PROJECT

DOCUMENTATION
COURSE FOR PROJECT
ENGINEERS &
INSPECTORS
REGIONAL & DISTRICT
OFFICES
QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
AND DOCUMENTATION
QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM
Quality Control Program ( QCP)

- A program of quality control works in a certain project which

involve inspection and testing of materials to be incorporated
into a work.

- It specifies the minimum number of tests required for an item

of work which corresponds to the quantities stated in the
approved Program of Work of a project.
 QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM
Project: Restoration of Nueva Ecija – Pangasinan Road
Sta. 3+930 to Sta. 14+360, Nueva Ecija
A. Tests to be Performed:
Item No. Description Unit Quantity No. of Tests (Min.)

103 (1) Structure Excavation cu.m. 41 None

103 (6) Exc. For Pipe Culverts cu.m. 85 None
104 (1) Emb. From Rd. Exc. cu.m. 659 GPC – 1, D-7
104 (2) Emb. From Borrow cu.m. 1657 GPC –1, D-17
105 (1) Subgrade Preparation sq.m. 21,808 GPC –3, D-44
200 (1) Agg. Subbase Course cu.m. 4811 GP-16,C-4,D-64,
Q-4, CBR-2
201 Agg. Base Course cu.m. 7474 GP-25, C-5,Q-5,
D-100, CBR-3
311 PCCP sq. m. 34,181
a. Cement bags 61,526 Q – 31
b. Fine Agg. cu. m. 3419 Q – 3, G- 46
c. Coarse Agg. cu. m. 5264 Q – 4, G-71
d. Steel Bars kg. 700 Q–1
 e. Concrete cu. m. FS – 91 sets CB
f. Completed PCCP, 200mm. , thk. 5 – cores/km/lane

B. Inspection:
Continuous quality control inspection on all Items of Works shall be
done as construction work progresses. Inspection Report to be submitted
as required.

Prepared and Submitted By: Approved By:

Contractor’s Materials Engineer DPWH Materials Engineer

SAMPLE CARD
 SAMPLE CARD
A form to be filled up and submitted to a testing laboratory
together with the materials sample taken in the project for
the conduct of the required quality tests .

What are the data a sample card have?

• Information about the kind , quantity represented,

origin/source, of construction materials
• Information on the proposed use, tests required and the
governing specifications for the material

• Information on who, where and when the sample was

taken and others
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works and Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDSA, Diliman, Quezon City
SAMPLE CARD
Project :_______________________________________________________________
Kind of Material :_______________________________________________________________

Sample Identification :________________________________________________________________

Quantity Represented :________________________________________________________________
Sampled At :________________________________________________________________
(Give accurate location, if possible)
Original Source :________________________________________________________________

Owner/Supplier :________________________________________________________________

Sampled/Cast By :________________________________________________________________
(Name of DPWH Authorized Representative) (Signature)
________________________________________________________________
(Designation) (Office) (Date)
Propose Use :________________________________________________________________
Test Desired :_________________________________________________________________
Governing Spec’s. :_________________________________________________________________
Shipped By :_________________________________________________________________
(Name & Designation) (Office) (Date)
Send Test Results to :________________________________________________________________________
Bill Charge To :________________________________________________________________
Submitted By : _________________________________________________________________
(Name & Designation) (Signature)
________________________________________________________________

Received By :_______________________ NOTED:

JUDY F. SESE
Due Date :_______________________
OIC – Bureau Director
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works and Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDSA, Diliman, Quezon City

SAMPLE CARD
Asphalt Overlay Along Roxas Boulevard, Manila
Project :______________________________________________________________

Kind of Material Emulsified Asphalt ( SS1 – h )

:______________________________________________________________

AOARB – EA - 1
Sample Identification :______________________________________________________________

40 tonnes
Quantity Represented:______________________________________________________________

Sampled At Contractor’s Batching Plant/ Job Site

:______________________________________________________________
(Give accurate location, if possible)

Original Source Shell Philippines (QC-020-2012)

:______________________________________________________________

Owner/Supplier Readycon Trading & Construction Corporation

:______________________________________________________________

Sampled/Cast By Nelson B. Canoy Nelson B. Canoy

:______________________________________________________________
(Name of DPWH Authorized Representative) (Signature)
Lab. Tech. II BRS – DPWH April 20, 2012
______________________________________________________________
(Designation) (Office) (Date)

