Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 1 of 122
INTRODUCTION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 2 of 122
INTRODUCTION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 3 of 122
INTRODUCTION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 4 of 122
INTRODUCTION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 5 of 122
INTRODUCTION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 7 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE ACTIVITIES
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 8 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE ACTIVITIES
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 9 of 122
PRODUCT DESIGN
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 11 of 122
PRODUCT DESIGN
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 12 of 122
PRODUCT DESIGN
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 13 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE ACTIVITIES
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 14 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 15 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 16 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 17 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 18 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 19 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 20 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 21 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 23 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 24 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 25 of 122
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 27 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE ACTIVITIES
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 28 of 122
PRODUCTION OPERATIONS
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 30 of 122
PRODUCTION OPERATIONS
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 31 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE ACTIVITIES
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 32 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 36 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 37 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 38 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 39 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 40 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 41 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 42 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 44 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 45 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 46 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 47 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 49 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
• Raw Material Usage Data:
– When production is initiated, the issuance of a
materials requisition triggers a debit (increase) to
work in process and a credit (decrease) to raw
materials inventory.
– Work in process is credited and raw materials are
debited for any amounts returned to inventory.
– Many raw materials are bar coded so that usage data
is collected by scanning.
– RFID tags improve the efficiency of tracking material
usage.
– Usage may be entered online for materials such as
liquids that are not conducive to tagging.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 50 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 51 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 52 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 53 of 122
COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 54 of 122
CONTROL: OBJECTIVES,
THREATS, AND PROCEDURES
• In the production cycle (or any cycle), a well-designed
AIS should provide adequate controls to ensure that the
following objectives are met:
– All transactions are properly authorized
– All recorded transactions are valid
– All valid and authorized transactions are recorded
– All transactions are recorded accurately
– Assets are safeguarded from loss or theft
– Business activities are performed efficiently and effectively
– The company is in compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations
– All disclosures are full and fair
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 55 of 122
CONTROL: OBJECTIVES,
THREATS, AND PROCEDURES
• There are several actions a company can take
with respect to any cycle to reduce threats of
errors or irregularities. These include:
– Using simple, easy-to-complete documents with
clear instructions (enhances accuracy and
reliability).
– Using appropriate application controls, such as
validity checks and field checks (enhances
accuracy and reliability).
– Providing space on forms to record who completed
and who reviewed the form (encourages proper
authorizations and accountability).
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 56 of 122
CONTROL: OBJECTIVES,
THREATS, AND PROCEDURES
– Pre-numbering documents (encourages recording
of valid and only valid transactions).
– Restricting access to blank documents (reduces
risk of unauthorized transaction).
– Using RFID tags when feasible to improve data
entry accuracy.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 57 of 122
THREATS IN PRODUCT DESIGN
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 58 of 122
THREATS IN PLANNING AND
SCHEDULING
• Threats in the planning and scheduling
process include:
– THREAT 2: Over- or Under-Production
– THREAT 3: Suboptimal Investment in
Fixed Assets
• You can click on any of the threats above to get
more information on:
– The types of problems posed by each threat
– The controls that can mitigate the threats.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 60 of 122
THREATS IN PRODUCTION OPERATIONS
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 65 of 122
THREATS IN COST ACCOUNTING
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 71 of 122
• You can click on any of the threats below to get
more information on:
GENERAL THREATS
– The types of problems posed by each threat
– The controls that can mitigate the threats.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 74 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE INFORMATION
NEEDS
• In a manufacturing environment, the focus
must be on total quality management.
Managers need info on:
– Defect rates
– Breakdown frequency
– Percent of finished goods needing rework
– Percent of defects discovered by customers
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 80 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE INFORMATION
NEEDS
• In traditional systems, this type of data
was not well linked with financial data, and
cost accounting systems were separate
from production operations information
systems.
