Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 79

Binomial Probability Distribution

 A fixed number of observations (trials), n


 e.g., 15 tosses of a coin; 20 patients; 1000 people surveyed
 A binary outcome
 e.g., head or tail in each toss of a coin; disease or no disease
 Generally called “success” and “failure”
 Probability of success is p, probability of failure is 1 – p
 Constant probability for each observation
 e.g., Probability of getting a tail is the same each time we
toss the coin
Binomial distribution

Take the example of 5 coin tosses. What’s the probability that you flip
exactly 3 heads in 5 coin tosses?
Binomial distribution

Solution:
One way to get exactly 3 heads: HHHTT

What’s the probability of this exact arrangement?


P(heads)xP(heads) xP(heads)xP(tails)xP(tails) =(1/2)3 x
(1/2)2

Another way to get exactly 3 heads: THHHT


Probability of this exact outcome = (1/2)1 x (1/2)3 x
(1/2)1 = (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
Binomial distribution

In fact, (1/2)3 x (1/2)2 is the probability of each


unique outcome that has exactly 3 heads and 2 tails.

So, the overall probability of 3 heads and 2 tails is:


(1/2)3 x (1/2)2 + (1/2)3 x (1/2)2 + (1/2)3 x (1/2)2 + …..
for as many unique arrangements as there are—but
how many are there??
Outcome Probability
THHHT (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
HHHTT (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
TTHHH (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
HTTHH (1/2)3 x (1/2)2 The probability
5 (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
ways to HHTTH of each unique
  (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
arrange 3 HTHHT outcome (note:
heads in THTHH (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
 3 5 trials HTHTH (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
they are all
equal)
HHTHT (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
THHTH (1/2)3 x (1/2)2
10 arrangements x (1/2)3 x (1/2)2

5C3 = 5!/3!2! = 10

Factorial review: n! = n(n-1)(n-2)…


5
P(3 heads and 2 tails) =  x P(heads)3 x P(tails)2 =
 3

10 x (½)5=31.25%
Binomial distribution, generally
Note the general pattern emerging  if you have only two possible
outcomes (call them 1/0 or yes/no or success/failure) in n independent
trials, then the probability of exactly X “successes”=
n = number of trials

n X n X
  p (1  p)
X 1-p = probability
of failure
X=# p=
successes probability of
out of n success
trials
Binomial distribution: example

• If I toss a coin 20 times, what’s the probability of getting exactly 10


heads?

 20  10 10
 (.5) (.5)  .176
 10 
Binomial distribution: example

• If I toss a coin 20 times, what’s the probability of getting of getting 2


or fewer heads?

 20  20!
 (.5) (.5) 
0 20
(.5) 20  9.5 x10  7 
0 20!0!
 20  20!
  (.5)1
(.5)19
 (.5) 20  20 x9.5 x10 7  1.9 x10 5 
1 19!1!
 20  20!
 (.5) (.5) 
2 18
(.5) 20  190 x9.5 x10  7  1.8 x10  4
2 18!2!
 1.8 x10  4
Session 12
DAI

10
DEMINGS 14 Points

Point 1: Create a Vision and Demonstrate


Commitment
• An organization must define its values, mission, and vision of the
future to provide long-term direction for its management and
employees.
• Businesses should not exist simply for profit; they are social entities
whose basic purpose is to serve their customers and employees.
Point 2: Learn the New Philosophy

• Companies must take a customer-driven approach based on mutual


cooperation between labor and management and a never-ending
cycle of improvement.
Point 3: Understand Inspection

• Inspection - the principal means of quality control.


• Routine inspection acknowledges that defects are
present, but does not add value to the product.
• Inspection should be used as an information-gathering
tool for improvement, not as a means of “assuring”
quality or blaming workers.
Point 4: Stop Making Decisions Purely on
the Basis of Cost
• The supplier and manufacturer must be considered as a
macro organization.
• Deming urged businesses to establish long-term
relationships with fewer suppliers, leading to loyalty
and opportunities for mutual improvement.
• Supply Chain Management (SCM) focuses heavily on a
system’s view of the supply chain with the objective of
minimizing total supply chain costs and developing
stronger partnerships with suppliers.
Point 5: Improve Constantly and Forever

• Improved design of goods and services comes from understanding


customer needs and continual market surveys and other sources of
feedback, and from understanding the manufacturing and service
delivery process.
• Improvements in operations are achieved by reducing the causes and
impacts of variation, and engaging all employees to innovate and
seek ways of doing their jobs more efficiently and effectively.
• Deming chain reaction: When quality improves, productivity
improves and costs decrease.
• Continuous improvement
Point 6: Institute Training

• Training
- results in improvements in quality and productivity
- adds to worker morale
- demonstrates to workers that the company is dedicated to helping
them and investing in the future
Point 7: Institute Leadership

• The job of management is leadership, not supervision.

