Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Management
Inventory Management
• Important for all businesses
• Inventory is created when receipt exceeds
disbursement
• It is depleted when disbursement exceeds receipt
• Challenge for a manager is not to cut cost by
reducing inventory to such level so as to have
dissatisfied customers (unfulfilled orders) or to have
plenty to satisfy all demands
• Challenge is to have right amount of inventory to
achieve competitive priority
Inventory Costs
• Interest or
Opportunity Costs
• Storage and
Handling Costs
• Taxes, Insurance, and
Shrinkage Costs
• Ordering and Setup Costs
• Transportation Costs
Why have low inventory?
• To control
– Inventory holding cost
– Interest or opportunity cost
– Storage & handling cost
– Taxes, Insurance & Shrinkage
• Shrinkages: Pilferage, Obsolescence &
Spoilage/Damage
Why have high inventory?
• Improved customer service
– Speed up delivery, Improve on time delivery,
reduced chances of stock outs & no back orders
• Lower ordering cost & set up cost
• Maximize labour & equipment utilization
• Reduced transportation cost: transport in bulk
• Avail quantity discounts while purchasing in
bulk
Types of Inventory
Types of Inventory
Cycle Inventory
Q+0
Average cycle inventory =
2
Types of Inventory
Cycle Inventory
Q+0
Average cycle inventory =
2
Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
Types of Inventory
• Cycle inventory
– Portion of total inventory that varies with lot size is called
cycle inventory. It follows two principles
• Lot size varies directly with the time gap between orders
• Larger the time gap, greater the cycle inventory
• Safety Stock inventory
– It is held to avoid customer service problems and hidden
costs of unavailable components
– Protects against uncertainties in demand, supply and
lead time
– To create safety stock firm places orders earlier than the
time when the item is actually needed
Types of Inventory
• Anticipation inventory
– When an inventory is built up in anticipation of
demand (AC manufacturers face maximum
demand during few months in summer – inventory
is built up throughout the year)
• Pipeline inventory
– Inventory moving from point to point in the
materials flow system is called pipeline inventory
– It is computed by multiplying average demand by
lead time
Types of Inventory
• A plant makes monthly shipments of electric drills to
a wholesaler in average lot size of 280 drills. The
wholesaler’s average demand is 70 drills a week, and
the lead time from the plant is three weeks. The
wholesalers must pay for the inventory from the
moment the plant makes a shipment. If the
wholesaler is willing to increase its purchase quantity
to 350 units, the plant will guarantee a lead time of
two weeks. What is the effect on cycle and pipe line
inventories?
Types of Inventory
Example 13.1
Types of Inventory
Example 13.1
Types of Inventory
Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
Example 13.1
Types of Inventory
Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
= (70 drills/week)(3 weeks)
= 210 drills
Example 13.1
Types of Inventory
Figure 13.1
Inventory reduction tactics
• For Cycle Inventory
– Primary lever: Reduce lot size
– Secondary lever:
• Streamline order placement and set up
• Increase repeatability
• For Safety Stock Inventory
– Primary lever: Place order closer to the time it may be received – this
may lead to unacceptable customer service level
– Secondary lever:
• Improve demand forecast
• Cut lead time of produced or purchased items
• Reduce supply uncertainties
• Rely more on equipment & labour buffers
Inventory reduction tactics
• For Anticipation Inventory
– Primary lever: Match demand rate with production rate
– Secondary levers are used to level customer demand
• Add new products with different demand cycles
• Provide off season promotional campaigns
• Offer seasonal pricing plans
• For Pipeline Inventory
– Primary lever: Reduce lead time (Because pipeline inventory is
function of demand during lead time)
– Secondary lever:
• Find more responsive suppliers, improve shipping time between two
stocking locations
• Decrease lot size – at least in those cases where lead time depends
on lot size
ABC Analysis
• Vifredo Pareto – a nineteenth century
Italian scientist proposed
• Commonly known as 80 – 20 Rule
• Also known as
– Vital Essential Desirable Analysis
ABC Analysis
100 —
90 —
Percentage of dollar value
80 —
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0—
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Figure 13.2 Percentage of items
ABC Analysis
100 —
90 —
Percentage of dollar value
80 —
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0—
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Figure 13.2 Percentage of items
ABC Analysis
Class C
100 — Class B
90 —
Percentage of dollar value Class A
80 —
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0—
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Figure 13.2 Percentage of items
ABC Analysis
Class C
100 — Class B
90 —
Percentage of dollar value Class A
80 —
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0—
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Figure 13.2 Percentage of items
ABC Analysis
Class C
100 — Class B
90 —
Percentage of dollar value Class A
80 —
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0—
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Figure 13.2 Percentage of items
ABC Analysis
Class C
100 — Class B
90 —
Percentage of dollar value Class A
80 —
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0—
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Figure 13.2 Percentage of items
How
Much?