Propose Use Tack Coat

:______________________________________________________________

Test Desired Quality Test

:_______________________________________________________________
Governing Spec’s. AASHTO M 140
:_______________________________________________________________

Shipped By Nelson B. Canoy Lab. Tech. II BRS – DPWH April 20, 2012
:_______________________________________________________________
(Name & Designation) (Office) (Date)

Send Test Results to :___For Pick up_________________________________________________

REMARKS :________________________________________________________________

Bill Charge To Readycon Trading & Construction Corporation

:________________________________________________________________

Submitted By Alberto de Guzman Engineer III Alberto de Guzman

: _______________________________________________________________
(Name & Designation) (Signature)
_______________________________________________________________
BRS – DPWH April 20, 2012
Office Date
=======================================================================================
=
MTD – BRS, DPWH
Received By:_______________________

Due Date :_______________________

NOTED:

JUDY F. SESE
OIC – Bureau Director
 TEST REPORTS

AND

LABORATORY WORKSHEETS
 TEST REPORTS
• a documented proof that determined the quality of
materials

• the basis for the acceptance or rejection of the

delivered materials

• the basis for payment of the completed pay item

of work
 Who will interpret the materials test results?

• It is the responsibility of the Materials Engineer

assigned in the project either from the contractor,
consultant or from the owner to interpret the test
results correctly and accurately.
• Project Engineers/Inspectors must also have the ability
to interpret and evaluate test reports of materials and
must not always depend in their Materials Engineer,
hence, they have the great responsibility in the
implementation of the project

• Interpretation of materials test reports needs

familiarization of materials specifications and a lot of
experienced in materials testing and quality control
works
How & When a materials test report is applied in the
project?

 The composition and properties of a material is individually

verified when it is subjected to a quality test to verify if it
meets or fails the specification requirement prior to
incorporation into the work .

 When the contents of the test reports after proper

interpretation shows that it fails or meets the specifications
requirement, the Project Engineer thru the advise of the
Materials Engineer shall immediately act to whether utilized or
not the delivered materials to avoid delay in the project
implementation
 The rejection or utilization of a material depends
on the outcome of test results. A material may fail
in one or more of its properties but still can be
utilized into the work thru the application of
alternative measures and Engineers should have
good judgment and in-depth knowledge on the
properties of the materials.

Example:

Soil aggregates sample fails to meet grading and plasticity

requirements
Reinforcing steel bars failed to meet variation in mass
requirement
Cement failed to meet loss ignition or insoluble residue
requirement
 Engineers should familiarize in the significant
properties of materials so that they can immediately
decide in the acceptance or rejection. Incorrect
interpretation of material test reports can cause delay
in the project implementation, additional cost and
failure of the structure.

Who’s Responsible For The Acceptance/Rejection of

Materials?

The Project Engineer has the authority to reject or

accept construction materials intended for use in the
project upon the recommendation of the Materials
Engineer based on the test results.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works and Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDSA, Diliman, Quezon City

Lab. Re port No.:

TEST REPORT ON REINFORCING STEEL Date

Project : Construction of Curb & Gutter Brgy. Poblacion, Ibaan, Batangas

:
Kind of material : Reinforcing Steel Bar (12 mm dia., deformed )
Sample identification : Q-405-01
Quantity represented : 7808.45 kgs.
Sampled at : Jobsite
Original source : Steel Asia
Supplied by : MelJean Construction Corporation
Proposed use : For Concrete Reinforcement ( Dowels )
Spec's Item No. : AASHTO M-31 Grade 40
Sampled by : P. B. Suarez,Prec. Inst. Tech. II DPWH-Bats. 4th DEO,Lipa City 4-03-06
(Name & designation) (Office) (Date)
Submitted by : B. B. Villanueva,Eng'r. II - do - 4-19-06
(Name & designation) (Office) (Date Received)
Lab. No. : 1301-06 ( Paid under OR #2595063 )

TESTS REQUIREMENTS RESULTS

Tensile Properties:
Yield Point, Mpa 276 Min. 345
Tensile Strength, Mpa 483 Min. 483
Elongation, % 12 Min. 12
Bending Properties: No cracking on outside Satisfactory
Degree bent, 180 degrees bent portion
Actual Unit mass, kg/m - 0.868
Variation in mass, % 6.0 Max. under nominal mass 13.0 under nominal mass *
Deformation, mm
Spacing, average 8.9 Max. 7.9
Height, average 0.51 Min. 0.60
Gap 4.9 Max 4.0
Phosphorous Content, % 0.06 Max. 0.01
REMARKS : * Sample fails to meet variation in mass requirement.
Te s te d by : Che cke d by:

T. Urmaza
S. Orate CLARITA C. FLORES
J. Tagalo Engine e r V
J. B e rgonio
C. de la Cruz ATTESTED :
Witnessed by:

B ASILIA S. VILLANUEVA ANTONIO V. MOLANO, JR.

