Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
Decision-making Criteria in
Capital Budgeting
How do we
decide if a
capital
investment
project should
be accepted or
rejected?
2
3
Project Evaluation:
Alternative Methods
5
Independent Project
8
Payback Period (PBP)
0 1 2 3 4 5
-40 K 10 K 12 K 15 K 10 K 7K
9
Payback Solution (#1)
0 1 2 3 (a) 4 5
Cumulative
PBP =a+(b-c)/d
Inflows
= 3 + (40 - 37) / 10
= 3 + (3) / 10
= 3.3
Years
10
Payback Solution (#2)
0 1 2 3 4 5
-40 K 10 K 12 K 15 K 10 K 7K
-40 K -30 K -18 K -3 K 7K 14 K
PBP = 3 + ( 3K ) / 10K
Cumulative = 3.3 Years
Cash Flows Note: Take absolute value of last
negative cumulative cash flow value.
11
PBP Acceptance
Criterion
The management of Basket Wonders has set a
maximum PBP of 3.5 years for projects of this
type.
12
Drawbacks of Payback Period:
14
Net Present Value
Σ
ACFt
NPV = - ICO
(1 + k) t
t=1
• Decision Rule:
= $-1424.423
18
NPV Solution
NPV = $10,000(PVIF13%,1) + $12,000(PVIF13%,2) +
$15,000(PVIF13%,3) + $10,000(PVIF13%,4) +
$ 7,000(PVIF13%,5) - $40,000
NPV = $10,000(.885) + $12,000(.783) +
$15,000(.693) + $10,000(.613) +
$ 7,000(.543) - $40,000
NPV = $8,850 + $9,396 + $10,395 +
$6,130 + $3,801 - $40,000
=- $1,428 (due to rounding)
19
NPV Acceptance
Criterion
The management of Basket Wonders has
determined that the required rate is
13% for projects of this type.
20
Net Present Value
Profile
$000s Sum of CF’s Plot NPV for each
15 Thre discount rate.
e
Net Present Value
of t h
ese
10 poin
t s ar
e ea
sy n
ow!
5 IRR (discussed later)
NPV@13%
0
-4
0 3 6 9 12 15 Discussed
Discount Rate (%) Later 21
NPV Example
• Suppose Small Wonders is considering a capital
investment that costs $276,400 and provides
annual net cash flows of $83,000 for four years
and $116,000 at the end of the fifth year. The
firm’s required rate of return is 15%.
0 1 2 3 4 5
You should get NPV = $18,235.71
22
Profitability Index
Σ
ACFt
NPV = t - IO
(1 + k)
t=1
23
Profitability Index
Σ
ACFt
NPV = t - IO
(1 + k)
t=1
Σ
ACFt
PI = IO
(1 + k) t
t=1
24
Profitability Index
(PI)
PI is the ratio of the present value
of a project’s future net cash flows
to the project’s initial cash outflow.
PI = 1 + [ NPV / ICO ]
25
Profitability Index
• Decision Rule:
27
PI Example
0 1 2 3 4 5
You should get PI = 1.066
28
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Σ
ACFt
NPV = - IO
(1 + k) t
t=1
30
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Σ
ACFt
NPV = - IO
(1 + k) t
t=1
n
ACFt
IRR:
Σ
t=1
(1 + IRR) t = IO
31
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
34
IRR Solution (Try
15%)
$40,000 = $10,000(PVIF15%, 1) + $12,000(PVIF15%, 2) +
$15,000(PVIF15%, 3) + $10,000(PVIF15%, 4) + $
7,000(PVIF15%, 5)
$40,000 = $10,000(.870) + $12,000(.756) +
$15,000(.658) + $10,000(.572) + $ 7,000(.497)
$40,000 = $8,700 + $9,072 + $9,870 + $5,720 +
$3,479 = $36,841 [Rate is too high!!]
35
IRR Solution
(Interpolate)
.10 $41,444
.05 X IRR $40,000 $1,444 $4,603
.15 $36,841
X $1,444
=
.05 $4,603
36
IRR Solution
(Interpolate)
.10 $41,444
.05 X IRR $40,000 $1,444 $4,603
.15 $36,841
($1,444)(0.05)
X= X = .0157
$4,603
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4 5
44
Potential Problems
Under Mutual
Exclusivity
Ranking of project proposals may create
contradictory results.
A. Scale of Investment
B. Cash-flow Pattern
C. Project Life
45
A. Scale Differences
Compare a small (S) and a large (L)
project.
47
B. Cash Flow Pattern
49
Examine NPV Profiles
600
discount rates.
400
NPV@10%
200
IRR
0
-200
0 5 10 15 20 25
Discount Rate (%)
50
Fisher’s Rate of
600
Net Present Value ($)
Intersection
At k>10%, D is best!
0 5 10 15 20 25
Discount Rate ($)
51
C. Project Life
Differences
Let us compare a long life (X) project and
a short life (Y) project.
53
Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing occurs when a
constraint (or budget ceiling) is placed
on the total size of capital expenditures
during a particular period.
Example: Julie Miller must determine what
investment opportunities to undertake for
Basket Wonders (BW). She is limited to a
maximum expenditure of $32,500 only for
this capital budgeting period.
54
Available Projects for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
A $ 500 18% $ 50 1.10
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
C 5,000 37 5,500 2.10
D 7,500 20 5,000 1.67
E 12,500 26 500 1.04
F 15,000 28 21,000 2.40
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
H 25,000 15 6,000 1.24
55
56
Choosing by NPVs for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
F $15,000 28% $21,000 2.40
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
Projects F and G have the
two largest NPVs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth
is $28,500 with a $32,500 outlay.
57
Choosing by PIs for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
F $15,000 28% $21,000 2.40
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
C 5,000 37 5,500 2.10
D 7,500 20 5,000 1.67
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
Projects F, B, C, and D have the four largest PIs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is
$38,000 with a $32,500 outlay.
58
Summary of Comparison
Method Projects Accepted Value Added
PI F, B, C, and D $38,000
NPV F and G $28,500
IRR C, F, and E $27,000
59
Multiple IRR Problem
60
NPV Profile -- Multiple
IRRs
75 Multiple IRRs at
k = 12.95% and 191.15%
Net Present Value
50
($000s)
25
-100
0 40 80 120 160 200
Discount Rate (%)
61
Post-Completion
Audit
Post-completion Audit
A formal comparison of the actual costs and
benefits of a project with original estimates.
62