Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MET 1
What is happening?
Some wise sayings on the
subject
So Far….
• 1. General intro to subject, what’s happening (a peep through),
some wise sayings on subject.
– Assignments – 1) individual paper cuttings (2) some 14 topics
group project – to be presented regularly by 2 or 3 groups in
each class)
• 2. Bus ethical issues – (price, product, A&P, etc)
• 3. Trusteeship (p 66)
• 4. Dev. various approaches towards ethical behavior (p82)
• NOW
• 5. Bus Ethics and Stakeholders (p109)
• 6. Decision making (p123)
Arthashastra
• This is a story of
• A wealthy family (NRI in India now) staying on the 7th
floor of a posh Malabar Hill apartment, and
• The “coolie”, and
• The “Lift”, and
• The Fridge (luggage)
James Baldwin on Bus & Society
• TRUSTEESHIP
TRUSTEESHIP
• The Concept
• A Trust is normally created when a fund or asset is earmarked
for a specific purpose. A wealth person may set apart some
funds, and request a trusted individual or a corporation or a
bank to manage it, and make available the funds to
beneficiaries specified by him, either by name or class (my
children, or “those suffering from cancer” or students’
scholarship, or a NGO)
• Trustee entitled to charge a nominal fee for administering the
asset or funds, but cannot derive benefit from it.
• The Concept applied to business is a Gandhian concept.
• PTO for Gandhiji’s observations on this:
Trusteeship (Gandhian concept
as applied to business)
• Ownership is a costly and illusory concept to ensure
permanency and succession.
• It gives birth to attachment, exploitation, possessiveness, great
exploitation and revenge.
• All assets must be held in trust and used for the good of all
• Distribution of assets and the benefits of the operations be
equitable, not equal.
• The owner of wealth has the right to a honorable livelihood. The
rest is that of the community.
• Let’s see some quotes from HARIJAN Oct. 1952, Pyarelal
• (next page)
Trusteeship (Gandhian concept
as applied to business
• Quote from Harijan:
• “Trusteeship provides a means of transforming the present
capitalist order of society into an egalitarian one. It gives no
quarter to capitalism but gives the present owning class, a
chance of reforming itself. It is based on the faith that human
nature is never beyond redemption. It does not recognize any
right of private ownership of property, except so far as it may be
permitted by society for its own welfare. It does not exclude
legislative regulation of the ownership and use of wealth.
• “Thus, under State regulated ownership, an individual will not be
free to hold or use his wealth for selfish satisfaction or in
disregard of the interests of Society”
Trusteeship (Gandhian concept as
applied to business
• Further, he said: If one has come by a fair amount of wealth,
either by way of legacy or by means of trade and industry, he
must know that all that wealth does not belong to him. What
belongs to him is the right to an honorable livelihood”
• Gandhiji’s concept of T was founded on non-violence.
• He thought very idea of ownership was at the root of violence.
• People can come together only when the rise above Cof
Interests, and T is a way to bring people together.
• This follows the Vedic dictum of RENOUNCE (rights and
pleasures of self) and ENJOY (the pleasures of others).
• This is also the basis of all religious commands – to share
one’s strengths and assets with others”
Trusteeship (Gandhian concept as
applied to business)
• Mahabharata: The character of Vidura is embodiment of all that
is proper.
• His advice to Duyodhana (son of Dhritarashtra) – kingdomof Ayodhya..
Said
• Kingdom does not belong to the king. King has only duty and
responsibility of looking after the welfare of subjects.
• DEBATE ON THE SUBJECT
• 1995 – “PROPRIETY of top execs. Increasing their salaries and perks
many times over. John Kay and Aubrey Silberston persuaded the PM
to see placing some limits on the packages.
• “Corporate managers are not so much agents of shareholders, as
trustees of the Company”
• They asked for a Co. Law to impose duty on directors to
balance claims of investors, customers, suppliers and
employees.
DEBATE ON THE SUBJECT (Trusteeship)
contd.
• In summary, therefore,
• T IS A PHILSOPHY THAT NEEDS TO BE BELIEVED IN BY
THE PERSONS in command
• By individuals collectively being aware of this, and willing to
work and live side by side with all Stake Holders, concerned.
