Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
vocabulary
OBJECTIVES
Define Drills
The Theory of Drills
Negative Aspects of Drills
Importance and benefits of Drills in Language Learning
Use of Drills in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
Steps of Drilling and Their Rationale
Summary
WHAT IS DRILLING
“At its simplest, drilling means listening to a
model, provided by the teacher, or a tape or
another student, and repeating what is
heard. This is a repetition drill, a technique
that is still used by many teachers when
introducing new language items to their
students. The teacher says (models) the word
or phrase and the students repeat it.”
(Tice, J. (2004)
THE THEORY
Based upon the ‘behaviourist’ model of language
learning
Included with an ‘Audio Linguistic’ approach to
language.
According to Audio-Lingual method, teaching habits
are formed by a process of stimulation ➔ response ➔
reinforcement.
Continuous practice will make perfect.
Emphasis on accuracy rather than fluency
What do you think are the negative
aspects of drills?
Too
much emphasis put on accuracy, hindering the
development of real communication skills.
“Monotonous chanting of decontextualised language
is not useful to anyone.”
(Tice (2004)
Ascommunicative language teachers we are told
that drilling is bad. We’re told it is pointless,
uncommunicative and deprived of any meaning. It
also makes our classes teacher–centred.
Accordingto Harris and O'Duibhir (2011), “ one
challenge of a communicative approach to
language teaching is to provide students with
chances to communicate meaningfully with their
classmates. In order to cope with this challenge
teachers need to create activities or tasks that extend
beyond language drills.“
Drills are only applicable and valid when teaching
lower levels.
Drills go against some styles of teaching, especially the
role of the teacher as a facilitator.
Being able to repeat in a parrot like fashion does not
mean the student will remember or be able to use the
language in real conversation.
Drilling doesn’t involve real communication.
Drilling means that the teacher imposes new
language on students and is unnatural.
Drilling won’t necessarily lead to internalisation and
acquisition of new language
Is drilling important in language
learning?
“For many years, some writers encouraged teachers not
to offer students any speaking tasks that did not involve
an element of ‘genuine communication’…of all
activities in the classroom, the oral drill is the one which
can be most productively demanding on accuracy.”
(Scrivener, 2011:256)
Harmer, J. 2015) The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fifth ed. Harlow, Essex:
Pearson Education Limited.
Harris, John and Pádraig Ó Duibhir (2011). Effective Language Teaching: a Synthesis of
Research. NCCA report #13. Dublin: NCCA.
Joseph, L. M., Eveleigh, E., Konrad, M., Neef, N., & Volpe, R. (2012). Comparison of
the efficiency of two flashcard drill methods on children’s reading performance.
Journal of Applied School Psychology,28, 317–337
Kiczkowiak, M. (2016). Controlled oral practice in ELT – what happened to drilling? Link:
https://teflreflections.wordpress.com/2016/02/23/controlled-oral-practice-in-elt-what-
happened-to-drilling (accessed on 02/11/2017)
Littlewood, W. (1984). Foreign and second language learning: Language acquisition
research and its implications for the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Nicholson, T. 1998. The flashcard strikes back. The Reading Teacher 52:188-192.
Scrivener. J., (2011). Learning Teaching: The Essential Guide to English.3rd edition.
MacMillan,416 p.
Tice, J. (2004). Drilling 1. British Council & BBC. Retrieved from
http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/drilling-1 (accessed on 30/10/2017)