0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
109 просмотров7 страниц
The Philippine Rice Share Tenancy Act of 1933 was implemented by President Manuel L. Quezon to regulate share-tenancy contracts and establish minimum standards, including a 50-50 crop sharing and a 10% annual interest rate limit. However, the major flaw was that it only applied if provincial councils petitioned for it, which never happened as landowners controlled the councils. The 1954 Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines aimed to establish fair relations between tenants and landholders and incentivize greater production, classifying tenancy into leasehold and share systems.
The Philippine Rice Share Tenancy Act of 1933 was implemented by President Manuel L. Quezon to regulate share-tenancy contracts and establish minimum standards, including a 50-50 crop sharing and a 10% annual interest rate limit. However, the major flaw was that it only applied if provincial councils petitioned for it, which never happened as landowners controlled the councils. The 1954 Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines aimed to establish fair relations between tenants and landholders and incentivize greater production, classifying tenancy into leasehold and share systems.
The Philippine Rice Share Tenancy Act of 1933 was implemented by President Manuel L. Quezon to regulate share-tenancy contracts and establish minimum standards, including a 50-50 crop sharing and a 10% annual interest rate limit. However, the major flaw was that it only applied if provincial councils petitioned for it, which never happened as landowners controlled the councils. The 1954 Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines aimed to establish fair relations between tenants and landholders and incentivize greater production, classifying tenancy into leasehold and share systems.
(act 4054) What is the Philippine rice share tenacy act of 1933 ? • When the Philippine Commonwealth was established, President Manuel L. Quezon implemented the Rice Share Tenancy Act of 1933. The purpose of this act was to regulate the share-tenancy contracts by establishing minimum standards. Primarily, the Act provided for better tenant-landlord relationship, a 50–50 sharing of the crop, regulation of interest to 10% per agricultural year, and a safeguard against arbitrary dismissal by the landlord. “Flaw of the law” • The major flaw of this law was that it could be used only when the majority of municipal councils in a province petitioned for it.
• Since landowners usually controlled such councils, no province ever
asked that the law be applied. -Therefore, Quezon ordered that the act be mandatory in all Central Luzon provinces. -However, contracts were good only for one year. By simply refusing the renew their contract, landlords were able to eject tenants. As a result, peasant organizations agitated in vain for a law that would make the contract automatically renewable for as long as the tenants fulfilled their obligations. • In 1936, this Act was amended to get rid of its loophole, but the landlords made its application relative and not absolute. Consequently, it was never carried out in spite of its good intentions. In fact, by 1939, thousands of peasants in Central Luzon were being threatened with wholesale eviction
• By the early 1940s, thousands of tenants in Central Luzon were
ejected from their farmlands and the rural conflict was more acute than ever. “Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines of 1954” (RA 1199) What is agricultural tenacy? -Agricultural tenancy is the physical possession by a person of land devoted to agriculture belonging to, or legally possessed by, another for the purpose of production through the labor of the former and of the members of his immediate farm household, in consideration of which the former agrees to share the harvest with the latter, or to pay a price certain or ascertainable, either in produce or in money, or in both. What is the purpose of this?
• It is the purpose of this Act to establish agricultural tenancy
relations between landholders and tenants upon the principle of school justice to afford adequate protection to the rights of both tenants and landholders to insure an equitable division of the produce and income derived from the land to provide tenant-farmers with incentives to greater and more efficient agricultural production. • Systems of Agricultural Tenancy; Their Definitions. - Agricultural tenancy is classified into leasehold tenancy and share tenancy. • Share tenancy exists whenever two persons agree on a joint undertaking for agricultural production wherein one party furnishes the land and the other his labor, with either or both contributing any one or several of the items of production, the tenant cultivating the land personally with the aid of labor available from members of his immediate farm household, and the produce thereof to be divided between the landholder and the tenant in proportion to their respective contributions. • Leasehold tenancy exists when a person who, either personally or with the aid of labor available from members of his immediate farm household, undertakes to cultivate a piece of agricultural land susceptible of cultivation by a single person together with members of his immediate farm household, belonging to or legally possessed by, another in consideration of a price certain or ascertainable to be paid by the person cultivating the land either in percentage of the production or in a fixed amount in money, or in both.