technologically viable, and other are not. • Once the viable projects are defined, it is possible to formulate the alternatives. • To help formulate alternatives, categorize each project as one of the following – Mutually Exclusive – Independent
selected by the economic analysis. Independent projects do not compete with one another in evaluation. Each is evaluated separately. The comparison is only between “one project at a time and the DO-Nothing (DN) alternative.
• If we have “m” independent projects, then zero, one, two or
ME-291 Engineering Economy
more may be selected. • There are a total of 2m alternatives. This include the DN alternative. For example, if we have three projects A,B,C, then we have 23 = 8 possible selections DN, A,B,C,AB,AC,BC,ABC • In real world problems, there is an upper budgetary limit, that eliminate many of 2m alternatives.
cash flow estimates, and possibly savings. • The alternatives usually involve those that require capital investment to generate revenue or savings. • To purchase new equipment to increase productivity and sales is revenue alternative.
• In present worth analysis, the P value, now called PW, is
ME-291 Engineering Economy
calculated at the MARR for each alternative. • This method is popular because future cost and revenue estimates are transformed into equivalent worth now. • This makes it easy to determine the economic advantage of one alternative over another. • The PW comparison of alternatives with equal lives is straightforward. If both alternatives are used in identical capacities for the same time period, they are termed equal- service alternatives.
disbursement only (service) or receipts and disbursement (revenue), the following guidelines are applied to select one alternative. – One alternative: Calculate PW at the MARR. If PW≥0, the requested MARR is met or exceed and the alternative is financially viable. – Two or more alternatives: Calculate the PW of each alternative at the MARR. Select the alternative with the PW value that is numerically largest, that is, less negative or more positive, indicating a lower PW of cost cash flows or larger PW of net cash flows of receipts minus disbursements.
all projects with PW ≥ 0 at the MARR • This compares each project with the do- nothing alternative. The project must have positive and negative cash flows to obtain a PW value that exceeds zero; that is, they must be revenue projects. • A PW analysis requires a MARR for use as the “i” value in all PW relations.
(Routledge Explorations in Development Studies) Ève Chiapello, Anita Engels, Eduardo Gonçalves Gresse - Financializations of Development - Global Games and Local Experiments-Routledge (2023) PDF