Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Overview
Reward Systems
Legal Issues
Reward Systems: Overview
Traditional and Contingent
Pay (CP) Plans
• Reasons for Introducing CP
Plans
• Possible Problems Associated
with CP
• Selecting a CP Plan
Putting Pay in Context
Pay Structures
Traditional Pay
Salary and salary increases
are based on
• Position
• Seniority
Contingent Pay (CP)
Salary and salary increases
are based on
• Job performance
• Piece rate
• Sales commissions
• Group incentives
Involvement
organizations
• Profit sharing
• Skill-based pay
B. CP Plans to enhance Strategic
Directions:(1)
Employee development
• Skill-based pay
Customer service
• Competency-based pay
• Gainsharing
Overall profit
• Executive pay
• Profit or stock sharing
B. CP Plans to enhance Strategic
Directions:(2)
Productivity
• Individual • Group
Piece rate Gainsharing
Sales commissions Group
incentives
Teamwork
• Team sales commissions
• Gainsharing
• Competency based pay
Putting Pay in Context
A reward increases the chance
that
Specific behaviors and results will be
repeated, or
Employee will engage in new
behavior and produce better results
Rewards can include:
Pay Trust &
Recognition Respect
• Public Challenge
• Private Responsibility
Status Freedom
Time Relationships
How to Make Rewards Work
Define and measure
performance first and then
allocate rewards
Only use rewards that are
available
Make sure all employees are
eligible
Rewards should be both
• Financial
• Non-financial
(continued)
How to Make Rewards Work
(continued)
Rewards should be:
• Visible
• Contingent
• Timely
• Reversible
Pay Structures
Job Evaluation
Broad-banding
Pay Structures
An organization’s pay structure
Classifies jobs
Into categories
Based on their relative
worth
Is designed by job evaluation
methods
Job Evaluation
Method of data collection
• Determine the worth of various
jobs
• Create a pay structure
Consideration of
• KSAs required for each job
• Value of job for organization
• How much other organizations
pay
Types of job evaluation methods:
Ranking
Classification
Point
Job evaluation methods: Ranking
Create job descriptions
Compare job descriptions
Rank jobs
Advantages of using Ranking method
Requires little time
Minimal effort needed for
administration
Disadvantages of using Ranking
method
Criteria for ranking may not
be clear:
Distances between each rank
may not be equal
Job evaluation methods:
Classification
A series of classes or grades
are created
Each job is placed within a job
class
Advantages of using Classification
method
Jobs can be quickly slotted into
structure
Employees accept method because
it seems valid
Disadvantages of using Classification
method
Requires extensive time and
effort for administration
Differences between
classification levels may not be
equal
Job evaluation methods: Point
method
Identify compensable factors (job
characteristics)
Scale factors (e.g. on a scale of 1
– 5)
Assign a weight to each factor so
the sum of the weights for all
factors = 100%
Advantages of using Point method
Establish worth of each job
relative to all other jobs within
organization
Comprehensive measurement
of relative worth of each job in
organization
Easy to rank jobs when total
points are known for each job
Disadvantages of using Point method
Requires extensive
administrative
• Time
• Effort
Does job evaluation method
matter?
• Fairness
• Evaluators
Impartial
Objective
Compensation surveys
Information on
• Base pay
• All other types of
compensation
Conducted in-house or by
consultants, such as:
www.salary.com or
www.haypaynet.com
Broad-banding
Most commonly used pay
structure
Pay structure collapses job
classes into fewer (≤ 5)
categories
Advantages of Broad-banding
Provides flexibility in rewarding
people
Reflects changes in organization
structure
Provides better base for
rewarding growth in competence
Gives more responsibility for pay
decisions to managers
Provides better basis for
rewarding career progression
Reward Systems: Summary
Traditional and Contingent
Pay (CP) Plans
• Reasons for Introducing CP
Plans
• Possible Problems Associated
with CP
• Selecting a CP Plan
Putting Pay in Context
Pay Structures
Legal Issues: Overview
Performance Management and
the Law
Some Legal Principles Affecting
PM
Laws Affecting PM
Performance Management and the Law
Performance management
systems are legally sound, if
they are fair:
• Procedures are standardized
• Same procedures are used with
all employees
Some Legal Principles Affecting PM:
Overview
Employment-at-will
Negligence
Defamation
Misrepresentation
Adverse Impact
Illegal Discrimination
Employment-at-will
Employment relationship can
be ended at any time by
• Employer
• Employee
Exceptions
• Implied contract
• Possible violation of legal rights
Negligence
If organization documents
describe a system
and
It is Not implemented as
described,
Direct evidence of
discrimination, or
Evidence regarding the
following:
• Membership in protected class
• Adverse employment decision
• Performance level deserved
reward/different treatment
• How others were treated (not
in protected class)
Employer response to claim of illegal
discrimination
Legitimate and non-discriminatory
reason for action
Related to performance
Religion
National Origin
Age
Disability status
Sexual orientation
Laws in the United Kingdom:
Equal Pay Act of 1970
Race Relations Act of 1976
Sex Discrimination Act of 1975
Disability Discrimination Act of 1995
Employment Equality (Sexual
Orientation) Regulations 2003
Employment Equality (Religion or
Belief) Regulations 2003
Laws in the United States of America