Financing in the Philippines– Case Study Case Outline • Case Questions • Conclusion • Recommendation Case Questions • Did the government achieve its goal in increasing revenue through sin tax reform law?? • Could the initial decline in smoking be sustained long-term? • Could the new revenues have the impact on the national health that he hoped? • Had the health system policy changes and investments he had chosen to leverage the increasing tax revenues been the right ones? • Could those changes be sustained under new leadership? Conclusion • The government achieve its goal to generate revenue, it is shown on the Exhibit that there are increased on Total Excise Tax Collection as: • 2012 – 32.9 (PhP billions) • 2013 – 100.92 (PhP billions) • 2014 – 111.62 (PhP billions) Conclusion • The primary goal of the law was to improved the public health by declining the numbers of smoking prevalence. Based on the data below it is sustainable as it shows that reduction in smoking was largely the result of fewer Filipinos starting the habit. Smoking Prevalence In smoking prevalence National Nutrition Survey reduction, it is also important to focus on 2008 2013 reduction or eliminating aged 20 or older 31% 25.40% the means for the people National Poll to start smoking. 2012 2014 PhilHealth include aged 18 or older 29% 26% smoking cessation counseling on its primary aged 18 to 24 35% 18% package coverage. Lowest Income quintile 38% 25% Conclusion • One of the health policy changes is expanding the coverage of PhilHealth. The DOH will now subsidize the Sponsored Program families of PhilHealth. This eliminate the problem of denial of coverage to the real poor families as previous qualification of the program was under LGU which do not have standard eligibility criteria. The newly gained revenues had finance this expansion program. Conclusion • Health infrastructure enhancement is the other program to be funded from the sin tax revenue. • The goal is to modernize the barangay health centers and rural health units to become “poly clinics” which would support universal health care. • The HFEP (Health Facilities Enhancement Program) is the named of the program for the health infra enhancement. Recommendation PhilHealth Low Utilization • The expansion of PhilHealth coverage was rooted due to the reported 83.6% household out of the pocket spending for private health. There’s a need to reduce this number, but as per report suggested, there’s a low utilization for PhilHealth which still leads on the out-of-the pocket spending to be high. • PhilHealth will need now to have an aggressive campaign awareness on the benefits of the program. • DOH will focus on increasing the accredited providers. Recommendation Infrastructure enhancement low impact to the improvement of health facilities. • PhilHealth will expand the coverage for more people but the DOH should need now to double speed on improving the health facilities that will serve as the PhilHealth accredited providers. • DOH should now establish and cope up its program processes on the other laws like the procurement law to avoid any delay of the program execution. • DOH to help the local government (health units) to utilize the budget allotted to them, as efficiency on budget spending will be needed for the people to access better services. Efficient use of budget will be another sign for them to receive more budget which will result more upgraded health services. End. “Sin Taxes” and Health Financing in the Philippines