Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 26

Educational Psychology

Define and contrast the three types of


behavioral learning theories (contiguity,
classical conditioning, and operant
conditioning), giving examples of how each
can be used in the classroom.

Developed by W. Huitt & J. Hummel (1999)


Behavioral Learning Theory

According to the behaviorists, learning can


be defined as the relatively permanent
change in behavior brought about as a
result of experience or practice.

Behaviorists recognize that learning is an


internal event. However, it is not
recognized as learning until it is displayed
by overt behavior.
Behavioral Learning Theory

The term "learning theory" is often


associated with the behavioral view.
The focus of the behavioral approach is on
how the environment impacts overt
behavior.

Remember that biological maturation or


genetics is an alternative explanation for
relatively permanent change.
Behavioral Learning Theory

The behavioral learning theory is


represented as an S-R paradigm. The
organism is treated as a black box. We
only know what is going on inside the box
by the organisms overt behavior.

Stimulus Organism Response


(S) (O) (R)
Behavioral Learning Theory

The feedback loop that connects overt


behavior to stimuli that activate the senses
has been studied extensively from this
perspective.
Behavioral Learning Theory

Notice that the behaviorists are only


interested in that aspect of feedback that
connects directly to overt behavior.

Behaviorists are not interested in the


conscious decision of the individual to
disrupt, modify, or go against the
conditioning process.
Behavioral Learning Theory

There are three types of behavioral


learning theories:
Contiguity theory
Classical or respondent conditioning
theory

Operant or instrumental conditioning


theory
Contiguity Theory

Contiguity theory is based on the work of


E. R. Guthrie.

It proposes that any stimulus and


response connected in time and/or space
will tend to be associated.
Contiguity Theory

Examples:

A baseball player wearing a certain pair


of socks on the day he hits three home
runs associates wearing the socks and
hitting home runs.
A student making a good grade on a
test after trying a new study technique
makes an association between the
stimulus of studying and the response of
getting a good grade.
Contiguity Theory

Guthries contiguity theory is one


foundation for the more cognitively-
oriented learning theory of neural
networks.
Classical Conditioning Theory

Classical conditioning was the first type of


learning to be discovered and studied within
the behaviorist tradition (hence the name
classical).
The major theorist in the development of
classical conditioning is Ivan Pavlov, a
Russian scientist trained in biology and
medicine (as was his German contemporary,
Sigmund Freud).
Classical Conditioning Theory
Pavlov was studying the digestive system of dogs
and became intrigued with his observation that
dogs deprived of food began to salivate when one of
his assistants walked into the room.
He began to investigate this phenomena and
established the laws of classical conditioning.

Skinner renamed this type of learning


"respondent conditioning since in this type of
learning, one is responding to an environmental
antecedent.
Classical Conditioning Theory

General model: Stimulus (S) elicits


>Response (R)
Classical conditioning starts with a reflex (R):
an innate, involuntary behavior.
This involuntary behavior is elicited or caused
by an antecedent environmental event.

For example, if air is blown into your eye,


you blink. You have no voluntary or conscious
control over whether the blink occurs or not.
Classical Conditioning Theory

The specific model for classical conditioning


is:

A stimulus will naturally (without learning)


elicit or bring about a reflexive response

Unconditioned Stimulus (US) elicits >


Unconditioned Response (UR)
Classical Conditioning Theory

The specific model for classical conditioning


is:
Neutral Stimulus (NS) --- does not elicit
the response of interest

This stimulus (sometimes called an


orienting stimulus as it elicits an
orienting response) is a neutral stimulus
since it does not elicit the Unconditioned
(or reflexive) Response.
Classical Conditioning Theory

The Neutral/Orientiing Stimulus (NS) is


repeatedly paired with the
Unconditioned/Natural Stimulus (US).
Classical Conditioning Theory

The Neutral Stimulus (NS) is transformed


into a Conditioned Stimulus (CS).
That is, when the CS is presented by itself, it
elicits or causes the CR (which is the same
involuntary response as the UR.

The name changes because it is elicited


by a different stimulus.

This is written CS elicits > CR.


Classical Conditioning Theory

In the area of classroom learning, classical


conditioning is seen primarily in the
conditioning of emotional behavior.

Things that make us happy, sad, angry,


etc. become associated with neutral
stimuli that gain our attention.
Classical Conditioning Theory

For example, the school, classroom, teacher,


or subject matter are initially neutral stimuli
that gain attention.
Activities at school or in the classroom
automatically elicit emotional responses
and these activities are associated with
the neutral or orienting stimulus
After repeated presentations, the
previously neutral stimulus will elicit the
emotional response
Classical Conditioning Theory

Example:

Child is harassed at school


Child feels bad when harassed
Child associates being harassed
and school
Child begins to feel bad when she
thinks of school
Classical Conditioning Theory

In order to extinguish the associated of


feeling bad and thinking of school, the
connection between school and being
harassed must be broken.
Operant Conditioning Theory

Operant conditioning is the study of the


impact of consequences on behavior.

With operant conditioning we are dealing


with voluntary behaviors.

The details of operant conditioning are


presented separately.

Вам также может понравиться