Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Production scheduling: “We need faster response. “We need realistic customer
Lead times are too long.” commitments that don’t
change like the wind direction
Physical distribution: “Why don’t we ever have “We can’t afford to keep huge
the right merchandise inventories.”
in inventory?”
Figure 16.3
The conflict Process
The Conflict Process:
Stage I: Potential Opposition or
Incompatibility
1. Communication:
Semantic difficulties, misunderstandings,
and “noise”
2. Structure:
Size and specialization of jobs
Jurisdictional clarity/ambiguity
Member/goal incompatibility
Leadership styles (close or participative)
Reward systems (win-lose)
Dependence/interdependence of groups
3. Personal Variables:
Differing individual value systems
Personality types
Stage II: Cognition and Personalization
Perceived Conflict
Awareness by one or
Felt Conflict
more parties of the Emotional involvement in
existence of conditions a conflict creating
that create anxiety, tenseness,
opportunities for frustration, or hostility.
conflict to arise.
Conflict Definition
Cooperativeness:
• Attempting to satisfy the other party’s
concerns.
Assertiveness:
• Attempting to satisfy one’s own concerns.
Dimensions of Conflict-Handling
Intentions:
How can conflict be
managed successfully?
Direct conflict management approaches are
based on the relative emphasis that a person
places on assertiveness and
cooperativeness.
Assertiveness:
Attempting to satisfy one’s own
concerns.
Unassertive versus assertive.
Cooperativeness:
Attempting to satisfy the other party’s
concern.
Uncooperative versus cooperative.
Stage III: Intentions (cont’d)
1. Competing
A desire to satisfy one’s interests, regardless
of the impact on the other party to the
conflict.
Competition and authoritative command:
Assertive and uncooperative.
Working against the wishes of the other party.
Fighting to dominate in win/lose competition.
Forcing things to a favorable conclusion through the exercise of
authority.
2. Collaborating
A situation in which the parties to a conflict
each desire to satisfy fully the concerns of all
parties.
Collaboration and problem solving:
Assertive and cooperative.
Seeking the satisfaction of everyone’s concerns by working
through differences.
Finding and solving problems so everyone gains as a result.
3. Avoiding
The desire to withdraw from or suppress a
conflict.
Avoidance:
Unassertive and uncooperative.
Downplaying disagreement.
Failing to participate in the situation and/or staying neutral at all
costs.
Stage III: Intentions (cont’d)
4. Accommodating:
The willingness of one party in a conflict to place
the opponent’s interests above his or her own.
Accommodation or smoothing:
Unassertive and cooperative.
Letting the other’s wishes rule.
Smoothing over differences to maintain superficial harmony.
5. Compromising:
A situation in which each party to a conflict is
willing to give up something.
Compromise:
Moderate assertiveness and moderate cooperativeness.
Working toward partial satisfaction of everyone’s concerns.
Seeking acceptable rather than optimal solutions so that no one totally
wins or loses.
Stage IV: Behavior
Conflict Management:
The use of resolution and stimulation
techniques to achieve the desired level
of conflict.
Stage V: Outcomes
Functional Outcomes from Conflict:
Increased group performance
Improved quality of decisions
Stimulation of creativity and innovation
Encouragement of interest and curiosity
Provision of a medium for problem-solving
Creation of an environment for self-evaluation
and change
Creating Functional Conflict:
Reward dissent and punish conflict avoiders.
Stage V: Outcomes
Conflict resolution:
A situation in which the underlying reasons
for a given destructive conflict are
eliminated.
Effective resolution begins with a diagnosis of
the stage to which conflict has developed
and recognition of the cause(s) of the
conflict.
Conflict Management Strategies:
• Functional Conflict Resolution
– Handling conflict by compromise or
collaboration between parties.
• Compromise: each party is concerned
about their goal accomplishment and is
willing to engage in give-and-take
exchange to reach a reasonable solution.
• Collaboration: parties try to handle the
conflict without making concessions by
coming up with a new way to resolve their
differences that leaves them both better off.
– Managers also must address individual
sources of conflict.
Conflict Management Strategies (cont’d)
• Win-Lose
• Lose-Lose
• Compromise
• Win-Win
Win-Lose
• In Win – Lose, one party gets what he
or she wants, whereas the other
comes up short.
Reduced interdependence:
Used for adjusting level of interdependency
when work-flow conflicts exists.
Options:
Decoupling.
Buffering.
Linking pins.
Managing conflicts: