a child exploited in prostitution or
Demanding, requesting, or otherwise requiring any sexual subjected to other sexual abuse.
3. Those who derive profit or advantage therefrom, whether
favor from the other, regardless of whether the demand,
as manager or owner of the establishment where the
request, or requirement is accepted by the object of the act.
prostitution takes place, or of the sauna, disco, bar,
resort, place of entertainment or establishment serving as
ARTICLE 340 a cover or which engages in prostitution in addition to the
CORRUPTION OF MINORS activity for which the license has been issued to said
(AS AMENDED BY BP 92) establishment. (Sec 5, RA 7610)

Acts Punished
Note: There is also a crime of attempted child prostitution
To promote or facilitate the prostitution or corruption of
under Sec 5 pars. 1 and 2 of RA 7610 (Sec 6, RA 7610).
persons under age to satisfy the lust of another.

Under age means under 18 years of age.
The victim must be of good reputation and not a prostitute
or corrupted person.
It is not necessary that the unchaste acts shall have been
done since what is being punished is mere act of promotion
or facilitation.
Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse Act
(R.A. 7610) Child prostitution and attempt to commit child
prostitution are punished under this Act.
There is an attempt to commit child prostitution under
Section 5, paragraph (a) hereof when any person who, not
being a relative of a child, is found alone with the said child
inside the room or cubicle of a house, an inn, hotel, motel,
pension house, apartelle or other similar establishments,
vessel, vehicle or any other hidden or secluded area under
circumstances which would lead a reasonable person to
believe that the child is about to be exploited in prostitution
and other sexual abuse.
There is also an attempt to commit child prostitution, under
paragraph (b) of Section 5 hereof when any person
is receiving services from a child in a sauna parlor or bath, 3. That the abduction is with lewd design.
massage clinic, health club and other similar
establishments. Grave Coercion/
Forcible Abduction
Kidnapping
ARTICLE 341
With lewd design No lewd design
WHITE SLAVE TRADE
There is no deprivation There is deprivation of
Prohibited acts: of liberty. liberty.
1. Engaging in the business of prostitution.
2. Profiting by prostitution. Conviction of acts of lasciviousness is not a bar to
3. Enlisting the services of women for the purpose of conviction of forcible abduction.
prostitution.
Attempted Rape is absorbed by Forcible Abduction as the
Corruption of Minors White Slave Trade former constitutes the element of lewd design.
It is essential that Minority need not be
If girl is under 12 crime is ALWAYS FORCIBLE
victims are minors. involved.
ABDUCTION even if she voluntarily goes with her abductor.
May have victims of Limited only to
either sex. females. Sexual intercourse is not necessary in forcible abduction.
May not necessarily be Generally for profit. The intent to seduce the girl is sufficient.
for profit.
ARTICLE 343
Committed by a single Generally committed CONSENTED ABDUCTION
act. habitually.

The first two modes require the element of profit and
habituality. In the third mode, the profit motive is not
required. (Regalado)
White slave trade may be with or without the consent of the
woman, while slavery for the purpose of assigning the
woman to immoral traffic (Art. 272) is committed against her
will.
Elements:
1. That the offended party must be a virgin;
2. That she must be over 12 and under 18 years if age;
3. That the taking away of the offended party must be with
her consent, after solicitation or cajolery from the
offender; and
4. That the taking away of the offended party must be with
lewd designs.

