Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 28

A RE-ENTRY PLAN

PRESENTATION
A PRACTICUM Requirement

Presented to:
SLH Nursing Service Administrators

Adviser:
Prof. Eligio Razalan

“ Changing Lives, Through Quality Management”


ACKNOWLEDGMENT

To the SLH Nursing Service Administrators,


A Million thanks!

From:

Frank, Philip and Mariel


The demand for quality service is continually increasing due to stiff
competition.

Human resources development is evolving.

Accreditation towards culture of excellence becomes a must.

Benchmarking is becoming a trend in replicating best practices.

Re-entry plan serves as a potent tool to ensure the introduction of best


practices to ensure competitiveness.
A. Client-Centered

B. Flexibility

 
C. Proper Communication / Protocol
To identify the best practices in leadership and
management, in the light of planning, organizing,
staffing, directing, and controlling, giving more
emphasis on the application of these practices in a more
contextual manner.
Orientation

Needs assessment by a
multi-disciplinary team

Institutionalization

Implementation

Monitor outcomes, review the re-entry


plan according to the stakeholders'
changing needs and progress

Follow-up
YES NO
Identification of institutional strengths, needs,
abilities and preferences of the management staff

Identification and selection of the point person to


implement the best practices learned from the benchmarked
institution.

Pilot testing the new learned practices as far as their


compatibility to the organizational culture of the
institution concerned

Dissemination of information through executive reporting from


the top management

Assessment using the criteria of identifying the best practices

Documentation of the quality practices as part of the


quality records of the institution concerned

Revision is dated and signed.


Does the Practice increase Accountability?

Will the Practice help to bring about the Culture of Safety and
Protection?

Does the Practice have a "sphere of influence" in terms of


benefits and cost effectiveness?
 Center of Quality
- Phil-health aligned programs

 Documentation
- Continuing Quality Improvement Manuals

 Referral System/ Social Networking


- Collaboration / triage system
• Nursing Research  Collaborate with Enhanced Evidence
NGOs, POs; Based Nursing

• Fast Turn-over  Manpower Pooling Well Attended


Clients

Enhanced
• Change Management  Dialogue
Involvement
Purpose

• The purpose is to develop an assessment-


driven re-entry plan tailored to identified
needs and recognized strengths that can be
enhanced as well.
Objectives Recognized Best Responsible Strategy/ Action Time Frame Output Indicator
Practices Plan

To strengthen Modified Infection Control Information, Sept 6-10 2010 Diminished cases
the practice in Infection Control Nurse and education and   of nosocomial
infection control Medical Staff communication infection.
standards Organization dissemination
thru seminars Eliminated or
and training minimized risk
from harm of
Monitoring and hospital staff.
valuating the
continuous 2010
implementation
Objectives Recognized Best Responsible Strategy/ Time Frame Output Indicator
Practices Action Plan

To upgrade the Center of Quality Designated Echoing of the 2010 Eliminated cases
existing quality Quality best practice of patient care
assurance in the Continuous Assurance applied by SLH errors
hospital. Quality Manager
Improvement Revision of Increased in the
Quality customer
Assurance satisfaction as
Manual based confirmed by
on Philhealth feedback and
Standards if inflation in no. of
applicable customers
Objectives Recognized Best Responsible Strategy/ Action Time Frame Output Indicator
Practices Plan

To enhance Center of Quality Human Resource Review of the Provided quality


performance Performance Personnel existing care thru good
appraisal in line Evaluation (Key Performance teamwork and
with the Result Areas) Appraisal collaboration of
philhealth process, if
team members
standards revision is September 2010
towards needed Minimized
effective and internal conflicts
efficient services Revise and apply
and professional
only in
applicable areas jealousy

Employee’s
Proper
dissemination Satisfaction
and
implementation

November 2010
 Training
- Training Needs Analysis

 Prevention/Promotion
- Information, education and communication drive

 Risk Management
- Provision for man-made or natural calamities
• Underutilization  Social Marketing Enhanced
Benefits

Time
• Tardiness  Counseling consciousness

• Infrastructure Lobbying Easy Access


Objective Best Action Person Time Expected
Practices(SLH) Responsible Frame Outcome