• Next Section
• M. Euel Wade Jr
Decisions are:
• Knowing What’s Right
• Doing What’s Right
• Managing Competing Rights
• Everything Counts
• Closing Thoughts
Knowing what is right
Use these guides …
• Laws
• Rules & Procedures
• Values
• Conscience
• Promises
• Heroes
We
WE BELIEVE
• 8 Behavioral strategies
• 1 Check BEFORE you act!
• 2 Master “The 3 R’s”!
• 3 Remember that little things…mean a lot!
• 4 Know what’s un-compromisable!
• 5 Say NO…with tact!
• 6 When in doubt, ASK!
• 7 Check yourself out!
• 8 “Walk the Talk!”
Check BEFORE you act!
A. Is it legal?
B. Does it comply with our rules and guidelines?
C. Is it in sync with our organizational values?
D. Will I be comfortable and guilt-free if I do it?
E. Does it match with our stated commitments and guarantees?
F. Would I do it to my family or friends?
G. Would I be perfectly okay with someone doing it to me?
H. Would the most ethical person I know do it?
Master “The 3 R’s”!
• RESPECT
• RESULTS
• RESPONSIBILITY
Common Rationalizations For Not
Doing What’s Right
“Everyone else does it”
“They’ll never miss it”
“Nobody will care”
“The boss does it”
“No one will ever know”
“I don’t have time to do it right”
“That’s close enough”
“Some rules were meant to be broken”
“It’s not my job”
3 Remember that “little things
mean a lot”!
• Examine your own ethical make-up
to see where you stand and where
you need to improve. Try looking
at…
#4 Know what’s
uncompromisable
While different organizations provide
different guidelines on operating
latitude, there are several universal
areas where zero tolerance for
violations is appropriate:
• Laws and Regulations
• Public and Employee Safety
• Truthfulness of record and statements
#5 Say NO…with Tact
Here’s How!
• State your objection and concern
without indictment.
• Propose an alternative action that you
feel is ethical.
• Ask for the person’s help and
agreement.
• Seek assistance from a higher authority
(if the person doesn’t agree).
#6 When in doubt, ASK!
• “Forgiveness is easier to get than
approval”
• But on Ethical Issues …
• “Approval is easier to get than
forgiveness”
#7 Check yourself out!
• Ethics Self-Assessment
#8 WALK THE TALK
“Giving what you expect to get from others is
called integrity.”
Managing Competing Rights…
Ethical Dilemmas
• Knowledge
• Information
• Skills
• Support
Provide “places to go”
“Make sure there are people within
your organization to whom
employees can turn to for guidance
and help with ethical issues-and for
reporting suspected ethics
violations.”
Keys To Success
• PETER DRUCKER
• MANAGEMENT IS NOT ALL BUSINESS.
MANAGEMENT EDUCATION MUST DEVELOP TO
TEACH AND EXEMPLIFY THE VALUES, THE
METHODS AND THE TOOLS FOR ALL
LEADERSHIP.
BUSINESS – Ethics & A VISION
FOR STAKEHOLDERS
• WHAT ARE THE BUS. CONSTITUENCIES
WHICH MAKES ETHICS SO DESIRABLE?
• Customers
• Colleagues employees
• Shareholders Suppliers-Service providers
• Business partners
• Society
BUSINESS – Ethics & A VISION
FOR STAKEHOLDERS
• Decision Making
Checklist for responsible
Decision Making
• Is something bothering you?
• Who are affected
• What ethical issues are involved
• Is It your responsibility?
• What are the compliances you shd. ensure?
• Whom should I seek for advice?
• Am I being true to myself?
• Is it consistent with my own personal values?
Decisions taken
What should be your reaction
• This refers to both your working and
professional life
• Decisions taken by you and has not produced
results as expected
• Decisions taken by you and has produced
results as expected and more than expected
• Decisions taken by others in your life (both
working and personal life) which helps you
• Similarly, which affects you adversely.