CHAPTER FOUR: ABDUCTION
(ARTS. 342-343)
Abduction
The taking away of a woman from her house or the place
where she may be for the purpose of carrying her to another
place with intent to marry or corrupt her.
Two Kinds of Abduction:
1. Forcible abduction (Art. 342)
2. Consented abduction (Art. 343)
ARTICLE 342
FORCIBLE ABDUCTION
Elements:
1. That the person abducted is a woman; regardless of her
age, civil status, or reputation;
2. That the abduction is against her will; and
Crimes against Chastity where age and reputation of
the victim are immaterial:
1. Acts of lasciviousness against the will of the offended
party or against a sister or descendant.
2. Qualified Seduction of sister or descendant.
3. Forcible Abduction
CHAPTER FIVE: PROVISIONS
RELATING TO THE PRECEDING
CHAPTERS OF TITLE ELEVEN
(ARTS. 344-346)
ARTICLE 344
PROSECUTION OF THE CRIMES OF ADULTERY,
CONCUBINAGE, SEDUCTION, ABDUCTION, RAPE
AND ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS
1. Adultery and concubinage must be prosecuted upon the
complaint signed by the offended spouse (and in the
absence of an express or implied pardon).
2. Seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness must be
prosecuted upon the complaint signed by (and in the
absence of an express pardon) offended party
a. Even if a minor;
b. If of legal age and not incapacitated, only she can file
complaint.
If a minor or incapacitated and refuses to file either of
the next succeeding persons may file:
a. Either of the parents;
b. Either of the grandparents whether paternal or
maternal side;
c. Legal or judicial guardians;
d. The State, as parens patriae when the offended
party dies or becomes incapacitated before she
could file the complaint and she has no known
parents, grandparents or guardians.
Pursuant to R.A. No. 8353, rape is now a crime against
persons, which may be prosecuted de officio.
In adultery and concubinage, the offended party must
institute the criminal prosecution against both the guilty
parties, if they are alive.
The right to file the action granted to the parent,
grandparent or guardian shall be exclusive of all other
persons and shall be exercised successively in the
order provided by law.
Effects of Pardon
Pardon in adultery and concubinage must come before
the institution of the criminal action and both offenders
must be pardoned by the offended party if said pardon
is to be effective.
Pardon in seduction must also come before the
institution of the criminal action.
Condonation is not pardon in concubinage or adultery
any subsequent act of the offender showing that
there was no repentance will not bar the prosecution of
the offense.
Pardon by the offended party who is a minor must have
the concurrence of parents except when the offended
party has no parents.
Marriage of the offender with the offended party in
seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness
extinguishes criminal action or remits the penalty
already imposed, and it benefits the co-principals,
accomplices and accessories. In rape, it extends only
as to the principal.
ARTICLE 345
CIVIL LIABILITY OF PERSONS GUILTY OF CRIMES
AGAINST CHASTITY
Persons who are guilty of rape, seduction or
abduction shall also be sentenced:
1. To indemnify the offended woman;
2. To acknowledge the offspring, EXCEPT:
a. In adultery and concubinage since only a natural child
may be acknowledged;
b. Where either the offended party or the accused is
married;
c. When paternity cannot be determined as in multiple
rape; and
d. Other instances where the law should prevent the
offender from doing so;
1. In every case to support the offspring.
Note: Under the Family Code, children are classified as
only either legitimate or illegitimate, with no further positive
act required from the parent, as the law itself provides the
childs status. Natural children under the Civil Code fall
within the classification of illegitimate children under the
Family Code.
Art. 176 of the Family Code confers parental authority over
illegitimate children on the mother and provides their
entitlement to support in conformity with the Family Code.
ARTICLE 346
LIABILITY OF ASCENDANTS, GUARDIANS,
TEACHERS, OR OTHER PERSONS ENTRUSTED WITH
THE CUSTODY OF THE OFFENDED PARTY
Persons who cooperate as accomplices but are punished
as principals in seduction, abduction, acts of
lasciviousness, acts of lasciviousness with the consent of
the offended party, corruption of minors, white slave trade:
1. Ascendants,
2. Guardians,
3. Curators,
4. Teachers, and
5. Any person, who cooperates as accomplice with abuse of
authority or confidential relationship.
Persons who act as accomplices in crimes against chastity
(EXCEPT adultery and concubinage where there can be no
accomplices or accessories), shall be punished as
principals.
In addition, teachers or persons entrusted with education
and guidance of the youth are penalized with
disqualification.
Furthermore, all those falling within the terms of this article 2. The offender conceals or abandons such child; and
shall be punished with special disqualification from the office 3. The offender has the intent to cause such child to lose its
of guardian. civil status.

