Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DEVELOPMENT-CHEVROLET
Present By
Jyitoka Verma
Shruti Maurya
Training & Development
Purpose
External Training
Training Evaluation
Steps
level of achievement
6
5
5
level of achievement
3
3
1 1
1
0 0
0
6 (fully) 5 4 3 2 1 (not at all)
your personal objectives for attending
the programme have been achieved
Level of Achievement
6 (fully)
3 3
5
4
3
2
1 (not at all)
4
your understanding of the subject has improved or increased as a result of the programme
Level of understanding
1 1 6 (A lot)
1 1 5
4
3
2
2
1 (little)
4
your skills in the subject of the programme
have improved or increased as a result of the
programme
4 Level of
improvement of
3 skills
2 2
2
1
1
0 0
0
6 (A lot) 5 4 3 2 1 (little)
Enhance your appreciation and understanding of your job as a whole
Level of rating
7
6
6
4 Level of rating
3
2
2
1 1
1
0 0
0
6 (Excellent) 5 4 3 2 1 (poor)
would you recommend others with similar
needs
Level of recommendation
3.5
3
3
2.5
2 2 2 Level of
2
recommendation
1.5
1
1
0.5
0
0
Necessary material to the programme provided to you prior to the
programme
level of satisfaction
4
3 3
level of satisfaction
0 0 0
) 5 4 3 2 ll)
l ly a
u at
(f t
6 o
(n
1
Level of the instructions
Complete pre-programme
Attend the programme
material
2
)
r)
nt
oo
le
(p
el
xc
1
(e
6
Bring relevant material with you
Travel to the training location
to the programme
Level of level of
instruction(relevant instruction(location
material) travelling)
6 5 4
4 3
4 3 2
2 1 1 2 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
nt) 5 4 3 2
o r) nt) 5 4 3 2
o r)
el le (p
o
elle (p
o
xc 1 xc 1
(e (e
6 6
The number of participants was on the course
level of praticipant
7
6
6
4 level of praticipant
3
3
2
1
1
0
Too few just right too many
Rate each trainer by placing his/her initials under the relevant score
Trainer Very Good (3) Not very Not effective Total
effective (4) effective (2) (1)
Knowledge of 3 4 1 2 10
subject
Organization of 2 6 1 3 10
sessions
Obvious 4 5 0 1 10
preparation
Responsiveness to 3 6 0 1 10
groupRate each trainer by placing his/her initials under the relevant score
Producing a good 1 7 0 2 10
learning
8
4
very effective
good
3
not very
effective
2
not effective
0
Rate the balance between input sessions, activities,
discussions, and videos
level of balance
6
5
5
4
3
3
2
1 1 level of balance
1
0 0
0
e) 5 4 3 2 e)
anc anc
al al
b b
d o r
o o o
( g (p
6 1
The length of the programme
length of programme
6
5
5
4
length of
3 programme
3
2
2
0
too short just right too long
The programme was logically sequenced
level of sequence
3.5
3 3
3
2.5
2 2
2
1.5
1
0.5
0 0
0
e) 5 4 3 2 e)
nc nc
ue ue
s eq se
q
l
el rly
(w o o
6 (p
1
Pacing of the programme
level of pace
3 3
too short
just right
too long
4
Effectiveness of the practical activities
level of effectiveness
1 3 6 (very effective)
2 5
4
3
2
1 (ineffective)
4
THANK YOU!!!!!!