You are on page 1of 24

Studies in bubble formation-IV : Bubble formation at porous discs

B. Bowonder and R. Kumar

Rajesh Kumar Bhagat


Overview
§ Introduction
§
§ Mathematical model
§
§ Results summary
§
§ Conclusions

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Objective and motivation
§ To study the bubble formation from porous disk
and predict a model which can explain the
physics of problem from first principle.
§
§ There was no paper to explain the effect of
surface tension and viscosity, so address that
problem.

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
phenomena of bubble
formation

§First stage is expansion stage.

§Second stage is detachment stage.


§
§

§
§

A. Ohnuki et al., Development of Multidimensional Two-Fluid Model Code ACE-3D for


Evaluation of Constitutive Equations, JJAERI-Data/Code 96-033 (1996).

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Mathematical model for the process
§Force balance on bubble
Inertial force = buoyancy force – viscous force –
force due to surface tension

Expansion Detachment stage Condition for Detachment


stage

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Assumptions for the model

§Porous disc is made of large number of pores of uniform


diameter and length having same resistance.
§Number of operative sites is equal to number of bubble
simultaneously on the disk which is only a fraction of total
number of sites.
§Effective pores may be made of number of pores but in this
analysis single pore is considered and flow through a single
pore is considered.
§Bubble arrange themselves in hexagonal close packed
manner.
§
§
Flow rate
increase

Effective sites
Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Mathematical model
§Number of bubble by considering hexagonal close packing

………………
(1)

…………………
…(2)

Hexagonal close packing of


bubble

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Mathematical model for expansion stage

……………………………
…(3)

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Mathematical model for detachment stage
…………
(IV)

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Verification of model

Experimental setup

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Range of variable covered during investigation

variable range
viscosity 1- 604cP
Surface tension 22.8-71.8 dyn/Cm
Density 0.792-1.255 g/Cm3
Flow rate of air 10-220 Cm3/sec
Pore diameter 45-110μ
Superficial velocity 4.389-60.94Cm/sec

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Results and discussion
Effect of surface tension, viscosity and pore diameter
Bubble volume , Cm 3

Flow per site , Cm 3 /sec Indian Institute of


Science 2010
Results and discussion
Effect of surface tension,viscosity and pore diameter
Bubble volume , Cm 3

Flow rate per site , Cm 3 /sec Indian Institute of


Science 2010
Results and discussion
Comparison between bubble volume
Theoretical bubble volume Cm 3

Bubble volume experimental Cm 3 Indian Institute of


Science 2010
Results and discussion
Comparison of number of sites
Number of sites calculated

Number of sites experimental


Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Conclusions
§With increase in pore diameter, surface tension, and
viscosity, bubble volume is increasing at low flow
Rate, but after a certain flow rate these factors are not
Increasing the bubble volume.

§With this model, there was possibility for the explanation


of bubbles in fluidized bed and author was working in that area.

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Thank you
Results and discussion

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Model for expansion stage

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Model for expansion stage

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Model for detachment stage

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Model for detachment stage

Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Indian Institute of
Science 2010
Indian Institute of
Science 2010