Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 22

VALUATIONS

RT
Approaches to valuation
• Income oriented approach
• Income oriented approach is based on the principle of future
benefits, which states that the value of any business equals the net
present value of all future economic benefits attained as a result of
the ownership of the business.

• To arrive at the net present value we require a discount factor that


considers the risk-return assessment of the market to finally derive
the value of equity.

• The three commonly used valuation methods under this approach


are the cash flow method, dividend discount method, and residual
income method.
• Market oriented approach
• Market-oriented approach is based on the principle of quick
valuation of companies (see, Fernandez, 2002).

• It is a simple, economic and less time consuming approach to


compute value.

• It is used to measure the relative performance of the firms by


practitioners as a control mechanism to assess whether the
intrinsic value is in line with the market view of the comparable.

• The two commonly used valuation methods under this approach


Equity multiples and Value multiples.
• Cost oriented approach
• The Cost Oriented Approach, also known as the Asset-based
Approach, involves methods of determining a company’s value by
analysing the market value of a company’s assets.

• This valuation approach often serves as a valuation floor since


most companies have greater value as a going concern than they
would if liquidated, i.e., the present value of future cash flows
generated by the assets usually far exceed the liquidation value of
those assets.

• This difference between the asset value and going concern value is
commonly referred to as “goodwill”. Therefore asset based
approach or cost oriented approach measures only a part of firm’s
value.
• It does not assign any value for future growth.

• The cost oriented or asset based value approach assumes the


liquidation of the firm and therefore violates the principle of going-
concern.

• Nevertheless, the Cost oriented approach is only meaningful for the


valuation of individual financial investments and valuation of assets
in case of liquidation.
Free Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow to the Free Cash Flow to
Firm Equity

= Cash flow available to = Cash flow available to

Common stockholders Common stockholders

Debtholders

Preferred stockholders
FCFF vs. FCFE Approaches to
Firm & Equity Valuation
Equity Value

FCFE Discounted FCFF Discounted


at Required Equity at WACC – Debt
Return Value
Calculating FCFF & FCFE from Net
Income
FCFF and FCFE from net income (NI):

FCFF = EBIT (1-Tax) + Dep. – CAPEX – WC

FCFE = NI + Dep. – CAPEX – WC + Net


borrowing
FCFF vs. FCFE Approaches to
Equity Valuation

FCFFt
Firm value  
t 1 1  WACC 
t

Equity value  Firm value  Debt value


FCFEt
Equity value  
t 1 1  r 
t
Single-Stage Free Cash Flow Models
FCFF1
Firm value 
WACC  g
Equity value  Firm value  Debt value

FCFE1
Equity value 
rg
Example: Single-Stage FCFF Model
Current FCFF $6,000,000
Target debt to capital 0.25
Market value to debt $30,000,000
Shares outstanding 2,900,000
Required return on equity 12%
Cost of debt 7%
Long-term growth in FCFF 5%
Tax rate 30%

Calculate Equity Value?


Example: Single-Stage FCFF Model
 MV(Debt)  
WACC     rd  (1  Tax rate) 
 MV(Equity)  MV(Debt)  
 MV(Equity)  
   r
 MV(Equity)  MV(Debt)  

WACC  0.25  7%  (1  0.30)  0.75 12%  10.23%


Example: Single-Stage FCFF Model
FCFF1
Firm value =
WACC −g

$6,000,000 (1.05)
Firm value = = $120.5 million
0.1023 −0.05

Equity value = $120.5 million – $30 million = $90.5 million

Equity value per share = $90.5 million/2.9 million = $31.21


Example: Calculating FCFF & FCFE
EBITDA $1,000
Depreciation expense $400
Interest expense $150
Tax rate 30%
Purchases of fixed assets $500
Change in working capital $50
Net borrowing $80
Simple Two-Stage FCF Models
n
FCFFt FCFFn 1
Firm value  
1
+
t 1 1  WACC 
t
 WACC  g  (1  WACC) n

n
FCFEt FCFEn 1

1
Equity value  +
t =1 1  r 
t
 r  g  (1  r )n
Example: Two-Stage FCF Models
Current FCFF in millions $100 .00

Shares outstanding in millions 300 .00


Long-term debt value in millions $400.00
FCFF growth for Years 1 to 3 10%
FCFF growth for Year 4 and thereafter 5%
WACC 10%
Example: Three-Stage FCF Models
Current FCFF in millions $100 .00

Shares outstanding in millions 300 .00


Long-term debt value in millions $400.00
FCFF growth for Years 1 to 3 30%
FCFF growth for Year 4 24%
FCFF growth for Year 5 12%
FCFF growth for Year 6 and thereafter 5%
WACC 10%
Example: Three-Stage FCF Models
Year

1 2 3 4 5 6

FCFF growth rate 30% 30% 30% 24% 12% 5%

FCFF $130.0 $169.0 $219.7 $272.4 $305.1 $320.4

PV of FCFF $118.2 $139.7 $165.1 $186.1 $189.5


Example: Three-Stage FCF Models

FCFFn 1 1
Terminal value 
 WACC  g  (1  WACC)n

$320.4 1
Terminal value   $3979
 0.10  0.05 (1  0.10) 5

Note : The above formula shows the present value of perpetual stream at t = 0
Example: Three-Stage FCF Models
n
FCFFt FCFFn 1

1
Firm value  +
t =1 1  WACC t  WACC  g  (1  WACC)n

Firm value  $118.2  $139.7  $165.1  $186.1  $189.5  $3,979  $4,777

Equity value  Firm value  Debt value

Equity value  $4777  $400  $4377

Equity value per share  $4377/300  $14.59


Summary
FCFF vs. FCFE

• FCFF = Cash flow available to all firm capital


providers
• FCFE = Cash flow available to common
equity holders
• FCFF is preferred when FCFE is negative

Equity Valuation with FCFF and FCFE

• Discount FCFF with WACC


• Discount FCFE with required return on equity
• Equity value = FCFF – Debt value
Thank you

Вам также может понравиться