Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2
FILTRATION
Filtration involves the removal of suspended
particles from the water by passing it through a
layer or bed of a porous granular material, such as
sand.
Filtration Spectrum
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE OPTICAL MICROSCOPE VISIBLE TO NAKED EYE
Angström
Molecular
weight
Sugars Viruses
Algae and protozoans
Dissolved salts
Bacteria
Pesticides
Colloids
Metal ions Sands
Humic acids
4
Membrane filtration Granular filtration
CLASSIFICATION OF FILTERS
Based on the filter media
Sand filters, e.g. natural silica sand
Anthracite filters, e.g. crushed anthracitic coal
Diatomaceous earth filters, e.g. diatomaceous earth
Metal fabric filters (microstrainers), e.g. stainless
steel fabric filter.
Based on the depth of filter media
Deep granular filters, e.g. sand, dual-media and
multi-media (combination of two or more media),
granular activated carbon
Precoat filters, e.g. diatomaceous earth, and
powdered activated carbon, filters
CLASSIFICATION OF FILTERS
Based on the rate of filtration, sand filters can
be further classified as
Gravity filters
Slow sand filters
rapid sand filters
high-rate sand filters
Pressure filters.
RATE OF FILTRATION
Rate of filtration (loading rate) is the flow rate
of water applied per unit area of the filter. It is the
velocity of the water approaching the face of the
filter:
Q
va
As
where va = face velocity, m/d = loading rate, m3/d.m2
Q = flow rate onto filter surface, m3/d
As = surface are of filter, m2
EXAMPLE
A city is to install rapid sand filters downstream of
the clarifiers. The design loading rate is selected to
be 160 m3/(m2 d). The design capacity of the water
works is 0.35 m3/s. The maximum surface per filter
is limited to 50 m2. Design the number and size of
filters and calculate the normal filtration rate.
SOLUTION
MECHANISM OF FILTRATION
The theory of filtration basically involves, transport mechanisms,
and attachment mechanisms.
The transport mechanism brings small particles from the bulk
solution to the surface of the media.
(a) gravitational settling,
(b) diffusion,
(c) interception and
(d) hydrodynamics.
These are affected by physical characteristics such as size of
the filter medium, filtration rate, fluid temperature, size and
density of suspended solids.
As the particles reach the surface of the filter media, an
attachment mechanism is required to retain it. This occurs due
to
(i) electrostatic interactions
(ii) chemical bridging or specific adsorption.
SLOW SAND FILTERS
In slow sand filters water is allowed at a slow rate through a
bed of sand, so that coarse suspended solids are retained on
or near the surface of the bed.
loading rate of 2.9 to 7.6 m3/d.m2
The raw water turbidity has be < 50 NTU.
The filtering action is a combination of straining, adsorption,
and biological flocculation.
Gelatinous slimes of bacterial growth called ‘schmutzdecke’
form on the surface and in the upper sand layer, consists of
bacteria, fungi, protozoa, rotifera and a range of aquatic
insect larvae.
The underlying sand provides the support medium for this
biological treatment layer.
CLEANING OF SLOW SAND FILTERS
Slow sand filters slowly lose their performance as the
Schmutzdecke grows and thereby reduces the rate of
flow through the filter. refurbishing
the top few millimetres of fine sand is very carefully scraped
off using mechanical plant and this exposes a new layer of
clean sand. Water is then decanted back into the filter and re-
circulated for a few hours to allow a new Schmutzedecke to
develop. The filter is then filled to full depth and brought back
into service.
wet harrowing, involves lowering the water level to just
above the Schmutzdecke, stirring the sand and thereby
suspending any solids held in that layer and then running the
water to waste. The filter is then filled to full depth and
brought back into service.
TYPICAL SLOW SAND FILTER
Schmutzecke
Sand filter
bed
Grave
l Finished
System of underdrains water
TYPICAL SLOW SAND FILTER
TYPICAL SLOW SAND FILTER CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Advantages
Simple to construct and supervise
Suitable where sand is readily available
Effective in bacterial removal
Preferable for uniform quality of treated water
Disadvantages
Large area is required
Unsuitable for treating highly turbid waters
Less flexibility in operation due to seasonal
variations in raw water quality
DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SLOW SAND FILTERS
Parameter Recommended level (UK experience)
Design life 10-15 year
Period of operation 24 h/day
Filtration rate 0.1 – 0.2 m/h
Filter bed area 5-200 m2/filter (minimum of two filters)
Height of filter bed
Initial 0.8-0.9 m
Minimum 0.5-0.6 m
Effective size 0.15-0.3 mm
Uniformity coefficient <3
Height of under drains 0.3-0.5 m
including gravel layer
Height of supernatant water 1m
EXAMPLE. SLOW SAND FILTER DESIGN.
Design a slow sand filter to treat a flow of 800 m3/day.
Solution:
assuming a filtration rate of 0.15 m/h,
Required tank area = (800/24) x (1/0.15) = 222 m2
Use a tank 23 m long x 10 m wide.
From Table 6.1, the height of the tank require is:
System under drain + gravel ≈ 0.5 m
Filter bed ≈ 0.9 m
Supernatant water ≈ 1 m
Therefore, total tank height = 2.4 m and tank
dimension becomes 23 m long x 10 m wide x 2.4 m
high
RAPID SAND FILTERS
The most common type of filter for treating
municipal water supplies.
During filtration, the water flows downward
through the bed under the force of gravity.
When the filter is washed, clean water is
forced upward, expanding the filter bed
slightly and carrying away the accumulated
impurities. This process is called
backwashing.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Advantages
Turbid water may be treated
Land required is less compared to slow sand filter
Operation is continuous.
Disadvantages
Requires skilled personnel for operation and
maintenance
Less effective in bacteria removal
Operational troubles
TYPICAL GRADATION OF RSF
ANTHRACIT
PROPERTY UNIT GARNET LMENITE SAND GAC
E
Effective Size,
ES
mm 0.2 - 0.4 0.2 - 0.4 0.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 2.0 0.8 - 2.0
Uniformity
Coefficient, UC
UC 1.3 - 1.7 1.3 - 1.7 1.3 - 1.7 1.3 - 1.7 1.3 - 2.4
Density, ρρ g/mL 3.6 - 4.2 4.5 - 5.0 2.65 1.4 - 1.8 1.3 - 1.7
Not Not
Porosity, ε % 45 - 58 40 - 43 47 - 52
available available
Hardness Moh 6.5 -7.5 5.6 7 2-3 Low
FILTER HYDRAULICS
The loss of pressure (head loss) through a clean
stratified-sand filter with uniform porosity was
described by Rose in the following form:
Laminar Turbulent
EXAMPLE
A dual medium filter is composed of 0.3 m
anthracite (mean size of 2.0 mm) that is placed over
a 0.6 m layer of sand (mean size of 0.7 mm) with
filtration rate of 9.78 m/h. Assume the grain
sphericity is = 0.75 and a porosity for both is 0.40.
Estimate the head loss of the filter at 15oC.
SOLUTION
Calculate head loss for anthracite