Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Figure 3
Asphaltene Aggregation Kinetics by FBRM.
A kinetic study was carried out to determine the
aggregate behavior of asphaltene. The 10% excess
heptane criterion was modified for an onset value
below 1 mL / g, because 10% is not a significant
increase if the onset is around 0.2 mL / g. In this
case, an addition of 0.1 mL / g was made to achieve
the desired excess n-heptane, ie 10% excess. The
results for both crude oil are shown in panels a
and b in Figure 4. The number of counts in the
kinetic study was normalized for all samples with
maximum values measured in the intervals shown
in the figure. For crude oil A, it is observed that
kinetics is slower when the end of the light is
removed, leading to a greater time until the final
particle size is reached; Slow kinetic growth shows
that bitumen is more stable in residue than in Figure 4
crude oil. Crude C doesn't show any trends.
CONCLUSIONS
With the information gathered from FBRM experiments, one can conclude that the
removal of light ends increases the amount of C7 needed to reach the onset, slows down the
precipitation of asphaltenes, butyields particles of similar size. Turbiscan results have confirmed
that light-end removal from crude oil leads to the stabilization of asphaltenes. Resins (defined as
C5-insoluble and C7-soluble) and an aromatic compound (RMN) have been doped in the original
crude, to assess their effect on stability. Results have shown that the C5-C7 fraction increases
asphaltene stability to a similar extent as a diaromatic molecule, such as RMN. All of this evidence
indicate that the effect of C5-C7 resins and diaro- matic addition and the removal of light ends
have a similar impact on asphaltene stability, supporting the belief that the solvent quality as a
whole rules asphaltene behavior.
REFERENCES
• Abeyasekera, S., 2005. Multivariate methods for index construction, in: Household Sample
Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries, ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/ 96, United Nations, New
York.
• Altınay, G., 2007. Short-run and long-run elasticities of import demand for crude oil in Turkey.
Energy Policy 35 (11), 5829–5835.
• Bacon, R., Kojima, M., 2008. Oil price risks: Measuring the vulnerability of oil importers.
Viewpoint no. 320, Available at; /http://rru.worldbank.org/docu ments/publicpolicyjournal/320-
OilPrices.pdfS.
• Balat, M., 2004. Oil and natural gas transport systems, trade and consumption trends in Turkey.
Energy Exploration and Exploitation 22 (3), 207–216.
• Balat, M., 2010. Security of energy supply in Turkey: Challenges and solutions.
• Energy Conversion and Management 51 (10), 1998–2011.
• Bohi, D.R., Toman, M.A., 1996. The economics of energy security. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Boston–Dordrecht–London.
• BP, 2009. Statistical Review of World Energy, Available at /www.bp.com/
statisticalreviewS.
•