The child must be legitimate and a fully developed and living

TITLE TWELVE: CRIMES AGAINST being (U.S. v. Capillo, et al., 30 Phil. 355).
THE CIVIL STATUS OF PERSONS
Abandon
CHAPTER ONE: SIMULATION OF Means to leave a child in a public place where other people
BIRTHS AND USURPATION OF CIVIL may find the child.
STATUS (ARTS. 347-348)
Art. 276 (Abandoning a Minor) distinguished from Art.
347
ARTICLE 347 Abandoning a Minor Simulation of Births,
SIMULATION OF BIRTHS, SUBSTITUTION OF ONE Substitution of One
CHILD FOR ANOTHER, AND CONCEALMENT OR Child for Another,
ABANDONMENT OF A LEGITIMATE CHILD and Concealment or
Abandonment of a
Acts punished: Legitimate Child
1. Simulation of births; Crime against security. Crime against the civil
2. Substitution of one child for another; status of a person.
3. Concealing or abandoning any legitimate child with intent The offender must be The offender is any
to cause such child to lose its civil status. the one who has the person.
Object of the crime under Art. 347 is the creation of false, or custody of the child.
the causing of the loss of, civil status. The purpose of the The purpose is to
offender is to avoid the cause the child to lose
Simulation of births obligation of rearing its civil status.
Takes place when the woman pretends to be pregnant and caring for the
when in fact she is not, and on the day of the supposed child.
delivery, takes the child of another as her own.
ARTICLE 348
The operative act in the simulation is the registration of the USURPATION OF CIVIL STATUS
child in the registry of births as the pretending parents own.
Usurping the civil status of another is committed by
assuming the filiation, or the parental or conjugal rights of
The simulation which is a crime is that which alters the civil another with intent to enjoy the rights arising from the civil
status of person. status of the latter.
Note: Crime is qualified if the purpose is to defraud
The woman who simulates birth and the one who furnishes offended parties and heirs.
the child are both liable as principals.
It is absolutely necessary in order to constitute this crime
The unlawful sale of the child by its father was held to be that the intent of the offender is to enjoy the rights arising
not punishable under the RPC (US vs. Capillo et. al., 30 Phil from the civil status of the person impersonated. Otherwise,
349). Now, it is punishable under PD 603, with its Art. 59(3) the case will only be a violation of Art. 178 for using a
which imposes 2-6 months imprisonment and/or P500.00 fictitious name, or as estafa under Art. 315.
fine. Furthermore, if the accused shall engage in trading and
dealing with children, including the act of buying and selling Example, where the intent of such usurpation is merely to
of child, that crime of child trafficking is punished with enjoy or use the usurped civil rights, as by using anothers
reclusion temporal to reclusion perpetua under Sec 7, R.A. license or getting a cedula in anothers name, to avoid
No. 7610. military service or to get a passport, it would not be
punishable under this article (II Cuello Calon, Codigo Penal,
In concealing or abandoning any legitimate child, three 10th edition, p. 670). The offender could be liable for using
requisites must be present, namely: fictitious name (Art. 178) or estafa if he intended to defraud
1. The child must be legitimate; third persons (Art. 315), or possibly perjury or
falsification depending on the acts he performed in
connection with his intended offense.
CHAPTER TWO: ILLEGAL MARRIAGES
(ARTS. 349-352)
ARTICLE 349
BIGAMY
Elements:
1. That the offender is legally married;
2. That the marriage has not been dissolved or, in case
the spouse is absent the absent spouse could not yet be
presumed dead according to the Civil Code;
3. That he contracts a second or subsequent marriage; and
4. That the second or subsequent marriage has all the
essential requisites for validity.
First marriage must be valid. If it is void or voidable, bigamy
may still be committed if there is no judicial declaration of
nullity or annulment of the first marriage.
Bigamy is a public crime, thus, its prosecution may be
initiated by anyone.
A person convicted of bigamy may still be prosecuted for
concubinage.
The death of the first spouse during the pendency of the
bigamy case does not extinguish the crime, because when
the accused married the second spouse the first marriage
was still subsisting.
The second spouse who knew of the first marriage is an
accomplice, as well as the person who vouched for the
capacity of either of the contracting parties.
The prescriptive period for the crime of bigamy does not
commence from the commission thereof but from the time of
its discovery by the complainant spouse. While, it may be
conceded that the bigamous marriage was celebrated
publicly in church and recorded in the Office of the Civil
Registrar, the rule on constructive notice cannot apply
(Regalado, Criminal Law Conspectus).
In Tenebro v. CA (G.R. No. 150758, Feb. 18, 2004), the SC
held that a declaration of the nullity of the second marriage
on the ground of psychological incapacity is of absolutely no
moment insofar as the
States penal laws are concerned. Since a marriage
contracted during the subsistence of a valid marriage is
automatically void, the nullity of this second marriage is not
per se an argument for the avoidance of criminal liability for
bigamy.
ARTICLE 350
MARRIAGE CONTRACTED AGAINST PROVISIONS OF
LAWS
(Illegal Marriage)
Elements:
1. That the offender contracted marriage; and
2. That he knew at the time that
a. The requirements of the law were not complied with; or
b. The marriage was in disregard of a legal impediment.
