Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
by:
Honorita B. Bayudan
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
• It promotes and supports the Philippine Commitment to the UN
Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC) through provision of
health, education and other services as basic rights of children.
• The program was patterned after the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT)
programs in Latin American countries such as Mexico, Columbia and
Brazil which have been proven successful as a poverty reduction and
social development measure.
PROGRAM GOALS
• Social Assistance – to provide cash assistance to the poor to alleviate
their needs (short term).
B. Education
• Children 6 to 14 enrolled in
elementary and high school
with 85% class
attendance/month
C. Parenting Education
Education
• Philpost – 170,598 HH
9
Program Cycle
4 5
3 Family Registry
Selection of Community
Assembly Preparation
Households (Final list of enrolled
(Enumeration, PMT, & (Registration and
4Ps beneficiaries with
Eligibility Check) Validation of
LBP enrollment)
Households)
2 6
Supply-Side 1st Release
Assessment
(Availability of health &
education facilities &
service providers)
7
8 Verification of
1 2 Succeeding
nd
Compliance with
Selection of Releases Conditions
Provinces /
Municipalities
(SAE) Community Assemblies
Updates/Grievance and Complaints
NHTSPR Overview
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
• NHTSPR was established after the 4Ps (CCT) proved the targeting system was a more effective
approach in determining and ensuring poor households enjoy the benefits;
• The NHTSPR Project Management Offices (N/RPMOs) were established last March 2009
composed of a mix of regular and contracted personnel of the DSWD to implement the nationwide
assessment. The PMOs hired and trained field staff consisting of enumerators, encoders, area
supervisors, area coordinators, regional field supervisors, and regional IT officers.
• Target number of households to cover is 4.7M poor households out of 1,492 municipalities and 137
cities nationwide;
• Information Technology (IT) systems such as Encoding Application (with validation routines), Proxy
Means Test module, and Duplicity Checker along with hardware equipments (such as servers,
internet connectivity and collocation, laptops, storage facility, etc.) were simultaneously developed,
tested and deployed during the enumeration phase;
• Executive Order 867 series of 2010, “Providing for the Adoption of the National Household
Targeting System for Poverty Reduction as the Mechanism for Identifying Poor Households
who shall be Recipients of Social Protection Programs Nationwide”
The Household Targeting System
Feature of the Household Assessment
DSWD’s Pantawid Pamilya, Social Pension, and Rice Subsidy for Farmer’s
and Fisherfolk’s
Philippine Health Insurance’s Social Indigent Sponsorship Program
Department of Energy on Electrification Project
NAPC on Waterless Communities Project
Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process on Internal
Displacement Project
International Labor Organization on Child Labor
World Vision
All Congressmen
Five (5) Provincial Governor s
Selection of Household Beneficiaries through
the Household Targeting System –NHTS NPMO
Table A. Geographic
Coverage
LEVEL TOTAL COVERAGE % OF COVERAGE
/1
NATIONWIDE
Region 17 17 100.00%
Province 80 79 98.75%
City 138 138 100.00%
Municipality 1,496 1,261 84.29%
Barangay 42,026 32,639 77.66%
Visayas
Mindanao 689,859
1,295,492 (22.88%)
(42.96%)
Luzon
1,030,320
(34.17%)
20
21
Increase/
STATISTICS/ REPORT SET 1 SET 2 SET 3 SET 4 SET 5 TOTAL
(Decrease)/2
HOUSEHOLD BENEFICIARIES 321,624 273,117 405,902 1,289,457 725,571 3,015,671 (342)
GRANTEES 321,624 273,117 405,902 1,289,457 725,571 3,015,671 (342)
Male 39,025 20,913 26,179 95,879 59,942 241,938 1,906
Female 282,599 252,204 379,723 1,193,578 665,629 2,773,733 (2,248)
CHILDREN 0-14 YEARS OLD 753,353 648,208 1,050,308 3,226,238 1,867,508 7,545,615 (3,728)
Male 387,372 333,854 542,566 1,665,142 968,150 3,897,084 (2,215)
Female 365,981 314,354 507,742 1,561,096 899,358 3,648,531 (1,513)
CHILDREN 0-2 YEARS OLD 254 1,915 30,559 115,856 94,894 243,478 (5,309)
Male 122 952 15,789 60,106 49,376 126,345 (2,849)
Female 132 963 14,770 55,750 45,518 117,133 (2,460)
CHILDREN 3-5 YEARS OLD 145,710 155,286 242,317 755,064 440,406 1,738,783 (2,190)
Male 75,249 80,323 125,864 390,336 229,100 900,872 (1,088)
Female 70,461 74,963 116,453 364,728 211,306 837,911 (1,102)
CHILDREN 6-14 YEARS OLD 607,389 491,007 777,432 2,355,318 1,332,208 5,563,354 3,771
Male 312,001 252,579 400,913 1,214,700 689,674 2,869,867 1,722
Female 295,388 238,428 376,519 1,140,618 642,534 2,693,487 2,049
CHILDREN 15-17 YEARS OLD 168,881 135,738 207,764 624,577 339,292 1,476,252 1,888
Male 87,440 69,701 106,633 322,370 176,187 762,331 1,038
Female 81,441 66,037 101,131 302,207 163,105 713,921 850
IP Beneficiaries 39,623 89,247 82,184 229,997 104,000 545,051 (1)
Households with PWD Members * 13,960 21,692 66,359 44,566 146,577 (20)
Hearing * 1,291 1,996 5,962 3,780 13,029 (2)
Mental * 1,287 1,753 5,789 3,874 12,703 (1)
Multiple Disabilities * 2,267 3,572 10,004 6,819 22,662 (2)
Orthopedic * 1,984 2,907 9,629 6,620 21,140 (2)
Speech * 1,563 2,129 7,198 4,430 15,320 (3)
Visual * 2,252 3,506 11,397 7,863 25,018 (5)
Other type * 3,316 5,829 16,380 11,180 36,705 (5)
Households with Solo Parents * 16,750 28,966 85,933 47,048 178,697 (60)
Households with Farmers and/or 233,036 211,038 264,873 738,744 330,257 1,777,948 (256)
Fisherfolks
*variable not included in HAF for Set 1
/1
Source: National Statisitical Coordination Board
/2
A decrease is attributed to the 361 delisted households from 17-23 May 2012 of which
309(85.60%) were delisted after voluntarily waived from the program. Meanwhile, there were
12 reactivated households and 7 late registered households, which resulted to the difference
of 342 households.
