Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FREE SPANNING
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SESSION #1:
Introduction
Limiting Span Criteria
Code and Standards
Data Requirements
Determination of Intervention
Methods of Intervention
Long Term Span Maintenance
SESSION #2:
Determination of Permissible Span and Stresses
Static Stress
Vortex Shedding
Bar Buckling
Fatigue
Case Study
SESSION #1
Session #1
INTRODUCTION
Pipeline laid on an uneven seabed will tend to form of free span rather than follow the
bathymetric features. A span length can either be shorter than the allowable limits
length (not effect the structural integrity) or it can be longer than the allowable limits
(presenting a point of potential failure).
Session #1
LIMITING SPAN CRITERIA
There are four (4) span length criteria which provide the limiting span conditions for
comparison with the pipeline configuration.
• Static stress
• Vortex shedding induced vibration
In-line
Cross flow
• Bar buckling
• Fatigue
Session #1
CODE AND STANDARDS
The following codes and standards provide guideline or limiting criteria with respect to
pipeline free span:
• DNV 1981 “Rules for Submarine Pipeline Systems”
• DNV RP-F105 “Free Spanning Pipelines”
• ASME B31.8 “Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems”
Session #1
DATA REQUIREMENTS
The data required to perform a free span analysis can be broken down into three groups:
• Pipe data
Pipe outside diameter
Pipe wall thickness and density
Mill tolerance of steel pipe
Corrosion allowance
Young’s modulus for steel pipe
Poissons’s ratio for steel pipe
Coefficient of thermal expansion for steel pipe
Specified Minimum Yield Strength for Steel pipe
Residual lay tension
Logarithmic decrement of structural damping
Corrosion coating thickness and density
Concrete coating thickness and density
Marine growth thickness and density
Session #1
DATA REQUIREMENTS
• Operational data
Design pressure
Design temperature
Content density
Hydrotest pressure
• Environmental data
Water depth
Design wave height
Design wave period
Wave direction
Steady current velocity
Steady current direction
Steady current height
Density of seawater
Kinematic viscosity of seawater
Seawater temperature
Soil stiffness
Session #1
DETERMINATION OF INTERVENTION
To determine intervention requirements, there span lengths are then compared to the
maximum allowable span length.
For convenience, the allowable span lengths may be divided into two categories:
• Temporary
• Permanent
The intervention of free spanning are depend on the following phase:
• Design phase
• Construction phase
Pre-lay
Post lay
Session #1
METHODS OF INTERVENTION
• Monitoring
Generally, subsea pipelines are inspected annually.
The purpose of periodic inspection are as follows:
To check the actual span length
To check damage on existing span
To locate any new spans that may have formed
To check the condition of previous intervention
• Spans Acceptance Criteria
During periodic inspection, pipeline span length shall be compared to the
permanent allowable span limits.
• Intervention
Spans which are considerably larger than the allowable limit may require
immediate intervention work to minimize the risk.
SESSION #2
Session #2
DETERMINATION OF PERMISSIBLE SPAN AND STRESSES
Allowable span length for a pipeline are calculated based on each of the following
criteria:
• Static Stress
• Vortex Shedding
In-Line
Cross Flow
• Bar Buckling
Each criteria hall generally be calculated for the following load cases:
• Empty (Installation Condition)
• Water filled
• Hydrotest
• Operating
Session #2
STATIC STRESS
Pipeline span is due to self weight and lateral hydrodynamic loading
Hydrodynamic Loading (Morison's Equation)
Where:
ρw : seawater density
Dt : total diameter of pipe
CD : coefficient of drag
CI : coefficient of inertia
VC : current velocity
Vw : wave induced velocity
φ : wave phase
TZ : wave period
Session #2
END CONDITION
• Generally, end condition is
assumed as fixed – pinned
condition.
• The fixed-pinned assumption
may not be accurate when a
pipeline spans between two
rock ridges.
• Value for the frequency factor
and Euler constant.
Session #2
STATIC STRESS
Total load
Where:
q : vertical load due to self weight
Where:
L : span length
Session #2
STATIC STRESS
The bending moment in a span due to the combination of qmax and axial compression
is given by:
Where:
K = (P/EI)1/2
P =Axial compressive load
E = Young’s Modulus
I = Section moment of area
Session #2
STATIC STRESS
Maximum bending stress:
Where:
σT = -E x α x T (Thermal Stress)
T = Temperature difference
α = coefficient of thermal expansion
σν = ν x σH (Poisson’s Stress)
ν = Poisson’s ratio
σH = (Hoop Stress)
Where:
Me = effective mass of pipeline
δ = logarithmic coefficient of structural
damping
Where:
Wsub = submerged weight of pipeline
Ca = coefficient of added mass
Session #2
VORTEX SHEDDING – IN-LINE
Excitation frequency of a span:
Where:
V = flow velocity normal to the pipe
Where:
C = end fixity constant
= 22.2 for fixed – fixed
= 15.4 for fixed – pinned
= 9.9 for pinned -pinned
Session #2
VORTEX SHEDDING – CROSS FLOW
Reduced velocity for cross flow oscillation is depend on Reynold’s number Re:
Where:
Vapp = appropriate velocity
(determined by Keuleugen Carpenter Number)
For a given KC number, wave velocity component can be generally determined from
the following:
KC > 40, then Vapp = Vc + Vw (wave and current)
KC < 40, then Vapp = Vc (current only)
Session #2
BAR BUCKLING
DNV 1981 gives the formula for calculating the effective axial force with respect to bar
buckling:
Where:
N = axial force in the pipe
Pi = internal pressure
Pe = external pressure
Span length for bar buckling:
Where:
N = constant on end fixity
= 4.0 (Fixed – Fixed)
= 2.05 (Fixed – Pinned)
=1.0 (Pinned – Pinned)
Session #2
FATIGUE
DNV 1981 provides a section dedicated to fatigue analysis. The code requirement is
for the total fatigue usage factor to be less than 30% for pipelines with inspection
access and 10% for pipeline without inspection access. The total fatigue usage factor is
obtained using Miner’s rule, which states that:
Where:
S = number of stress blocks
ni = number of stress cycles in stress block
Ni = number of cycles to failure at constant stress range
Session #2
FATIGUE
Session #2
FATIGUE
The fundamental natural frequency may be approximate by (Refer to DNV RP-F105):
Session #2
FATIGUE
Screening Fatigue Criteria
In-Line Cross Flow
Session #2
FATIGUE
The fatigue damage assessment is based on the accumulation law by Palmgren-Miner
The number of cycles to failure at stress range S is defined by the SN Curve of the form:
Session #2
FATIGUE
Session #2
FATIGUE
Session #2
FATIGUE
Session #2
FATIGUE
Fatigue Life
Session #2
CASE STUDY
Pipe Data
Session #2
CASE STUDY
Coating Data
Session #2
CASE STUDY
Operational Data
Tidal Data
Current Data
Soil Data
Session #2
CASE STUDY
Fatigue Limit State