The offender must not be guilty of bigamy.
QUALIFYING CIRCUMSTANCE: If either of the contracting
parties obtains the consent of the other by means of
violence, intimidation or fraud.
Conviction of a violation of Art. 350 involves moral
turpitude.
ARTICLE 351
PREMATURE MARRIAGES
Persons liable:
1. A widow who married within 301 days from the date of
the death of her husband, or before having delivered if
she is pregnant at the time of his death.
2. A woman whose marriage having been annulled or
dissolved, married before delivery or before expiration of
the period of 301 days after the date of legal separation.
Period may be disregarded if the first husband was impotent
or sterile or if the woman was pregnant before the death of
the first husband and gave birth within the said period.
The period of 301 days is important only in cases where the
woman is not pregnant, or does not know that she is
pregnant at the time she becomes a widow. If she is
pregnant at the time she becomes a widow, the prohibition
is good only up to delivery.
Since the purpose of this article is to avoid cases of doubtful
paternity, the woman will not be liable thereunder if: (a) she
has already delivered; and (b) she has conclusive proof that
she was not pregnant by her first spouse since he was
permanently sterile (People vs. Masinsin, CA, 49 OG 3908).
 ARTICLE 352
PERFORMANCE OF ILLEGAL MARRIAGES
Priests or ministers of any religious denomination or sect, or
civil authorities who shall perform or authorize any illegal
marriage ceremony shall be punished under the Marriage
Law.
Art. 352 presuppose that the priest or minister or civil
authority is authorized to solemnize marriages. If the
accused is not authorized to solemnize marriage and he
performs an illegal marriage ceremony, he is liable under
Art. 177 (usurpation of authority or public function).
The solemnizing officer of any of the foregoing illegal
marriages who performs or authorizes the same, despite his
knowledge of the illegality, shall be punished under Sec. 39
of Act No. 3613.
TITLE THIRTEEN: CRIMES AGAINST
HONOR
CHAPTER ONE: LIBEL
(ARTS. 353-362)
SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS, FORMS, AND
PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME
ARTICLE 353
LIBEL
Elements:
1. That there must be an imputation of a crime, or a vice or
defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission,
condition, status or circumstance;
2. That the imputation must be made publicly;
3. That it must be malicious;
4. That the imputation must be directed at a natural person
or a juridical person, or one who is dead; and
5. That the imputation must tend to cause the dishonor,
discredit, or contempt of the person defamed.
Test of defamatory imputation:
A charge is sufficient if the words are calculated to induce
the hearers to suppose and understand that the person
against whom they were uttered was guilty of certain
offenses, or are sufficient to impeach the honesty, virtue or
reputation, or to hold him up to public ridicule.
The meaning of the writer is immaterial. However, if criminal
intention is imputed against another, it is not
considered libelous.
An expression of opinion by one affected by the act of
another and based on actual fact is not libelous.
Imputation may cover:
1. Crime allegedly committed by the offended party;
2. Vice or defect, real or imaginary, of the offended party;
3. Any act, omission, condition, status of, or circumstances
relating to the offended party.
Dishonor
Means disgrace, shame, ignominy.
Discredit
Means loss of credit or reputation; disesteem.
Contempt
Means state of being despised.
Publication
Is the communication of the defamatory matter to some third
person or persons. Thus, sending a letter containing
defamatory words against another to a third person is
sufficient publication.
2 types of malice:
1. Malice in fact shown by proof of ill-will, hatred, or
purpose to injure; also known as EXPRESS MALICE.
2. Malice in law presumed to be malicious from the
defamatory imputation even if it is true; proof is not
required because it is presumed to exist from the
defamatory imputation.
When the communication is PRIVILEGED, malice is not
presumed from the defamatory words. Malice (in fact) must
be proved.
Guidelines when several persons are defamed:
1. If the defamation is made on different occasions or by
independent acts, there are as many crimes of libel as
there are persons directly addressed with such
statements or directly referred to.
2. If the defamation is made on a single occasion:
a. Where the same was directed at a class or group of
numerous persons in general terms only without any
particular person being directly addressed, there is no
victim identified or identifiable, hence no actionable
libel.
b. If the statement is so sweeping or all embracing as to
apply to every individual in that group or class so that
each individual therein can prove that the defamatory
statement specifically pointed to him, he can bring his
action separately.
 c. If several identifiable victims are libeled in a single
article, there are as many crimes of libel as there are
persons defamed.
ARTICLE 354
REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLICITY
Every Defamatory Imputation is presumed to be
Malicious, Even if it be True.
The PRESUMPTION is rebutted if it is shown by the
accused that
1. The defamatory imputation is true, in case the law allows
proof of the truth of the imputation (see Art. 361);
2. It is published with good intention;
3. There is justifiable motive for making it.
MALICE is not presumed in the following cases
involving qualifiedly privileged communication:
1. Private communication made by any person to another in
