Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Scoping
Scoping
•Scoping :-is the procedure in the EIA process that establishes the
key environmental issues to be addressed in the compilation of the
EIR Report.
•Scoping refers to the early, open and interactive process of determining
the major issues and impacts that will be important in decision-making on
the proposal, and need to be addressed in an EIA.
•Scoping is possibly the most important step in an EIA. Scoping means the
scope or range of the EIA report.
•It undertakes the project’s effect on the air, water, soil, noise level, air quality
and physical impact.
Scoping
• It identifies issues and concerns, decides the assessment
methods, identifies affected parties and invites public
participation for agreement on debatable issues. In which
public participation involves interactions of all
stakeholders including project beneficiaries, local people,
private sectors, NGOs, scientists and other.
• It is on-going process and is likely to continue in the
planning and design phases of the project.
• Scoping is important because it is possible to bring
changes in the project in the early stages of the cycle of
the project and it ensures the study of all possible
important issues.
Scoping
In this stage there is an option for cancelling or
revising the project. After crossing this stage, there
is little opportunity for major changes to the
project.
Scoping is a stage, usually involving the public and
other interested parties, that identifies the key
environmental issues that should be addressed in
an EIA. This step provides one of the first
opportunities for members of the public to learn
about a proposed project and to voice their
opinions.
Key objectives of scoping
• Objective:-
The following are some of the main objectives of the scoping stage:-
Identify the key environmental issues to be included in the
assessment.
Identify the legal requirements and framework for the project
through its life cycle.
Identify the relevant component studies to establish the baseline
conditions for the area of the project.
Finalize the terms of references (TOR).
Methodology
•Methodology:-
The following methodology was used to fulfill the above –mentioned objectives:-
The decision was made by the Ministry of Environment (MoEnv) .
To conduct a scoping session for the purpose of the EIA in accordance with
MoEV/EIA regulations for the project.
A list of potential and relevant stakeholders was prepared by MoEV.
An invitation letter was issued by MoEnv.The letter included the data and place of
the scoping session .
The session was held in due time and place.
Scoping Session
• Scoping Session:-
• Invited stakeholders including organizations from the public and
private sectors in addition to NGOs attended this session.
• The session consisted of the following activities:-
A presentation about the project activities , facilities , and processes
was given by production manager and the EIA team leader.
The presentation was supported by process flow diagrams (PFD)
highlighting details of the project and the need for identifying
potential interactions between the project activities and the valued
Environmental components “VECs”.
Scoping Session
• The participants were then asked to review the legal requirements and the
proposed TORs and provide any necessary legal requirement and suggest TORs
changes or additions.
• The participants were provided with a special form to write down their concerns
about the project as a function of the following valued environmental
components and they were given the right amount of time needed to do so:-
Public health.
Water Resources.
Biodiversity.
Socio-Economic conditions.
occupational Health and safety .
archaeology.
Scoping Session
• All forms were collected from the participant by the MoEnv
representation
The ToR should commence with a brief description of the project. This should include a plan of the
area that will be affected either indirectly or directly.
The study should ensure that the consultants or practitioners focus on the major issues and the most
serious likely impacts identified during scoping e.g. air emission, waste water discharge etc. The
opportunities for enhancing any positive benefits from the project should also be highlighted. This
component of ToR is usually submitted to designated authority for scrutiny and approval.
The ToR should contain explicit references to which safeguard policies may be relevant and which
legal requirements should be applied.
TOR
The ToR should give an indication of the team considered necessary
for the study and a team leader identified. Depending on the scope of
the study this may be multi- disciplinary. However, as the team should
not be rigidly imposed on the consultant.
If international experts are doing the EIA, it is important to make
provision for local capacity building in the ToR. Apart from enabling in-
country expertise to be built up, this will promote more involvement
and understanding of the issues raised by the study. As most EIA
studies are of relatively short duration, this is probably best achieved
through the attachment of project proponent to the consultants
during the study or an insistence on the use of local staff personnel for
some of the tasks.
TOR
• The expected date of commencement and time limit should be given and
consultants program of work must be within the given time limit.
• The budget limit should be given in the ToR. The type of experts, and whether
foreign or local, and the duration of their inputs will usually be the deciding cost
factors although a large field survey or measurement program with laboratory
analysis could significantly increase costs. Any assistance to be provided by the
Client to reduce costs should be clearly stated in the ToR.
• Consultant payments proposal should be made and tied to specific milestones
e.g. the consultant will be paid 20% of their fee upon receipt of draft report by
client etc.
• Reporting requirements should be clearly stated and should comply with local
or international reporting guidelines. The format of EIS must be clear and the
number of copies in soft and hard must be stated.
• ToR should make provision for the consultants to improve the terms of
reference in order to improve the quality of EIA.
TOR
TOR
TOR
Impact Identification Methods
Impact Identification Methods
Evaluation methods:-
Checklists
Matr ices
Networks
Map overlays
Geographic informations systems (GIS)
Task-specific computer modeling
Expert systems
Mathematical models to predict the effect on ambient air quality,
noise, level predictions and groundwater pollution possibility.
What are Checklists?
• In developing a network diagram, the first step is to identify the first order changes in
environmental components.
• The secondary changes in other environmental components that will result from the first
order changes are then identified.
• In turn, third order charges resulting from secondary changes are identified. This process is
continued until the network diagram is completed to the practitioner’s satisfaction. The
network helps in exploring and understanding the underlying relationships between
environmental components that produce higher order changes that are often overlooked
by simpler approaches.
Overlay
• Overlay techniques were previously used in planning before
they were adopted in designing formal EIAs.
• Individual impacts such as the effects on soil, water,
settlements and noise are individually summarized and clearly
highlighted by mapping over the area using chloropleths
(shaded zones) to indicate the relative intensity of the impact.
• By this technique, the individual maps are transferred on to
transparencies which are then laid over one another to produce
a composite effect.
• Thus, the individual effects are summed up to show the total
impact of the project. Of course only a limited number of
impacts can be shown by this method. However, it is possible to
summarize a large
Overlay
• amount of information on each transparency. The physical
constraint on this method has been eased with the advent of
new modern computer technology and the Geographic
Information System (GIS).
• An overlay is based on a set of transparent maps, each of which represents the spatial
distribution of an environmental characteristic (for example, susceptibility to erosion).
Information for an array of variables is collected for standard geographical units within
the study area, and recorded on a series of maps, typically one for each variable. These
maps are overlaid to produce a composite
• The resulting composite maps characterize the area’s physical, social, ecological, land use
and other relevant characteristics, relative to the location of the proposed development.
• One way is to use before and after maps to assess visually the changes to the landscape.
• The other way is to combine mapping with an analysis of sensitive areas or ecological
carrying capacity.
• Their limitations relate to:
• 1) lack of causal explanation of impact pathways; and
• 2) lack of predictive capability with respect to population effects. However, some
sophisticated versions can make predictions about potential habitat loss.
Overlays
Baseline data collection
• The term “baseline” refers to the collection of background
information on the biophysical , social and economic settings
proposed project area. Normally , information is obtained from
secondary sources , or the acquisition of new information
through field samplings , interviews , surveys and consultations
with the public .
• The task of collecting baseline data starts right from the period
of project inception , however , a majority of this task may be
undertaken during scoping and actual EIA.
Baseline data collection
• Baseline data is collected for two main purposes