Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION
Thank you...
Problem 3; Basis to test the result of the questionaire
using α = 0.05 to test the significant difference.
Table 1. Gender
Respondents in term of Gender
Male %
Female60 %
Male Female
Indicators
WM VD WM VD WM VD
1. Communication 3.78 O 3.82 O 3.83 O 3.81
Table 2.5 shows that among the indicators the respondents rated the
Safety and Security 3.88 with the verbal description of Often, next
the Marketing Strategy,3.84 which is Often followed by
Communication 3.83 with the verbal description of Often and lasty,
Transportation 3.75 with the verbal description of Often. The over-all
result is 3.80 with the verbal description of Often.
P
Table 2 Tourists Status
Respondents in term of Types of tourist
40
35
35
30
25
20
20
15
15
10 10 10
10
0
International Local Balik Bayan
Male Female
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
3.78 3 11.25 3.75 0.0019
3.82 3 11.42 3.806667 0.002633
3.83 3 11.47 3.823333 0.004433
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit
Variation
Total 0.0268 8
Table 3.2, the ANOVA Results comparing the profile of respondent in terms of
geographic and psychographic.The table shows using α= 0.05 level of significant
that the Fcrit,5.14325 is greater than the Fstat,1.43327 the hyphothesis is
accepted. Therefore there is no significant difference on the development of
historic tourism in Butuan City as perceived by respondents.This implies that
geographic and psychographic is not a differentiating variable.
CONCLUSION:
The researchers concluded that in the Profile of
Respondents in terms of Geographic and Psychographic are
not a differentiating factor when it comes to determining the
perception on the Development of Historic Tourism.
In terms of gender, sixty percent of the total 30
respondents are females and the rest are males. The
researchers found out that the female population has a
higher level of perception compare to male, based on their
answers in survey form and through showing of interest
regarding on the Development of Historic Tourism.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the conclusions of the study, the following recommendations are
given:
For the Institution
Based on the result it is recommended that they must be more up-to-date
when it comes to informing students regarding development of historic tourism
rather than limiting student’s knowledge on the given existing curriculum.
Conducting of more Historic Tourism-related symposiums and forum will do, as
well as encouraging not only the graduating students rather all Hotel and
Restaurant Management department to get involved.
For the Hotel and Restaurant Students
Regarding on what year level, based on the result every student must have an
initiative to be aware of what’s happening in their community, and their country
and in the world.
For the Future Researchers
The same study may be conducted considering other variables which were not
used by the researchers, based on the result.
HYPOTHESIS
Statement 1 and 2 are hypothesis-free. It is in statement 3
that the following hypothesis are formulated and to be
tested at α=0.05
Ho: There is no significant difference on the respondents
perception on the development of Historic Tourism in
Butuan City as percieved by the selected Tourists in terms
of geographic and psychographic profile.
Ha: There is a significant difference on the respondents
perception on the development of Historic Tourism in
Butuan City as perceived by the selected Tourists in terms
of geographic and psychographic profile.