“Management is a process or series of activities that
gives direction to an enterprise’s resources so that its objectives can be achieved as productively as possible in the environment in which it operates.” Smit P.J and G.J de J Cronje (1997) MANAGEMENT
• “Management is the process of coordinating
work activities so that they are completed efficiently and effectively with and through other people.” Robbins S.P and M Coulter (2003). • There are four basic management functions namely planning, organizing, leading and controlling. MANAGEMENT SKILLS • CONCEPTUAL: To be able to see the “big picture” of the situation. Ability to arrive at ideas create a vision and plan for the future • TECHNICAL: Posses specific knowledge or have a specialised expertise • HUMAN: To be able to work well with others both individually or in a group setting PLANNING • PLANNING: • Definition: A process that involves defining the organizations objectives or goals, establishing an overall strategy for achieving those goals, and developing those goals, and developing a comprehensive hierarchy of plans to integrate and coordinate activities. PLANNING • DEFINITION: This is the management activity that determines the enterprise’s mission and goals. It includes identifying ways of attaining the goals as well as the resources needed for each task. It entails determining the future position of the enterprise and guidelines or plans needed to reach that position. PLANNING • TYPES 1. Informal planning: Nothing is written down, there is little or no sharing of objectives with others in the organisation. 2. Formal planning: Specific objectives covering a period are defined PLANNING • Purpose of planning 1. Gives direction 2. Reduces impact of change 3. Minimises waste and redundancy 4. Sets standards used in controlling PLANNING • TYPES OF PLANS Breadth Time frame Specificity Frequency of use Strategic Long term Directional Single use Operational Short term Specific Standing PLANNING • Strategic plan: Plans that apply to the entire organisation establish organisation overall objectives and position organisation in terms of its environment – cover extended time period 3years or more. Done by top executives • Operational plans: are plans that specify detail on how objectives are to be achieved over shorter periods- monthly, weekly, daily. Done by managers. • Long term plans: time frame beyond 3 years • Short term plans: cover one year and less PLANNING • Specific plans: have clearly defined objectives eg increase sales volume by 20% over 3 months period • Directional plans: identify general guidelines increase sales volume by 10-20% over 3 months period STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT • VISION is the overall conception of what the organization is trying to become. The direction in which the organization is headed almost like a dream. • A mission statement is an enduring declaration of: 1. A company’s purpose for which it is set STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MISSION cont 2. Provides elements that assist management’s targets and the way it should operate, and some of these elements are as follows: • Beliefs and values of the organisation that is what it stands for • Targets customers and products and services it produces • Reason for existence • Customers perceived values • Internal competences • Key market segments • Key stakeholders • Mission statement if well crafted should be a source of inspiration and strategic direction set up. It should communicate strategic core competences STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT • Objectives are the desired end result more immediate and concrete than the vision • Objectives convert vision into specific performance targets • Objectives have to be smart Specific clear message as to what exactly is to be accomplished Objectives have to be measureable STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT • Objectives have to be appropriate that is consistent with the vision • Realistic that is have to be achievable • Timely that is time bound that is you need time frame to accomplish the objective LEVELS OF STRATEGY 1. CORPORATE-LEVEL STRATEGY If an organisation is in more than one type of business, it will need a corporate level strategy. Seeks to determine what businesses a corporation should be in. 2. BUSINESS-LEVEL STRATEGY Seeks to determine how corporation should compete in each of its businesses Strategic business unit (SBU) represents a single business or grouping of related businesses Each SBU has its own unique mission, competitors and strategy. LEVELS OF STRATEGY 3. FUNCTIONAL-LEVEL STRATEGY Seek to determine how to support the business level strategy. Functional departments such as manufacturing, marketing, human resource, research and development and finance, strategies need to support business level strategies. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS Is an eight step process that encompasses strategic planning, implementation and evaluation. The first six steps describe the planning, then implementation and evaluation Step1: Identify the organisation's current Mission, Objectives and Strategies. Step 2: Analyse the external environment. Step 3: Identify opportunities and threats STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS Step 4: Analysing the organisations resources Step 5: Identifying strengths and weaknesses Step 6: Formulating strategies Step 7: Implementing strategies Step 8: Evaluating results ORGANIZING
• This is the second step in the management
process. Once the goals and plans have been determined, management has to allocate the organisation’s human and physical resources to relevant departments. Duties have to be defined and procedures fixed to attain the objectives. Organizing therefore entails developing an organizational structure to indicate how personnel and materials should be employed to achieve the goals. PURPOSE OF ORGANIZING
1. Divides work to be done into specific jobs and
departments 2. Assigns tasks and responsibilities associated with individual jobs. 3. Coordinates diverse organizational tasks 4. Cluster jobs into units 5. Establishes relationship among individuals, groups and departments 6. Establishes formal lines of authority 7. Allocates and deploys organisational resources ORGANIZING • An organisational structure is a formal framework in which jobs tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated • Organisational design is when managers develop or change organisation’s structure. A process that involves decision about six key elements 1. Work specialisation 2. Departmentalization 3. Chain of command 4. Span of control 5. Centralization and Decentralization 6. Formalization WORK SPECILISATION This is when jobs are broken down into simple routine and well defined tasks e.g one person could paint a door and another person fixes the door It has an advantage that work may be completed quickly , effectively and efficiently . This saves time and also the employee skills of performing his job successfully increase through repetition WORK SPECIALISATION The disadvantage is that when employees do one task they become bored and tired .
