Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Cavan, S. (1977) Review of J.D. Douglas’s (1976) Investigative Social Review: Individual
• Seek to ensure that participants will be fully aware of what they are
being asked to do as part of the research process and that they are
aware that they are neither compelled to participate;
• Responsibilities to:
– Participants
– Sponsors of Research
– Community of Educational Researchers
– Educational Professionals, Policy Makers, & General
Public
Ethics procedures and codes of
professional conduct
• Faculty
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/fssl/current-staff/researchethics/
• SoE
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/education/research/networks/ethicnet
• Informed Consent/Assent
– PPT Information letter
• What they will do & why
• Risks/benefits
• Voluntary
• Right to withdraw w/o penalty
• What do with data (Data Protection Act 1998)
• Contact information of researcher(s)
Main Ethical Considerations (BPS)
• Honesty
– Necessary deception (Hawthorne effect)
– Needs of research well justified
• Respect for PPT time
Main Ethical Considerations (BPS)
• Data Protection
– Data Protection Act 1998
• Use for purpose collected
• Not excessive for purpose
• Not kept longer than necessary
• Kept in safe place, limited access
Main Ethical Considerations (BPS)
• Vulnerable Groups
• Data Ownership
• Authorship
With thanks to Prof Tim Bond & Wan Yee for the use of some slides in this presentation