the performance of any legal, moral or social duty.
Requisites of the first kind of privileged
communication:
1. That the person who made the communication had a
legal, moral or social duty to make the communication, or,
at least, he had an interest to be upheld;
2. That the communication is addressed to an officer or a
board, or superior, having some interest or duty in the
matter; and
3. That the statements in the communication are made in
good faith without malice (in fact).
The defense of privileged communication will be
overcome if it is shown that (1) the defendant acted with
malice in fact, or (2) there is no reasonable ground for
believing the charge to be true.
4. A fair and true report, made in good faith, without any
comments or remarks, of any judicial, legislative, or
other official proceedings which are not of confidential
nature or of any statement, report, or speech delivered
in said proceedings, or of any other act performed by
public officers in the exercise of their functions.
Requisites of the second kind of privileged
communication:
1. That it is fair and true report of a judicial, legislative, or
other official proceedings which are not of a confidential
nature, or of a statement, report or speech delivered in
said proceedings, or of any other act performed by a
public officer in the exercise of his functions;
2. That it is made in good faith; and
3. That it is without any comments or remarks.
Therefore, qualified privileged communications must be
made with malice and bad faith in order to be actionable.
An absolutely privileged communication is not actionable
even if made in bad faith. Specifically recognized in the
Constitution as absolutely privileged are statements made in
official proceedings of Congress by members thereof, as an
implementation of their parliamentary immunity.
Statements made in judicial proceedings are privileged but
only if pertinent or relevant to the case involved.
Enumeration under Art. 354 is not an exclusive list of
qualifiedly privileged communication.
Defamatory remarks and comments on the conduct or acts
of public officers which are related to the discharge of their
official duties will not constitute libel if the defendant proves
the truth of the imputation.
Doctrine of Fair Comment
Means that while in general every discreditable imputation
publicly made is deemed false, because every man is
presumed innocent until his guilt is judicially proved, and
every false imputation is directed against a public person in
his public capacity, it is not necessarily actionable.
Criticism
Deals only with such things as shall invite public attention
or call for public comment. It does not follow a public man
into his private life nor pry into his domestic concerns.
If ones good name is assailed in the newspaper, he may
reply by defending himself, and if his reply is made in good
faith, without malice and is not unnecessarily defamatory of
his assailant, it is privileged. (People v. Baja, C.A., 40 O.G.
Supp. 5, 206)
Retaliation or vindictiveness cannot be a basis of self-
defense.
THE ANTI-WIRE TAPPING ACT
(R.A. No. 4200)
Unlawful acts by any person or participant, not
authorized by all the parties to any private
communication or spoken word:
1. To tap any wire or cable.
2. To use any other device or arrangement to secretly
overhear, intercept or record such communication or
spoken word by using a device known as dictaphone,
dictagraph, detectaphone, walkie-talkie or tape-
recorder.
3. To knowingly possess any tape/wire or disc record of any
communication or spoken word or copies thereof.
4. To replay the same for any person or persons.
5. To communicate the contents thereof, verbally or in
writing.
6. To furnish transcriptions thereof, whether complete or
partial.
Exception: When a peace officer is authorized by written
order from the court.
Any recording, communication or spoken word obtained in
violation of the provisions of this Act shall be
INADMISSIBLE IN EVIDENCE in any judicial, quasi- judicial
or administrative hearing or investigation.
The phrase any other device or arrangement does not
cover an extension line (Gaanan v. IAC, G.R. No. L- 69809,
October 16, 1986).
ARTICLE 355
LIBEL BY MEANS OF WRITINGS
OR SIMILAR MEANS
Committed by means of:
1. Writing
2. Printing
3. Lithography
4. Engraving
5. Radio
6. Phonograph
7. Painting
8. Theatrical exhibition
9. Cinematographic exhibition
10. Or any similar means
Defamation through amplifier system is slander not libel.
If defamatory remarks are made in the heat of passion
which culminated in a threat, the derogatory statements will
not constitute an independent crime of libel but a part of the
more serious crime of threats.
Administrative Circular No. 08-2008, issued on January
25, 2008, laid down a rule of preference for the imposition of
a fine only rather than imprisonment in libel cases. The
Administrative Circular provides that:
1. It does not remove imprisonment as an alternative penalty
for the crime of libel under Art. 355 of the RPC.
2. The Judges may, in the exercise of sound discretion,
and taking into consideration the peculiar circumstances
of each case, determine whether the imposition of a fine
alone would best serve the interests of justice or whether
forbearing to impose imprisonment would depreciate the
seriousness of the offense, work violence on the social
order, or otherwise be contrary to the imperatives of
justice.
3. Should only a fine be imposed and the accused be
unable to pay the fine, there is no legal obstacle to the
application of the RPC provisions on subsidiary
imprisonment.
ARTICLE 356
THREATENING TO PUBLISH AND OFFER TO
PREVENT SUCH PUBLICATION FOR A
COMPENSATION
Acts punished:
1. Threatening another to publish a libel concerning him, or
