Do virtuous people do better in life? ------------------------------------------------------------- The clear answer is NO. People following straight & narrow path of virtue, end up being side lined, if not being persecuted. Some Learnings from “Mahabharat” Four classic epics: – Iliad & Odyssey – Ramayan & Mahabharat
Both ‘Ramayana’ & ‘Mahabharat’ address
the question of “duty” at its core
But arrive at very different answers.
Ramayan’s answers
Your duty is clear, though it may entail
sufferings. Straight forward story of ideals to be pursued. No Moral Dilemmas Happy ending with ‘Maryada Purushottam’ Ram back on his throne. (Righteousness triumphing in the end.) Mahabharat’s questions
Mahabharat takes life as it is, not as it
should be. - Presents no ideals. Does not leave the reader with comfort of a happy ending. Full of unsolved dilemmas & riddles. Characters struggle to find what is right, make mistakes & suffer full consequences. Bhishma
Child of Shantanu & Ganga
Great sacrifice – Never sit on throne, never
marry & have children (Bhishma Pratigya)
Blessing of “Itchha Mrityu” Choose the
time of his death “Bhishma” Pitamaha Choosing brides for Dhrutarashta & Pandu Draupadi’s vastraharan In war, to be on whose side / be neutral ----------------------------------------------------- - Not merely knowing, but doing - Act of omission can also be unethical, not only act of commission - Outstanding self sacrifice, but is he accountable? Dhritarashtra
Elder son of Vichitravirya
After Pandu’s death, ruled Hastinapur,
never formally crowned.
Considered a great scholar – Practice ?
Dhritarashtra
Could never understand his dharma as a
king and distinguish it from his duties as a father (fairness and impartiality expected from a king) End of exile, when Pandavas came back – not even 5 villages Blindness is more metaphorical Karna
Highly principled and generous
Life deprived him of a lot
– Kunti did not accept him – Drona rejects him as pupil – Parsuram gives a
Searching for his identity
Karna
Always in the company of unscrupulous
Kauravas & Shakuni – Never could rise above them In friendship & loyalty, there is a fine line which one should never cross. Friendship with Duryodhan was his ethical albatros Krishna
Lives life to its fullest – No effort to make
golden rules
Newphew to Kunti – Partial to Pandavas –
Sakha to Draupadi Krishna
“Nishkam Karma” – Action without
attachment to the fruits of action
War as a necessity to achieve larger goals
Why should one be ethical ?
Non of the theories that we studied, are
really useful in telling us what to do. At the most they help us evaluate different courses of action. After which, the judgement is one’s own.
Ethics is not for convincing others, it is
about convincing oneself. ……………….. As we end
Character of Don Quixote, reminds us
– if we trust only when trust is warranted, – love only when love is returned, – learn only when learning is valuable, we abandon our humanness.