Engine e r IV Dire ctor IV
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works and Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDSA, Diliman, Quezon City

Lab. Re port No.: 6-84-06

27 June 2006
TEST REPORT ON REINFORCING STEEL Date

Const. Of 2 Storey RGR Type Sch. Bldg. At Dona Ma. Platon Laurel, Aya, Talisay, Bats.
Project : Const. Of Circumferential Road Around Lake Taal, Agoncillo, Bats.
Completion of Aya-Tranca-Talisay Road, Talisay, Bats.
Kind of material : Reinforcing Steel Bar ( 16 mm dia., deformed )
Sample identification : DMP- 5
Quantity represented : 10,000 kgs.
Sampled at : Stockpile at jobsite
Original source : Top Steel
Supplied by : Revere Construction & Supply
Proposed use : for concrete reinforcement
Spec's Item No. : PNS 49 Grade 275 NW
Sampled by : F. Opena,Lab. Tech. II DPWH-Bats. 3rd DEO 06-08-06
(Name & designation) (Office) (Date)
Submitted by : Ma. B. M. Marquez - do - 6-14-06
(Name & designation) (Office) (Date Received)
Lab. No. : 1718-06 ( Paid under OR No. 2595342 )

TESTS REQUIREM ENTS RESULTS

Tensile Properties:
Y ield Point, Mpa 275 Min. 277
Tensile Strength, Mpa 480 Min, 410 *
Elongation, % 10 Min. 27
Bending Properties: No cracking on outside Satisfactory
Degree bent, 180 degrees bent portion
Actual Unit mass, kg/m - 1.508
Variation in mass, % 6 Max. under nominal mass 4.0 under nominal mass
Deformation, mm
Spacing, average 11.1 Max. 10.5
Height, average 0.7 - 1.4 1.15
Gap 12.6 Max 12.2
Phosphorous Content, % 0.06 Max. 0.01
REM ARKS : Sample fails to meet specification
Te s te d by : Che cke d by:
T. Urmaza
A. Empe rador
J. B e rgonio CLARITA C. FLORES
J. Tagalo Engine e r V
C. de la Cruz ATTESTED :

Witnessed by:

B ASILIA S. VILLANUEVA ANTONIO V. M OLANO, JR.

Engine e r IV Dire ctor IV
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Work s And Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDS A, Diliman, Quezon City

Lab. Report No.:

(Date)
TEST REPORT ON CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
Project :
Construction of 2 Storey RGR Type Sch. Bldg. At Dona Ma. Platon Laurel, Aya, Talisay, Bats.
Type of Unit :
Concrete Hollow Blocks (Non Load Bearing) 4" thick
Quantity represented :
10,000 pcs.
Sampled at :
Stockpile at jobsite
Original source :
Allied
Supplied by :
REVERE Construction & Supply
Proposed use :
for walling
Spec's Item No. :
ASTM C-129 ( Non- Load Bearing )
Sampled by :
N. Magnaye Revere Cons't. & Supply 06-08-06
F. Opena,Lab. Tech. II DPWH-Bats. 3rd DEO 06-08-06
(Name & designation) (Office) (Date)
Submitted by : Ma. B. M. Marquez - do - 6-16-06
(Name & designation) (Office) (Date received)
Lab. No. : 1720- 06 ( Paid under OR No. 2595342 )
SAMPLE I.D. TESTS REQUIREMENTS RESULTS

DMP-9 Dimension Measurement, mm

Width
1 - 96
2 - 96
3 - 98
Length
1 - 400
2 - 408
3 - 410
Height
1 - 195
2 - 190
3 - 195
Compressive Strength, MN/m 2
Individual Unit
1 3.45 Min. 1.89
2 3.45 Min. 1.98
3 3.45 Min. 1.88

Average of three(3) units 4.14 Min. 1.92

Water Absorption,kg/m 3 (Avg. of 3 units) - 128
Moisture Content, %(Avg .of 3 units) - 19
REMARKS : Sample fails to meets specification requirements.
Che cke d by:
Te s te d by :

T. Urmaza
A. Emperador CLARITA C. FLORES
J. Tagalo Engine e r V
J. Bergonio ATTESTED:

Witne s s e d by :

B ASILIA S. VILLANUEVA ANTONIO V. MOLANO, JR.