his parents, spouse, child or other members of the family.
2. Offering to prevent the publication of such libel for
compensation or money consideration.
This is also known as blackmail. Art. 283 regarding light
threats is another form of blackmail.
Blackmail
Any lawful extortion of money by threats of accusation or
exposure.
It is essential that the threat to publish, or to offer to prevent
the publication of libel must be for a compensation or money
consideration, in order it may be penalized under this article.
Blackmail is possible in the following crimes:
a. Light threats (Art 283)
b. Threatening to publish, or offering to prevent the
publication of, a libel for compensation (Art 356)
ARTICLE 357
PROHIBITED PUBLICATION OF ACTS REFERRED TO
IN THE COURSE
OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Elements:
1. That the offender is a reporter, editor or manager of a
newspaper, daily or magazine;
2. He publishes facts connected with the private life of
another; and
3. Such facts are offensive to the honor, virtue and
reputation of said person.
This article is referred to as the Gag Law because while a
report of an official proceeding is allowed, it gags those who
would publish therein facts which this article prohibits, and
punishes any violation thereof.
The Gag Law prohibits the publication of cases relating to
adultery, divorce, legitimacy of children, etc.
 CRIMINAL LAW
Under Republic Act No. 1477:
A newspaper reporter cannot be compelled to reveal the
source of the news report he made, unless the court or a
House or committee of Congress finds that such revelation
is demanded by the security of the state.
ARTICLE 358
SLANDER (Oral Defamation)
Kinds:
1. Simple slander; and
2. Grave slander, when it is of a serious and insulting
nature.
Factors that determine the gravity of the oral
defamation:
1. Expressions used;
2. Personal relations of the accused and the offended party;
3. Circumstances surrounding the case;
4. Social standing and position of the offended party.
The slander need not be heard by the offended party.
Gossiping is considered as oral defamation if a defamatory
fact is imputed or intriguing against honor if there is no
imputation.
Self-defense in slander may only be invoked if his reply is
made in good faith, without malice, is not necessarily
defamatory to his assailant and is necessary for his
explanation or defense.
ARTICLE 359
SLANDER BY DEED
Slander by Deed
Is a crime committed by performing any act which casts
dishonor, discredit or contempt upon another person.
Elements:
1. That the offender performs any act not included in any
other crime against honor;
2. That such act is performed in the presence of other
persons; and
3. That such act casts dishonor, discredit, or contempt
upon the offended party.
If there is no intent to dishonor the offended party, the crime
is maltreatment by deed under Art. 266.
Slander by deed is of two kinds:
1. Simple slander by deed; and
BOOK TWO
2. Grave slander by deed, that is, which is of a serious
nature.
Common Element of Slander by deed and Unjust
Vexation: Irritation or Annoyance; without any other
concurring factor, it is only Unjust Vexation; if the purpose is
to shame or humiliate, Slander by deed.
SECTION TWO: GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 360
PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LIBEL
1. The person who publishes, exhibits or causes the
publication or exhibition of any defamation in writing or
similar means.
2. The author or editor of a book or pamphlet.
3. The editor or business manager of a daily newspaper
magazine or serial publication.
4. The owner of the printing plant which publishes a
libelous article with his consent and all other persons who
in any way participate in or have connection with its
publication.
An independent civil action may be filed simultaneously or
separately in the same RTC where the criminal action was
filed and vice versa.
ARTICLE 361
PROOF OF TRUTH
When proof of the truth is admissible in a charge for
Libel:
1. When the act or omission imputed constitutes a crime
regardless of whether the offended party is a private
individual or a public officer.
2. When the offended party is a Government employee,
even if the imputation does not constitute a crime,
provided it is related to the discharge of his official duties.
The proof of truth of the accusation cannot be based upon
mere hearsay, rumors or suspicion. It must be positive,
direct evidence upon which a definite finding may be
made by the court.
Defense in Defamation:
1. It appears that the matters charged as libelous is true;
2. It was published with good motives; AND
3. For a justifiable ends.
SAN BEDA COLLEGE OF LAW 213
2013 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
 Incriminating employee, from imprisonment to fine of P1,000.00, with
Innocent Defamation subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, on the
Persons ground that the latter committed the offense in the heat of
anger and in reaction to a perceived provocation.
Imputation is public and
Offender does not avail
malicious
himself of written or In Jose Alemania Buatis, Jr. v. People of the Philippines and
calculated to cause
spoken word in Atty. Jose Pieraz (G.R. No. 142509, March 24, 2006), the
dishonor, discredit, or
besmirching the Court opted to impose upon petitioner, a lawyer, the penalty
contempt upon the
victims reputation. of fine only for the crime of libel considering that it was his
offended party.
first offense and he was motivated purely by his belief that
he was merely exercising a civic or moral duty to his client
ARTICLE 362 when wrote the defamatory letter to private complainant.
LIBELOUS REMARKS

