Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Session #1C
Introduction to the Gospels
Matthew
The Gospels
Mark
Luke
John
NIV Study Bible, 1471
Mark
Luke
four Gospels?
John
Perhaps for Synoptics
the same
reason These three Gospels are so much alike
different that they are called Synoptic ("see with,"
descriptions or "see alike") Gospels. They all look at
of a finely cut Christ’s life from a historical perspective.
jewel would On the other hand, John's Gospel dwells
appeal to more on the inner meaning of Jesus' life
different and teachings.
people.
Matthew
describes one
facet of the
life of Christ,
Mark another,
and Luke a
third.
Synoptic Similarities
Matthew, Mark and Luke are noticeably similar, while
John is quite different.
How do the first three Gospels agree?
Language
Material they include
General order of the events and sayings from the life of Christ
The math facts:
91 percent of Mark is found in Matthew
53 percent of Mark is found in Luke
Such agreement raises questions as to the origin of the
Synoptic Gospels. Did the authors rely on a common
source? Were they interdependent?
The THAT STRANGE
New Testament SOUNDING WORD…
SYNOPTIC:
Comes Together
1 MATTHEW 2 MARK
TO: JEWS TO: ROMANS
AS: KING AS: SERVANT
WHAT WHAT
HE: SAID HE: DID
3 LUKE “TO
TO: GREEKS
GOD/MAN
SEE
TOGETHER”
AS:
WHAT
HE: FELT
3 LUKE 4 JOHN
3 LUKE 4 JOHN
TO: GREEKS TO: CHURCH
3 LUKE 4 JOHN
TO: GREEKS TO: CHURCH
AS: GOD/MAN AS: GOD
3 LUKE 4 JOHN
TO: GREEKS TO: CHURCH
AS: GOD/MAN AS: GOD
WHAT WHAT
HE: FELT HE: MEANT
∑
3 LUKE 4 JOHN
TO: GREEKS TO:CHURCH
92%
unique!
661
Mark Marcan
Priority
Diagrammed
1068 1149
500 350
Matthew Luke
Numbers
indicate the
235 verses in each
333 564
M L proposed
Q source
Dating the Synoptic Gospels
Adapted from the NIV Study Bible, 1431
MARK
MATTHEW LUKE MARK MATTHEW LUKE
ASSUMPTION A: ASSUMPTION B:
Matthew and Luke used Matthew and Luke did not use
Mark as a source Mark as a source
View #1 View #1
Mark written in the 50s Mark could have been written
or early 60s anytime between 50 and 70
(1) Matthew written in
late 50s or the 60s
View #2
(2) Luke written 59-63 Mark written 65-70
View #2 (1) Matthew written early 50s (see
Mark written 65-70 Matthew notes)
(1) Matthew written in (2) Luke written 59-63 (see Luke
the 70s notes)
(2) Luke written in the
70s
Taught in this class
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem
Questions like these constitute what is known as the Synoptic
Problem. Several solutions have been advanced:
1. The use of oral tradition. Some have thought that tradition had
become so stereotyped that it provided a common source
from which all the Gospel writers drew.
2. The use of an early Gospel. Some have postulated that the
Synoptic authors all had access to an earlier Gospel, now lost.
3. The use of written fragments. Some have assumed that
written fragments had been composed concerning various
events from the life of Christ and that these were used by the
Synoptic authors.
4. Mutual dependence. Some have suggested that the Synoptic
writers drew from each other with the result that what they
wrote was often very similar.
NIV Study Bible, 1431
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem
4. The use of two major sources. The most common view
currently is that Mark and a hypothetical document, called
Quelle (German for "source") or Q, were used by Matthew
and Luke as sources for most of the materials included in
their Gospels.
5. The priority and use of Matthew. Another view suggests
that the other two Synoptics drew from Matthew as their
main source.
6. A combination of most of the above. This theory assumes
that the authors of the Synoptic Gospels made use of oral
tradition, written fragments, mutual dependence on other
Synoptic writers or on their Gospels, and the testimony of
eyewitnesses.
Q Mark
AD 50 AD 65
Matthew Luke
Four-Source Hypothesis
M Mark Q L
Jerusalem Rome Antioch Caesare
AD 60-65 AD 65 AD 50 a
Proto-Luke
Matthew Luke
Antioch Caesarea, Corinth?
AD 85 AD 60, AD 80
Antiochene Source of
Tradition Luke 1-2
Date Options for John’s Gospel
Authorship is easier to determine than when John wrote.
Three periods have been proposed for the date of the Gospel:
33 70 95
Christ's Temple John's
Death Destroyed Death
The Four Gospels Compared
Matthew Mark Luke John
Author Matthew Mark Luke John
Job before
Tax Collector None (Youth) Medical Doctor Fisherman
Saved
Race Jew Jew Gentile Jew
Office and / or Service or Service or
Apostle Apostle
Spiritual Gift Pastoring Teaching
Readers
Ethnically Jewish Roman Gentile (Greek) World
Signs Wisdom
Interest
(1 Cor. 1:22) (1 Cor. 1:22)
Spiritually Unbelievers Believers Unbelievers Unbelievers
Model in
Universality
Messiah and Suffering
Primary Need: (and kingdom Deity
Kingdom Offer (exhorts
The Four Gospels Compared
Matthew Mark Luke John
Date Written 40s 64-68 57-59 late 60s
Antioch or Caesarea or
Place Written Rome Ephesus
Syria Rome
Place Sent Palestine Rome To Theophilus Asia, etc.