Engineer IV Dire ctor IV
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works And Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDSA, Diliman, Quezon City

Lab. Report No. : 8-29-06

04 August 2006
Date
TEST REPORT ON PORTLAND CEMENT

Project : Concreting of Road, Barangay II, San Carlos City, Negros Occidental
Sample identification : CRBII-01
Quantity represented : 2000 bags
Sampled at : Jobsite
Manufactured by : Taiheiyo Cement Phils., Inc., San Fernando, Cebu City
Brand : Grand Portland Cement
Supplied by : Kuntel Construction
Spec's Item No. : ASTM C-150
Sampled by : R.dela Cruz/J.Yanson DPWH-Neg. 1st EDO/Kuntel Const. 6-16-06
: (Name & designation) (Office) (Date)
Submitted by : N.A. Noble-Engr. III DPWH-Neg. 1st EDO Neg. Occ. 6-20-06
: (Name & designation) (Office) (Date received)
Lab. No. : 1741-06 (Paid under OR # 2595384)
TESTS REQUIREMENTS RESULTS
Magnesium Oxide (MgO), % 6.0 Max. 1.30
Sulfur Trioxide (SO 3), % 3.0 Max. 2.47
Loss on Ignition, % 3.0 Max. 4.70*
Insoluble Residue, % 0.75 Max. 1.10*
Air Content of Mortar, % 12.0 Max. -
Fineness : Amount Passing
No. 0.075 mm Sieve, % - 99
Autoclave Expansion, % 0.8 Max. 0.03
Time of Setting : Gilmore Test
Initial set, min. 60 Min. 120
Final set, min. 600 Max. 253
Compressive Strength, Avg. mortar
cubes, Mpa:
3 days 12.0 Min. 19.0
7 days 19.0 Min. 17.5
28 days 28.0 Min. 23.0
Specific Gravity - 3.09
REMARKS: * Sample fails to meet Specification requirements.
Tested by: Checked by:
P. Malonzo
B.A. Minano
E. Cruz CLARITA C. FLORES
E. Flores Engineer V
M. S. Gianan ATTESTED :

Witnessed by:

EUGENIO P. ELERIA ANTONIO V. MOLANO, JR.

Engineer IV Director IV
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Works And Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDSA, Diliman, Quezon City

Lab. Re port No. : 8-77-06

14 Augus t 2006
Date
TEST REPORT ON PORTLAND CEMENT

Proje ct : Const.of Water Supply/Spring development @Taysan Bats./San Jose Bats.

: and Brgy. Talisay, Lipa City
Sample ide ntification : Q-405-01
Quantity re pre s e nte d : 2000 bags
Sample d at : Jobsite
Manufacture d by : Fortune Cement Corp.
B rand : Fortune Portland Cement
Supplie d by : Nermar Lumber and Hardware Corp.
Spe c's Ite m No. : ASTM C-150
Sample d by : P.B.Suarez-Prec.Inst.Tech.II Bats.4th DEO 7-07-06
: (Name & de s ignation) (Office ) (Date )
Submitte d by : B.B.Villanueva-Engr.II -do- 7-07-06
: (Name & de s ignation) (Office ) (Date re ce ive d)
Lab. No. : 1976-06 (Paid under OR # 2596013)
TESTS REQUIREMENTS RESULTS
Magne s ium Oxide (MgO), % 6.0 Max. 1.66
Sulfur Trioxide (SO 3), % 3.0 Max. 2.37
Los s on Ignition, % 3.0 Max. 3.50*
Ins oluble Re s idue , % 0.75 Max. 0.90*
Air Conte nt of Mortar, % 12.0 Max. -
Fine ne s s : Amount Pas s ing
No. 0.075 mm Sie ve , % - 98
Autoclave Expans ion, % 0.8 Max. 0.03
Time of Se tting : Gilmore Te s t
Initial s e t, min. 60 Min. 134
Final s e t, min. 600 Max. 254
Compre s s ive Stre ngth, Avg. mortar
cube s , Mpa:
3 days 12.0 Min. 20.5
7 days 19.0 Min. 21.7
28 days 28.0 Min. -
Spe cific Gravity - 3.12
Strength of mortar samples tested at 3 days and 7 days can be considered for acceptance,
provided that the strength of sample at 7 days is not less than 23.46 MPA w/c is 85%
of the compressive strength requirement for 28 days (27.6 MPA) D.O. No.57
REMARKS: * Sample fails to meet Loss on Ignition & Insoluble residue requirement.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Public Work s And Highways
BUREAU OF RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
EDS A, Diliman, Quezon City