• However, both financial and operating
information are needed to manage and
evaluate these activities.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 81 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE INFORMATION
NEEDS
• Two major criticisms have been directed at
traditional cost accounting systems:
– Overhead costs are inappropriately allocated
to products
– Reports do not accurately reflect effects of
factory automation
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 82 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE INFORMATION
NEEDS
• Two major criticisms have been directed at
traditional cost accounting systems:
– Overhead costs are inappropriately
allocated to products
– Reports do not accurately reflect effects of
factory automation
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 83 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Traditional cost accounting systems use
volume-driven bases such as direct labor
hours or machine hours to apply
overhead.
• However, overhead does not vary with
production volume.
• EXAMPLE: Purchasing costs vary with
the number of purchase orders processed.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 84 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Allocating overhead based on output
volume:
– Overstates the costs of products
manufactured in large quantities
– Understates the costs of products
manufactured in small batches
• Also, allocating overhead based on direct
labor input can distort costs.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 85 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Example of Two Products:
– Product 1 uses:
• $5 of materials
• 1 hour of labor
• 5 minutes of machine time
– Product 2 uses:
• $5 of materials
• 1 hour of labor
• 42 hours of machine time on very expensive
equipment
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 86 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Example of Two Products:
– Product 1 uses:
Under a traditional
• $5 of materials cost accounting
• 1 hour of labor system, both
products will
• 5 minutes of machine time appear to have the
– Product 2 uses: same cost.
• $5 of materials
• 1 hour of labor
• 42 hours of machine time on very expensive
equipment
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 87 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Solution to Criticism 1: Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
– ABC can refine and improve cost allocations
under either job-order or process costing
systems.
• ABC traces costs to the activities that create them
and allocates them accordingly.
• ABC aims to link costs to corporate strategy.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 88 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
– Corporate strategy results in decisions about
what goods and services to produce.
• These activities incur costs.
• So corporate strategy determines costs.
– By measuring the costs of the basic activities,
ABC provides information to management for
evaluating the consequences of their decisions.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 89 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC vs. Traditional Cost Systems:
– There are three significant differences between
ABC and traditional approaches.
• Tracing of overhead costs
• Number of cost pools
• Identification of cost drivers
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 90 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC vs. Traditional Cost Systems:
– There are three significant differences between
ABC and traditional cost accounting approaches.
• Tracing of overhead costs
• Number of cost pools
• Identification of cost drivers
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 91 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC directly traces a larger proportion of
overhead costs to products.
• This tracing is made possible by advances
in IT.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 92 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC vs. Traditional Cost Systems:
– There are three significant differences between
ABC and traditional cost accounting approaches.
• Tracing of overhead costs
• Number of cost pools
• Identification of cost drivers
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 93 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC uses a greater number of cost pools
• EXAMPLES: Setup, inspection, and material
to accumulate indirect
handling costs. costs
(manufacturing overhead).
• Accumulated for a batch and allocated to the
products in that batch.
• Most systems lump all
• Consequently, overhead
costs per product together,
will be less
but ABC distinguishes
when products arethree
made incategories:
larger quantities.
- Batch-related overhead
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 94 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC uses• aExamples:
greaterR&D, number of cost
environmental pools and
regulations,
purchasing costs.
to accumulate indirect
• These costs are costs
related to the diversity of the
company’s
(manufacturing product line.
overhead).
• ABC attempts to link these costs to the products
• Most systems
thatlump
generateallthem.
overhead together,
• For example, purchasing
but ABC distinguishes three categories:
costs might be
allocated to products based on the number of
- Batch-related overhead
purchase orders generated for each product.
- Product-related overhead
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 95 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC uses a greater number of cost pools
to accumulate indirect costs
(manufacturing overhead).
• Most systems lump all overhead together,
but ABC distinguishes three
• EXAMPLE: Rentcategories:
or depreciation.
• These costs are applied to all products
- Batch-related overhead
and allocated according to departmental
- Product-related overhead
or plant rates.
