Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES
Purpose of written interrogatories:
To elicit facts from any adverse party (answers may also be used as
admissions of the adverse party).
According to your answer, you already paid, please answer the following
questions:
Q1: When did you pay?
Q2: Place?
Q3: Who was present when you paid?
OR…….
Q1: Mr. Frudo, you have been in continuous possession of this piece
of land for 30 years, would you kindly narrate the improvements
that you introduced in the property?
I will compel you to reveal the evidentiary facts. And that process is
called written interrogatories to parties. Almost the same with deposition. I
can also ask the same questions through deposition taking under Rule 23.
Why do I have to resort to Rule 25?
The trouble is under Rule 23, I need a deposition officer and I will
have to course everything to him. In Rule 25, there is no need of a
deposition officer. I will ask you a question and you will answer me. Both
are done directly. So, less expensive. But take note, under Rule 25, you
can only ask questions to your opponent. You cannot ask questions to a
stranger. Unlike in Rule 23, you can take the deposition of any person
whether a party or not. In Rule 25, the questioning is direct. Plaintiff
questions the defendant, defendant questions the plaintiff. So, these
are the differences between deposition upon written interrogatories
and interrogatories to parties.
Distinguish INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES (Rule
25) from DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN
INTERROGATORIES (Rule 23).
1) (Procedure) Under Rule 23 on Depositions upon written
interrogatories, the deposition is taken before a deposition officer;
whereas Under Rule 25 on Interrogatories to Parties, there is no deposition
officer;
5) (Period to answer) Under Rule 23, there is no fixed time while under
this rule the party concerned has 15 days to answer unless extended
or reduced by the court.
SECTION 1- INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES;
SERVICE THEREOF
IT DEPENDS. The Rule says “under the same conditions specified in Section 1 of
Rule 23.” So the manner of resorting to interrogatories are done under
the same conditions for taking of depositions.
2) WITH LEAVE OF COURT if no answer has been served, although the court
has already acquired jurisdiction over the defendant. That is the same
under the rule on deposition. The reason is that, at that time, the
issues are not yet joined and the disputed facts are not yet clear.
SECTION 2- ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES
Remedy:
Question the admissibility of such interrogatories on appeal from
final judgement
Section 4. Number of interrogatories.
No party may, without leave of court, serve more than one set of
interrogatories to be answered by the same party. (4)