Supervision – simply overseeing and directing work


Leadership – providing guidance to help employees do their Jobs
with less effort.
Point 8: Drive Out Fear

• Fear is manifasted in many ways: fear of reprisal, fear of failure, fear


of the unknown, fear of relinquishing control, and fear of change.
• Fear encourages short-term thinking
• Fear is a cultural issue for all organizations
Point 9: Optimize the Efforts of Teams

• Teamwork helps to break down barriers between


departments and individuals.

Barriers between functional areas occurs when


managers fear they might lose power.

• Lack of cooperation leads to poor quality.


Point 10: Eliminate Exhortations

• Motivational approaches overlook the major source of many


problems – the system
• Causes of variation stemming from the design of the system are
management’s problem, not the workers’
Point 11: Enumerate Numerical Quotas and
Management by Objective (MBO)
• Many organizations manage by the numbers.
• Goals are useful, but numerical goals set for others
without incorporating a method to reach the goal
generate frustration and resentment.
• Management must understand the system and
continually try to improve it, rather than focus on short-
term goals.
Point 12: Remove Barriers to Pride in
Workmanship
• Deming believed that one of the biggest barriers to
pride in workmanship is performance appraisal
Performance appraisal destroys teamwork by promoting competition for
limited resources, fosters mediocrity because objectives typically are
driven by numbers and what the boss wants rather than by quality,
focuses on the short term and discourages risk taking, and confounds
the “people resources” with other resources.
• Three categories of performance:
Majority of performances that are within the system
Performances outside the system on the superior side
Performances outside the system on the inferior side
Point 13: Encourage Education and Self-
Improvement
• Continuing, broad education for self-improvement
• Organizations must invest in their people at all levels to ensure
success in the long term
• Developing the worth of the individual is a powerful motivation
method
Point 14: Take Action

• Any culture change begins with top management and includes


everyone
• Team-based approach
Funnel Experiment

• The Funnel Experiment is a famous experiment first developed by Dr.


Deming. It was designed to show primarily two things:
1. All processes have statistical variation
2. Improving processes to reduce variation is infinitely better than trying to
control process variation
Funnel Experiment
Funnel Experiment

Funnel Experiment

Rule 1: Do nothing

Funnel Experiment
Rule 2: Move the funnel in an equal but opposite
direction
Rule 3: Move the funnel in an equal
Funnel Experiment

but opposite direction from (0,0)


Rule 4: Move the funnel to the last
position where the last hit.
Funnel Experiment
Funnel Experiment

• The Funnel Experiment is a famous experiment first developed by Dr.


Deming. It was designed to show primarily two things:
1. All processes have statistical variation
2. Improving processes to reduce variation is infinitely better than trying to
control process variation
The Funnel Experiment

Rule 1: Set the funnel over the target


at (0,0) and leave the funnel fixed through all 50 drops.

Funnel Experiment; Rule 1

4
3
2
1
Yk

0
-4 -3 -2 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4
-2
-3
-4
Xk
The Funnel Experiment
Rule 2: Move the funnel in an equal but opposite direction
from where the last marbel hit. The funnel should be moved
the distance (-xk,-yk) from its last resting point.

Funnel Experiment; Rule 2

4
3
2
1
Yk

0
-4 -3 -2 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4
-2
-3
-4
Xk
The Funnel Experiment

Rule 2: Move the funnel in an equal but opposite direction from


where the last marbel hit. The funnel should be moved the distance
(-xk,-yk) from its last resting point.

Machine/Process adjustment rules using control chart


limits.

Automatic compensating machinery


The Funnel Experiment
Rule 3: Move the funnel in an equal but opposite direction
from target (0,0) to where the last marble hit. Rule 3 states
that the funnel should be moved a distance (-xk,-yk) from the
target (0,0).

Funnel Experiment; Rule 3

4
3
2
1
Yk

0
-4 -3 -2 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4
-2
-3
-4
Xk
The Funnel Experiment

Rule 3: Move the funnel in an equal but opposite direction from target
(0,0) to where the last marble hit. Rule 3 states that the funnel should
be moved a distance (-xk,-yk) from the target (0,0).

