0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
153 просмотров15 страниц
The document discusses the nature of science. It defines science as the way of knowing, describing, classifying and understanding the universe. It notes that science attempts to describe and understand nature through observation and experiment. The document outlines distinguishing and non-distinguishing features of the nature of science, including that scientific knowledge is empirical, testable, tentative and self-correcting. It also discusses myths about science, including that there is a universal scientific method and that hypotheses become theories which become laws.
The document discusses the nature of science. It defines science as the way of knowing, describing, classifying and understanding the universe. It notes that science attempts to describe and understand nature through observation and experiment. The document outlines distinguishing and non-distinguishing features of the nature of science, including that scientific knowledge is empirical, testable, tentative and self-correcting. It also discusses myths about science, including that there is a universal scientific method and that hypotheses become theories which become laws.
The document discusses the nature of science. It defines science as the way of knowing, describing, classifying and understanding the universe. It notes that science attempts to describe and understand nature through observation and experiment. The document outlines distinguishing and non-distinguishing features of the nature of science, including that scientific knowledge is empirical, testable, tentative and self-correcting. It also discusses myths about science, including that there is a universal scientific method and that hypotheses become theories which become laws.
It is the way of knowing, describing, classifying and
understanding our universe
The field of study which attempts to describe and
understand the nature of the universe in whole or part • Engage in the discourses about science
• Understanding the strengths and limitations of
Science
• The ways of knowing Science may include
aesthetic, interpersonal, intuitive, narrative, formal, and practical modes of knowing NOS are therefore presented in two parts
The first part contains distinguishing features of
NOS, which tend to make a question or field of study “more scientific” rather than “less scientific.”
The second part gives important non-distinguishing
features of NOS. Distinguishing Features of the Nature of Science
• Scientific knowledge demands empirical evidence
(i.e., science is derived from, and guided by, observation or experiment)
• Scientific claims are testable/falsifiable
• Scientific tests or observations are repeatable
• Scientific knowledge is tentative and developmental, and hence fallible • Science is self-correcting
Reliability of Science? Non-Distinguishing Features of the Nature of Science
• Scientific progress is characterized by the invention
of, and competition among, hypotheses/theories (Wegener’s suggestion that the continents had once been one, and drifted apart, was regarded at the time as almost lunatic) • Different scientists can sense the same things, and interpret the same experimental data, differently • Science cannot provide complete answers to all questions/problems (Science cannot, though, answer moral, ethical, aesthetic, social questions)
• Science is a social activity, both influencing society
and being influenced by people’s values and opinions
• Logic, imagination, curiosity, and serendipity
contribute to scientific exploration • Science cannot provide complete answers to all questions/problems (moral, ethical, aesthetic, social questions)
• Science is a social activity, both influencing society
and being influenced by people’s values and opinions
• Logic, imagination, curiosity, and serendipity
contribute to scientific exploration Myth 1: A universal scientific method exists
This myth probably stems from the series of
sequential steps, commonly termed the scientific method Observation Hypothesis Experiment Theory Results Myth 2: A hypothesis is an educated guess Myth 3: Hypotheses become theories, which in turn become laws
A hypothesis might become a theory, but laws and
theories are different kinds of knowledge.
Laws summarize regularities or patterns in nature,
theories attempt to explain these generalities. For example, we have the law of universal gravitation, but presently we do not have a well-accepted theory of gravity. Myth 4: Science is a solitary pursuit Conclusion Thank You
(Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy) Miranda Fricker, Peter J. Graham, David Henderson, Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen - The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology (2019, Routledge) PDF