Labour standards are those that are applied to the way workers are treated. The term covers a wide range of things: from use of child labour and forced labour, to the right to organize trade unions and to strike, minimum wages, health and safety conditions, and working hours. The interaction of labor standards and international trade has become a key issue in the relations between the advanced industrialized and developing countries in the past decade. Although existing codified labor standards vary from country to country, depending on the stage of development, per capita income, political, social, and cultural conditions and institutions, efforts have been made to identify and achieve consensus on a group of so- called core labor standards that ideally should apply universally. Introduction One of the important social issues in the developed countries in respect of business with the developing countries pertains to ill treatment of labor and children. Child labor used in the manufacture of exports from the developing countries is widely criticized by people in the developed countries. There is protest against this in the developing countries too. For example, it is alleged that child labor is used by the carpet industry in India and some other countries and social activist in the developed nations demand ban on the import of goods embodying child labor. Similar issue is the sweat labor. The argument here is that goods are manufactured by labor working in inhuman/unhealthy working conditions not getting fair wages should be banned or boycotted. Creating important developing country, like garments, are alleged to be suffering from such problem. Contd… Another important issue is trade union rights. Absence of trade union rights in some countries provides them a cost advantage, Should the products of such countries be permitted in other countries? It may be noted that many multinationals are taking advantage of the absence of trade union rights in some countries. According to an ILO Report, it is a regrettable feature of many export processing zones that both male and female workers are trapped in low wage and low skilled jobs and labor relations and human resource development remain two of the most problematic aspects of zone function. Contd… The frequent absence of minimal standards and poor labor management relations have predictable outcomes, such as high labor turnover, absenteeism, stress and fatigue, low rates of productivity, excessive wastage of materials and labor unrest which are still too common.
While some of the criticisms are valid, it is also a fact that
the developed country firms which are adversely affected by the cheap, blow up the issues to serve their vested interests. Acc to WTO According to the WTO the debate on the interaction between trade and labor standards is in many ways similar to the debate on trade and environmental standards. A concern expressed in some industrial countries is that excessively low standards in certain countries will impose downward pressure on standards, or give the low standard countries an unwarranted competitive advantage. Acc to WTO Developing countries, on the other hand, fear that this argument may be used as a surrogate form of protection.
As with environmental standards, the WHO was not
designed to set labor standards. This was made clear in the Singapore Ministerial Declaration of December 1996, which also acknowledged the competence of the International Labor Organization (ILO) in the matter of labor standards. Acc to WTO The Singapore Ministerial Declaration concluded that: Members are committed to the observance of internationally recognized core labor standards. These standards should be addressed in the ILO, whose work the Members support. Standards are promoted by growth and development, fostered through tarred liberalization. Members reject the use of labor standards for protectionist purposes and agree that the comparative advantage of countries must in no way be put into question. Members of the ILO recently agreed on a ‘Declaration of fundamental Principle and rights at work’, in which ILO Members agreed to increase the scrutiny of adherence to core labor rights and reiterated the commitment in the Singapore Declaration not to use labor standards for protectionist purposes. The WTO points out that the debate on labor standards distinguish between so called basic labor rights and less commonly accepted standards. Basic labor rights are part of the ILO Conventions in human rights and labor standards and include the prohibition of forced labor, the freedom of association, the right to organize and bargain collectively, the elimination of child labor exploitation and the non-discrimination in employment. Other less common accepted standard include minimum ages, limits on the hours worked and occupational safety and health standards. Environmental Issues Introduction Environmental issues have been engaging increasing discussion in the international business horizon. As in the case of some other social issues in the fore, the environmental issues raised are mostly which disadvantage the developing countries, ignoring or relegating to the background several serious which hold the developed nations or firms from such nations guilty. Some countries prohibit the import of goods which cause ecological damage. For example, the US has banned the import of shrimp harvested without turtle excluder devise because of its concern for the endangered sea turtles. Countries like India are affected by it. Developing countries are affected by the relocation of polluting industries from the developed it the developing ones. Similarly, several products which are banned in the developed nations are marketed in the under developed world. The dumping of nuclear and hazardous wastes in developing countries and the shifting of polluting industries to the developing countries impose heavy social costs on them.
The exploitation of the natural resources of the
developing countries to satisfy the global demand also often causes ecological problems. When the multinationals employ in the developing nations polluting technologies which are not allowed in the developed countries or do not care for the ecology as much as they do in the developed nations, it is essentially a question of ethics. Another serious problem is that developed nations some times raise environmental issues as a trade barrier or a coercive measure rather than for genuine reasons. Acc to WTO The debate has intensified in recent years on the links between trade and the environment, and the role the WTO should play in promoting environmental friendly trade. A central concern of those who have raised the profile of this issue in the WTO is that there are circumstances where trade and the pursuit of trade liberalization may have harmful environmental effects. There main arguments are forwarded as to how this might occur. First, trade can have adverse consequences on the environment when property rights in environmental resources are ill defined or prices do not reflect scarcity .This situation results in production or consumption ‘externalities’ and can lead to the abuse of scarce environmental resources and degradation, which is exacerbated through trade. Some of the pollution can be purely local, such as a very noisy factory. Other pollution can have global repercussions, for example, the excessive emission of greenhouse gases, the destruction of rainforests, and so on. Critics argue that trade liberalization which encourage trade in products creating global pollution is undesirable. The second argument linking trade and the environment is related to the first one. If some countries have low environmental standards, industry is likely to shift production of environment-intensive or highly polluting products so called pollution havens. Trade liberalization can make the shift of ‘smoke stack’ industries across borders to pollution havens even more attractive. If these industries then create pollution with global adverse effects, trade liberalization, indirectly, promote environmental degradation. Worse trade induced competitive pressure may force countries to lower their environmental standards. The argument in other words, is that trade liberalization leads to a race to the bottom in environmental standards. The third concern about environmental issues is the role of trade relating to more social preferences. Some practices may simply be unacceptable for certain people or societies, so they oppose trade in products which encourage such practice. These can include killing dolphins in the process of catching tuna, using leg hold traps for catching animals for their furs, or the use of polluting production methods which have only local effects. To summarize On the other hand, it has also been pointed out that trade liberalization may improve the quality of the environment rather than promote degradation. First, trade stimulates economic growth and growing prosperity is one of the key factors in societies demand for a cleaner environment. Growth also provides the resources to deal with environmental problems at hand – resource which poor countries often do not have. Second, trade and growth can encourage the development and dissemination of environmental friendly production techniques as the demand for cleaner products grows and trade increases the size of markets. International companies may also contribute to a cleaner environment by using the most modern and environmentally clean technology in all their operations.