Management by Objectives

Committees
The Funnel Experiment
Rule 4: Move the funnel to the last position where the last
marble hit. Rule 4 states that the funnel should be moved to
the resting point, (xk,yk).

Funnel Experiment; Rule 4

4
3
2
1
Yk

0
-4 -3 -2 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4
-2
-3
-4
Xk
The Funnel Experiment

Rule 4: Move the funnel to the last position where the last marble
hit. Rule 4 states that the funnel should be moved to the resting
point, (xk,yk).

Operator matches color from batch to batch


without reference to original swatch.

Operator attempts to make every piece like the


last one.

On the job training.


Basics of Statistical Process
Control

• Statistical Process Control (SPC)


• monitoring production process to
detect and prevent poor quality
• Sample UCL
• subset of items produced to use
for inspection
• Control Charts
• process is within statistical control LCL

limits

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-36


Variability

• Random • Non-Random
• common causes • special causes
• inherent in a process • due to identifiable factors
• can be eliminated only • can be modified through
through improvements in operator or management
the system action

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-37


SPC in TQM

• SPC
• tool for identifying problems and make improvements
• contributes to the TQM goal of continuous improvements

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-38


Quality Measures
• Attribute
• a product characteristic that can be evaluated with a discrete response
• good – bad; yes - no
• Variable
• a product characteristic that is continuous and can be measured
• weight - length

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-39


Applying SPC to Service

• Nature of defect is different in services


• Service defect is a failure to meet customer requirements
• Monitor times, customer satisfaction

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-40


Applying SPC to Service
(cont.)
• Hospitals
• timeliness and quickness of care, staff responses to requests,
accuracy of lab tests, cleanliness, courtesy, accuracy of paperwork,
speed of admittance and checkouts
• Grocery Stores
• waiting time to check out, frequency of out-of-stock items, quality of
food items, cleanliness, customer complaints, checkout register
errors
• Airlines
• flight delays, lost luggage and luggage handling, waiting time at ticket
counters and check-in, agent and flight attendant courtesy, accurate
flight information, passenger cabin cleanliness and maintenance

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-41


Applying SPC to Service
(cont.)

• Fast-Food Restaurants
• waiting time for service, customer complaints, cleanliness,
food quality, order accuracy, employee courtesy
• Catalogue-Order Companies
• order accuracy, operator knowledge and courtesy,
packaging, delivery time, phone order waiting time
• Insurance Companies
• billing accuracy, timeliness of claims processing, agent
availability and response time

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-42


Where to Use Control Charts

• Process has a tendency to go out of control


• Process is particularly harmful and costly if it goes out
of control
• Examples
• at the beginning of a process because it is a waste of time and
money to begin production process with bad supplies
• before a costly or irreversible point, after which product is
difficult to rework or correct
• before and after assembly or painting operations that might
cover defects
• before the outgoing final product or service is delivered

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-43


Control Charts

• A graph that establishes


control limits of a process • Types of charts
• Attributes
• Control limits • p-chart
• upper and lower bands of a • c-chart
control chart • Variables
• range (R-chart)
• mean (x bar – chart)

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-44


Process Control Chart

Out of control
Upper
control
limit

Process
average

Lower
control
limit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample number
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-45
Normal Distribution

95%
99.74%
-3 -2 -1 =0 1 2 3

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-46


A Process Is in Control If

1. … no sample points outside limits


2. … most points near process average
3. … about equal number of points above
and below centerline
4. … points appear randomly distributed

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-47


Control Charts for Attributes

 p-charts
 uses portion defective in a sample
 c-charts
 uses number of defects in an item

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-48


p-Chart

UCL = p + zp
LCL = p - zp
z = number of standard deviations from
process average
p = sample proportion defective; an estimate
of process average
p = standard deviation of sample proportion

p(1 - p)
p = n
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-49
p-Chart Example

NUMBER OF PROPORTION
SAMPLE DEFECTIVES DEFECTIVE
1 6 .06
2 0 .00
3 4 .04
: : :
: : :
20 18 .18
200

20 samples of 100 pairs of jeans

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-50


p-Chart Example (cont.)

total defectives
p= = 200 / 20(100) = 0.10
total sample observations

p(1 - p) 0.10(1 - 0.10)