Libelous remarks or comments connected with the matter

privileged under the provisions of Art. 354, if made with CHAPTER TWO: INCRIMINATORY
malice, shall not exempt the author thereof nor the editor or MACHINATIONS (ART. 363-364)
managing editor of a newspaper from criminal liability.
ARTICLE 363
INCRIMINATING INNOCENT PERSONS
ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR No. 08-2008
Elements:
GUIDELINES IN THE OBSERVANCE OF A RULE OF 1. That the offender performs an act;
PREFERENCE IN THE IMPOSITION OF PENALTIES IN 2. That by such act he directly incriminates or imputes to an
LIBEL CASES. innocent person the commission of a crime; and
3. That such act does not constitute perjury.
Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code penalizes libel,
committed by means of writing, printing, lithography, Incriminating
engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical exhibition, Perjury by Making
Innocent
cinematographic exhibition, or any similar means, with False Accusation
Persons
prision correctional in its minimum and medium periods or
fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or both, in addition to Limited to the act of Giving of false
the civil action which may be brought by the offended party. planting evidence and statement under oath
the like in order to or making a false
incriminate an innocent affidavit, imputing to
In the following cases, the Court opted to impose only a fine
person. the person the
on the person convicted of the crime of libel:
commission of a crime.
It is committed by It is committed when
In Fernando Sazon v. Court of Appeals and People of the performing an act by the imputation was
Philippines (G.R. No. 120715, March 29, 1996) the Court which the offender falsely made before an
modified the penalty imposed upon petitioner, an officer of a directly incriminates or officer.
homeowners association, for the crime of libel from imputes to an innocent
imprisonment and fine in the amount of P200.00, to fine only person the commission
of P3,000.00, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of of a crime.
insolvency, for the reason that he wrote the libelous article
merely to defend his honor against the malicious messages ARTICLE 364
that earlier circulated around the subdivision, which he INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR
thought was the handiwork of the private complainant.
Committed by any person who shall make any intrigue
which has for its principal purpose to blemish the honor or
In Quirico Mari v. Court of Appeals and People of the reputation of another.
Philippines( 388 Phil. 269, 279, 2000) ,where the crime
involved is slander by deed, the Court modified the penalty This refers to such intrigues against a persons honor or
imposed on the petitioner, an ordinary government reputation which are not otherwise punished under other
articles of the RPC. It differs from defamation in that it Reckless Imprudence
consists of tricky or secret plots and may be committed Consists in voluntarily but without malice, doing or failing to
without using written or spoken words which are do an act from which material damage results by reason of
defamatory. inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person
performing or failing to perform such act, taking into
Intriguing Against consideration his employment or occupation, degree of
Defamation intelligence, physical condition and other circumstances
Honor
regarding persons, time and place.
Source of derogatory Source is known.
statements cannot be
Elements:
determined.
1. That the offender does or fails to do an act;
Consists of some tricky Committed in a public 2. That the doing of or the failure to do that act is voluntary;
and secret plot. and malicious manner. 3. That it be without malice;
Passes such The remarks made are 4. That material damage results; and
utterances without claimed to be true. 5. That there is inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of
subscribing to the truth the person performing or failing to perform such act taking
of the remarks. into consideration
a. Employment or occupation.
b. Degree of intelligence, physical condition. and
TITLE XIV: QUASI-OFFENSES c. Other circumstances regarding persons, time and
place.

