Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OBJECTIVES
■ To help the conductor meet participants’ needs in order to
maintain their motivation to attend activities;
■ To address the issue of participants’ dropout.
METHODS
■ Assistance of two activities held by peer
students at the ALSB over the period of
one month;
■ Parallel survey after each session;
■ Interviews with conductors;
■ Analysis of attendance lists.
RESULTS
ACTIVITY ONE
■ CLOSE QUESTIONS:
o Conductor’s self-criticism;
o Participants and conductor’s interaction;
o The activity effectiveness.
■ OPEN QUESTIONS:
o Conductor’s impression X compliments given by participants;
o Participants’ suggestions.
RESULTS
ACTIVITY TWO
■ CLOSE QUESTIONS:
o Conductor’s excellent teaching skills and self-confidence;
o Participants' satisfaction with the activity.
■ OPEN QUESTIONS:
o Participants’ suggestions;
o Conductor’s response to participants’ feedback.
INTERVIEWS
CONDUCTOR ONE
■ “In the places where I worked before, I had to be attached to a specific
methodology … but here at the ALSB I have more freedom”.
■ ”It was nice because I could understand what they expected from the
activity... because even though I proposed the activity, it is not only mine, it is
also theirs... So, I want to know what they want to do”.
CONDUCTOR TWO
■ “With no modesty? I know that I can teach well”.
■ “I wish I had more time, but I didn’t… but I always finished what I planned…
When I could not finish everything I had planned for that day, I continued on
the next meeting”.
DROPOUT RATE
Number of participants
Session 1 Session 2 Session 3