Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Transient response
Chapter 4
Objectives
To find time response from transfer
function
To describe quantitatively the
transient response of a 1st and 2nd
order system
To determine response of a control
system using poles and zeros
Introduction
In Chapter 1, we learned that the total
response of a system, c(t) is given by
c t cforced t cnatural t
In order to qualitatively examine and
describe this output response, the poles and
zeros method is used.
Poles & zeros
The poles of a TF are the values of
the Laplace variable that cause the TF
to become infinite (denominator)
The zeros of a TF are the values of
the Laplace variable that cause the TF
to become zero (numerator)
Poles & zeros
Example : Given the TF of G(s), find
the poles and zeros
Solution :
G(s) = zero/pole
Pole at s=-5
Zero at s=-2
Poles & zeros
Zero (o), Pole (x)
Transfer function = Numerator
Denominator
= Zeros
Poles
Poles & zeros
Example : Given G(s), obtain the
pole-zero plot of the system
Zero (o)
Pole (x)
Poles & zeros
Exercise : Obtain and plot the poles
and zeros for the system given
First order system
First order system with no zeros
First order system
Performance specifications:
Time constant, t
1/a, time taken for response to rise to 63%
of its final value
Rise time, Tr
time taken for response to go from 10% to
90% of its final value
Settling time, Ts
time for response to reach and stay within
5% of final value
First order system
System response
Second order system
Second order system
Second order system
Exercise : Is this system
under/over/critically damped?
Second order system
Performance specifications
damping ratio
Peak time, Tp
Tp
n 1 2
Second order system
2nd order underdamped response
Second order system
Second-order response as a function
of damping ratio
Second order system
Second order system
Step responses of second-order
under-damped systems as poles
move:
K
T (s) 2
s 5s K
2 n 5
and
n K
Thus,
5
2 K
Block diagram: Analysis and
design
Can be calculated using the %OS
ln %OS / 100
2 ln 2 %OS / 100
= 0.591
We substitute the value and calculate K, we get
K=17.9
Higher order systems
Systems with >2 poles and zeros can
be approximated to 2nd order system
with 2 dominant poles
Higher order systems
Placement of third pole. Which most closely
resembles a 2nd order system?
Higher order systems
Case I : Non-dominant pole is near
dominant second-order pair (=)
Case II : Non-dominant pole is far from the
pair (>>)
Case III : Non-dominant pole is at infinity
(=)
a) T(s) = 16
s2 + 3s + 16
b) T(s) = 0.04
s2 + 0.02s + 0.04
c)
T(s) = 1.05 x 107
s2 + (1.6 x 103)s + (1.5 x 107)
Solution part (a)
ωn = 4
ζ = 0.375
Ts =4s
Tp = 0.8472 s
%OS = 28.06 %
Solution part (b)
ωn = 0.2
ζ = 0.05
Ts =400s
Tp = 15.73s
%OS = 85.45 %
Solution part (c)
ωn = 3240
ζ = 0.247
Ts =0.005 s
Tp = 0.001 s
%OS = 44.92 %