SOLE CHAPTER: CRIMINAL

NEGLIGENCE (ART. 365)
ARTICLE 365
IMPRUDENCE AND NEGLIGENCE
Four ways of committing quasi-offenses under Art 365:
1. By committing through reckless imprudence any act
which, had it been intentional, would constitute a grave or
less grave felony or light felony;
2. By committing through simple imprudence or
negligence an act which would otherwise constitute a
grave or less serious felony;
3. By causing damage to the property of another through
reckless imprudence or simple imprudence or negligence;
4. By causing through simple imprudence or negligence
some wrong which, if done maliciously, would have
constituted a light felony.
Test of negligence: Would a prudent man, in the position
of the person to whom negligence is attributed, foresee
harm to the person injured as a reasonable consequence of
the course about to be pursued? If so, the law imposes a
duty on the actor to refrain from that course or to take
precaution against its mischievous results, and the failure to
do so constitutes negligence.
Simple Imprudence
Consists in the lack of precaution displayed in those cases
in which the damage impending to be caused is not
immediate nor the danger clearly manifest.
Elements:
1. That there is lack of precaution on the part of the
offender; and
2. That the damage impending to be caused is not
immediate nor the danger clearly manifest.

Art. 64 relative to mitigating and aggravating circumstances

Imprudence Negligence is not applicable to crimes committed through negligence.
Deficiency of action. Deficiency of perception.
Failure in precaution. Failure in advertence. The defense of contributory negligence does not apply in
criminal cases through reckless imprudence since one
To avoid wrongful acts: To avoid wrongful acts: cannot allege negligence of another to evade the effects of
one must take the paying proper attention ones own negligence. It only mitigates criminal liability.
necessary precaution and using due diligence (Reyes, p. 1059)
once they are foreseen. in foreseeing them.
The penalties provided for in Article 365 are NOT and the same, and cannot be split into different crimes and
applicable when: prosecutions.
1. The penalty provided for the offense is equal to or lower
than those provided in the first two paragraphs of Art
365;
2. By imprudence or negligence, and with violation of the
Automobile Law, the death of a person shall be caused.

Qualifying Circumstance: Failing to lend on-the-spot help

to the victims of his act of negligence. It raises the penalty
one degree higher.

Exception: Sec. 55 of RA 4136, the driver can leave his

vehicle without aiding the victims if:
1. He is in imminent danger of being harmed,
2. He wants to report to the nearest officer of the law, or
3. He desires to summon a physician or a nurse for medical
assistance to the injured.

There must be injury to person or damage to property as a

consequence of reckless or simple imprudence.

Doctrine of Last Clear Chance

The contributory negligence of the party injured will not
defeat the action if it be shown that the accused might, by
the exercise of reasonable care and prudence, have
avoided the consequences of the negligence of the injured
party.

Emergency Rule
An automobile driver who, by the negligence of another and
not by his own negligence, is suddenly placed in an
emergency and compelled to act instantly to avoid a
collision or injury is not guilty of negligence if he makes such
a choice which a person of ordinary prudence placed in
such a position might make even though he did not make
the wisest choice.

The SC held in the case of Ivler v. San Pedro (G.R. No.

172716, Nov. 17, 2010) that reckless imprudence or
negligence is a crime in itself. Hence, once convicted or
acquitted of a specific act of reckless imprudence, the
accused may not be prosecuted again for that same act. For
the essence of the quasi offense of criminal negligence
under Art. 365 of the RPC lies in the execution of an
imprudent or negligent act that, if intentionally done, would
be punishable as a felony. The law penalizes thus the
negligent or careless act, not the result thereof. The gravity
of the consequence is only taken into account to determine
the penalty, it does not qualify the substance of the offense.
And, as the careless act is single, whether the injurious
result should affect one person or several persons, the
offense (criminal negligence) remains one