Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Bearing Capacity of
Shallow Footings
Geological Engineering
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Learning Objectives
• Dense soil
• “Brittle” response
• Loose soil
• “Ductile” response
Punching Failure
(Coduto)
Practice is to check general shear case
Then do settlement analysis
(implicitly checks local and punching)
(Coduto)
Limit Equilibrium Approach
1
Ultimate Bearing Capacity qult cN c qN q B N
2
More general form… (Vesic, 1973)
1
qult c' N c f c qN q f q B N f
2
f
N q tan 2 45 e tanf
2
N c N q 1cot f
N 2N q 1 tan f
Correction Factors
Shape Depth Inclination
P b
Df
L
B
Ultimate, Net, and Allowable Capacity
1
qult cN c f c qN q f q B N f
2
qnet qult D f Subtract pressure from excavated soil above footing
qnet
qall F.S. = factor of safety (F.S. = 2 – 4)
F .S .
Pall qall A
Effect of Water Table
Case 1 (Shallow water table):
If Dw < Df, then use ’ in 1/2BN term , where (’ = – w)
If Dw = 0, then use ’ in qNq term and 1/2BN term
Dw D f
avg w 1
B
Case 3: (Deep Water Table):
If Dw > Df +B, then no effect
0
1
qult cN c f c qN q f q B N f
Df = 5’ 2
L = 10’
Check water table:
B = 6’ Sand (c = 0) Dw (13) > Df + B (11) so no effect
Dw = 13’ = 110 pcf
From Vesic (1973): for f = 33 deg.
f = 33
Nq = 26.1
N = 35.2
Correction factors:
Pall qall A B
Fqs 1 tan f 1.39
L
qnet
qall Df
Fqd 1 2 tan f 1 sin f
2
1.22
FS B
qnet qult D f B
Fs 1 0.4 0.76
L
Fd 1
P
Find Pall for FS = 3.0
0
1
Df = 5’ qult cN c f c qN q f q B N f
L = 10’
2
1
B = 6’ qult D f N q Fqs Fqd BN Fs Fd
Dw = 13’ Sand (c = 0) 2
= 110 pcf qult 110526.11.391.22
f = 33 1
611035.2 0.761
2
qult 24334 8826 33160 psf
qnet 33160 1105 32610
qnet 32610
qall 10870
FS 3
Pall qall A 10870 psf 6'10' 652 kips
Example: Clay
P
Dw = 0 0
1
Df = 6’
qult su N c f c qN q f q B N f
2
qult 12505.14 1.4 1.2 1006 11
L = 10’
B = 6’
qult 11394 psf
Clay
= 100 pcf qnet 11394 1006 10794 psf
qnet 10794
qall 3598 psf
FS 3
Pall qall A 35986 10 216 kips