Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(z) = ∫ tz-1 et dt
0
Peak shape
4 most common profile fitting fcns
Peak shape
X-ray peaks usually asymmetric -
even after a2 stripping
Peak shape
Crystallite size - simple method
Scherrer eqn.
2 2 2
Btot = Binstr + Bsize
Peak shape
Crystallite size - simple method
Scherrer eqn.
For best results, use integral breadth for peak width (width
of rectangle with same area and height as peak)
Peak shape
Local strains also contribute to broadening
The Warren-Averbach method
(see Warren: X-ray Diffraction, Chap 13)
x y zy
Peak shape
Local strains also contribute to broadening
The Warren-Averbach method
x y zy
Peak shape
Local strains also contribute to broadening
The Warren-Averbach method
W-A:
AL = ALS ALD (ALS indep of L; ALD dep on L)
L = na
Peak shape
W-A showed
AL = ALS ALD (ALS indep of L; ALD dep on L)
W-A showed
AL = ALS ALD (ALS indep of L; ALD dep on L)
n=0
n=1
ln An n=2
n=3
l2
Advantages vs. the Williamson-Hall
Method ハ・Produces crystallite size
distribution.・More accurately separates the
instrumental and sample broadening effects.・
Gives a length average size rather than a
volume average size.Disadvantages vs. the
Williamson-Hall Method ハ・More prone to
error when peak overlap is significant (in
other words it is much more difficult to
determine the entire peak shape accurately,
than it is to determine the integral breadth or
FWHM).・Typically only a few peaks in the
pattern are analyzed.