Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
V Vc vm V Vc vm
m
Vm m 1, whenVm Vc DSB-
FC
Vc m 1, whenVm Vc
m 1, whenVm Vc Vmax Vmin
m
Vmax Vmin
C
LSB USB
m m
c - m c c + m
DISTORTS THE ENVELOPE
VOICE CLIPPED OFF
Freq Spec & BW of AM Wave
Freq domain representation of a sig can be obtained by
applying FT tech.These tech translate the signal from its time
domain to its corresponding freq domain.The freq domain
representation gives the details of the various freq-components
in the signal, their amplitudes, power and BW.
BW f c f m f c f m
2 Amp(Peak )
V
Ptot PLSB PUSB
c Vrms
2
2R
Avg Power in sine wave of peak value
2
Vc2 mVc
Pc 2 2 2 2 2
2R m V 1 m
PSSB c
Pc
R 4 2R 4
Eff Vol & Current for AM
m2 m2
Ptot Pc 1 & AM 2 100%
2 m 2
Vtot2 I tot2 R
Ptot Efficiency = Psb/Ptot
2R 2
2
m m2
Vtot Vc 1 I tot I c 1
2 2
MODN BY SEVERAL SIN WAVES
Vtot V V V ....
1
2
2
2
3
2
mtot m m m ....
2
1
2
2
2
3
DSB_SC
Equation of the signal
SSB Physical appearance of the signal
Freq spec of Sig
ISB
VSB
DSB-SC
Carrier is absent t-axis remains the reference axis of envelop.
Base band still carried by carrier by hiding it in amp variations.
Instantaneous amp still varies as per modulating sig.
Carrier sig in its un-modulated form is suppressed.
Do not get confused with the presence of carrier sig with
varying amp that appears as envelope. Envelope is resultant sum
of LSB & USB
cos 2 f c f m t cos 2 f c f m t
mVc mVc
vmo Vc sin ct 2 2
Freq-spec of a DSB-SC
Double Side Band Suppressed Carrier
(DSB-SC) Modulation
Eq of SSB
Phy Appearance of
Single-Tone SSB
sig for USB
Phy Appearance of
Multi-Tone SSB sig
for LSB
MULTI-TONE SSB MOD
For example if the transmitted sig is vSSB-L and contains LSB. In
this case all the LSBs will be sel to transmit BB sig.
Tx sig sum of all LSBs contributed from each freq compo.
Amplitude of Tx sig will vary in accordance to amplitude of various LSBs
cos 2 f c f m1 t 2 c cos 2 f c f m 2 t
m1Vc mV
v SSB _ U
2 2
Vm1 Vm 2 & f m1 f m 2
BW f c f c f m 2 f m 2
Freq Spectrums of single-
tone-SSB and of Multi-
tone SSB.
COMPARISON OF BANDWIDTHS OF CONVENTIONAL
AM AND SSB VOICE CHANNELS
INDEPENDENT SIDE BAND (ISB)
v m1
Vm1 sin m1t
vm 2 Vm 2 sin m 2t
& carrier vc Vc sin ct
This carrier is simultaneously mod by two modulating freq.The two
DSB-FC sig so generated are :-
cos 2 f c f m1 t 1 c cos 2 f c f m1 t
m1Vc mV
vDSB _ FC1 Vc sin ct 2 2
cos 2 f c f m 2 t 2 c cos 2 f c f m 2 t
m2Vc mV
vDSB _ FC 2 Vc sin ct 2 2
Note:In ISB one side band from each DSB-FC sig is accommodated on
freq spec
In ISB it is necessary to select one side band from each DSB-SC
signal and accommodate them on the freq spec. The carrier sig
is also suppressed to have SSB sig.If the LSB is chosen from
eqn 1 to generate lower band then we have
cos 2 f c f m 2 t
m2Vc
v SSB2 U
2
When these two sig are combined we get the final ISB
BW ISB
f m2 f m1
Comparison of Amplitude Modulation methods
DSB-SC
- Less transmitted power than full AM and all the transmitted
power is useful.
- Requires a coherent carrier at the receiver; This results in
increased complexity in the detector(i.e. synchroniser)
- Suited for point to point communication involving one
transmitter and one receiver which would justify the use of
increased receiver complexity.
Comparison of Amplitude Modulation methods
SSB
- Good bandwidth utilization (message signal bandwidth =
modulated signal bandwidth)
- Good power efficiency
- Demodulation is harder as compares to full AM; Exact
filter design and coherent demodulation are required
- Preferred in long distance transmission of voice signals
FREQUENCY MODULATION
FREQUENCY MODULATION
v Vc sin i
d i t
i i i dt
dt
0
i c k f Vm cos mt
t
i c k f Vm cos mt dt
0
Vm
i ct k f sin mt 1
m
Vm
i ct k f sin mt
m
Final exp of FM wave will be
Vm
v Vc sin ct k f sin mt
m
FREQ DEVIATION
i c k f Vm cos mt
This eq gives the instantaneous angular freq of
an FM carrier. k f Vm
fi fc cos mt
2
Deviation in frequency in an
unmodulated carrier freq depends upon
the factor
k f Vm
cos mt
2
This in turn depends on the value of cos mt
at any instant of time. The freq deviation is
defined as
k f Vm
fd
2
This is the max freq deviation related to the maximum
or peak amplitude of the modulation signal.
