Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
11/17/2019
The finest granularity at which location can be maintained I
a cell. Used by GSM and Mobile Internet protocol.
Another important mobility management task, which is
known as handoff.
11/17/2019
Differentiate hard and soft hand . off.
Hard Hand - Off
Occurs in GSM
Available in FDD / TDD modes
Inter frequency handover, Inter system handover
Soft Hand - Off
Occurs in UMTS
Available only in FDD mode
Macro diversity
11/17/2019
The choice of the base station to which to hand off may
depend on such factors as:
“Beacon signals are an integral part of various new applications, including all wireless
systems. ”
11/17/2019
11/17/2019
every time she moves, she has to inform the New York registrar.
Won’t it be easier (less burdensome) for Alice to tell the New York
registrar that she is currently in Texas and that the person who
wishes to find her current address should contact the Texas registrar
for her current address.
it is better to maintain a location pointer at the New York registrar
[the average total cost per month is 4 × local update cost + 3 ×
remote search cost for the location pointer scheme
Versus 4 × (local update cost + remote update cost) + remote
search cost = 4 × local update cost + 5 × remote search cost for
the actual address scheme].
Techniques that reduce the search cost tend to increase the update
cost, and vice versa.
11/17/2019
Maintaining a forwarding location pointer at the New York
registrar instead of the actual address reduces the burden on
Alice (update cost) but increases the burden on Bob (search
cost) because now he has to contact the New York registrar
first and then the Texas registrar.
Which scheme is better, maintaining the actual address at the
home registrar or the location pointer?
11/17/2019
reduces the update cost (two local updates for each move as
opposed to one remote and one local update) but increases
the search cost
[(1 + number of links in the chain) × remote access cost as
opposed to 2 × remote access cost].
11/17/2019
Analyzing cost versus benefit of
location management optimization
techniques
Let fs and fu be the number of searches per unit time for a
mobile node.
assume that Cs,u and Cu,u are the respective search and update
costs.
Cs,o and Cu,o are the respective search and update costs after
optimization.
11/17/2019
if the average cost of location management before the
optimization is more than the average cost after the
optimization is performed,
fsCs,u + fuCu,u > fsCs,o + fuCu,o → fs(Cs,u − Cs,o) > fu (Cu,o − Cu,u)…..(2.1)
if the optimization reduces the search cost, then Cs,u is greater than Cs,o, and Cs,u
− Cs,o is positive.
preceding inequality as
→ fs/fu > − [(Cu,u − Cu,o)/(Cs,u − Cs,o)] …………………(2.2)
11/17/2019
For the optimization that reduces the update cost, Cs,u − Cs,o
will be negative, so the inequality becomes.
→ fs/fu < −[(Cu,u − Cu,o)/(Cs,u − Cs,o)] ……2.3
11/17/2019
Replicating location information.
If no replication is used, then mobile node m’s location
information is maintained at one of the n location registrars.
11/17/2019
11/17/2019