Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Combining
Factors and
Spreadsheet
Functions
Lecture slides to accompany
Engineering Economy
7th edition
Leland Blank
Anthony Tarquin
A = Given
0 1 2 3 4 5
P=?
The present worth of the cash flow shown below at i=10% is:
(a) $25,304 (b) $29,562 (c)$34,462 (d) $37,908
P0=?
P1=?
i=10%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 1 2 3 4 5
A= $10,000
Solution: (1) Use P/A factor with n = 5 (i.e. 5 CF arrows) to get P1 in year 1:
(2) Use P/F factor with n = 1 to move P1 back to year 0:
P0= P1(P/F,10%1) = 37,908(0.9091) = $34,462 Answer is (c)
i = 10% F=?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A = $8000
Solution: Re-number diagram to determine n (i.e. number of arrows)
F = 8000(F/A,10%,8)
= 8000(11.4359)
= $91,487 (Answer)
The resulting values are then combined per the problem statement
PT = ?
i = 10%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A = $5000
$2000
PT = ?
i = 10%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A = $5000
$2000
Solution: First, re-number cash flow diagram to get n for uniform series: n = 8
Use P/A to get PA in year 2: PA = 5000(P/A,10%,8) = 5000(5.3349) = $26,675
Move PA back to year 0 using P/F: P0 = 26,675(P/F,10%,2) = 26,675(0.8264) = $22,044
Move $2000 single amount back to year 0: P2000 = 2000(P/F,10%,8) = 2000(0.4665) = $933
Now, add P values to get PT: PT = 22,044 + 933 = $22,977 (Answer)
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved
3-7
Example 1 Worked a Different Way
(i.e. Using F/A instead of P/A for uniform series)
The same re-numbered CF diagram from the previous slide is shown below
PT = ?
i = 10%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A = $5000
$2000
As shown here, there are usually multiple ways to work these problems
i = 10%
A=?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 1 2 3 4 5
A = $3000
$1000
Solution: Convert all cash flows into P in year 0 (and then use A/P with n=8) or F in year 8 (and then use A/F with n=8)
60 60 60
65
70
G=5 95
Solution: First find P2 for the gradient ($5) and its base amount ($60) in actual year 2:
Equation yields P for all cash flow (i.e. base amount is included)
Solution: The gradient starts between actual years 5 and 6, so that is where gradient years 1 and 2 are located.
Pg will be located in year 4 as shown in the diagram.
Pg = 7000 {1-[(1+0.12)/(1+0.15)]9/(0.15-0.12)} = $49,4001
General equation for determining P of cash flow is: P = present worth of base amount - PG
Changed from + to -
P=A{1-[(1-g)/(1+i)]n/(i+g)}
Changed from - to +
i = 10% F=?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Actual years
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gradient years
450
500
550
600
650
700
G = $-50
Solution: First change equal to G occurs between actual years 2 and 3; those are years 1 & 2 for gradient
PG is in year 0 of gradient years (i.e. actual year 1); base amount is in gradient year 1 (i.e. $700)
PG = 700(P/A,10%,6) – 50(P/G,10%,6)
= 700(4.3553) – 50(9.6842)
= $2565 (Answer)
F for shifted uniform series is in same period as last A; n is equal to number of A values
For gradients, years 1 and 2 are where first change equal to G or g occurs