- Company-wide overhead
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 96 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• ABC vs. Traditional Cost Systems:
– There are three significant differences between
ABC and traditional cost accounting approaches.
• Tracing of overhead costs
• Number of cost pools
• Identification of cost drivers
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 97 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Benefits of ABC Systems
– ABC systems are more costly and complex.
– But proponents argue two important benefits:
• More accurate cost data result in better product
mix and pricing decisions.
• More detailed cost data improve management’s
ability to control and manage total costs.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 98 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Benefits of ABC Systems
– ABC systems are more costly and complex.
– But proponents argue two important benefits:
• More accurate cost data result in better
product mix and pricing decisions
• More detailed cost data improve management’s
ability to control and manage total costs.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 99 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Better Decisions
– ABC avoids problems of applying too much or
too little overhead to products and
consequently results in better price decisions.
– ABC uses the data collected to improve
product design.
– ABC provides management with the
information about the costs associated with
specific activities, resulting in better analysis
and decisions.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 100 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Benefits of ABC Systems
– ABC systems are more costly and complex.
– But proponents argue two important benefits:
• More accurate cost data result in better product
mix and pricing decisions
• More detailed cost data improve management’s
ability to control and manage total costs.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 101 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Improved Cost Management
– ABC measures the results of managerial
actions on overall profitability.
– ABC measures both the amount spent to
acquire resources and the amount spent to
consume them.
– ABC measures unused capacity:
• Cost of activity capability = Cost of activity used +
Cost of unused capacity
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 102 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• EXAMPLE: A publishing company has five
employees who operate printing presses.
• The employees each have annual salaries of
$25,000 for a total salary cost of $125,000.
• Each employee should be able to print about 10,000
books per year.
• The total capacity, therefore is 50,000 books.
• The salary cost per book would be $125,000 /
50,000 books = $2.50 per book.
• During the most recent year, the presses produced
47,000 books.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 103 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• EXAMPLE: A publishing company has five
employees who operate printing presses.
• The employees• The
eachcosthave
of theannual
activity capability
salaries isofthe total
booksalary
$25,000 for a total capacity for the
cost year of 50,000 books times
of $125,000.
the salary cost per book of $2.50.
• Each employee should
• 50,000 be xable
books $2.50to= print about 10,000
$125,000.
books per year.
• The total capacity, therefore is 50,000 books.
• The salary cost per book would be $125,000 /
50,000 books = $2.50 per book.
• During the most recent year, the presses produced
47,000 books.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 104 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• EXAMPLE: A publishing company has five
employees who operate printing presses.
• The employees each have annual salaries of
$25,000 for a total salary cost of $125,000.
• The cost of the activity used is the number of
• Each employeebooks
should be able
actually to print
produced about
times 10,000
the salary cost
books per year.per book of $2.50.
• The total capacity,
• 47,000 books x $2.50
therefore = $117,500.
is 50,000 books.
• The salary cost per book would be $125,000 /
50,000 books = $2.50 per book.
• During the most recent year, the presses produced
47,000 books.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 105 of 122
• The unused
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
capacity is the difference between
the activity capability ($125,000) and the cost of
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD
the activity used ($117,500). COSTS
• $125,000 - $117,500 = $7,500 unused capacity.
• EXAMPLE: A • publishing company
Alternately, unused has can
capacity fivebe calculated
employees whoasoperate printing
the cost per presses.
book of $2.50 times the difference
• The employeesbetween the books
each have that salaries
annual could be produced
of and
the books that were actually produced.
$25,000 for a total salary cost of $125,000.
• $2.50 x (50,000 possible books – 47,000 actual
• Each employeebooks)
should be able
= $7,500 to print
unused about 10,000
capacity.
books per year.
• The total capacity, therefore is 50,000 books.
• The salary cost per book would be $125,000 /
50,000 books = $2.50 per book.