To be able to Excellent 1.Faculty 1.VP for October A. Improved


enhance Programs on Development Academic Affair 2010 Clinical
existing Training Program Instructor
training 2.Faculty Competencies
program for 2.Seminar Development
clinical committee B. High Passing
instructors 3.Convention Rate (NLE)

4.Training

5. Curriculum
Development
program
Objective Best Action Person Time Frame Expected
Practices(SLH) Responsible Outcome

To be able to Health 1.Recruitment 1.VP for 5 months Increase of


enhance Promotion program Academic Affair January Number of
existing Health February enrolees in the
promotion Education thru 2. Committee March college of nursing
program/market information 2.Media on Recruitment April
ing strategies Dissemination Advertisement( and Promotion May
for the college TV,News
of nursing of St. Paper, 3.Guidance
Joseph’s Publications) Officer

3.Information
Campaigns
Objective Best Action Person Time Expected
Practices(SLH Responsible Frame Outcome
)

To strengthen the Proper Review proper HR officer May 2011 Easy access to
level of documentation documentation and Consultant important
accountability observe regular Committee on Audit Information
thru seminar
workshop
Objective Best Action Person Time Frame Expected
Practices(SLH Responsible Outcome
)

To be able to Provisions for 1.Fire, 1.School 2 months equipped


enhance potential risks, earthquake and President Period building
existing risk like fire and disaster 2.School March facilities
management infection management Engineer September
program in fire control training, drills 3. Disaster
prevention, and seminar Management
Safety concern 2. Check of the trainers
and disaster existing
management infrastructure
for potential
risks
 Infection Control

 Sustainability

 Crisis Management
• Absenteeism  Reward System Complete
Attendance

Enhanced
• Budgeting  Zero Budgeting Benefits

• Political  Transparency Enhanced


Accommodation Impartiality
The Re-Entry Plan for
Nikki Louise College
Plan - A
Objective
• To enhance the existing policy on infection control and
waste management in the campus

Benchmarked Best Practices From SLH


 Proper segregation and treatment of waste

Action to be Taken By the Proponent(s)


 Design a Proper segregation and waste treatment
Through a seminar-workshop
Time Frame: September 2010

Responsible Office / Point Person: School President

Expected Outcome (Results)


Minimized students’ absenteeism due to tropical and infectious
diseases
The Re-Entry Plan for
Nikki Louise College
Plan - B
Objective
• To improve the institutional promotion for quality education

Benchmarked Best Practices From SLH


 program based on the culture of Excellence

Action to be Taken By the Proponent(s)


 Design a program based on the culture of Excellence
Through a seminar-workshop
Time Frame: October 2010

Responsible Office / Point Person: Vice-President for Academics

Expected Outcome (Results)


Improved enrolment population and student retention
The Re-Entry Plan for
Nikki Louise College
Plan - C
Objective
• To increase the level of accountability

Benchmarked Best Practices From SLH


 Proper Documentation

Action to be Taken By the Proponent(s)


 Introduce Proper Documentation and observe regular
performance audit , through a seminar-workshop
Time Frame: November 2010

Responsible Office / Point Person: HR Manager / Legal Consultant

Expected Outcome (Results)


Minimized legal repercussions; easy access to information
The Re-Entry Plan for
Nikki Louise College
Plan - D
Objective
• To improve the existing policy on risk management

Benchmarked Best Practices From SLH


 Provisions for potential risks, like fire and
earthquake
Action to be Taken By the Proponent(s)
 Conduct a thorough check of the existing infra for potential risks
like man-made or natural disasters, through a seminar-
workshop
Time Frame: December 2010
Responsible Office / Point Person: School President / City Engineer

Expected Outcome (Results)


Fortified building facilities
The Re-Entry Plan for
Nikki Louise College
Plan - E
Objective
• To enhance the existing policy on crisis management

Benchmarked Best Practices From SLH


 Provisions for collaboration and social
mobilization
Action to be Taken By the Proponent(s)
 Encourage collaboration and Improve social mobilization,
through a seminar-workshop

Time Frame: January 2011


Responsible Office / Point Person: School President / College Dean
 
Expected Outcome (Results)
Enhanced sense of Involvement and ownership

Вам также может понравиться