(An Undergraduate Thesis)

By
Tañega, Christian L
Cantuba, Hersheena Rose L.
and
Yaguel, Aprileen B.
Introduction
 Theoretical Framework

Dr. Paul G. Stoltz’s Adversity

Quotient
 Four Dimensions of Adversity
Quotient
Control Ownership Reach Endurance

Resilience, Accountability, Burden, stress, Hope,

health, and responsibility, energy, and optimism, and
action, and effort; it tends willingness to
tenacity.
engagement. to have persevere.
cumulative
effect.
Anthony Grasha’s Teaching Styles
 Teaching Styles

• Formal Authority

• Demonstrator or Personal

• Facilitator

• Delegator
 Conceptual Framework
The Relationship of Teachers’ Adversity Quotient and Teaching Styles
to their Teaching Performance

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES DEPENDENT VARIABLES

I. Personal Profile I. Teachers’ Performance
a. age; based on :
b. gender; and
c. civil Status

II. Teachers’ Adversity Quotient

(AQ)
a. control; Teacher’s Performance
b. ownership; Evaluation Ratings on School Year
c. reach; and 2012-2013
d. endurance

III. Teaching Styles

a. formal authority;
b. demonstrator or personal;
c. facilitator; and
d. delegator
 Statement of the Problem
This study will try to find out The Relationship of Teachers’ Adversity Quotient and
Teaching Styles to their Teaching Performance. Specifically, it will seek answer to
the following questions:

1. What is the profile of the respondents in the terms of the following:

a. age;
b. gender; and
c. civil status;
2. What is the extent of the respondents’ AQ in terms of :
a. control;
b. ownership;
c. reach; and
d. endurance;
3. What is the assessment of the respondents’ teaching style in terms of :
a. formal authority;
b. demonstrator or personal;
c. facilitator; and
d. delegator;
4. Is there any significant relationship between teachers’ AQ and teachers’
performance?
5. Is there any significant relationship between teachers’ teaching style and teachers’
performance?
 Hypotheses
• Ho1 There is no significant difference in the Adversity Quotient and
teaching styles between the male and female selected teacher
respondents in this study.

• Ho2 There is no significant difference in the Adversity Quotient and

teaching styles of the selected teacher respondents when grouped
according to age.

• Ho3 There is no significant difference in Adversity Quotient and teaching

style of the selected teacher respondents when grouped according
to civil status.

• Ho4 There is no significant relationship between the Adversity Quotient

and Performance of the teacher respondents in this study.

• Ho5 There is no significant relationship between the Teaching style and

Performance of the teacher respondents in this study.
 Significance of the Study
This study aims to be beneficial to the following:

• Respondents
• Teachers
• Future Researchers
• Researcher
• Administrators
• Curriculum Developer
• Faculty and Staff
• Human Relation
• Policymakers
• Students
 LOCAL STUDIES
Title Author Findings
The Adversity Quotient of Abejo (2002) Based on the results, 58.94% of
Employees of the College the employees fall within the
of Arts and Sciences of St. moderate level of adversity
Joseph’s College in quotient, however, there was no
Quezon City for the significant difference between
School Year 2001-2002 male and female respondents in
their Adversity Quotient, but the
results showed that older
employees had higher adversity
quotient than the younger
employees. Moreover, there was
no significant difference in the
AQ of the workers in relation to
their respective job description.
Title
Adversity Quotient Profile Dela Fuente and Lee (1999) Based on the results, the
of the Graduating students
of Assumption College for
SY 1988-1989
Author Findings
graduating batch 1999 has
a moderate AQ and CO2RE
Profile; with their average
mean scores for all the four
dimensions of Control (C),
Origin and Ownership (O2),
Reach ( R), and Endurance (
E) falling within the mid-
range. This could mean
that most times, the
students are able to handle
adversity pretty well,
depending on the degree
and duration of the
adverse event.
FOREIGN STUDIES
Research Design

This study used Descriptive Method

Research Locale
The researchers conducted their study in
Polytechnic University of the Philippines San
Pedro Campus.
Respondents of the Study
The respondents of this study are the Professors
of Polytechnic University of the Philippines
San Pedro Campus.

Sample
The researchers used the total population of the
University. Equivalent to 51 respondents.
Instrumentation

The researcher used the pen and paper procedure

of inquiry method. The questionnaire was
divided into 3 parts namely;

• Profile of the Respondents

• Adversity Response Profile (ARP)
• Teaching Styles
Data Gathering Procedures
Statistical Treatment

To solve the statement of the problems the formulas

are as follow:

• Frequency Distribution
• Percentage
• Weighted Mean
• Mean
• Pearson r
• Chi-Square of Independence
 Statement of the Findings Conclusions Recommendations
problem

1. What is the
profile of the
respondents in
the terms of the
following:

a. age;
b. gender; and
c. civil status;
 Statement of the Findings Conclusions Recommendations
problem

2.What is the extent

of the
respondents’
AQ in terms of:

a. control;
b. ownership;
c. reach; and
d. endurance;
 Statement of the Findings Conclusions Recommendations
problem

3. What is the
assessment of
the
respondents’
teaching style
in terms of :

a. formal
authority;
b. demonstrator
or
personal;
c. facilitator;
and
d. delegator;
 Statement of the Findings Conclusions Recommendations
problem

4. Is there any
significant
relationship between
teachers’ AQ and
teachers’
performance?
 Statement of the Findings Conclusions Recommendations
problem

5. Is there any
significant
relationship between
teachers’ teaching
style and teachers’
performance?
The Profile of the Respondents in
terms of Age
The Profile of the Respondents in terms of Sex
The Profile of the Respondents in
terms of Civil Status