When!
Inventory Management
• Decision making in production and inventory
management involves dealing with large
number of items, with very diverse
characteristics and with external factors.
• We want to resolve:
– How often the inventory status (of an item) should
be determined ?
– When a replenishment order should be placed ?
– How large a replenishment order should be?
Economic
Order
Quantity
Economic Order Quantity
Assumptions
1. Demand rate is constant
2. No constraints on lot size
3. Only relevant costs are holding and
ordering/setup
4. Decisions for items are independent
from other items
5. No uncertainty in lead time or supply
Economic Order Quantity
Economic Order Quantity
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Figure 13.3 Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive
order
Q
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Figure 13.3 Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive Inventory depletion
order (demand rate)
Q
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Figure 13.3 Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive Inventory depletion
order (demand rate)
Q
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Figure 13.3 Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive Inventory depletion
order (demand rate)
Q
On-hand inventory (units)
Q Average
— cycle
2
inventory
1 cycle
Figure 13.3 Time
Economic Order Quantity
EOQ: Assumptions
• The demand rate is known and
constant.
– Therefore the depletion of inventory results
in a straight line with slope equal to the
negative of the demand rate.
EOQ: Assumptions
• Replenishments arrive in a batch equal
to the order quantity rather than
piecemeal. There are no limitations on
lot size.
– The replenishment results in a vertical line
on the graph, rather than a line with a
positive finite slope.
EOQ: Assumptions
• Annual holding cost and annual
ordering cost are the only costs that are
relevant to the order quantity decision.
– There are no quantity discounts, so per-
unit price is irrelevant.
EOQ: Assumptions
• Replenishment decisions for one item
(say doughnuts) are made
independently from replenishment
decisions for other items (say coffee).
– Model enhancements are required to
consider situations where several items are
purchased from the same supplier, or
several items belong to a product family
that can share the same setup.
EOQ: Assumptions
• There is no uncertainty in lead time or
supply.
– Therefore, replenishment orders can be
timed so that no stockouts occur. Because
none occur, stockout costs are irrelevant to
the decision.
– The minimum inventory equals zero, the
maximum inventory equals the EOQ, and
the average cycle inventory equals EOQ/2.
Economic Order Quantity
Annual cost (dollars)
Total cost = HC + OC
Annual cost (dollars)
3000 —
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 —
1000 —
0—
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 —
Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 —
D
Ordering cost = (S)
0— Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 — Birdfeeder costs
Q
Holding cost = (H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H =1000
0.25—($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S)
0—C = (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 — Bird feeder costs
Q
Holding cost = (H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H =1000
0.25—($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S)
0—C = (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C = $2925
50 + $108
100 =150
$3033
200 250 300 350 400
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 — Bird feeder costs
Q
Holding cost = (H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H =1000
0.25—($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S)
0—C = (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C = $2925
50 + $108
100 =150
$3033
200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost Example 13.2
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 — Bird feeder costs
Q
Holding cost = (H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H =1000
0.25—($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S)
0—C = (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C = $2925
50 + $108
100 =150
$3033
200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost Example 13.2
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 — Bird feeder costs
Q
Holding cost = (H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H =1000
0.25—($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 468 units
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S)
0—C = (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost Example 13.2
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 — Bird feeder costs
Q
Holding cost = (H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H =1000
0.25—($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 468 units
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S)
0—C = (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C = $3510
50 + $90
100 = 150
$3600200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost Figure 13.4