UCL = p + z = 0.10 + 3
n 100
UCL = 0.190

p(1 - p) 0.10(1 - 0.10)


LCL = p - z = 0.10 - 3
n 100
LCL = 0.010

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-51


0.20

0.18 UCL = 0.190

0.16

0.14

Proportion defective
p-Chart 0.12

Example 0.10
p = 0.10

(cont.) 0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02 LCL = 0.010

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample number

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-52


c-Chart

UCL = c + zc
c = c
LCL = c - zc

where
c = number of defects per sample

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-53


c-Chart (cont.)
Number of defects in 15 sample rooms

NUMBER
OF
SAMPLE DEFECTS
190
1 12 c= 15 = 12.67
2 8
3 16 UCL = c + zc
= 12.67 + 3 12.67
: : = 23.35

: :
15 15 LCL = c + zc
190 = 12.67 - 3 12.67
= 1.99

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-54


24
UCL = 23.35
21

18

Number of defects
c = 12.67

15
c-Chart
12
(cont.)
9

3 LCL = 1.99

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Sample number

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-55


Control Charts for Variables

 Mean chart ( x -Chart )


 uses average of a sample
 Range chart ( R-Chart )
 uses amount of dispersion in a
sample

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-56


x-bar Chart

x1 + x2 + ... xk
=
x= k

= =
UCL = x + A2R LCL = x - A2R

where

=
x = average of sample means

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-57


x-bar Chart Example
OBSERVATIONS (SLIP- RING DIAMETER, CM)
SAMPLE k 1 2 3 4 5 x R
1 5.02 5.01 4.94 4.99 4.96 4.98 0.08
2 5.01 5.03 5.07 4.95 4.96 5.00 0.12
3 4.99 5.00 4.93 4.92 4.99 4.97 0.08
4 5.03 4.91 5.01 4.98 4.89 4.96 0.14
5 4.95 4.92 5.03 5.05 5.01 4.99 0.13
6 4.97 5.06 5.06 4.96 5.03 5.01 0.10
7 5.05 5.01 5.10 4.96 4.99 5.02 0.14
8 5.09 5.10 5.00 4.99 5.08 5.05 0.11
9 5.14 5.10 4.99 5.08 5.09 5.08 0.15
10 5.01 4.98 5.08 5.07 4.99 5.03 0.10
50.09 1.15

Example 15.4
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-58
x- bar Chart Example
(cont.)

== x 50.09 = 5.01 cm
x =
k 10

UCL = x +=A2R = 5.01 + (0.58)(0.115) = 5.08


=
LCL = x - A2R = 5.01 - (0.58)(0.115) = 4.94

Retrieve Factor Value A2

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-59


5.10 –

5.08 –
UCL = 5.08
5.06 –

5.04 –

5.02 –
x= = 5.01
Mean

5.00 –

4.98 –
x- bar
Chart 4.96 –

Example 4.94 – LCL = 4.94

(cont.) 4.92 –
| | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample number

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-60


R- Chart

UCL = D4R LCL = D3R

R
R= k

where
R = range of each sample
k = number of samples

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-61


R-Chart Example
OBSERVATIONS (SLIP-RING DIAMETER, CM)
SAMPLE k 1 2 3 4 5 x R
1 5.02 5.01 4.94 4.99 4.96 4.98 0.08
2 5.01 5.03 5.07 4.95 4.96 5.00 0.12
3 4.99 5.00 4.93 4.92 4.99 4.97 0.08
4 5.03 4.91 5.01 4.98 4.89 4.96 0.14
5 4.95 4.92 5.03 5.05 5.01 4.99 0.13
6 4.97 5.06 5.06 4.96 5.03 5.01 0.10
7 5.05 5.01 5.10 4.96 4.99 5.02 0.14
8 5.09 5.10 5.00 4.99 5.08 5.05 0.11
9 5.14 5.10 4.99 5.08 5.09 5.08 0.15
10 5.01 4.98 5.08 5.07 4.99 5.03 0.10
50.09 1.15

Example 15.3
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-62
R-Chart Example (cont.)

R 1.15 UCL = D4R = 2.11(0.115) = 0.243


R= = = 0.115
k 10 LCL = D3R = 0(0.115) = 0

Retrieve Factor Values D3 and D4

Example 15.3
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-63
R-Chart Example (cont.)