Also the scope of the employee`s growth will
be limited DEPARTMENTALISATION • It is the basis by which jobs are grouped together. For instance every organisation has its own specific way of classifying and grouping work activities • There are five common forms of departmentalisation; i. Functional departmentalisation ii. Product departmentalisation iii. Geographical departmentalisation iv. Process departmentalisation v. Customer departmentalisation CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION Centralisation This refers to a relatively high degree of concentration of decision making of top managers at the head office e.g. departmental stores have this characteristics. Decentralisation This refers to dispersal or diffusion of decision making authority to lower level management in an organisation. Variables used for centralising/decentralising The size of the organisation. Diversity of product lines. Geographical location of the business. Communication frequency and facilities. Nature of growth. CHAIN OF COMMAND • An order which authority and power in an organisation is used and delegated from top management to lower management. o The unity of command states that every employee should report to only one manager instructions from two or more superiors may result in conflicts , this has a negative effect on the production of an organisation SPAN OF CONTROL This refers to the number of subordinates who report directly to a given manager • A manager with a broad span of control that is a large number of subordinates under his supervision maybe over extending him/herself and hence difficulties in coordination delaying decision making • A narrow span of control can give subordinates close supervision . FORMALISATION Is the extent to which employee behaviour is guided by rules and procedures. • The organisations with high formalisation have strict rules and regulations • The low formalising organisations have very few written rules and procedures and are less stable LEADING • Leading – This refers to giving orders to the human resources of the enterprise and motivating them in such a way that their actions are in accordance with the goals and plans formulated. Taking the lead, motivating and influencing personnel as well as communication with and among personnel has a profound effect on the climate prevailing in an enterprise. • Leaders: Persons who are able to influence others and possess managerial authority. • Leadership is the ability to influence a group towards the achievement of goals. CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP 1. Fiedler’s 2. Path goal 3. Leader participation • FIEDLER CONTINGENCY MODEL • The theory that effective groups depend on proper match between a leader’s style of interaction with subordinates and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader. THE FIEDLER MODEL • The research uncovered three contingency dimensions that defined the key situational factors for determining leader effectiveness: 1. Leader member relationship: the degree of confidence, trust and respect subordinates had for their leader, rated as either good or poor 2. Task structure: the degree to which the job assignments were formalized and procedurized, rated as either high or low 3. Position power: degree of influence a leader had over power based activities such as hiring, firing, discipline, promotions, salary increase rated as either strong or weak PATH-GOAL THEORY • Developed by Robert House • The leader’s job is to assist his or her follower’s in attaining their goals and to provide the direction or support needed to ensure that their goals are compatible with the overall objectives of the group or organisation. Leader’s behaviour is motivational making satisfaction of subordinates’ need and provide coaching , guidance, support and rewards that are necessary. PATH-GOAL THEORY • House identified four leadership behaviour: 1. Directive leadership: let subordinates know what’s expected of them. Schedules work to be done, and give specific guidance as to how to accomplish tasks 2. Supportive leader: is friendly and shows concerns for the needs of subordinates. 3. Participative leader: consults with subordinates and uses their suggestions before making decision. 4. Achievement oriented leader: sets challenging goals and expects subordinates to perform at their highest level NB: In contrast to Feider, House assumes that leaders are flexible. Leaders can display any of these leadership style depending on the situation LEADER PARTICIPATION MODEL • Developed by Victor Vroom and Phillip Yetton which related leadership behaviour and participation to decision making. Decision making is determined by the different type of situation giving five leadership styles LEADER PARTICIPATION MODEL Autocratic 1 You solve problems and make a decision yourself using information available to you at that time
Autocratic 11 You obtain necessary information from subordinates and then
decide on the problem yourself. The role of subordinates is to provide information to you rather than generating or evaluating alternative solution Consultative 1 You share problem with relevant subordinate individually, getting their ideas and suggestions without bring them together as a group. Decision may not reflect your subordinates influence Consultative 11 You share problem with your subordinates as a group, collectively getting their ideas and suggestions. Then when you make decision, which may or may not reflect your subordinates’ influence Group 11 You share problem with your subordinates as a group. Together you generate and evaluate alternatives and attempt to reach an agreement on a solution Leadership styles style Main feature Draw back Possible application Autocratic leader takes all demotivates • defence forces decisions staff who want and police ■ gives little to contribute and where quick information to staff accept decisions are ■ supervises responsibility needed and the workers closely ■ decisions do not scope for ■ only one-way benefit from discussion must communication staff input be limited ■ workers only ■ times of crisis given limited when decisive information about action might be the business needed to limit damage to the business or danger to others Leadership styles style Main feature Draw back Possible application DemocraticDemocr participation consultation with most likely to be atic encouraged