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 —
Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 —
D
Ordering cost = (S)
0— Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost
Bird feeder costs
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = D = (18Q/week)(52
(H) + (S) weeks) = 936 units
Annual cost (dollars)
2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
2000 — S = $45 Q = EOQ
Q
2DS Holding cost
Q = (H)
D
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
1000 —
H 2 Q
D
Ordering cost = (S)
0— Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example 13.3 Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost
Bird feeder costs
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = D = (18Q/week)(52
(H) + (S) weeks) = 936 units
Annual cost (dollars)
2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
2000 — S = $45 Q = 75 units
Q
2DS Holding cost
Q = (H)
D
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
1000 —
H 2 Q
D
Ordering cost = (S)
0— Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example 13.3 Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost
Bird feeder costs
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = D = (18Q/week)(52
(H) + (S) weeks) = 936 units
Annual cost (dollars)
2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
2000 — S = $45 Q = 75 units
Q
2DS Holding cost
Q = (H)
D
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
1000 —
H 2 Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example 13.3 Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost
Bird feeder costs
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = D = (18Q/week)(52
(H) + (S) weeks) = 936 units
Annual cost (dollars)
2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
2000 — S = $45 Q = 75 units
Q
2DS Holding cost
Q = (H)
D
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
1000 —
H 2 Q
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example 13.3 Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity
Current
cost
Bird feeder costs
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = D = (18Q/week)(52
(H) + (S) weeks) = 936 units
Annual cost (dollars)
2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
2000 — S = $45 Q = 75 units
Q
2DS Holding cost
Q = (H)
D
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
1000 —
H 2 Q
2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
2000 — S = $45 Q = 75 units
2DS D Q
EOQ = C= (H) + (S)
1000 —
H Q 2
2 Q
HTBO EOQ = $15
= 0.25 ($60/unit)
= = 75/936 = 0.080 year
2000 —
EOQ
S = $45 D Q = 75 units
2DS D Q
EOQ = C= (H) + (S)
1000 —
H Q 2
2 Q
HTBO EOQ = $15
= 0.25 ($60/unit)
= = 75/936 = 0.080 year
2000 —
EOQ
S = $45 D Q = 75 units
3000 —
Q D
Total cost = (H) + (S)
Annual cost (dollars)
2 Q
2000 —
Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 —
D
Lowest Ordering cost = (S)
0— Q
cost
| | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Figure 13.5 Lot Size (Q)
(EOQ) Q
How
Much?
When!
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
• IP = Inventory Position
• SR = Scheduled receipt
On-hand inventory
• OH = On hand
inventory
• BO = Back orders
Time
Figure 13.7
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
Order
received
On-hand inventory
OH
Time
Figure 13.7
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP
Order
received
On-hand inventory
OH
R
Order
placed
L
TBO
Figure 13.7
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP
Q Q Q
OH OH OH
R
Order Order Order
placed placed placed
L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
Figure 13.7
Continuous Review
• Demand for Chicken soup at a super market
is 25cases a day and the lead time is four
days. The shelves were just restocked with
chicken soup, leaving an on hand inventory
of only 10 cases. There are no back orders,
but there is an open order for 200 cases.
What is the inventory position? Should a new
order be placed?
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP
Q Q
Chicken Soup
Q
OH OH OH
R
Order Order Order
placed placed placed
L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
Example 13.4
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP
Q Q Q
Chicken Soup
OH OH R = Average demand
OH during lead time
R = (25)(4) = 100 cases
Order Order Order
placed placed placed
L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
Example 13.4
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP
Chicken Soup
Q Q Q
R = Average demand during lead time
OH OH = (25)(4) = 100
OH cases
R
IP = OH + SR – BO
Order Order Order
placed
=
placed
10 + 200 – 0 = 210 cases
placed
L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
Example 13.4
Uncertain Demand
Uncertain Demand
Figure 13.8
On-hand inventory
Time
Uncertain Demand
Figure 13.6
IP
IP
Order
Order
Order received
received
received Order
received
On-hand inventory
Q
Q Q
OH
R
Order Order Order
placed placed placed
L1 L2 L3 Time
TBO1 TBO2 TBO3
Reorder Point / Safety Stock
• Records show that the demand for
dishwasher detergent during the lead
time is normally distributed, with an
average of 250 boxes and standard
deviation = 22. What safety stock
should be carried for a 99 percent cycle
service level? What is R?
