The Cover-Up

The 1969 Moon Landing Conspiracy

was one of the most covered-up stories
in history. In Fact, most people of
today’s generation don’t even know the
first men to land on the moon is, none-
the-less knowing that the whole moon
landing could be a cover-up. This could
be one of the best, yet unfortunate
cover-ups in history.
The 1 st Argument
 Many top officials have said that
all of the moon pictures don’t
include stars in the background
of the night sky.
 Their response for that was that
according to most professional
photographers, that it is difficult
to capture something very bright
, like a star and something very
dim, like the night sky from
space in the same picture.
 The 2 nd Argument
In many of the pictures with the flag, it
is waving and rippling in the

background. As many people know,
there is no wind on the moon.
NASA’s response to that is that in
most of the pictures the astronauts are
putting in the flag in so it has to be
waving for them to put it in the hard

ground.
The 1 st Argument
 Many top officials have said that
all of the moon pictures don’t
include stars in the background
of the night sky.
 Their response for that was that
according to most professional
photographers, that it is difficult
to capture something very bright
, like a star and something very
dim, like the night sky from
space in the same picture.
 Reasons For
 In some cases you just
can trump the human
experience. From
1969-1972, 12 astronauts
have landed on the
moon. Nine of them are
still alive today and have
testified their experience.
I don’t think that nine
smart, well-trained
astronauts would lie
about such an amazing
experience.
 Moon Rocks
 Just as Colombus carried
back a few hundred natives
back to Spain, Apollo
astronauts brought 841
pounds of moon rock home.
 Many people argue that the
rocks could be from
anywhere. However, these
rocks contained elements
that could only be found on a
space mass that has little or
no atmosphere.
 1 st Reason Against
 Many people who covered the
moon landing said that the
picture and video quality was
very poor. They say that the
still pictures don’t match the
video even though NASA said
they were taken at the same
time. Another argument with
the video’s is that the video
was shot from ahead so how
could Neil Armstrong be the
first man on the moon.
 2 nd Reason Against
 The second argument is that
many people say that the United
States didn’t have the technology
to land on the moon. Many of the
computers were said to have
very little power. Some even went
as far to say that they had the
energy equivalent to a kitchen
appliance. This is probably not
true, but the United States would
need a lot of energy to land on
the moon.
 Conclusion
 In conclusion, I think most of the
reasons against the 1969 moon
landing are very speculative.
Therefore, I think the reasons for
outweigh the reasons against. So, I
think the moon landing of 1969 is real
and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin
were the first men to land on the
moon.