staff can be useful in ■ two-way time-consuming businesses that communication ■ on occasions, expect workers used, quick to contribute fully which allows decisionmaking to the feedback from will be required production and staff ■ level of decision-making ■ workers given involvement – processes, thereby information some satisfying about the business issues might be too their higher-order to allow full sensitive needs staff involvement (e.g. job losses) or ■ an experienced too secret and flexible (e.g. development workforce will be of new likely to Leadership styles Style Main feature Draw back Possible application Laissez-faire managers delegate workers may not when managers are virtually all appreciate the too busy authority and lack of structure (or too lazy) to decision-making and direction intervene powers in their work – this ■ may be ■ very broad could lead appropriate in criteria or limits to a loss of security research might be ■ the lack of institutions where established for the feedback – as experts are more staff to work within managers will not likely to be closely arrive at solutions monitoring when not progress – may be constrained by demotivating narrow rules or management controls style Leadership Main feature styles Drawback Possible application Paternalistic managers do what some workers will used by managers they think is be who best for the dissatisfied with the have a genuine workers apparent concern for ■ some attempts to workers’ interests, consultation might consult, while but feel that take not having any real ‘managers know place, but the final power or best’ in the decisions influence end – when are taken by the workers are young managers – or inexperienced there is no true this might be participation in an appropriate decision-making style to employ ■ managers want workers to be happy in their jobs Case study Disaster at the bakery The fire at the bakery was a disaster for T&S Provisions Ltd. Eli Tarranto, the chief executive and main shareholder, had been the first one to be called by the fire brigade officer at 3am. ‘The whole building is up in flames – we have not been able to save anything,’ he had shouted down the phone. The next day, as Eli waited for his staff to turn up for work outside the burnt-out shell of his bakery, a plan was beginning to form in his head. He had already contacted both the owner of a small competing bakery, who was actually a very good friend, and the commercial estate agent from whom he had bought the land for the bakery four years ago. The owner of the bakery agreed to allow Eli to use one of his spare ovens if he sent his own workers to operate it. This would give him about 50% of his normal capacity. The commercial estate agent suggested that Eli rent, for a period of three months, an empty depot on the other side of town. He believed that it would take around two weeks to have this equipped as a temporary bakery. When the staff started to arrive, Eli gave them all clear instructions. They were shocked by the state of the old building but they seemed willing to help in this time of crisis. Six of them were despatched to his friend’s bakery to start organising production there. Case study Two were sent to the estate agent to pick up keys for the depot and had instructions to start cleaning the premises. The remaining three workers were to help Eli salvage what he could from the office records of the burnt-out building. Before this could start, Eli telephoned all of his major customers – he did not leave it to his sales manager – to explain the extent of the problem and to promise that some production would be back on stream just as soon as possible. He then contacted suppliers to inform them of the disaster, to reduce order quantities and to give them the new, temporary address for Deliveries [17 marks, 25 minutes] 1 Identify the management roles that Eli seems to have demonstrated in this case. [4] 2 What leadership style did Eli seem to be employing in the case? Explain your answer. [3] 3 Discuss whether this is the most appropriate style of leadership to apply in all situations. [10] CONTROLLING • – Managers should constantly be making sure that the enterprise is on the right track in the attainment of its goals. This is done through controlling. The aim of control is therefore to check that performance and action conform to plans to attain predetermined goals. Control also enables management to identify subordinates' weakness TYPES OF CONTROL 1. Concurrent control 2. Feedback control 3. Feed forward control CONCURRENT CONTROL • Definition: – It takes place while plans are carried out and it is the heart of any control system. • Characteristic: – Takes place while plans are being carried out – Directing , monitoring and fine-tuning activities FEEDBACK CONTROL • Feedback control implies that performance data is gathered and analyzed and the results returned to someone (or something) in the process to make corrections. FEED FORWARD CONTROL • Definition: – It takes place prior to implementation of plans eg raw material testing before product manufacturing. COMPARISON OF FEEDBACK AND CONCURRENT CONTROL Concurrent Feedback Concurrent control maintains Feedback control can not high quality of standards and maintain the quality of outputs standards
Concurrent control minimizes Feedback control waste the
the loss of resources resources
Concurrent control protects Feedback damages the brand
the brand name and loyalty name and loyalty
Concurrent control cultivates Feedback control a culture of
a good culture in employees relaxation
Concurrent improves the Feedback control cannot
output improve the output COMPARISON OF FEEDBACK AND CONCURRENT CONTROL CONCURRENT FEEDBACK Concurrent can not provides Feedback control provides information on how effective information of how effective the planning was the planning was
Concurrent control is Feedback control is cheaper
expensive
Concurrent control can not Feedback control is faster (
save time time saving)
Concurrent is not easy to Feedback control is easy to
accept accept COMPARISON OF FEEDBACK AND CONCURRENT CONTROL CONCURRENT FEEDBACK Concurrent can control the Feedback control can not process in time control the process in time
Concurrent managers can Feedback control managers
quickly identify the problem can not quickly identify the problem and eliminate it
Concurrent protects the Feedback control damages the