Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
• Electron diffraction
• Interference of matter-waves
Vacuum Light,
frequency ν Classical expectations
chamber
Metal Collecting Electric field E of light exerts
plate plate force F=-eE on electrons. As
intensity of light increases, force
increases, so KE of ejected
electrons should increase.
Electrons should be emitted
whatever the frequency ν of the
I light, so long as E is sufficiently
Ammeter large
For very low intensities, expect a
Potentiostat time lag between light exposure
and emission, while electrons
absorb enough energy to escape
from material
Einstein
PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT (cont)
Actual results: Einstein’s
interpretation
Maximum KE of ejected (1905):
electrons is independent of
intensity, but dependent on ν Light comes in
packets of energy
For ν<ν0 (i.e. for frequencies
below a cut-off frequency) no
(photons) E = h n Millikan
electrons are emitted An electron
There is no time lag. absorbs a single
However, rate of ejection of photon to leave
electrons depends on light the material
intensity.
Collimator Crystal
X-ray source
(selects angle) (measure
wavelenght)
θ
Target
Before After pn �
Incoming
scattered photon
photon
θ
pn
Electron
pe scattered electron
COMPTON SCATTERING (cont)
Before After pn �
Incoming scattered photon
photon θ
pn
Electro
n pe scattered electron
since mN ?> me
WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY OF LIGHT
In 1924 Einstein wrote:- “ There are therefore now two theories
of light, both indispensable, and … without any logical connection.”
MATTER WAVES
We have seen that light comes in discrete units (photons) with
particle properties (energy and momentum) that are related to the
wave-like properties of frequency and wavelength.
In 1923 Prince Louis de Broglie postulated that ordinary matter can have
wave-like properties, with the wavelength λ related to momentum
p in the same way as for light
θi Path
a cos qi difference:
a(cos q r - cos qi )
θr
Constructive interference
a
when
a(cos q r - cos qi ) = nl
Electron scattering
dominated by
surface layers a cos q r Note difference from usual “Bragg’s
Law” geometry: the identical
Note θi and θr not scattering planes are oriented
necessarily equal perpendicular to the surface
THE DOUBLE-SLIT EXPERIMENT
Originally performed by Young (1801) to demonstrate the wave-nature
of light. Has now been done with electrons, neutrons, He atoms
among others.
Alternative
method of
y detection: scan
a detector
across the
d
θ plane and
record number
Incoming
d sin q of arrivals at
coherent beam each point
of particles (or Detecting
light) screen
D
Path d sin q
difference:
Constructive interference: d sin q = nl
lD
Separation between maxima: Dy = y
(proof following) d
Experiment: He atoms at 83K, d
with d=8μm and D=64cm θ
d sin q
Measured separation:Dy = 8.2m m
Predicted de Broglie
wavelength: D
3kT
K= , Mass = 4m u
2 Predicted separation:Dy = 8.4 �0.8m m
h
l= = 1.03 �10-10 m Good agreement with experiment
3MkT
FRINGE SPACING IN
DOUBLE-SLIT EXPERIMENT
Maxima when: d sin q = nl
D ? d so use small angle approximation
nl
q� y
d
l
� Dq � d
d θ
d sin q
Position on screen:y = D tan q �Dq
Heisenberg
Particle
θ/2
Dy
Light source,
wavelength λ
Resolving power of lens:
Lens, with angular
diameter θ l
Dy �
q
HEISENBERG MICROSCOPE (cont)
Photons transfer momentum to the particle when they scatter.
Magnitude of p is the same before and after the collision. Why?
p
Uncertainty in photon y-momentum
= Uncertainty in particle y-momentum
θ/
- p sin ( q / 2 ) �p y �p sin ( q / 2 ) 2
p
Small angle approximation
Dp y = 2 p sin ( q / 2 ) �pq
hq
de Broglie relation givesp = h / l and so Dp y �
l
l
From before Dy � hence Dp y Dy �h
q
HEISENBERG UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE.
Point for discussion
The thought experiment seems to imply that, while
prior to experiment we have well defined values, it
is the act of measurement which introduces the
uncertainty by disturbing the particle’s position
and momentum.
DxDpx �h/ 2
DyDp y �h/ 2
Dz Dpz �h/ 2
DE Dt �h/ 2
Transitions between energy levels of atoms are not perfectly
sharp in frequency.
n=1
Intensity
There is a corresponding ‘spread’ in
Dn 32
the emitted frequency
n 32 Frequency
CONCLUSIONS
Light and matter exhibit wave-particle duality