Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL & MINING ENGINEERING
Performed by:
Andoy, Julie Joy
Barredo, Apple Mae
Gomonid, Jana Marie
Mariquit, Eldwin
Suerte, Clyde Mae
INTRODUCTION AND THEORY
The partial molar volume of a component A in a mixture is the change in volume per mole
of A added to a large volume of the mixture.
Objective: To determine the density and specific volume of a HCl-water solutions with
varying concentrations, and partial molar volumes of its components by using a
pycnometer.
INTRODUCTION AND THEORY
For a binary system with components A and B, the total volume of a molar solution can be
expressed as follows:
𝑚𝑙
𝑉 = 𝑥𝐴 𝑉ത𝐴 + 𝑥𝐵 𝑉ത𝐵 (𝑚𝑜𝑙) (eq. 1)
where 𝑥𝐴 and 𝑥𝐵 are the mole fractions, and 𝑉ത𝐵 and 𝑉ത𝐵 are the partial molar volumes of A and
B, respectively. [2]
The partial molar volume 𝑉ത𝐶 of a component can be calculated using the formula:
𝑚𝑙
𝑉ത𝐶 = 𝑉ത𝑠 ∗ 𝑀𝑊 (𝑚𝑜𝑙)
Where 𝑉ത𝑠 and MW is the partial specific volume and molecular weight of the component,
respectively.[1]
PROCEDURE
Step 1. Dry and weigh a 25 mL
pycnometer.
Step 2. Fill with distilled water with the water level reaching the top of
the capillary, wipe dry then weigh.
Figure 2. Weighing of
Step 6. Make it reach the top of the pycnometer with distilled
capillary, wipe dry, then weigh. water.
𝑐1 𝑣1 = 𝑐2 𝑣2 (eq. 2)
𝑚
𝑝= (eq. 3)
𝑣
37.25% HCl solution 30% HCl solution 20% HCl solution 10% HCl solution
0.96
specific volume (ml/g)
0.94
0.92
0.9
0.88
0.86
0.84
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
percentage weight of HCl (%)
Specific Volume, Vs =
1 𝑚𝑙 (eq. 4)
( )
𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑔
10% HCl solution 20% HCl solution 30% HCl solution 37.25% HCl solution
1 1
0.9 0.9
0.8 0.8
Partial specific volumes of Water (ml/g)
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
Let Vm be the partial molar volume of component A at some given concentration, thus,
𝑚𝑙
Partial molar volume, PMV = 𝑃𝑆𝑉 ∗ 𝑀𝑊 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 (𝑚𝑜𝑙) (eq. 5)
Percentage weight of HCl (%) Partial Molar Volume of Water Partial Molar Volume of HCl
10 18.87 10.87
20 18.20 18.23
30 17.48 23.15
37.25 16.61 26.29
Table 5. The calculated partial molar volumes of the components in the solution.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Molar Volume, 𝑉𝑚 = 𝑃𝑀𝑉𝐻𝐶𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝐻𝐶𝑙 + 𝑃𝑀𝑉𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 (𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 ) (eq. 6)
10% HCl solution 20% HCl solution 30% HCl solution 37.25% HCl
solution
18.9
18.8
molar volume of solution (ml/mol)
18.7
18.6
18.5
18.4
18.3
18.2
18.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
percentage weight of HCl (%)
10% HCl solution 20% HCl solution 30% HCl solution 37.25% HCl
solution
Table 7. The calculated specific volume of HCl solutions using partial specific volumes and weight fractions of
components within the solution. (theoretical data)
𝑉𝑠𝑡 − 𝑉𝑠𝑒
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = ∗ 100 (eq. 8)
𝑉𝑠𝑡
10% HCl solution 20% HCl solution 30% HCl solution 37.25% HCl solution
Table 8. Comparison of the results obtained from equation 7 to the experimental data.
RESULTS
30 AND DISCUSSION 30
27.5 27.5
22.5 22.5
20 20
17.5 17.5
15 15
Partial Molar Volume of Water
12.5 12.5 Partial Molar Volume of HCl
10 10
𝑤𝑡% 𝐻𝐶𝑙
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐻𝐶𝑙 = 𝑀𝑊 𝐻𝐶𝑙
𝑤𝑡% 𝐻𝐶𝑙 100 − 𝑤𝑡% 𝐻𝐶𝑙 (eq. 8)
+
𝑀𝑊 𝐻𝐶𝑙 𝑀𝑊 𝐻2 𝑂
10% HCl solution 20% HCl solution 30% HCl solution 37.25% HCl solution
Results showed that the partial molar volume of HCl increases with its
concentration and molar fraction, exhibiting direct proportionality. The partial molar
volume of water, on the other hand, decreases with increasing concentration of HCl
The potential sources of errors in this experiment are the improper use of the
pipette in transferring the liquids into the container, presence of air space in the
pycnometer, presence of liquid outside of the pycnometer before the initial weighing and
the improper use of the pycnometer. It is therefore recommended to use a graphing device
[1] Athawale, V.D. and Parul, M., Experimental Physical Chemistry, New Age International
(P) Limited Publishers. 2001. pp. 56-58
[2] Atkins, P. and De Paula, J., Physical Chemistry, 9th ed., New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
2010. pp. 157-158
[3] Nguyen, T.K., Chemical and Materials Engineering. Winter 2009. pp. 36-37