Jesus is… King of Israel Suffering Ideal Man Son of God
(Messiah) Servant (Deity) (Messiah) (Deity)
Key Verse 21:5 10:45 19:10 20:31
Themes Law Power Grace Glory
Literary
Sermons Miracles Parables Allegories
Emphasis
Arrangement Topical Chronological Chronological Topical
Abraham to
Genealogy None None None
Joseph
The Four Gospels Compared
Matthew Mark Luke John
Birth to Ministry to Ministry to Ministry to
Scope
Resurrection Resurrection Resurrection Resurrection
Tone Prophetic Pastoral Historical Spiritual
Christ's Words 60% 42% 50% 50%
Chapters 28 16 24 21
Verses 1068 661 1149 878
Verses per
38 41 48 42
Chap.
OT Quotations 53 36 25 20
OT Allusions 76 27 42 105
OT References 129 63 67 125
Unique
42% 7% 59% 92%
Material
Supplementary
Broad Division ------------------- Synoptic Gospels-------------------
Gospel
Synoptic & Johannine Gospels
Topics Synoptics John
Portrait of Christ God – Man God – Man
33-34 years
“Now Jesus himself was about 30
years old when he began his
ministry” (Luke 3:23)
Age of Jesus
When He Began His Ministry
1yr
3 yrs 28 / 29 years
4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …………………………………………………………………………26 27 28 29
BC AD
NT Books
(5)
4. John
5. Acts
6. Romans
7. 1 Corinthians
8. 2 Corinthians
9. Galatians
10 Ephesians
11. Philippians
12. Colossians
13. 1 Thessalonians
Pauline
14. 2 Thessalonians
15. 1 Timothy
16. 2 Timothy
17. Titus
Epistles
18. Philemon
19. Hebrews
20. James
21. 1 Peter
22. 2 Peter
General
27
23. 1 John
24. 2 John
25. 3 John
26. Jude
27. Revelation
Apocalypse
A) Interesting Parallel to the OT Composition
FOUNDATION PAST PRESENT FUTURE
OLD POETRY &
TORAH (LAW) HISTORY PROPHETS
TESTAMENT WISDOM
NEW
GOSPELS ACTS EPISTLES REVELATION
TESTAMENT
Chapters Verses
Author Nationality Occupation Relationship Books Written
Written Written
Apostle of Jesus
Matthew Jew Tax Collector 28 1,071 Gospel of Matthew
Christ
Unknown
Mark Jew Disciple of Peter 16 678 Gospel of Mark
Missionary
Gospel of Luke
Luke Gentile Physician Disciple of Paul 52 2,158
Acts
Gospel of John
1 John
Apostle of Jesus
John Jew Fisherman 50 1,414 2 John
Christ
3 John
Revelation
Romans
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Galatians
Ephesians
Philippians
Apostle of Jesus
Paul Jew Tentmaker 87 2,033 Colossians
Christ
1 Thess
2 Thess
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Titus
Philemon
Brother of Jesus
James Jew Carpenter? 5 108 James
Christ
Apostle of Jesus 1 Peter
Peter Jew Fisherman 8 166
Christ 2 Peter
Brother of Jesus
Jude Jew Carpenter? 1 25 Jude
Christ
? ? ? ? 13 303 Hebrews
1) INTRODUCTION
A) The 4 Gospels make up 46% of the New Testament.
B) The gospel (euangelion in Greek) means good news! It is the good news preached by
Jesus, that the Kingdom of God is at hand (Mark 1:15), and the good news of what God
has done on behalf of humanity in Jesus (Rom 1:3-5).
The four Gospels are our main source of knowledge for the life of Christ. But the Gospels are more
than just historical documents. The Greek term for gospel is euangelion, which means “good
news” or “good message.” The Gospels provide us with a message of good news, worthy to be
proclaimed.
Dan Akin
A gospel is not a historical document and nothing else; but a gospel is an attempt to present the
portrait and teaching of Jesus in such a way that those who read it will also take Him as Savior,
Master and Lord.
William Barclay
2) WHY 4 GOSPELS?
There is no one definitive biography of Jesus Christ in existence, but rather four separate and
complementary accounts. Why? Because a picture, or portrait, is more complete when viewed
from several different angles. The biography of an important person is not really complete unless
we have accounts from various perspectives. Different persons would see things from a different
viewpoint and thus give us a little different slant on his life. Similarly, each of the four Gospel writers
looks at Jesus from his own distinct angle.
Dan Akin
1 Condensed from SJSM Christian Education 2012 NEW TESTAMENT SURVEY Lesson 2a: The Gospels
i) Each writer had to be selective in what they include as the contents of each Gospel
were limited by length of ancient scroll (John 21:25). The aims of the writers thus
determined what they selected in the respective Gospels.
ii) Each Gospel must be treated as equally valuable and equally authoritative.
Assignments:
1.NT Reading: Matthew 26 to Luke 24
2.…Book By Book (BBB): Matthew-Luke (Page 269-
295)
3.…For All Its Worth (FAIW): Chapter 7 (Page 132-153)
4.READING REPORT: #2