What would be your decision?(1)
Comparative study of
Value Systems
Comparative study of Value Systems
• JAPAN
• Dedicated to service. Quality is the Key. Work is worship (like
us) in practice!. KAIZEN – continuous, small improvements.
• Patriots – a natural macro vision, honest and dedicated – his
output help in nation building, growth & development of nation,
hence, personal obj. is second criteria.
• Emphasis on spiritualism: practice meditation, attend lectures
on spiritualism, belief in intuition, and sixth sense. Peaceful –
enhancing productivity
• Professional life kept away from personal life: Enter house
barefoot, external problems keep outside. We also do that.
Comparative study of Value Systems
• Bus. Ethics: Quality products – and no cheating, community
service. Profit yes, but not at the cost of quality.
• Team Spirit: As a provider of positive energy and harmony.
Team output better than individual output. Believe in joint
decision making. QC, etc.
• Holistic approach: Long term association with company
• Self management: Self-discipline and self-control – emp.
Expected to control anger, hared, selfishness, jealousy, greed,
etc. In face of challenges, expected to adapt or adjust
• Value system: courteous and gracious people, cannot express
one’s opinion openly or directly. “Honne” real opinion, and the
othr “tatemae” public opinion. Agreement with people around
important.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
Japan
• Gratitude shown
• Non-interruption – while on phone, etc.
• Informal relationship –w/o hierarchical structure.
• Long Term relationship: employer, employee, trade,
kaizen, respect to elders.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
America
• Materialistic – now slowly to spiritualism – realizing emptiness –
wish to enjoy the luxuries of life. Achievement oriented,
challenging goals, ambitious and hard working. U/stand
individual uniqueness, and depending on the drive,
management needs to motivate them in different manners.
• Relationship based on give and take: in work life, mutually
beneficial. Higher o/p higher return. So, work hard, give best
output and get rewarded. Believe in formal relationship in
professional life.
• Believe in non-interference: Not much inclined to family. Once
adult, individual decisions w/o bothering about parents.
• Equity and cooperation: While they encourage team spirit,
individual performance is rewarded.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
America
• Prefer Top-dn approach: Decisions at top communicated down.
• Interest to develop employee skills: Skill upgradation, yes, More
output, more profit. Less care on instilling values.
• No job security – Unlike Japan, if good retain him. Employees
just a cog in the machine.
• Loyal to the profession: Not to the organization. Leave if not
happy.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
CHINA
• Emphasize that people should be truthful, non violent, generous,
sincere, kind hearted, benevolent, courageous and selfless by
nature. They love the kith and kin.
• Jen & Yi : Jen – love, friendship, benevolence. Yi –
righteousness. Expect life to be full of harmony and peace.
• Wu Wei : Means w/o forcing, emphasized on accepting and
harmonizing with the flow.
• Thought counts: Man went on a long journey to visit friend with a
swan. Swan escaped, trying to catch it, he got hold of a feather
only. He explained to his friend what happened, but the friend
took the feather as a “priceless gift”. As the saying in chinese
goes, “the gift is nothing much, but it is the thought that counts”.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
CHINA
• Punctuality : Value this much. Confucius, great chinese
philosopher: “there Is a time to act and a time to remain inactive.
When one is inactive, although consciously he is not working,
the subconscious mind continues the process, and work would
be accomplished. Too much action makes the job monotonous,
destroys the creative energy”.
• Zen: Tranquil, focusing the mind to bring harmony with nature.
Zen philosophy was based on simplicity of thought and action.
To attain this state, monks needed to be self-disciplines, relaxed
nd focused. Free from ego and relate to the elements of nature.
• Tao: Law of integration and nature balance.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
CHINA
• Yin-Yang: symbol of harmonious balance. The polar opposites
define the duality required for all life to exist. Male-female;
flora/fauna, positive-negative; dark-light, wind-water. Without
one, the other cannot exist, the two forces cannot be separated.
Energy or Chi is the moment of yin-yang. Energy moves, flows,
encompasses everyone. Comes from the earth core and circles
the globe. Chi/energy can generate and destroy continents
through tectonic plates and land mass movement. Chi for the
environment nand our persona Chi are one and the same. We
should develop our sensitivity to use and direct the energy in
our bodies and environment.