0.28 –
0.24 –
UCL = 0.243
0.20 –
0.16 –
Range

R = 0.115
0.12 –
0.08 –
0.04 – LCL = 0
0– | | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample number
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-64
Using x- bar and R-Charts Together

 Process average and process variability must be in control.

 It is possible for samples to have very narrow ranges, but their


averages is beyond control limits.

 It is possible for sample averages to be in control, but ranges


might be very large.

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-65


Control Chart Patterns
UCL

UCL

LCL

Sample observations
consistently below the LCL
center line
Sample observations
consistently above the
center line
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-66
Control Chart Patterns (cont.)
UCL

UCL

LCL

Sample observations
consistently increasing LCL

Sample observations
consistently decreasing

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-67


Zones for Pattern Tests
UCL =
3 sigma = x + A2R
Zone A
= 2
2 sigma = x + 3 (A2R)

Zone B
= 1
1 sigma = x + 3 (A2R)
Zone C
Process =
x
average
Zone C
=
1 sigma = x - 1 (A2R)
3
Zone B
=
2 sigma = x - 2 (A2R)
3
Zone A
=
LCL 3 sigma = x - A2R
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Sample number
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-68
Control Chart Patterns

 8 consecutive points on one side of the center line


 8 consecutive points up or down across zones
 14 points alternating up or down
 2 out of 3 consecutive points in zone A but still inside the control
limits
 4 out of 5 consecutive points in zone A or B

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-69


Performing a Pattern Test
SAMPLE x ABOVE/BELOW UP/DOWN ZONE

1 4.98 B — B
2 5.00 B U C
3 4.95 B D A
4 4.96 B D A
5 4.99 B U C
6 5.01 — U C
7 5.02 A U C
8 5.05 A U B
9 5.08 A U A
10 5.03 A D B

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-70


Sample Size

 Attribute charts require larger sample sizes


 50 to 100 parts in a sample
 Variable charts require smaller samples
 2 to 10 parts in a sample

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-71


Process Capability

• Tolerances
• design specifications reflecting product requirements
• Process capability
• range of natural variability in a process what we measure with control charts

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-72


Process Capability
Design
Specifications

(a) Natural variation


exceeds design
specifications; process
is not capable of
meeting specifications
all the time.
Process
Design
Specifications

(b) Design specifications


and natural variation the
same; process is capable
of meeting specifications
most of the time.

Process
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-73
Process Capability (cont.)
Design
Specifications

(c) Design specifications


greater than natural
variation; process is
capable of always
conforming to
specifications.
Process
Design
Specifications

(d) Specifications greater


than natural variation,
but process off center;
capable but some output
will not meet upper
specification.
Process
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-74
Process Capability Measures

Process Capability Ratio

tolerance range
Cp = process range

upper specification limit -


lower specification limit
=
6

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-75


Computing Cp

Net weight specification = 9.0 oz  0.5 oz


Process mean = 8.80 oz
Process standard deviation = 0.12 oz

upper specification limit -


lower specification limit
Cp = 6

9.5 - 8.5
= = 1.39
6(0.12)

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-76


Process Capability Measures

Process Capability Index

= x - lower specification limit


3 ,
Cpk = minimum
upper specification limit - x =
3

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-77


Computing Cpk

Net weight specification = 9.0 oz  0.5 oz


Process mean = 8.80 oz
Process standard deviation = 0.12 oz

=
x - lower specification limit
,
Cpk = minimum 3
=
upper specification limit - x
3

8.80 - 8.50 9.50 - 8.80


= minimum , = 0.83
3(0.12) 3(0.12)

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-78


Appendix:
Determining Control Limits for x-bar and R-Charts

SAMPLE SIZE FACTOR FOR x-CHART FACTORS FOR R-CHART


n A2 D3 D4

2 1.88 0.00 3.27


3 1.02 0.00 2.57
Fact 4 0.73 0.00 2.28
5 0.58 0.00 2.11
ors 6 0.48 0.00 2.00
7 0.42 0.08 1.92
8 0.37 0.14 1.86
9 0.44 0.18 1.82
10 0.11 0.22 1.78
11 0.99 0.26 1.74
12 0.77 0.28 1.72
13 0.55 0.31 1.69
14 0.44 0.33 1.67
15 0.22 0.35 1.65
16 0.11 0.36 1.64
17 0.00 0.38 1.62
18 0.99 0.39 1.61
19 0.99 0.40 1.61
20 0.88 0.41 1.59
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4-79

Вам также может понравиться