Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
5-mm Wetsuit
Juliana Amenta, Bergen Benedict, Nicholas Hoffman, Shayne Lew, Michelle Mendez, Megan Paterson, Juliana Sanchez, Nicolas Sesno, Natalie Skillern, Megan Yee
Department of Kinesiology, California State University, San Marcos, CA, 92096
Purpose • Male subjects had significantly higher skin temperature at the upper arm and upper leg
while female subjects had significantly higher skin temperature at the lower arm
The purpose of this study was to perform a controlled investigation of skin and core temperatures between
(Figure 1).
male and female surfers wearing a 1.5-mm wetsuit. We hypothesized that females will maintain higher
core and lower skin temperatures due to higher body fat percentage. • These differences were potentially due to the significant differences in body fat
percentage in the arm and leg, total body composition (Figure 2), and height and mass
(Table 2).
Methods • These findings suggest that future wetsuit designs should account for potential sex
Subjects:
differences in skin temperature.
• Seventeen recreational surfers (9 male, 8 female), between the ages of 18 and 45.
• Inclusion participation criteria included having at least 5 years of surfing experience.
• Informed consent and surfing demographic questionnaire forms were filled out by subjects prior to participation. References
Procedures:
● Body composition measured using InBody. 1. Moran, K., and J. Webber. (2013). Surfing injuries requiring first aid in New Zealand, 2007-2012. International
● Subjects were instrumented with eight wireless iButton thermal sensors (chest, back, lower abdomen, lower Figure 3: Average core temperature was not found to be significantly different Figure 4: Average heart rate was not found to be significantly different between Journal of Aquatic Research and Education 7: 192-203.
back, arm, forearm, thigh, and calf), a heart rate monitor, a wireless T-pill, and a custom 1.5-mm full wetsuit. between males (n=9) and females (n=8) at p<0.05 (p=0.497). males (n=9) and females (n=8) at p<0.05 (p=0.289). 2. Mendez-Villanueva, A., Perez-Landaluce, J., Bishop, D., Fernandez-Garcia, B., Ortolano, R., Leibar, X., & Terrados,
N. (2005). Upper body aerobic fitness comparison between two groups of competitive surfboard riders. J. Sci Med
● Skin and core temperature and heart rate measurements were obtained at 1-minute intervals.
Sport, 8(1), 43-51.
● Following instrumentation, subjects engaged in a sixty-minute simulated surfing protocol in a flume and
3. Mendez-Villanueva, A., Bishop, D. (2005). Physiological aspects of surfboard riding performance. J Sports
alternated between sitting, laying, duck diving, and paddling at 1-minute intervals. Table 1: Air temperature (p=0.981), flume water temperature (p=0.728), and relative humidity (p=0.083) were not found to be significantly different at p<0.05.
Medicine, 35(1).
● Swim flume speed was set at 1.2 m/s and increased 0.2 m/s every 20 min. 4. Nimmo, M. (2004). Exercise in the cold. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(10): 898-916.
Measurements: Flume Environmental Characteristics 5. Corona, L.J., Simmons, G.H., Nessler, J.A., & Newcomer, S.C. (2018). Characterisation of regional skin
● Body Composition: InBody Composition Analysis test. temperatures in recreational surfers wearing a 2-mm wetsuit. Ergonomics, 61(5), 729-735.
● Heart Rate: Baseline heart rate was obtained (RCX5 receiver and T32 recorder, Polar). 6. Jackson, A.S., Stanforth, P.R., Gagnon, J., Rankinen, T., Leon, A.S., Rao, D.C., Skinner, J.S., Bouchard, C., &
● Skin Temp: Skin temperature was recorded every minute (DS1922L iButton, Maxim Integrated).
Male Female Wilmore, J.H. (2002). The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: The
● Core Temp: Baseline core temperature was obtained (CorTemp Data & Recorder, HQ Inc.).
heritage family study. International Journal of Obesity, 26(1), 789-796.
7. Kessler, M. (2018). Characterization of regional skin temperatures in recreational female surfers wearing a 2-mm
● Environmental: Humidity, ambient air temperature, and water temperature were acquired before the start of each Ambient Air Temperature (°C) 19.3±1.45 19.4±0.75
wetsuit. (Submitted).
protocol (Vantage Vue, Davis Instruments).
Statistical Analysis:
• Statistical Significance was set at p<0.05. All data is presented as mean ± SE.
Water Temperature (°C) 15.9±0.09 16.0±0.09 Acknowledgements
• Microsoft Excel was used for statistical analysis.
• T-tests were used to identify significant differences between male and female data of skin and core temperatures, Relative Humidity (%) 63.0±6.85 44.0±7.74 We would like to acknowledge Natalie Skillern, Morgan Simmons, the students of the California State
heart rate, subject and flume environmental characteristics. This data was displayed through various bar graphs University, San Marcos Kinesiology 326 class for their assistance in data collection, and the surfers who
and tables. participated in our research study.