Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 28

c 

 

    



ë Step 1 - Send flowers

ë Step 2 - Invoke the detailed plan that you already had in


place to ensure continuance after just such an
occurrence

ë Step 3 - Business as usual

ë Ôr«.., if you   have a Disaster Recovery


plan in place«

Start the arduous task of putting a puzzle back


together with many of the pieces missing

«and accept the fact that you¶re going to lose


time, money, reputation and clients.

¦ ¦
 
 

ë D S about lack of Disaster Recovery


Planning

ë Understanding the impact to your business

ë PES of Disaster

ë SEPS to protect our business

ë Questions

º º
D ! "#
! "#

ë fter the incident of the World rade enter, º$


of the companies without disaster recovery
capability were out of business within 6 weeks
[Dorbes Aagazine]

ë In fact, º$ of enterprises that experience  


disaster go out of business within five years.
[Gartner]

ë Enterprises can improve those odds ± but |  if


they take the necessary measures before and
after the disaster.

O O
D ! "#
! "#

ë Dile corruption and data loss are becoming


much more common

ë It costs the average company between


]] per year for desktop
oriented disasters (both hard and soft costs)

th Annual ICSA Lab's Virus Prevalence Survey, March 2002

 
c 
 %
&

 %
&

§ Disaster recovery is a series of actions to be taken in


the event of major unplanned outages to minimize
their adverse effects.
± Power failure
± Underground cable cuts or failures
± Dire, flood, earthquake, and other natural disasters
± Aistakes in system administration
± Sabotage (intentional, virus, hacking, internal/external)
± Loss of employee
c  
 %

 
 %


§ We typically think of:

ë How to backup and restore data to computer


systems
ë How to restore network connections
ë How to replace computers and where to put them
ë Where employees can work if the building is
damaged

 

 %
"

ë plan to restore all of these components must be in


place.

ë he system must be able to put them back together


if your business is to survive a disaster.

ë he efficiency with which this is done may make the


difference in surviving or not!

â â
  ' 
 (!
') &

ë Potential pitfall - Disaster Recovery focusing only on the


technical components.

ë onsider the impact of the following:

± Lost productivity and idle employees


± Aissed service level agreements
± Diminished reputation for customer service
± Increased technical support costs for onsite repair
± Loss of customer confidence
± Legal liabilities
± Regulatory fines
± Downward stock prices
± « and more

i i
½     "

ë Instead of Computer Disaster Recovery, think in terms of

½     "

ë BP is more comprehensive. It addresses:

ù Risk of lost revenue and productivity


ù Plan of action for continuing the business, NÔ computers

ii ii
½     "

Example of items that typical planning might leave out:

ë Business processes and procedures


ë Roles and responsibilities
ë What happens at the absence of key individuals
ë Sources and consumers of data
ë Recovery time-frame requirements
ë Ôrder of recovery
ë Documented procedures
ë Reconstitution

i
i

½  "
  "
 

½   "
  "
 


Business Processes and Procedures are:

ë Rarely documented

ë ypically defined only in the combined knowledge


of key employees
(his is true of the ³big picture´ as well as for the details of
each departmental process)

ë Ône of the most difficult things to put back


the if key employees are not available
½     
½      

ritical time is lost without pre-defined roles and


responsibilities for:

ë Aaking the decision to invoke the plan

ë he second in charge

ë Being responsible for each element of the plan

ë Exception handling

ë Decisions of priorities

ë Signature authority

iº iº
½  * % 
½   * % 

bsence of key individuals

ë more difficult thing to consider

ë Aental notes

ë Revenge (sabotage or withholding of information)

iO iO
½  D'
½   D'

Sources and onsumers of Information

ë Detailed data flow

ë Detailed process flow

ë Updated documentation

i i
½   %
) D
) 
½    %
) D
) 

Recovery ime-frames and Ôrder

ë Set expectations up-front

ë Help to design budgets

ë ssign priorities for recovery

i i
½   ) 
½    ) 

Documentation

ë reate documentation so that a contractor can


restart your business

ë reate policies and procedures for updating

i i
½    
½     

Reconstitution

ë When is disaster over?

ë How to go back to business as usual?

ë What steps need to be taken?

iâ iâ
½     "

ë We¶ve talked about things that are commonly


left out...

ë Now the things that typical planning ³almost


always´ leaves out

§ Aental notes
§ Periodic testing
§ Updating procedures and plan content
§ Aoving DR Planning to the DR Site
§ Details, Details, Details!

½  + 


½   +   

Aental Notes

³Steve knows how to do that´


But what if Steve isn¶t here?

ë Aost common obstruction

ëan involve relationships, passwords, technical


understanding, history, contractual obligations«

ë Documentation will never be perfect


i
i
½    ) 
½     ) 

esting and Updating

ë 32% of all data lost is due to human error

ù We¶re all busy, so why take the time to work on


something that we can put off and we probably
won¶t use anyway?
ù³I¶ll have time to do it tomorrow´
ù ³It¶s someone else¶s responsibility´

ë We¶ve seen too many people that have lost data that they
³wish they would have taken the time´ to safeguard!

½    

Aoving Planning to the DR Site

ë he same disciplines must be put into practice


at the DR site.


¦
¦
½     "

method is needed that will:

ë Bring knowledge together

ë Document it

ë Enable processes to be reconstructed (possibly without


the help of key employees)

ë Enforce periodic testing and updating of the plan


º
º
½     "! ))

ontinuance Planning defines and documents

ë Departmental processes
ë Sources of data
ë onsumers of data
ë Relationships
ë ost ramifications
ë Budget justifications
ë Recovery criteria
ë Solution design
ë Documentation
ë ssistance with testing and updating
½     "! ))

Planning is approached in phases

ë Process nalysis
§ Data flows

ë Risk nalysis
§ osts/Effects

ë Disaster Recovery Planning


§ raditional technical component

ë Implementation and esting


§ nnual or after significant changes




½     "! ))

ontinuance Planning can be implemented:

ë Departmentally
ë In phases
ë s a single phase
ë o practical extents




hank You!

Questions?

Rob Didlake Aary Linse


913-780-2525 913-971-6863
rob@dataedge.net mlinse@olatheks.org

Вам также может понравиться