• During the most recent year, the presses produced
47,000 books.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 106 of 122
CRITICISM 1: INAPPROPRIATE
ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS
• Management may be able to improve
profitability by:
- Applying the unused capacity to other
revenue-generating activities; or
- Eliminating the unused capacity.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 107 of 122
PRODUCTION CYCLE INFORMATION
NEEDS
• Two major criticisms have been directed at
traditional cost accounting systems:
– Overhead costs are inappropriately allocated
to products
– Reports do not accurately reflect effects of
factory automation
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 108 of 122
CRITICISM 2: REPORTS DO NOT ACCURATELY
REFLECT EFFECTS OF AUTOMATION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 110 of 122
CRITICISM 2: REPORTS DO NOT ACCURATELY
REFLECT EFFECTS OF AUTOMATION
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 111 of 122
THROUGHPUT: A MEASURE OF
PRODUCTION EFFECTIVENESS
• Throughput = Productive Capacity x
Productive Processing Time x Yield
– Productive Capacity = Total Units
Produced / Processing Time
• Can be improved by:
– Improving machine or labor efficiency.
– Improving factory layout.
– Simplifying product design specifications.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 112 of 122
THROUGHPUT: A MEASURE OF
PRODUCTION EFFECTIVENESS
• Throughput = Productive Capacity x
Productive Processing Time x Yield
– Productive Capacity = Total Units Produced /
Processing Time
– Productive Processing Time = Processing
Time / Total Time
• The opposite of downtime.
• Can be improved by:
– Better maintenance to reduce machine downtime.
– Better scheduling of deliveries to reduce wait time.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 113 of 122
THROUGHPUT: A MEASURE OF
PRODUCTION EFFECTIVENESS
• Throughput = Productive Capacity x
Productive Processing Time x Yield
– Productive Capacity = Total Units Produced /
Processing Time
– Productive Processing Time = Processing
Time / Total Time
– Yield = Good Units / Total Units
• Can be improved by:
– Using better raw materials
– Improving worker skills
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 114 of 122
THROUGHPUT: A MEASURE OF
PRODUCTION EFFECTIVENESS
• Throughput = Productive Capacity x Productive
Processing Time x Yield
– Productive Capacity = Total Units Produced / Processing Time
– Productive Processing Time = Processing Time / Total Time
– Yield = Good Units / Total Units
• EXAMPLE: Manster Co. produced 1,000 bottles of Zithmowash
in a 10-hour period. During this period there was a total of 1
hour of machine downtime and waiting time for materials. One
hundred of the bottles were defective.
– PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY = 1,000 bottles / 9 productive hours =
111.11 bottles / hour.
– PRODUCTIVE PROCESSING TIME = 9 productive hours / 10 total
hours = .90.
– YIELD = 900 good units / 1,000 total units = .90
– THROUGHPUT = 111.11 x .90 x .90 = 90.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 115 of 122
QUALITY CONTROL
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 116 of 122
QUALITY CONTROL
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 117 of 122
QUALITY CONTROL
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 118 of 122
QUALITY CONTROL
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 119 of 122
QUALITY CONTROL
• Information About Quality Control
–Quality control costs can be divided
into four categories:
• Prevention costs
• Inspection costs
• Internal failure costs
• External failure costs
– The objective of quality control is to
minimize the sum of these four costs.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 120 of 122
SUMMARY
• You’ve learned about the basic business
activities and data processing operations that
are performed in the production cycle, including:
– Product design
– Production planning and scheduling
– Production operations
– Cost accounting
• You’ve learned how IT can improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of these processes.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 121 of 122
SUMMARY
• You’ve learned about decisions that need to be
made in the production cycle and the information
required to make these decisions.
• You’ve also learned about the major threats that
present themselves in the production cycle and
the controls that can mitigate those threats.
• Finally, you’ve learned how the company’s cost
accounting system can help in achieving the
entity’s objectives.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 10/e Romney/Steinbart 122 of 122