Lab. Report No.: 11-151-04

17 Nove mbe r 2004
Date
TEST REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

Proje ct :
Subic Port Development Project - SBMA
Kind and Clas s :
RCCP 750 mmØ Circular Class IV Wall B
Quantity re pre s e nte d :
50 pcs.
Sample d at :
Supermix Redi-Concrete Casting Yard
Original s ource :
Supermix Redi-Concrete
Propos e d us e :
Access Road
Spe c's Ite m No. :
ASTM C-76 M Class IV Wall B
Sample d by :
R. Benito-Engrs. Rep. PCI 10-23-04
(Name & de s ignation) (Office ) (Date )
Submitte d by : R. Testado- not stated A.M. Oreta & Co., Inc. 11-8-04
(Name & de s ignation) (Office ) (Date re ce ive d)
Lab. No. : 5990-04 (Paid under OR # 3708704)

TESTS REQUIREM ENTS RESULTS

Inte rnal diame te r, mm 750 - 775 765

Wall thickne s s , mm 83 Min. 100
Le ngth, mm 990 Min. 1005
Side s variation, mm 16 Max. 0
Re inforce me nt:
Cove ring, mm 13 Min. 35
Spacing, mm 100 Max. 65
Re inforce me nt Are a,, mm2/line ar m:
Inne r cage 740 Min. 498*
Oute r cage - -
Stre ngth, D- load to produce :
0.3 mm crack , N 100 Min. 83*
Ultimate load, N 150 Min. 168
Abs orption, % 9 Max. 3
Note : D-load is e xpre s s e d in ne wton pe r line ar me te r pe r mm of diame te r
REM ARKS : *Sample fails to meet Specification.

Te s te d by : L.Cas anova J. B e rgonio Che cke d by:

T. Urma za J.Ta ga lo
S.Orate ,Jr. CLARITA C. FLORES
Witne s s e d by: Engine e r V
ATTESTED :
B ASILIA S. VILLANUEVA
Engine e r IV ANTONIO V. M OLANO, JR.
Dire ctor IV
 LABORATORY WORKSHEETS
• Like test reports, laboratory worksheets are also documented proofs
that the laboratory test was conducted in the construction materials.
Details of laboratory testing data ( measurements, laboratory testing
apparatus/equipment used, testing procedures and computations ) were
among the contents of this documents.

• Laboratory Worksheets should always be kept for future references

and can be use for in case when there is doubt or contest in the result
of test. It is the document that will verify how the result of test was
derived or attained.
 LABORATORY TESTING
EQUIPMENT OF CONTRACTORS
 LABORATORY TESTING EQUIPMENT OF
CONTRACTORS

• Per Department Order No. 80, Series of 1990,

contractors are required to have laboratory facilities
and minimum laboratory testing equipment for the
conduct of field tests of materials to effectively
ensure the incorporation of the right quality of
construction materials in the projects.

• Minimum materials testing requirements shall be on a

“ per contractor ” basis, and not on “ per project
basis, i.e. the equipment may be used to service
several on-going projects of the contractors.
 BASIC LABORATORY TESTING EQUIPMENT
Minimum Laboratory Testing Equipment
SMALL CONTRACTORS MEDIUM CONTRACTORS LARGE CONTRACTORS

1. Set of Sieves Similar to Minimum Similar to Minimum

including cover and Materials Testing Materials Testing
brush, fine & wire Equipment of small Equipment of medium
sieve contractor plus: contractors plus :
2. Mortar & Paste Vertical Capping Set 1. Mechanical CBR
Apparatus complete
3. Liquid Limit Test Set with accessories
including Plate
2. Volumetric Flask
4. Hammer, Modified
Compaction 3. Sand Absorption Cone
and Tamper
5. Compaction Mold
4. Specific Gravity Test
6. MC Can Set for coarse
7. FDT Test Set aggregates
8. Triple Beam Balance ( 5. Los Angeles Abrasion
0.01 g and 0.1 g Machine
sensitivity )
 SMALL CONTRACTORS MEDIUM CONTRACTORS LARGE CONTRACTORS