22
Convergence and Commitments with Partners
• Partnership with CSOs - As of March 2012, the Department has engaged with
311 CSOs, of which 304 are local partners with 7 national networks thru a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) in monitoring the transparency of program implementation under the
framework Bantay, Gabay, Tulay, and Kaagapay. Some of the CSO’s with MOA with DSWD
are I Serve QC, Sinag PPVR QC, CO Multidiversity in NCR and Rizal,Urban Poor Alliance,
Negrense Volunteers for cchange, MAGNETO, Change Politics Movement
23
4Ps Pilot Spot Check – SWS STUDY
AREAS COVERED - Municipalities of Palapag, Mondragon, and
Pambujan in Northern Samar in February-March 2010 (760 hh
beneficiaries)
On average, each pregnant woman received 4.7 visits
(antenatal care services) during the duration of the pregnancy
Of 611 respondents, 79% (482) attended ante-natal care
services at least 3 times during the duration of the pregnancy;
82% (564 of 689) of children under-five years old attend
growth monitoring and health checkups in health centers in
accordance to DOH protocols
62% (101 of 164) of the children 1-2 years old received full
immunization, and 84% (137 of 164) had received at least one
immunization
All 6-14 years old (1,018) received deworming pills at least once
while 32% received two doses during the last school year
6-11 year-olds: 96% (422 of 440) attend more than 85% of the
school days in the last 3 months
12-14 year-olds: 86% (77 of 90) attend more that 85% of the
school days in the last 3 months
Key Findings of IPC -Ateneo de Manila
• Generally observed improvements in school attendance and use of
health services (Immunization, nutrition, illness management, and
maternal health services
26
• Explore other modalities of payments in very isolated
Pantawid Pamilya areas
• Increase involvement of key stakeholders such as PSWDO,
SWDOs, NAC, PAC, MAC members
• Implement exit and graduation schemes and plans for Set 1
and 2 beneficiaries through Case Management System
using Social Welfare Indicators as a tool.
• Accessing and augmentation of support services by the
LGUs in preparation for and as part of the exit
plan/graduation scheme for beneficiaries.
27
There is a need to strategically pool together
the expertise and resources of the Department
to be more efficient in the implementation of
projects and programs for poverty reduction.
Common understanding (what and how)
Common commitment (institutional support)
Common resolve (convergent action)
Objectives are :
Maximize resources by reducing duplication of Efforts and
enhancing efficiency
Enhance local skills, knowledge, and collaborative action between
stakeholders for sustainability . Enhance local skills, knowledge, and
collaborative action between stakeholders for sustainability
28
GEOGRAPHIC CONVERGENCE
KALAHI-CIDSS
48
provinces
48 provinces 46 provinces
46
provinces
SEA-K 78
4Ps
78 79
provinces* provinces provinces*
29
* Excluding cities, with Metro Manila counted as one province.
Convergence of Strategies
• Inclusion
• Accountability
Poor CDD
Transformative • Building Social
Communities Kalahi-CIDSS
Capital
Economically
•Entrepreneurship Active Poor
Livelihood
•Wealth creation
Promotive SEA-K
• Prevention
• Protection CCT
Poorest
Protective 4Ps
• Investing in human
capital
30
Convergence of Outcomes
Improved
delivery of
Kalahi-
Services to the
poorest
CIDSS Reduced
Poverty
Inclusion Improved
and Human and
Participation Social Capital
SEA-K 31
Support to the Convergence Efforts
• BANTAY
Projects & activities on anti-corruption
• GABAY
A mechanism in extending technical assistance
• TULAY
Refers to facilitating action, feedback and
monitoring
• KAAGAPAY
Projects and activities on anti-poverty
32