Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

INTRODUCTION CONCLUSIONS

The goal of experiment six is to create a pH curve while


DATA & RESULTS
According to the results, experiment seven turned
titrating several acid-base solutions between a strong acid-strong
out to be successful. The results are good due to a low
base, weak acid-strong base, and strong acid-weak base using a
percent error. The results were taken from another group
pH meter, magnetic strip, and buret. These solutions then establish Table one includes the results from experiment six for each solution created and their
average absorbance found to determine other calculations. due to multiple errors for our experiment. These errors
a Beers Law Plot which includes the amount of energy absorbed
were going past or under the meniscus when pipetting,
to be proportional to the solutions absorptivity and the
measuring to the wrong line since the volumetric flask
concentration of the solute. Equilibrium, which states opposing Sample Avg. Abs.
has the numbers going in the opposite direction. Also
forces are balanced, is reached throughout the equation by certain
A1 0.529 cross-contaminating the pipets couldve also altered the
reagents. Equilibrium's constant, Kc is reached by multiplying the
A2 0.957 results of the experiment. According to the figure it
products in the reaction and dividing the total product by the total
A3 1.40
shows the corrleation between average absorbance and
product of reactants in the equation. The balanced chemical
the concentration of FeSCN2+.
equation including both products and reactants to solve for A4 2.00

equilibriums constant includes 3+ (aq) + (aq) Sample Vol Fe3+ stock Vol SCN- stock Avg. Abs.[FeSCN 2+]eq [Fe3+]i [Fe3+]eq [SCN-]i [SCN-]eq Kc
2+ (aq).
B1 4.00 1.00 0.283 5.79799E-05 0.00142 0.00136202 0.0004 0.00034202 124.4636454

B2 3.00 2.00 0.403 8.25650E-05 0.001065 0.000982435 0.0008 0.000717435 117.1412632

B3 2.50 2.50 0.467 9.56771E-05 0.0008875 0.000791823 0.001 0.000904323 133.6153958

B4 2.00 3.00 0.487 9.97746E-05 0.00071 0.000610225 0.0012 0.001100225 148.6100725

METHODS B5 1.00 4.00 0.490 1.00389E-04 0.000355 0.000254611 0.0016 0.001499611 262.9250832

Throughout experiment six, several titrations were performed


with different solutions in volumetric flasks. Samples A1-A5 were Figure one includes the Beers Law Plot based on the average absorbance of B1-B5 and the
3+
created with different volumes of , , and HN3 2+ Concentration from part two of the experiment.
provided in table one before being transferred to labeled test FUTURE DIRECTIONS
tubes. Each solution was tested for its absorbance with three trials
Average Absorbance vs [FESCN2+] Concentration
when the Spec20 was calibrated at 460nm with A5, which was a
blank solution. For part two of experiment six, samples B1-B6 Kelsey Plecenik, Tyler Duck
y = 4881x This experiment could be something conducted further
2.5

were created with the specific volumes for each reagent in table by comparing the results on different wavelengths of the
two. Three trials were then performed to find the absorbance after spec 20 by just using a lower frequency to see the difference
calibrating the Spec20 each time with B6, which was a different
2 in absorbance for the series of B tests. You could also test
blank solution. The data collected from part two of the experiment this further by using a higher frequency and using a different
level of pH on the reader.
Average Absorbance

created a Beers Law Plot. Likewise, the data helped find 1.5

calculations for certain reagent's concentrations, equilibriums, and


percent errors. The equation used to determine the reagent's 1
concentration value includes 11 = 22. Another equation
used to determine equilibrium and its constant includes
0.5
= .

0
0 0.00005 0.0001 0.00015 0.0002 0.00025 0.0003 0.00035 0.0004 0.00045
[FeSCN2+] Concentration

Вам также может понравиться