9. Heavy Duty Solution 6.Thermostatic Controlled

Balance (20 kg capacity, Oven
1 g sensitivity)
7.Core Drilling Machine
10. Post Hole Auger complete with
accessories
11. Double Graduated Glass 8. Centrifuge or Reflex
Cylinder Extractor
12. Mixing Bowl
9. Marshall Stability
13.Square Pan Apparatus complete
with accessories
14.Spade or Shovel
15.Pick Axe
 SMALL CONTRACTORS MEDIUM CONTRACTORS LARGE CONTRACTORS

11. Crowbar Similar to Minimum

Materials Testing
12. Steel Cylinder Mold
Equipment of medium
13. Steel Beam Mold contractors plus ( con’t ) :
14. Slump Cone Set
15. Dial type Metal
Thermometer
16. Concrete Measure
17. Steel Straight Edge
18. Portable Concrete
Mixer
MATERIALS QUALITY

CONTROL LOGBOOK
Control Logbook where the daily entries of activities
relative to sampling, testing, inspection and other
quality control activities/ comments in the project
accomplished by the concerned Materials Engineer is
called Materials Quality Control Logbook.

Materials Quality Control Logbook shall contain all

information and/or observation relevant to materials
quality control and shall be duly signed by the
concerned Materials Engineer of the project.

Logbook must always be kept available at all times for

inspection.
 ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF MATERIALS LOGBOOK
Date and Day _ _ _ _ February 10,2011 / Thursday
Weather _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A.M…Clear PM…….Clear
Project Activities:
a. Compaction of the fill materials, Item 105 was done with sheep
foot roller at Sta. 1+600 to Sta. 2+000
b. Screening of coarse aggregate from Bauan River was done at
the batching plant for use for Item 405
c. Preparation of reinforcing steel bars for concrete pouring of
double culvert at Sta. 2+105.70

Materials Quality Control Activities:

a. Field Density test were performed by Contractor’s men at Sta.
1+700 and Sta. 1+800 and supervised by government Materials
Engr. R. Cruz. We reported that two test were made and the
samples for moisture content were brought to the project
laboratory, weighed and dried under my supervision.
b. Sieve analysis was conducted on screened coarse aggregates for
use for Item 405 for checking of the required gradation and
the results was reviewed by me.

c. Checked the size and spacing of rebars installed at double

culvert at Sta. 2+105.70 for compliance to approved plans.

SGD.) JUAN DELA CRUZ

Materials Engineer
 MONTHLY MATERIALS AND
QUALITY CONTROL REPORTS
The Materials Engineer shall prepare and submit to
the Project Engineer a Monthly Materials and
Quality Control Reports containing the individual
tests conducted on the materials incorporated into
the works and the status of tests accomplished based on
the approved Quality Control Program.

The report shall include the following:

a. Status of tests performed and the balanced of
tests as required in the approved Quality Control
Program
b. Summary of field and laboratory tests
c. Back-up test results of all tested construction
materials
d. Photographs and Inspection Reports covering
materials used during the month.
 CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY
CONTROL ASSURANCE ( CQCA)
Certificate of Quality Control Assurance (CQCA) is an
assurance report prepared and accomplished by the
project implementing office stating that the
accomplished quantity per item of work as the work
progresses and certifying the quality of materials
completed works.

CQCA is accomplished and submitted weekly by the Materials

Engineer and both duly signed by the concerned Project
Engineer and Materials Engineer and it is a required
documents when a contractor is requesting for partial or final
payment of the completed works.
 _______________________
Date
CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY CONTROL ASSURANCE
Project : _____________________________________________
Contractor : _____________________________________________
We hereby certify that we have conducted an inspection and
verification on work accomplished on the above – mentioned
project for the period ______________. We further certify that we
found that the quality of materials in the following items of work
corresponding to the quantity accomplished conforms with the
Standard Specifications and Special Provision of the Contract,
viz:
Item No. Description Quantity
Accomplished
__________ ________________________ ____________________
__________ _______________________ ____________________
__________ ________________________ ____________________
Note: To be submitted every quarter of the month
1 st report 1–7 2 nd report 8 – 15
3 rd report 16 – 22 4 th report 23 – 30/31
 STATUS OF TESTS
• This document is prepare on a monthly basis to monitor
the status of tests performed on the construction materials
as the work progresses based on the approved Quality
Control Program (QCP) of the project.

• It serve as a control to determine the number of tests

performed as reflected on file and the balance of tests
based on the status of the project.
THANK YOU!!!