Comparative study of Value Systems –
CHINA
• Gunaxi: or Relationship is an imp. Chinese business element.
Right gunaxi will make business successful, minimize risks,
frustrations and disappointments. Right Gunaxi with rlevant
authorities will determine the competitive standing of an orgn. In
the long run. Unlike West, chinese business would like to deal
with people whom they know and rust. On the surface it may
not seem so, in reality Western cos. Have to make themselves
kown to the chinese people before any business can take place.
Also between individuals at a personal level. Not before sales
takes place, but an ongoing process. Trustworthiness.
Greek – the Tragic Hero
• .. He is a man who is neither a paragon of virtue and justice nor
undergoes the change to misfortune through any real badness
or wickedness but because of some mistake.
• ..TRAGOIDIA – “SONG OF THE GOAT” depicts the downfall or
a noble hero or heroine.
• DIONYSUS was the Greek god of nature, wine, creativity,
intuition and imagination. His followers were a randy bunch of
goat-legged creatures called SATYRS. In a drunken state,
these creatures would sing songs that raised questions on
various cultural codes and notions of righteous and appropriate
social conduct. (the origin of the greek theare.)
Greek – the Tragic Hero
• Anthropologists say, the function of drama was to reflect the
subconscious and cosmic patterns by re-enacting the everyday
world
• It was to acknowledge inherent conflicts of civilization that
demanded but defied easy resolution.
• In INDIA
• Natyashastra (Brahmanas)
• Drama as an integral part of religious rites – e.g. NAVRATRI
(Rama Leela), Xmas – Nativity plays.
• Throughout the play one enacts a holy event. As years pass, the
drama remains the same, but those watching are growing up or
growing old. They discover different layers of meaning in the
same play, in the same character, in the same dialogue. (contd.)
Greek – the Tragic Hero & India
Plays
• With that consistent and repetitive
interaction with theater more light is
thrown on the meaning of life.
• The Goat’s song thus joins us in our
struggle to make sense of existence.
The Family and Values – lessons
from India
• The Ambani brothers
• The Raju brothers
• R Raju – built through skill, talent and dedication a great
company. There was a sense of purpose, dedication,
competency and leadership vision in him. People who had
business with Satyam even abroad paid glowing tributes to their
dedication to quality, reliability and integrity. No greater tribute
than a satisfied customer.
• Perhaps a reason at that time of India’s growth and economy.
• Why then such a lofty person turn to crime? Greed or low stake.
• Was it a family dispute? Based on ownership of LAND, etc.
• Or Was it that political nexus was essential to get what he felt
was his due? And not, from another angle, sharing it with family.
The Family and Values – lessons from
India & mythology
• Real Estate & Infrastructure – two sectors, that are only half-
liberalized and possibly needed upfront bribes, so needed to dip
into funds.
• It would have worked out, but no one anticipated such collosal
economic downturn.
• Or does it mean that if it was fully liberalized economy, this
would not have happened?
• Was it greed or HUBRIS? (arrogant pride), like DURYODHANA
– thought himself as master of universe and get away with
anything. In Raju there was an infallibility, Entire Hyd thought
of him that way.
• Or was he like Dhritarasha – weakness for his sons. Leave
them much more even crossing the line of DHARMA.
The Family and Values – lessons from
India & mythology
• Mahabharata challenges the old
• Sva dharma vs Sanadhana Dharma – teaches behaving
impartially with everyone.
• IS REGULATORY WAYS THE ANSWER? IS IT A
GOVERNANCE FAILURE. CAN IND. DIRECTORS’ BE
FAULTED?
• CAN MOST FOOL PROOF SYSTEM CAN STILL BE SIDE
STEPPED.
• SO WHY IMPROVE OR REFORM THE SYSTEM., OR BLAME
LIBERALIZATION? WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER?
The Family and Values – lessons from
India & mythology
• Is there a lesson from when Yudhishtra insisted on taking a
stray dog into heaven, he performed an act of dharma, showing
that goodness is one of the few things of genuine worth in the
world that might take away some of the familiar pain of being
alive and being human in our post-liberalization times.