fi f c f d cos mt
Substituting this eq we get
The limiting freq of an FM wave are
obtained as
Consider the factor, cos (mf sinωmt) of constituent I. This factor can
be expanded using the Fourier series:
Constituent II =
2 J1 m f cos ct sin mt 2 J 3 (m f ) cos ct sin 3 mt ...
2 J 2 n1 m f cos ct sin( 2n 1) mt .....
Constituent II =
2 J1 m f sin( c m )t sin( c m )t
1 1
2 2
2 J 3 m f sin( c 3m )t sin( c 3m )t ...
1 1
2 2
1 1
2 J 2 n 1 m f sin( c (2n 1)m )t sin( 2n 1)m )t ...x
2 2
this is the final expansion of constituent II. 7
Both these constituents can be substituted to get the final
expression as
As these are an infinite number of side bands in the FM signal, the
bandwidth of an FM system required to transmit the entire spectrum is
infinite. This is practically not feasible and therefore, only a finite number of
side bands are transmitted to have a finite and practically feasible bandwidth
of the systems.
THE FOLLOWING POINTS ARE OBSERVED FROM THIS
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM :-
There are an infinite number of lower and upper side bands in
the spectrum.
The USBs are located at +ωm, +2 ωm, +3 ωm, up to infinity
with reference to the location of the carrier frequency. This
shows that the separation between the two adjacent side bands is
ωm on the frequency axis.
The LSBs are located at -ωm, -2 ωm, -3 ωm up to infinity. This
shows that the adjacent LSBs are also separated by ωm.
The sidebands at equal distances from ƒc have equal
amplitudes, so that the sideband distribution is symmetrical
about the carrier frequency. The J coefficients occasionally have
negative values, signifying a 180°phase change for that particular
pair of sidebands.
It is seen from the table that as mƒ increases, so does the
value of a particular J coefficient.
There are side bands in FM signal that should also contain some
power. In an FM system, the total power is shared by all the side
bands and the carrier signal .Therefore, the side bands take their
power from the carrier power.
This reduces the carrier power in the modulated signal and the
amplitude of the un-modulated carrier present in the FM signal
reduces.
As the number of side bands increase, the amplitude of the
carrier in the transmitted signal decreases to maintain the total
power of the FM signal at a constant value.
This is the reason why the carrier amplitude is not equal to unity,
as assumed earlier. If the number of side bands is reduced in the
transmitted FM signal, the carrier amplitude will correspondingly
increase.
It is possible for the carrier component of the FM wave to
disappear completely. This happens for certain values of the
modulation index, called eigenvalues. Fig-y, shows that these are
approximately 2.4,5.5,8.6,11.8, and so on.
It can be shown that the output consists of carrier and an apparently
infinite number of pairs of sidebands. Each preceded by J coefficients.
These are Bessel functions. Here they happen to be of the first kind and
of the order denoted by the subscript, with the argument mƒ. J May be
shown to be a solution of an equation of the form
2
d y dy
(m f ) 2
2
m f m 2
f n 2
y0
dm f dm f
mf
2
mf
4
mf
6
n
mf 1 2 2 2
J n (m f )
n! 1!n 1! 2!n 2! 3!n 1! .....
2
In order to evaluate the value of a given pair of sidebands or the
value of the carrier, it is necessary to know the value of the
corresponding Bessel function. Separate calculation from this
equation for each case is not required, since info is already
available in form of a table or graphical form.
CARSON’S RULE
Carson’s rule gives the estimation of the
bandwidth of an FM system. This rule states
that the bandwidth of an FM system is double
the sum of the maximum frequency deviation fd
and the highest modulating frequency fm. Thus,
if B is the bandwidth of the system, then
according to Carson’s rule :
B 2( f d f m )
CARSON’S RULE
This rule is based upon experimental results that proved
that there are a limited number of side bands around the
carrier frequency, which contain approximately 98
percent of the total power of an FM signal.
• DRAWBACKS
• FM requires much wider channel.
• More complex and costly modulation, demodulation,
transmitting and receiving eqpt for FM.
• FM has much smaller ranges restricted to line of sight.
FREQUENCY MODULATION
ADVANTAGES
• The amplitude of FM signal is constant, thus independent of Modulation depth.
In AM modulation depth governs
transmitted power
• All the power transmitted in FM is useful. In AM carrier contains max power
and no information
• FM receivers can be fitted with amplitude limiters to remove amplitude
variations caused by noise. This makes FM
reception more immune to noise than AM
• It is possible to reduce noise by increasing deviation. This is not possible in
AM. Modulation index more than 1.0
causes distortion
DISADVANTAGES
• A much wider channel is required by FM, almost 10 times that of
AM
• FM modulators and demodulators are complex
• Costly equipment