Reorder Point / Safety Stock
Average
demand
during
lead time
Figure 13.9
Reorder Point / Safety Stock
Probability of stockout
(1.0 – 0.85 = 0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time R
zσ L
Figure 13.9
Reorder Point / Safety Stock
Safety Stock/R
Probability of stockout
(1.0 –
- 0.85
0.85 == 0.15)
0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time R
zσ L
Example 13.5
Reorder Point / Safety Stock
Safety Stock/R
Safety stock = zσ L
= 2.33(22) = 51.3 Cycle-service level = 85%
= 51 boxes
Probability of stockout
(1.0 - 0.85 = 0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time R
zσ L
Example 13.5
Reorder Point / Safety Stock
Safety Stock/R
Safety stock = zσ L
= 2.33(22) = 51.3 Cycle-service level = 85%
= 51 boxes
zσ L
Example 13.5
Lead Time Distributions
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
+
75
Demand for week 1
Figure 13.10
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
+
75
Demand for week 1
σ t = 15
+
75
Demand for week 2
Figure 13.10
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
+
75
Demand for week 1
σ t = 15
+
75
Demand for week 2
σ t = 15
Figure 13.10
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
+
75
Demand for week 1
σ t = 15
+ 225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
Figure 13.10
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
+ 225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
Example 13.6
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
+ 225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
Example 13.6
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
+ σ L =σ t L =5 2 = 7.1
225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
Example 13.6
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
+ σ L =σ t L =5 2 = 7.1
225
75 Safety stock = zσ L = 1.28(7.1)Demand
= 9.1 for
or 9 units
Demand for week 2 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
Reorder point = dL + Safety stock
Example 13.6
=
= 2(18) + 9 = 45 units
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
+ 225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
Example 13.6
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lead Time Distributions
σ t = 15
σ t = 26
C=
+
75
($15) +
936
($45)
225
+ 9($15)
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2
2 75 three-week lead time
σ t = 15
C = $562.50 + $561.60 + $135 = $1259.10
Example 13.6
=
75
Demand for week 3
Periodic Review Systems
Periodic Review Systems
T
On-hand inventory
Time
P P
Figure 13.11
Periodic Review Systems
T
On-hand inventory
Q1
Order
placed
Time
P P
Figure 13.11
Periodic Review Systems
T
On-hand inventory
Q1
Order
placed
L Time
P P
Figure 13.11
Periodic Review Systems
T
Order
received
On-hand inventory
Q1
Order
placed
L Time
P P
Figure 13.11
Periodic Review Systems
T
Order Order Order
received received received
Q3
On-hand inventory
Q1
Q2
Order Order
placed placed
L L L Time
P P
Figure 13.11
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP IP Order
Order
received received received
Q3
On-hand inventory
Q1 OH
OH Q2
IP1
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Figure 13.11
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP TV Set
IP - P System
Order IP Order Order IP Order
received IP = OHreceived
received + SR – BOreceived
Q3
On-hand inventory
Q1 QOH
OH t = T - IPt
Q2
IP1
T = 400 BO = 5
OH = 0 SR = 0
IP3 Order Order
placed placed
IP = 0 + 0 – 5 = –5 sets
IP2
Q = 400 – (–5) = 405 sets
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP IP Order
Order
received received received
Q3
On-hand inventory
Q1 OH
OH Q2
IP1
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Example 13.7
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP Order IP Order
Bird feeder— Calculating P and T
received received received
Q3
On-hand inventory
Q1 OH
OH Q2
IP1
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Example 13.8
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP Order IP Order
Bird feeder—Calculating P and T
received received received
Q3 = 90%
On-hand inventory
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Example 13.8
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP Order IP Order
Bird feeder—Calculating P and T
received received received
Q3 = 90%
On-hand inventory
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Example 13.8
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP Order IP Order
Bird feeder—Calculating P and T
received received received
Q3 = 90%
On-hand inventory
IP2
T = Average demand during the protection interval + Safety stock
= d (P + L) + zσ P+L
L L L Time
= (18 units/week)(16
P weeks) + 1.28(12
P units) = 123 units
Protection interval
Example 13.8
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP Order IP Order
Bird feeder—Calculating P and T
received received received
Q3 = 90%
On-hand inventory
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Example 13.8
Periodic Review Systems
T
IP Order IP Order IP Order
Bird feeder—Calculating P and T
received received received
Q3 = 90%
On-hand inventory
Quantity
on hand
Demand 10 20 30 40 50